Skip to main content

Table 2 The 20 most abundant OTUs in chicken feces

From: Comparison of fecal and cecal microbiotas reveals qualitative similarities but quantitative differences

Closest culturable isolate

Isolate accession number

% similarity

% in cecal

% in fecal

OTU ID

Lactobacillus crispatus

Y17362

99.81

11.3

15.4

1

Lactobacillus salivarius

AF089108

99.43

5.4

12.7

3

Lactobacillus johnsonii

ACGR01000047

99.61

9.6

12.2

2

Lactobacillus helveticus

ACLM01000202

97.62

3.5

8.6

133

Lactobacillus reuteri JC

AP007281

99.40

4.3

5.6

5

Clostridium perfringens

CP000246

99.60

0.1

4.5

6

Lactobacillus crispatus

Y17362

91.98

0.3

2.9

2234

Clostridium lituseburense

M59107

96.91

0.4

2.8

7

Lactobacillus salivarius

AF089108

93.01

0.3

2.8

2200

Lactobacillus helveticus

ACLM01000202

96.67

1.2

2.7

874

Candidatus Arthromitus sp.

X80834

100.00

0.0

2.1

11

Lactobacillus salivarius

AF089108

94.44

0.1

2.1

1905

Lactobacillus crispatus

Y17362

94.50

0.1

1.2

1845

Lactobacillus johnsonii

ACGR01000047

89.41

0.2

1.2

2251

Bacteroides fragilis

CR626927

99.62

14.1

1.2

4

Lactobacillus pontis

AJ422032

92.01

0.1

1.0

2154

Lactobacillus helveticus

ACLM01000202

98.59

0.2

0.9

254

Lactobacillus vaginalis

AF243177

99.60

1.3

0.8

10

Lactobacillus crispatus

Y17362

93.60

0.1

0.7

1557

Lactobacillus gallinarum

AJ417737

90.77

0.1

0.6

1814

  1. The representative sequences for all abundant OTUs are publically available in EMBL database with OTU ID as identifier with accession numbers HG810851- HG810882.