Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 1 Mitotype determination by RFLP analysis (combination I)

From: Uniparental mitochondrial DNA inheritance is not affected in Ustilago maydis Δatg11 mutants blocked in mitophagy

Tumor sample 1 Spores analysed F type 3 (m2) W type 3 (m1) X1 type 3 F type dominance 4
   a b c d a b c d a b c d  
wt#1,#22 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 100
wt#4 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100
wt#5 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 100
wt#6 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100
wt#7 10 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 7 0 0 0 30
wt#8 10 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 8 0 2 0 0
wt#9,#102 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100
Σ 66 49 2 0 0 0 0 0 13 15 0 2 1 74.2
Δatg11#1 9 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 88.9
Δatg11#2 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 100
Δatg11#4 8 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 87.5
Δatg11#7 10 7 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 70
Δatg11#8 10 5 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 50
Δatg11#11 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 100
Δatg11#12 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0
Σ 67 47 0 1 0 7 0 0 6 12 1 0 1 70.1
  1. 1Wt strain combination: MF34/pKS2 x FB2/pMB2-2; Δatg11 strain combination: MF34Δatg11/pKS2 x FB2Δatg11/pMB2-2.
  2. 2The values from these two samples were grouped.
  3. 3Relative percentages of band intensities are indicated as: a) >97%, b) >50-97%, c) 3-50%, d) <3%.
  4. 4Values (F type category a) expressed in percentages (%).