Skip to main content

Table 2 The 10 sample pool metagenomic analysis comparison to bTEFAP 10 sample pool and bTEFAP 40 sample averages at the taxonomic class level.

From: Evaluation of the bacterial diversity among and within individual venous leg ulcers using bacterial tag-encoded FLX and Titanium amplicon pyrosequencing and metagenomic approaches

Class

bTEFAP

10 pool %

Metagenomics

10 pool %

bTEFAP 40 avg. %

Bacilli

4.5

4.6

29

Gammaproteobacteria

54

37.4

25

Clostridia

1.1

4.4

12

Betaproteobacteria

2.6

3.6

0.1

Actinobacteria (class)

1.1

19.1

12

Alphaproteobacteria

1.4

7.6

05

deltaproteobacteria

5.4

7.5

0.14

Epsilonproteobacteria

2

13

0.24

Bacteroidetes

10.5

6.1

17.9

other

17.2

8.6

3.5

  1. This table shows the difference in metagenomic and 16s pyrosequencing approach described previously [15]. Also shown is the averages related to the 40 individual samples for comparison. The R-squared = 0.74 for correlation between bTEFAP and metagenomics at the class level in the 10 pooled samples.