Skip to main content

Table 4 Genetic diversity depending on antimicrobial selection

From: Genotype variation and genetic relationship among Escherichia coli from nursery pigs located in different pens in the same farm

Selection/N col REP profiles (N col/N pigs)
No antibiotic/288 REP_2 (41/21), REP_3 (4/2), REP_4 (64/25), REP_5 (92/45), REP_9 (2/2), REP_17 (43/25), REP_18 (3/3), REP_19 (3/2), REP_28 (1/1), REP_33 (1/1)a, REP_34 (1/1)a, REP_36 (3/1), REP_38 (2/2), REP_39 (3/3)a, REP_61 (1/1), REP_63 (2/2), REP_64 (1/1)a, REP_65 (4/3)a, REP_66 (1/1)a, REP_67 (2/1)a, REP_68 (1/1)a, REP_69 (1/1)a, REP_70 (2/2)a, REP_71 (1/1)a, REP_72 (2/2)a, REP_73 (1/1)a, REP_74 (4/1)a, REP_75 (2/1)a
Ampicillin/216 REP_2 (66/39), REP_3 (2/1), REP_4 (7/5), REP_5 (46/25), REP_6 (10/8), REP_10 (4/4), REP_15 (1/1), REP_17 (22/15), REP_18 (6/4), REP_19 (5/5), REP_20 (2/1), REP_21 (2/2), REP_24 (1/1), REP_28 (1/1), REP_36 (2/1), REP_37 (1/1)a, REP_38 (3/3), REP_40 (1/1)a, REP_41 (2/2)a, REP_42 (5/3)a, REP_43 (1/1)a, REP_44 (1/1)a, REP_45 (2/2)a, REP_46 (1/1)a, REP_47(1/1)a, REP_48 (1/1)a, REP_49 (1/1)a, REP_50 (1/1)a, REP_ 51 (1/1)a, REP_52 (1/1)a, REP_53 (2/2)a, REP_54 (1/1)a, REP_55 (1/1)a, REP_56 (2/1)a, REP_57 (2/1)a, REP_58 (3/2)a, REP_59 (1/1)a, REP_60 (1/1)a, REP_61 (1/1), REP_62 (1/1)a, REP_63 (1/1)
Tetracycline/216 REP_1 (3/2), REP_2 (64/36), REP_4 (42/17), REP_5 (30/22), REP_6 (3/3), REP_7 (8/4)a, REP_8 (1/1)a, REP_9 (1/1), REP_10 (1/1), REP_11 (2/1)a, REP_12 (1/1)a, REP_13 (2/1)a, REP_14 (1/1)a, REP_15 (1/1), REP_16 (1/1)a, REP_17 (14/12), REP_18 (3/2), REP_19 (15/11), REP_20 (2/2), REP_21 (1/1), REP_22 (1/1)a, REP_23 (2/1)a, REP_24 (2/2), REP_25 (1/1)a, REP_26 (1/1)a, REP_27 (5/2)a, REP_28 (2/2), REP_29 (1/1)a, REP_30 (1/1)a, REP_31 (2/1)a, REP_32 (1/1)a, REP_35 (1/1)a
  1. N col number of colonies, N pigs number of pigs
  2. aprofiles marked with awere specific for each of the groups of isolates (collected from media without antibiotic or supplemented with ampicillin or tetracycline)