Table 2 Diversity of VNTR loci over the course of the study: 2003–2007 for Squibnocket and 2004–2007 for Katama.
From: Metapopulation structure for perpetuation of Francisella tularensis tularensis
| Â | Squibnocket | Katama | Together | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Loci | D | No. alleles | No. repeats | D | No. alleles | No. repeats | D | No. alleles | No. repeats |
Ft-M3 (SSTR9) | 0.45 | 5 | 8–13 | 0.56 | 4 | 16–20 | 0.58 | 9 | 8–20 |
Ft-M10 (SSTR16) | 0.32 | 7 | 4–21 | 0.77 | 8 | 9–16 | 0.48 | 13 | 4–21 |
Ft-M9 | 0.04 | 2 | 4–5 | 0.09 | 2 | 4–5 | 0.05 | 2 | 4–5 |
Ft-M2 | 0.78 | 20 | 15–38 | 0.91 | 11 | 18–33 | 0.81 | 22 | 15–38 |
Ft-M3, M10, M9 | 0.56 | 16 | na | 0.83 | 12 | na | 0.67 | 28 | na |
All | 0.88 | 52 | na | 0.96 | 23 | na | 0.91 | 75 | na |