Oral administration of a probiotic Lactobacillus modulates cytokine production and TLR expression improving the immune response against Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium infection in mice
© Castillo et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 17 March 2011
Accepted: 3 August 2011
Published: 3 August 2011
Diarrheal infections caused by Salmonella, are one of the major causes of childhood morbidity and mortality in developing countries. Salmonella causes various diseases that range from mild gastroenteritis to enteric fever, depending on the serovar involved, infective dose, species, age and immune status of the host. Probiotics are proposed as an attractive alternative possibility in the prevention against this pathogen infection. Previously we demonstrated that continuous Lactobacillus casei CRL 431 administration to BALB/c mice before and after challenge with Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (S. Typhimurium) decreased the severity of Salmonella infection. The aim of the present work was to deep into the knowledge about how this probiotic bacterium exerts its effect, by assessing its impact on the expression and secretion of pro-inflammatory (TNFα, IFNγ) and anti-inflammatory (IL-10) cytokines in the inductor and effector sites of the gut immune response, and analyzing toll-like receptor (TLR2, TLR4, TLR5 and TLR9) expressions in both healthy and infected mice.
Probiotic administration to healthy mice increased the expression of TLR2, TLR4 and TLR9 and improved the production and secretion of TNFα, IFNγ and IL-10 in the inductor sites of the gut immune response (Peyer's patches). Post infection, the continuous probiotic administration, before and after Salmonella challenge, protected the host by modulating the inflammatory response, mainly in the immune effector site of the gut, decreasing TNFα and increasing IFNγ, IL-6 and IL-10 production in the lamina propria of the small intestine.
The oral administration of L. casei CRL 431 induces variations in the cytokine profile and in the TLRs expression previous and also after the challenge with S. Typhimurium. These changes show some of the immune mechanisms implicated in the protective effect of this probiotic strain against S. Typhimurium, providing an alternative way to reduce the severity of the infection.
Diarrheal infections caused by bacterial enteric pathogens including Salmonella, are one of the major causes of childhood morbidity and mortality in developing countries . Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (S. Typhimurium) is an intracellular Gram-negative bacterium characterized by its ability to survive and replicate within eukaryotic host cells, particularly epithelial cells and macrophages. In humans, while Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi typically causes severe or sometimes lethal systemic illness called "Typhoid Fever", Salmonella Typhimurium is associated with self limiting gastroenteritis and requires treatment only in immunocompromised patients. S. Typhimurium develops in mice an infection with the same pathogenesis and clinical manifestations than S. Typhi in humans thus, this mouse model is useful for the study of this disease .
The intestine harbours trillions of commensal bacteria that participate in digestive functions and help to protect the host from the aggression of several enteropathogens . The beneficial effects of the microbiota on the host immune system have allowed the proposal to use some non pathogenic bacteria, such as probiotics in improving animal health and protection against infectious agents . Probiotics have been shown to influence both innate and adaptive immunity through direct contact with epithelial and immune cells, or by their ability to modify the composition and activity of the gut microbiota. They exert their protective effects by multiple immune and non immune mechanisms , i.e., exerting direct antimicrobial activity against pathogens , increasing phagocytosis , modifying cytokine production by different cell populations [8–10] or enhancing IgA production . One of the principal mechanisms of protection against gastroenteric infections by probiotics is via modulation of pro-inflammatory (like IFNγ and TNFα) and anti-inflammatory (IL-10) cytokines, but the pathways and cells involved in this mechanisms are not clear yet . It is a fact that not all microorganisms have the same effect on the host, and that probiotic properties are strain and host specific. In this sense, it is not possible to extrapolate the effects found with one probiotic strain to another, or its effect against a specific pathogen to other pathogen .
L. casei CRL 431 is a probiotic bacterium and its effects on the gut immune cells have been extensively studied. In a previous work, the effect of L. casei CRL 431 in the prevention of S. Typhimurium infection in BALB/c mice was evaluated. It was demonstrated that 7 days of L. casei CRL 431 administration before S. Typhimurium infection decreased its severity. The continuous probiotic administration (before and after infection) diminished the pathogen counts in the intestine as well as its spread outside this organ. The probiotic administration decreased the neutrophil infiltration with the consequent diminution of intestinal inflammation; activated the macrophage phagocytic capacity in Peyer's patches, spleen and peritoneum; and increased the number of IgA(+) cells in the lamina propria of the small intestine which was correlated with increased release of s-IgA specific against the pathogen in the intestinal fluids .
The aim of the present work was to deep into the knowledge about how the probiotic bacterium L. casei CRL 431 exerts its protective effect against S. Typhimurium infection, by assessing the impact of this probiotic strain on the cytokine profile (expression and secretion) and in the expression of different Toll-like receptors (TLRs) in the inductor and effector sites of the immune response in the small intestine, in both healthy and infected animals.
Effect of L. casei CRL 431 administration on the cytokine producing cells isolated from Peyer's patches in animals non infected or infected with Salmonella
Cytokine producing cells isolated from Peyer's patches of mice untreated or treated with L. casei CRL 431 previous and post challenge with S. Typhimurium
N° of cytokine secreting cells
10 ± 4a
13 ± 3ad
12 ± 3a
24 ± 9b
20 ± 3b
17 ± 1b
26 ± 4b
16 ± 1ab
22 ± 6b
36 ± 12b
12 ± 2d
9 ± 4a
75 ± 4c
41 ± 10c
13 ± 5a,b
Measurement of cytokines released by immune cells isolated from Peyer's patches of mice untreated or treated with the probiotic strain previous and post infection
Effect of L. casei CRL 431 administration on the cytokines released in cultures of immune cells isolated from Peyer's patches of mice untreated, treated and infected with S. Typhimurium
Cytokine concentration (pg/ml)
203 ± 32a
139 ± 83a
65 ± 13ac
257 ± 55ac
1175 ± 563bc
187 ± 91b
336 ± 90bcd
1384 ± 74c
102 ± 42ab
328 ± 4b
148 ± 86a
102 ± 24ab
432 ± 20d
592 ± 40b
34 ± 18c
Effect of L. caseiCRL 431 consumption on the cytokine producing cells in the lamina propria of the small intestine in healthy and infected mice
Cytokine profile on the small intestinal fluid
Effect of probiotic administration and S. Typhimurium infection on TLR2, TLR4, TLR5 and TLR9 expression in the lamina propria of the small intestine
A previous work demonstrated that L. casei CRL 431 administration induced activation of the immune cells associated to the small intestine of mice that received the probiotic strain . We also observed that this probiotic strain decreased the severity of S. Typhimurium infection in a mouse model, showing the continuous administration, the best effect. Continous probiotic administration decreased the mortality percentage (ten times) and the CFU/g of Salmonella in liver, spleen and large intestine for 7 and 10 days post- infection . In the present work, some immune mechanisms by which L. casei CRL 431 administration exerts its protective effect against Salmonella infection were analyzed, as the intestinal cytokine profile in the inductor (Peyer's patches) and effector sites (lamina propria) of the gut immune response. The modulation of TLRs expressions was also determined in the small intestine tissues.
Previous to the infection, analyzing the mononuclear cells isolated from Peyer's patches, it was observed that mice fed 7 days with L. casei CRL 431 significantly increased cytokines expression and also the release of IFNγ and IL-10 by these cells. The production of cytokines in Peyer's patches was maintained without significant differences in healthy animals that received the probiotic strain (Lc) during all the experiment. These cytokines were also studied 7 days post infection and it was observed that mice from infection control group (S) and the group fed continuously with the probiotic strain maintained increased expression of both TNFα and IFNγ in the cells isolated from Peyer's patches. Nevertheless, the release of IFNγ from these cell cultures was significantly higher in the infection control (S) than in the mice given probiotic (Lc-S-Lc group). The increases of these cytokines in Peyer's patches are important because they constitute the main inductor site for mucosal immune response. In S. Typhimurium infection, this site is one of the pathways that Salmonella uses to invade the host, although Salmonella infection can also occur through the intestinal epithelial cells along the small intestine . Therefore post infection, we also focused on the cytokine expression in cells from the lamina propria of the small intestine and the cytokines secretion into the intestinal lumen, due to this is the effector site of the gut immune response (Figure 1 and 2). TNFα is a pro-inflammatory cytokine that induces activation and recruitment of neutrophils involved in local inflammatory processes, and produces intestinal epithelial barrier dysfunction, contributing to the entry and colonization of pathogenic bacteria usually excluded from the subepithelial mucosa [15–17]. Seven days post infection, the probiotic administration (Lc-S and Lc-S-Lc grups) was able to maintain TNFα production in the lamina propria of the small intestine and its secretion to the intestinal fluid similar to the observed in the non infected groups (C and Lc groups). These values showed a tendency to decrease 10 days post challenge. In contrast, the infection control group significantly increased TNFα expression 7 days post challenge as well as its secretion 10 days post infection (Figure 2). The TNFα modulation by probiotic administration could be related with the lesser polymorphonuclear infiltration and inflammation degree in the lamina propria observed previously . Otherwise, the positive cells for this cytokine and its release from these cells were increased in Peyer's patches when the mice received continuously the probiotic strain compared to the untreated control (C). These increments could be related with the high number of activated macrophages present in these sites, suggesting that TNFα is required in the inductor site to maintain the immune response against Salmonella (Tables 1 and 2). IFNγ is implicated in the immune activation by probiotic bacteria and fermented milks. It contributes in the activation of macrophages to promote the effective killing of pathogens that can survive within them. In our model, the number of IFNγ (+) cells in small intestinal tissues was significantly lower in the group of mice from the infection control group (S) than in the group of mice given continuously L. casei CRL 431, which maintained the number of these positive cells similar to the Lc group (Figure 1B). As regard to the release of IFNγ to the intestinal fluid, the administration of the probiotic bacteria maintained the levels of this cytokine similar to the basal data, at difference of the S group, which showed a significant decrease of IFNγ concentration after infection (Figure 2B). IFNγ (+) cells also increased in healthy mice given probiotic bacteria in both inductor and effector sites of the immune response compared to the untreated control group (Figure 1B and Table 1). This is consistent with previous reports where the administration of probiotic suspensions or fermented milks was associated with increased number of IFNγ (+) cells in the small intestine of mice [4, 18]. Recent findings revealed an inhibitory effect of IFNγ on neutrophils trafficking and pro-inflammatory Th17 cells differentiation [19–21]. According to this observation, the increased levels of this cytokine in Lc-S-Lc group could be correlated with the reduced spread of Salmonella and the lower inflammation of small intestinal tissues observed previously . IL-6 was analyzed because promotes both B cell maturation  and pro-inflammatory activity . It was observed that 7 days after Salmonella challenge, the production of this cytokine in the small intestine tissues was significantly increased in the three infected groups compared with the untreated control (C), and 10 days post-challenge, only the group Lc-S-Lc maintained a number of IL-6 (+) cells higher than both control groups (C and S, Figure 1C). However, in the mice fed continuously with the probiotic (Lc-S-Lc group), the IL-6 release into the intestinal lumen remained stable 7 and 10 days post-infection. In contrast, the infection control group (S) significantly increased IL-6 secretion during all the experiment, compared with basal data (Figure 2C). These results showed that probiotic administration can down regulate the release of IL-6 but maintain increased production of this cytokine in the intestine which could be used by the host if it is required.
According with the results obtained for the mentioned cytokines, IL-10 was studied as an anti-inflammatory cytokine and similar to IL-6 is required to maintain the IgA (+) B cell population [24, 25]. In our work, 7 days post challenge the number of IL-10 (+) cells was significantly higher in infected mice that received probiotic administration than in mice from S group, (Figure 1D). As regard to this cytokine release, the concentration of IL-10 in the intestinal fluid was significantly decreased in the infected control group (S) throughout the study, while in mice from Lc-S group the significant decrease was observed 10 days post infection. At day 7 post-challenge, IL-10 release of Lc-S-Lc group was lower than absolute control (group C) and Lc group, but restored at day 10 post-challenge. These results highlight the importance of continuous probiotic administration in the modulation of the immune response (Figure 2D).
Previous results obtained in our group suggested that probiotic administration modulates the cytokine profile, mainly in the cells from the innate immune response through TLRs stimulation [4, 26]. According to this, and considering the differences observed for the cytokines, we analyzed the expression of TLRs in immune and epithelial cells of the small intestine in our infection model.
TLR2 was studied due this receptor recognize the peptidoglycan which is the principal component of the Gram+ bacteria such as Lactobacillus genus. Our results showed a significant increase of TLR2 (+) cells in the small intestine of healthy mice that received L. casei CRL 431 compared to the untreated control (Figure 3A) and significant increases were also observed, only for 7 days post infection, in the mice given continuously the probiotic bacteria (Lc-S-Lc group) compared to the infection control (S group). This result agrees with other findings describing a similar effect induced by two Lactobacillus strains, L. rhamnosus GG and L. plantarum BFE 1685, which enhanced TLR2 in vitro using human intestinal cells . We consider that the probiotic strain stimulates the TLR2 not only to increase the signals to produce cytokines, but also to increase the epithelial barrier because it was demonstrated TLR2 activation have an important role in enhancing trans-epithelial resistance to invading bacteria . Another receptor analyzed was TLR4, which recognizes the LPS present in the cell wall of the Gram(-) bacteria . It is known that TLR4 plays a significant role in the host defences against Salmonella infection in vivo [29–31]. In our model, L. casei CRL 431 administration to healthy mice increased the number of TLR4 (+) cells compared to the untreated control, which could be used as a surveillance mechanism against pathogen bacteria such as Salmonella. Recent findings suggest that the activation of this receptor initiates an innate immune response leading to the induction of pro-inflammatory mediators, to increase TLR2 expression, and to reduce its own expression, which leads to the recruitment of inflammatory cells and the initiation of the appropriate responses in the spleen leading control of the bacterial multiplication [29, 32]. This is consistent with the results obtained in our study where the enhancement of TLR4 was accompanied of increased number of TLR2 (+) cells previous and post infection (Figure 3). The early increase in the expression of TLR4 could be related with the decrease of the severity of the infection observed in the treated groups where the bacterial growth in the spleen and the liver decreased faster than in the infection control .
TLR5 was evaluated because flagellated bacteria, including E. coli and Salmonella, can interact with TLR5 to induce activation of pro-inflammatory gene programs for host protection [33–35]. In the present work, we observed that probiotic administration increased TLR5 (+) cells after Salmonella infection in both groups that received the probiotic strain for 7 days post challenge compared to untreated mice (C, Figure 3C). This finding agrees with other study where two lactobacilli were able to increase the cell surface expression of TLR5 in HT29 cells to respond to S. Typhimurium . In our model, this receptor could be also implicated in the protective effect of L. casei CRL 431 against S. Typhimurium infection.
Finally, in our study, it was observed that L. casei CRL 431 oral administration increased TLR9 expression in healthy mice (Figure 3D). Seven days post infection, the increase of TLR9 (+) cells was observed in both groups of mice given probiotic bacteria (Lc-S and Lc-S-Lc), but not in the infection control (S group), comparing with the untreated control group (C). This finding agrees with several works which affirm that CpG-TLR9 interaction can improve the resistance of normal adult mice to a variety of bacterial, viral and parasitic pathogens [36–38], including increased resistance to oral challenge with S. Typhimurium. TLR9 signalling is also required to mediate an anti-inflammatory effect induced by probiotics, in a mouse colitis model .
The results of the present work demonstrated the importance of L. casei CRL 431 continuous administration, before and after S. Typhimurium infection, to maintain the mechanisms of protection against this pathogen. L. casei CRL 431 administration before infection maintained the innate immune system in alert state, through modulated expression of TLRs and cytokine signals in the effector and inductor site of the gut immune system, which could be related with the protection against S. Typhimurium observed in a previous report. The results from the present work show that once established the disease, the continuous L. casei CRL 431 administration protected the host mainly modulating the inflammatory response against the enteropathogen in both effector and inductor sites of the gut. This preliminary study shows some of the immune mechanisms implicated in the protective effect of L. casei CRL 431 againts S. Typhimurium infection. More studies should be performed to validate the use of this probiotic strain in the prevention and as a complement to treatments in the defense against salmonellosis.
The cellular populations involved in the cytokine production and how TLRs activate the different signals and the transcriptional factors for cytokine production are currently under study.
Animals and experimental groups
Five-week-old BALB/c mice weighting 22-26 g were obtained from the closed random bred colony maintained at CERELA (Centro de Referencia para Lactobacilos, San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentina). The assays were performed using 3 experimental groups to assess the effect of the preventive or continuous probiotic administration against S. Typhimurium infection comparing with the infection control group (S). The same number of female and male mice was distributed in all the groups.
For the study of the mechanisms involved in the preventive effect, mice received L. casei CRL 431 for 7 consecutive days before challenge with the enteropathogen (Lc-S group). For the effect of the continuous probiotic administration, mice were administered L. casei CRL 431 during 7 days, challenged with the pathogen and then continued receiving L. casei CRL 431 post challenge (Lc-S-Lc group). Mice of the infection control group (S) did not receive special feeding and were challenged with S. Typhimurium. Additionally, two control groups without infection (healthy mice) were analyzed: a group of mice received L. casei CRL 431 (Lc group), and the other group did not received special feeding (untreated control group, C). Mice were euthanized and the samples were collected after 7 days (the day of the infection) for Lc and C groups, and 7 and/or 10 days post challenge (depending on the assay performed) for all the groups.
All animal protocols were pre-approved by the Animal Protection Committee of CERELA and all experiments complied with the current laws of Argentina.
L. casei CRL 431 was obtained from the CERELA culture collection. Overnight cultures were grown at 37°C in sterile Mann-Rogosa-Sharp (MRS) broth (Britania, Buenos Aires, Argentina). The cells were harvested by centrifugation at 5 000g for 10 minutes, washed three times with fresh PBS and then resuspended in sterile 10% (vol/vol) non-fat milk. L. casei CRL 431 was administered to the mice in the drinking water to reach a concentration of 1 × 108 CFU/ml. This lactobacilli count was periodically controlled at the beginning and after 24 h of dilution in water (maintained in the same room where the mice are) to avoid modifications of more than 1 logarithmic unit.
S. Typhimurium strain was obtained from the Bacteriology Department of the Hospital del Niño Jesús (San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentina). An aliquot (200 μl) from an overnight culture was placed in 5 ml of sterile Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) broth (Britania, Buenos Aires, Argentina) and incubated during 4 hours. The concentration of Salmonella was adjusted to 1 × 108 CFU/ml in phosphate buffered saline (PBS). Each mouse was challenged with 100 μl of 1 × 108 CFU/ml of S. Typhimurium given by gavage. This dose was selected in our previous work because induce 50% of mice mortality .
Isolation and culture of immune cells from Peyer's patches for cytokine determination
The protocol described by Galdeano and Perdigón  was used for the isolation of cells from Peyer's patches. The cells were isolated after 7 days of feeding for Lc and C groups and 7 days post Salmonella infection for all the challenged groups. The small intestine of each mouse was removed, washed and the Peyer's patches were excised in Hank's buffered salt solution (HBSS) containing 4% foetal bovine serum (FBS). The epithelium cells were separated with HBSS/FBS solution containing EDTA. The sediments were incubated with dispase/DNAse solution and the mononuclear cells were recovered. The cells were collected and washed with RPMI 1640 medium (Sigma, St. Louis, USA). The cells concentrations were adjusted in RPMI and cultured in a CO2 incubator. The culture supernatants were recovered after 4 h and 24 h for TNFα and after 24 h to analyze the levels of IFNγ and IL-10 using ELISA technique. BD OptEIA mouse cytokine ELISA sets from BD Bioscience (San Diego, USA) were used according manufacturer instructions. The results were expressed as concentration of each cytokine (pg/ml).
Detection of cytokine producing cells isolated from Peyer's patches
Mononuclear cells were isolated from Peyer's patches as described above. 20 μl of each cell suspension (1 × 106) was placed per well in special glass slides by triplicate. They were fixed 15 minutes with BD Pharmigen ICC Fixation Buffer. TNFα, IFNγ and IL-10 were determined by immunocytochemistry following the technique described by Dogi et al . Briefly, the glass slides were incubated with a blocking solution of bovine serum albumin (BSA)/PBS, washed with PBS, and incubated with normal goat serum (Sigma, St. Louis, USA). The activity of the endogenous peroxidase was blocked with a peroxidase blocking reagent (Dako Cytomation, Inc., California, USA). The cells were then incubated with avidin and biotin blocking solutions (Avidin/biotin blocking kit, Vector laboratories, Inc., Burlingame, USA) to block endogenous avidin and biotin. The cells were incubated with rat anti-mouse TNFα, IFNγ or IL-10 (diluted in ICC cytokine buffer, PharMingen, B-D Biosciences, Canada), washed with PBS, and incubated with goat anti-rat polyclonal antibody conjugated with peroxidase (PharMingen, B-D Biosciences, Canada). Vectastain Elite ABC solution (Vector Labs, Burlingame, USA) was added to cells and incubated with a DAB kit (Vector Laboratories, Inc., Burlingame, USA). The results were obtained from two individual blind counts per each sample (by two different investigators) and were expressed as number of positive cells counted per 2 × 104 cells at 1 000X magnification.
Determination of cytokine producing cells in the lamina propria of the small intestine
The small intestines were removed after 7 days of feeding (Lc and C groups), and 7 and 10 days post Salmonella challenge for all experimental groups, and processed following the technique described by Sainte-Marie for paraffin embedding . Tissue sections (4 μm) from each mouse were used to analyze cytokine producing cells by an indirect immunofluorescence assay following the technique described previously . The sections were incubated with a blocking solution of BSA/PBS, washed with PBS, and incubated with normal goat serum (Sigma, St. Louis, USA) to prevent non-specific staining. Rabbit anti-mouse TNFα, IFNγ, IL-10, and IL-6 (Peprotech, Inc. Rocky Hill, NJ, USA) polyclonal antibodies (diluted in saponin-PBS) were applied to the tissue sections for 105 min at room temperature (RT, 21°C). The sections were then treated 1 h with diluted goat anti-rabbit antibody conjugated with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC, Jackson Immuno Research, Labs. Inc. West Grove USA). The results were expressed as the number of fluorescent cells in 10 fields of vision as seen with 1 000X magnification using a fluorescent light microscope. The number of fluorescent cells was counted for two different investigators (by blind counts) three times to cover different portions of each sample.
Determination of TNFα, IFNγ, IL-10 and IL-6 released in the small intestine fluid
Intestinal fluid from the small intestines of all the groups under study were collected with 1 ml of NaCl 0.85% at the same time points that the samples from intestinal tissues. The fluids were immediately centrifuged at 4 000g during 15 min at 4°C. The supernatants were recovered and stored at -20°C until cytokines determination by ELISA using the methodology previously described for cell culture supernatants. The results were expressed as concentration of each cytokine in the intestinal fluid (pg/ml).
Immunofluorescence assays for determination of TLR2, TLR4, TLR5 and TLR9 positive cells on small intestine tissues
TLR2, TLR4, TLR5 and TLR9 positive cells were counted in the samples taken at the same time points used to determine the cytokine producing cells. Positive cells for each analyzed TLR were counted in the small intestine tissue (including lamina propria and epithelium or intraepithelial cells) for all the groups assayed. After deparaffinization and rehydration, paraffin sections were incubated with solution of 1% BSA for 30 min at room temperature and washed three times in PBS. Rat anti-mouse monoclonal TLR2 or TLR4 (eBioscience, USA) diluted 1:300, rabbit anti-mouse polyclonal TLR5 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, INC) diluted 1:250 or TLR9 (eBioscience, USA) in a concentration of 0.5 μg/ml antibodies, were applied to the tissue sections for 105 min at room temperature. The slides were washed twice with PBS and incubated for 60 min with a dilution of FITC conjugated goat anti-rat (1:50) or goat anti-rabbit (1:100) antibody (Jackson Immuno Research Labs Inc.). The results were expressed as the number of fluorescent cells in ten fields of vision at 1 000X of magnification and they were obtained from two individual blind counts per each sample (by two different investigators).
Each trial, test and control groups contained 10 animals. Three mice of each group were sacrificed for each sample taken. The experiments were repeated three times and all results (from the three trials) were analyzed together (N = 9). Statistical analyses were performed using MINITAB 14 software. A factorial experimental design (replicates - dietary regimen - time point) was used. Comparisons were accomplished by an ANOVA general linear model followed by a Tukey's post hoc test and p < 0.01 was considered significant. No significant differences between the three independent replicates were observed.
The authors thank Lic. Elena Bru de Labanda for her contribution in the statistical analysis, and Lic. Ivanna Novotny Núñez for her valuable contribution in the experimental work. This work was financially supported by Consejo de Investigación de la Universidad Nacional de Tucumán (CIUNT 26/D442), and Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET, PIP 0652), Argentina.
- Kosek M, Bern C, Guerrant RL: The global burden of diarrhoeal disease, as estimated from studies published between 1992 and 2000. Bull World Health Organ. 2003, 81 (3): 197-204.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Zhang S, Kingsley RA, Santos RL, Andrews-Polymenis H, Raffatellu M, Figueiredo J, Nunes J, Tsolis RM, Adams LG, Baumler AJ: Molecular pathogenesis of Salmonella enterica serotype typhimurium-induced diarrhea. Infect Immun. 2003, 71 (1): 1-12. 10.1128/IAI.71.1.1-12.2003.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lievin-Le Moal V, Servin AL: The front line of enteric host defense against unwelcome intrusion of harmful microorganisms: mucins, antimicrobial peptides, and microbiota. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2006, 19 (2): 315-337. 10.1128/CMR.19.2.315-337.2006.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Galdeano CM, de Moreno de LeBlanc A, Vinderola G, Bonet ME, Perdigón G: Proposed model: mechanisms of immunomodulation induced by probiotic bacteria. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2007, 14 (5): 485-492. 10.1128/CVI.00406-06.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lebeer S, Vanderleyden J, De Keersmaecker SC: Genes and molecules of lactobacilli supporting probiotic action. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2008, 72 (4): 728-764, Table of Contents. 10.1128/MMBR.00017-08.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Servin AL: Antagonistic activities of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria against microbial pathogens. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2004, 28 (4): 405-440. 10.1016/j.femsre.2004.01.003.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- de Moreno de LeBlanc A, Castillo NA, Perdigón G: Anti-infective mechanisms induced by a probiotic Lactobacillus strain against Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium infection. Int J Food Microbiol. 2010, 138 (3): 223-231. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.01.020.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Latvala S, Pietila TE, Veckman V, Kekkonen RA, Tynkkynen S, Korpela R, Julkunen I: Potentially probiotic bacteria induce efficient maturation but differential cytokine production in human monocyte-derived dendritic cells. World J Gastroenterol. 2008, 14 (36): 5570-5583; discussion 5581-5572. 10.3748/wjg.14.5570.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Erickson KL, Hubbard NE: Probiotic immunomodulation in health and disease. J Nutr. 2000, 130 (2S Suppl): 403S-409S.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vizoso Pinto MG, Rodriguez Gomez M, Seifert S, Watzl B, Holzapfel WH, Franz CM: Lactobacilli stimulate the innate immune response and modulate the TLR expression of HT29 intestinal epithelial cells in vitro. Int J Food Microbiol. 2009, 133: (1-2):86-93. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.04.012.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Galdeano CM, Perdigón G: The probiotic bacterium Lactobacillus casei induces activation of the gut mucosal immune system through innate immunity. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2006, 13 (2): 219-226. 10.1128/CVI.13.2.219-226.2006.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mileti E, Matteoli G, Iliev ID, Rescigno M: Comparison of the immunomodulatory properties of three probiotic strains of Lactobacilli using complex culture systems: prediction for in vivo efficacy. PLoS One. 2009, 4 (9): e7056-10.1371/journal.pone.0007056.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- FAO/WHO: Health and Nutritional Properties of Probiotics in Food including Powder Milk with Live Lactic Acid Bacteria. 2001, [http://www.who.int/foodsafety/publications/fs_management/en/probiotics.pdf]Google Scholar
- Mastroeni P, Maskell D: Salmonella infections: clinical, immunological, and molecular aspects. 2006, Cambridge University PressView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Turner JR: Molecular basis of epithelial barrier regulation: from basic mechanisms to clinical application. Am J Pathol. 2006, 169 (6): 1901-1909. 10.2353/ajpath.2006.060681.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Abreu MT, Arnold ET, Thomas LS, Gonsky R, Zhou Y, Hu B, Arditi M: TLR4 and MD-2 expression is regulated by immune-mediated signals in human intestinal epithelial cells. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277 (23): 20431-20437. 10.1074/jbc.M110333200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yuan Q, Wang J, Fang QH, Liu YY, Fan JY, Zhang SW, Ma YM: Attenuating effect of pretreatment with Yiqifumai on lipopolysaccharide-induced intestine injury and survival rate in rat. J Inflamm (Lond). 2011, 8 (1): 10-10.1186/1476-9255-8-10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Galdeano CM, de Leblanc Ade M, Carmuega E, Weill R, Perdigon G: Mechanisms involved in the immunostimulation by probiotic fermented milk. J Dairy Res. 2009, 76 (4): 446-454. 10.1017/S0022029909990021.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Green SJ, Crawford RM, Hockmeyer JT, Meltzer MS, Nacy CA: Leishmania major amastigotes initiate the L-arginine-dependent killing mechanism in IFN-gamma-stimulated macrophages by induction of tumor necrosis factor-alpha. J Immunol. 1990, 145 (12): 4290-4297.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ekchariyawat P, Pudla S, Limposuwan K, Arjcharoen S, Sirisinha S, Utaisincharoen P: Burkholderia pseudomallei-induced expression of suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 and cytokine-inducible src homology 2-containing protein in mouse macrophages: a possible mechanism for suppression of the response to gamma interferon stimulation. Infect Immun. 2005, 73 (11): 7332-7339. 10.1128/IAI.73.11.7332-7339.2005.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kelchtermans H, Billiau A, Matthys P: How interferon-gamma keeps autoimmune diseases in check. Trends Immunol. 2008, 29 (10): 479-486. 10.1016/j.it.2008.07.002.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Clark EA, Grabstein KH, Gown AM, Skelly M, Kaisho T, Hirano T, Shu GL: Activation of B lymphocyte maturation by a human follicular dendritic cell line, FDC-1. J Immunol. 1995, 155 (2): 545-555.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Naugler WE, Karin M: The wolf in sheep's clothing: the role of interleukin-6 in immunity, inflammation and cancer. Trends Mol Med. 2008, 14 (3): 109-119. 10.1016/j.molmed.2007.12.007.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Correa D, Canedo-Solares I, Ortiz-Alegria LB, Caballero-Ortega H, Rico-Torres CP: Congenital and acquired toxoplasmosis: diversity and role of antibodies in different compartments of the host. Parasite Immunol. 2007, 29 (12): 651-660. 10.1111/j.1365-3024.2007.00982.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Brandao GP, Melo MN, Gazzinelli RT, Caetano BC, Ferreira AM, Silva LA, Vitor RW: Experimental reinfection of BALB/c mice with different recombinant type I/III strains of Toxoplasma gondii: involvement of IFN-gamma and IL-10. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2009, 104 (2): 241-245.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dogi CA, Galdeano CM, Perdigon G: Gut immune stimulation by non pathogenic Gram(+) and Gram(-) bacteria. Comparison with a probiotic strain. Cytokine. 2008, 41 (3): 223-231. 10.1016/j.cyto.2007.11.014.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Abreu MT, Fukata M, Arditi M: TLR signaling in the gut in health and disease. J Immunol. 2005, 174 (8): 4453-4460.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Beutler B, Poltorak A: The sole gateway to endotoxin response: how LPS was identified as Tlr4, and its role in innate immunity. Drug Metab Dispos. 2001, 29: (4 Pt 2):474-478.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Weiss DS, Raupach B, Takeda K, Akira S, Zychlinsky A: Toll-like receptors are temporally involved in host defense. J Immunol. 2004, 172 (7): 4463-4469.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- van Bruggen R, Zweers D, van Diepen A, van Dissel JT, Roos D, Verhoeven AJ, Kuijpers TW: Complement receptor 3 and Toll-like receptor 4 act sequentially in uptake and intracellular killing of unopsonized Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium by human neutrophils. Infect Immun. 2007, 75 (6): 2655-2660. 10.1128/IAI.01111-06.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Duerr CU, Zenk SF, Chassin C, Pott J, Gutle D, Hensel M, Hornef MW: O-antigen delays lipopolysaccharide recognition and impairs antibacterial host defense in murine intestinal epithelial cells. PLoS Pathog. 2009, 5: (9):e1000567-PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Totemeyer S, Foster N, Kaiser P, Maskell DJ, Bryant CE: Toll-like receptor expression in C3H/HeN and C3H/HeJ mice during Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium infection. Infect Immun. 2003, 71 (11): 6653-6657. 10.1128/IAI.71.11.6653-6657.2003.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gribar SC, Richardson WM, Sodhi CP, Hackam DJ: No longer an innocent bystander: epithelial toll-like receptor signaling in the development of mucosal inflammation. Mol Med. 2008, 14: (9-10):645-659.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fournier B, Williams IR, Gewirtz AT, Neish AS: Toll-like receptor 5-dependent regulation of inflammation in systemic Salmonella enterica Serovar typhimurium infection. Infect Immun. 2009, 77 (9): 4121-4129. 10.1128/IAI.00656-09.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vijay-Kumar M, Sanders CJ, Taylor RT, Kumar A, Aitken JD, Sitaraman SV, Neish AS, Uematsu S, Akira S, Williams IR, et al: Deletion of TLR5 results in spontaneous colitis in mice. J Clin Invest. 2007, 117 (12): 3909-3921.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Gramzinski RA, Doolan DL, Sedegah M, Davis HL, Krieg AM, Hoffman SL: Interleukin-12- and gamma interferon-dependent protection against malaria conferred by CpG oligodeoxynucleotide in mice. Infect Immun. 2001, 69 (3): 1643-1649. 10.1128/IAI.69.3.1643-1649.2001.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Juffermans NP, Leemans JC, Florquin S, Verbon A, Kolk AH, Speelman P, van Deventer SJ, van der Poll T: CpG oligodeoxynucleotides enhance host defense during murine tuberculosis. Infect Immun. 2002, 70 (1): 147-152. 10.1128/IAI.70.1.147-152.2002.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Olbrich AR, Schimmer S, Dittmer U: Preinfection treatment of resistant mice with CpG oligodeoxynucleotides renders them susceptible to friend retrovirus-induced leukemia. J Virol. 2003, 77 (19): 10658-10662. 10.1128/JVI.77.19.10658-10662.2003.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lavelle EC, Murphy C, O'Neill LA, Creagh EM: The role of TLRs, NLRs, and RLRs in mucosal innate immunity and homeostasis. Mucosal Immunol. 2010, 3 (1): 17-28. 10.1038/mi.2009.124.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dogi CA, Weill F, Perdigon G: Immune response of non-pathogenic gram(+) and gram(-) bacteria in inductive sites of the intestinal mucosa study of the pathway of signaling involved. Immunobiology. 2010, 215 (1): 60-69. 10.1016/j.imbio.2009.01.005.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sainte-Marie G: A paraffin embedding technique for studies employing immunofluorescence. J Histochem Cytochem. 1961, 250-256. 10Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.