Open Access

A proteomic study of Corynebacterium glutamicumAAA+ protease FtsH

BMC Microbiology20077:6

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2180-7-6

Received: 19 August 2006

Accepted: 25 January 2007

Published: 25 January 2007

Abstract

Background

The influence of the membrane-bound AAA+ protease FtsH on membrane and cytoplasmic proteins of Corynebacterium glutamicum was investigated in this study. For the analysis of the membrane fraction, anion exchange chromatography was combined with SDS-PAGE, while the cytoplasmic protein fraction was studied by conventional two-dimensional gel electrophoresis.

Results

In contrast to the situation in other bacteria, deletion of C. glutamicum ftsH has no significant effect on growth in standard minimal medium or response to heat or osmotic stress. On the proteome level, deletion of the ftsH gene resulted in a strong increase of ten cytoplasmic and membrane proteins, namely biotin carboxylase/biotin carboxyl carrier protein (accBC), glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (gap), homocysteine methyltransferase (metE), malate synthase (aceB), isocitrate lyase (aceA), a conserved hypothetical protein (NCgl1985), succinate dehydrogenase A (sdhA), succinate dehydrogenase B (sdhB), succinate dehydrogenase CD (sdhCD), and glutamate binding protein (gluB), while 38 cytoplasmic and membrane-associated proteins showed a decreased abundance. The decreasing amount of succinate dehydrogenase A (sdhA) in the cytoplasmic fraction of the ftsH mutant compared to the wild type and its increasing abundance in the membrane fraction indicates that FtsH might be involved in the cleavage of a membrane anchor of this membrane-associated protein and by this changes its localization.

Conclusion

The data obtained hint to an involvement of C. glutamicum FtsH protease mainly in regulation of energy and carbon metabolism, while the protease is not involved in stress response, as found in other bacteria.

Background

Corynebacterium glutamicum, is a Gram-positive soil bacterium, which is used for the industrial production of different amino acids, mainly L-glutamate and L-lysine, and of nucleotides [1, 2]. As a member of the Corynebacterinae, C. glutamicum is closely related to other mycolic acid-containing bacteria, e. g. to the amino acids producer Corynebacterium efficiens and to important pathogens such as Corynebacterium diphtheriae, Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium leprae [3]. Due to the enormous industrial importance of C. glutamicum, this bacterium is very well investigated. Its genome was sequenced and published independently by different industry-supported groups recently [4, 5] and different global analyses techniques are available including transcriptome [6], metabolome [7], flux [8] and proteome analyses [9].

We are interested in nitrogen metabolism and nitrogen control in C. glutamicum (for review, see [1012]) and recently identified proteolysis as a new regulatory mechanism in nitrogen regulation [13]. Different proteases, namely ClpXP and ClpCP [14] as well as FtsH are involved in the degradation of nitrogen signal transduction protein GlnK [13]. The identified enzymes are members of the AAA+ protease family. These proteases and protein disassembly machines are found in all kingdoms of life and often exhibit crucial regulatory functions (for recent reviews, see [15, 16]).

In C. glutamicum, an effect of FtsH on the degradation of nitrogen signal control protein GlnK was reported [13]. The deletion of the ftsH gene is very well tolerated by C. glutamicum cells and obvious detrimental effects of an ftsH deletion could not be observed. Since we were interested in the function of this protease, we initiated a proteomic study and investigated the influence of an ftsH deletion on membrane and cytoplasmic protein profiles.

Results

Influence of FtsH on growth of C. glutamicumstrains

Mutations of ftsH were described in different bacteria. The effect of these mutations are remarkably species-specific and range from drastic growth impairment in Escherichia coli [17] to effects on sporulation, development and stress response in Bacillus subtilis [18, 19] and Caulobacter crescentus [20]. When growth of C. glutamicum wild type strains ATCC 13032 and strain ΔftsH was analyzed, only a minor effect of the ftsH deletion was observed (Fig. 1A). Doubling times of wild type and mutant strain were very similar in standard minimal medium (2 h 18 min versus 2 h 38 min). Next, the influence of increased temperature on growth was tested. Neither growth at increased temperature (37°C instead of 30°C) had a significant detrimental effect nor exposure of cells grown at 30°C to a sudden heat shock of 37 and 39°C, respectively (data not shown). Also when the ftsH mutant was exposed to osmotic stress applied either by growth in medium with increased osmolarity or as sudden osmotic shock due to sodium chloride addition, no significant growth defect compared to the wild type was detectable (S. Morbach and U. Meyer, personal communication). Obviously, FtsH plays a less crucial role in C. glutamicum compared to other bacteria. To identify FtsH targets in the cell, proteome studies were carried out.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2180-7-6/MediaObjects/12866_2006_Article_323_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

(A) Growth of the wild type strain ATCC 13032 (black line) and the deletion mutant ATCC 13032 ΔftsH (dotted line). Doubling times of the wild type and the mutant strain were very similar (2 h 18 min versus 2 h 38 min). (B) Control of ftsH deletion by PCR. Primers were designed to anneal approx. 214 bps up and down stream of ftsH gene (2562 bps). The PCR product comprised 2990 bps in the wild type strain (lane 1) and 530 bps in the deletion mutant (lane 2), lane 3 contains marker DNA. (C) Control of ftsH deletion by Western blotting. 25 μg of membrane protein of the wild type and ΔftsH were applied per lane. No signal was obtained with cytoplasmic proteins (data not shown).

Differences in the membrane proteome of wild type and ftsHdeletion strain

FtsH is a membrane-bound AAA+ protease and therefore we started our investigations with an analysis of membrane proteins. While the separation of C. glutamicum membrane proteins by 2-D PAGE is restricted to those with two or less transmembrane helices [21, 22], recently, a technique was established to separate highly hydrophobic proteins of the membrane fraction by anion exchange chromatography and 1-D SDS-PAGE [23]. This technique was applied for the comparison of membrane proteins from wild type and corresponding ftsH deletion strain.

The FtsH protease was identified for the wild type in a faint gel band in all three biological replicates, while this band was absent in the deletion strain (Figure 2). Compared to the wild type, five different proteins showed an increased abundance in the ftsH mutant strain (Table 1), namely all subunits of the succinate dehydrogenase complex (sdhA, sdhB and sdhCD), glutamate binding protein (gluB) and homocysteine methyltransferase (metE). Upregulation of protein concentration did not exceed a factor of five. While the succinate dehydrogenase complex could be a direct substrate of FtsH, GluB is a lipid-anchored glutamate binding protein [24], which is located at the outer face of the cytoplasmic membrane. Therefore, GluB must be an indirect target or processed by FtsH before secretion to the external site of the cell. C. glutamicum contains two homocysteine methyltransferares (metE and metH) catalyzing the final reaction of methionine synthesis, yet only metH requires vitamin B12 (cobalamin) as a cofactor [25]. Upregulation of metE could indicate that more of this enzyme is required for methionine synthesis, maybe due to reduced import of cobalamin in the ftsH deletion mutant, though further experiments are needed to verify this hypothesis. Interestingly, the ftsH deletion also influenced the abundance of ClpC, the ATPase component of the ClpCP protease complex. This protein was down-regulated in the mutant compared to the wild type by a factor of 0.4. However, the significance of this putative cross-talk between AAA+ proteases in C. glutamicum needs further investigation.
Table 1

Protein pattern of the membrane fraction of the wild type ATCC13032 and ftsH deletion mutant.

Spot #

NCgl #

Protein (Gene)

ΔftsH/wildtype ratio

S.D.

p-value

1

0359

succinate dehydrogenase CD (sdhCD)

1.6

0.4

0.0804

2

0360

succinate dehydrogenase A (sdhA)

4.5

0.2

0.0003

3

0361

succinate dehydrogenase B (sdhB)

2.4

0.9

0.0916

4

1876

glutamate binding protein (gluB)

2.2

0.7

0.0734

5

2585

ATP-dependent protease (clpC)

0.4

0.03

0.0045

6

1094

homocysteine methyltransferase (metE)

4.9

1.4

0.0147

FtsH

2603

cell division protein

-

  
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2180-7-6/MediaObjects/12866_2006_Article_323_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Coomassie-stained 1-D gels after ion exchange chromatography of wild type and ftsH deletion mutant membrane fraction. Protein spots which appear to be regulated are marked by red arrow heads and are listed in Table 1.

Additionally, a role of FtsH in the response to nitrogen starvation and to improving nitrogen conditions after a starvation period was tested. Compared to the wild type, NADH dehydrogenase (ndh), a putative integral membrane protein (cg0952) and the ATPase component of an ABC-type sugar transport system (msiK) were down-regulated by a factor of 0.5 (data not shown).

Comparison of cytoplasmic protein profiles

In addition to the membrane proteome also the cytoplasmic protein fraction of wild type and ftsH deletion was analyzed by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-D PAGE, Figure 3). By this approach, six proteins were found in increasing amounts, namely the biotin carboxylase/biotin carrier protein (accBC), glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (gap), malate synthase (aceB), isocitrate lyase (aceA), a conserved hypothetical protein (NCgl1985) and homocysteine methyltransferase (metE), which was also identified as an upregulated protein in the membrane fraction. AccBC was upregulated more than 50-fold, while GAP-DH was upregulated by a factor of four. 37 different protein spots showed a decreased abundance in the mutant. Almost one third of the proteins identified (presented in Table 2) is clearly involved in carbon and energy metabolism. These include the maltooligosyl trehalose synthase (treY), the 1,4-alpha-glucan branching enzyme (glgB), fumarate hydratase (fum), a putative L-lactate dehydrogenase (lldA), glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (gap), phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (ppc), pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 component (aceE), an acyl-CoA synthetase (fadD4), succinate dehydrogenase A (sdhA) and transaldolase (tal). Interestingly, GAPDH is present in two spots, which differ in their approximate pI, an upregulated one (see above) spot number 2 in Figure 4 and a downregulated spot (number 30), indicating a posttranslational modification of the protein. Furthermore in the ftsH deletion strain succinate dehydrogenase A (sdhA) is less present in the cytoplasm but enriched in the membrane fraction. This indicates that FtsH is involved, either directly or indirectly, in the release of this succinate dehydrogenase subunit from the membrane into the cytoplasm. Since FtsH lacks a robust unfolding activity, a cleavage of SdhA and release of the protein from the complex by FtsH is rather unlikely. Other identified proteins with decreased abundance were parts of amino acid metabolism such as glutamine synthetase (glnA), aspartate-ammonium-lyase (aspA), succinyl-diaminopimelate desuccinylase (dapE), and dihydroxy-acid dehydratase (ilvD) (Fig. 4). As in the case of the membrane proteome, the influence of FtsH on the cytoplasmic protein profile in dependence of the nitrogen status of the cell was analyzed. For unknown reasons, 2-D gels of proteins isolated from nitrogen-starved ΔftsH cells revealed in contrast to the wild type (see also [26]) reproducibly strong horizontal streaking. The reason for this FtsH-specific effect, which made comparisons impossible, is unknown and could not be prevented by alternative gel loading techniques such as cup loading (C. Lück, personal communication).
Table 2

Cytoplasmic protein pattern of wild type strain ATCC13032 and ftsH deletion mutant. The listed proteins differ in their abundance of a factor of at least two.

Spot #

NCgl #

Protein (Gene)

ΔftsH/wild type ratio

MW kDa

pI

1

0670

biotin carboxylase/biotin carboxyl carrier protein (accBC)

53.48

63.5

5.02

2

1526

glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (gap)

4.24

36.2

5.16

3

2247

malate synthase (aceB)

2.95

82.5

5.0

4

2248

isocitrate lyase (aceA)

2.65

47.2

4.92

5

1985

conserved hypothetical protein

2.31

122.8

4.85

6

1094

homocysteine methyltransferase (metE)

2.16

81.3

4.78

7

2037

maltooligosyl trehalose synthase (treY)

0.48

90.5

5.03

8

1177

1,4-alpha-glucan branching enzyme (glgB)

0.48

82.6

4.99

9

1023

putative nicotinate-nucleotide pyrophosphorylase

0.47

29.4

5.22

10

2431

nicotinic acid phosphoribosyltransferase

0.47

48.0

5.22

11

0187

L-gulonolactone oxidase

0.47

53.0

5.68

12

0578

inositol-monophosphate dehydrogenase (guaB2)

0.47

53.4

5.99

13

0094

AMP nucleosidase (amn)

0.46

53.7

5.23

14

0358

transcriptional regulator, MerR family (ramB)

0.46

53.9

6.29

15

0704

putative DNA helicase

0.46

84.1

5.35

16

2718

sulfite reductase (hemoprotein) (cysI)

0.43

63.0

5.53

17

0251

catalase (katA)

0.42

58.7

5.18

18

0200

quinone oxidoreductase

0.41

33.2

4.99

19

2133

glutamine synthetase (glnA)

0.41

53.3

4.90

20

0471

DNA-directed RNA polymerase beta chain (rpoB)

0.41

128.8

4.86

21

1446

aspartate ammonia-lyase (aspartase) (aspA)

0.4

57.6

5.69

22

1440

ATPases of the AAA+ class

0.4

58

4.91

23

1835

polyphosphate glucokinase (ppgK)

0.4

26.7

4.97

24

0371

probable formyltetrahydrofolate deformylase protein (purU)

0.39

34.3

5.68

25

2986

N-acetymuramyl-L-alanine amidase (cwlM)

0.38

44.5

5.63

26

0967

fumarate hydratase (fum)

0.37

49.8

5.06

27

1442

aspartyl aminopeptidase (pepC)

0.36

44.9

5.10

28

2817

putative L-lactate dehydrogenase (lldA)

0.34

45.7

5.72

29

2126

dihydrolipoamide succinyltransferase (sucB)

0.34

70.9

4.26

30

1526

glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (gap)

0.34

36.0

5.16

31

1523

phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (ppc)

0.33

103.2

4.92

32

0251

catalase (katA)

0.29

58.7

5.18

33

1064

succinyl-diaminopimelate desuccinylase (dapE)

0.29

40.0

4.84

34

2586

inositol-monophosphate dehydrogenase (guaB1)

0.28

50.8

6.39

35

2487

GCN5-related N-acetyltransferase

0.27

32.1

5.86

36

2167

pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 component (aceE)

0.27

102.8

5.26

37

1151

acyl-CoA synthetase (fadD4)

0.26

63.7

5.08

38

0360

succinate dehydrogenase A (sdhA)

0.25

74.7

5.37

39

0570

predicted carbohydrate kinase

0.19

60.0

5.08

40

0707

superfamily II DNA/RNA helicase, SNF2 family

0.16

106.9

5.65

41

1219

dihydroxy-acid dehydratase (ilvD)

0.16

64.2

5.18

42

1513

transaldolase (tal)

0.15

38.3

4.47

43

2602

GTP cyclohydrolase (folE)

0.08

22.0

6.08

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2180-7-6/MediaObjects/12866_2006_Article_323_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

Comparison of cytoplasmic proteins of wild type strain ATCC 13032 and strain ΔftsH. Overlay of 2-D gels and false colour presentation: wild type proteins were stained in green, proteins of the deletion mutant in red. Spots present in both protein profiles appear in yellow. Molecular mass and pH range are indicated.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2180-7-6/MediaObjects/12866_2006_Article_323_Fig4_HTML.jpg
Figure 4

Coomassie-stained 2-D gels of wild type ATCC 13032 and corresponding ftsH deletion mutant. Protein spots which appear to be regulated are marked by red arrow heads and are listed in Table 2. Molecular mass and pH range are indicated.

Discussion

Data which hint to an involvement of FtsH in GlnK signal transduction protein degradation [13] prompted us to investigate the influence of this AAA+ protease on membrane and cytoplasmic protein profiles in C. glutamicum. Using a combination of anion exchange chromatography and SDS-PAGE for membrane protein analysis and 2-D PAGE for cytoplasmic proteins, we were able to show that FtsH regulates only a few proteins under the growth conditions tested. However, since the applied method only covers about 10% of the C. glutamicum membrane proteome [23], some FtsH targets may have been missed due to technical limitations. For example, the FtsH target GlnK is degraded depending on FtsH but proteolysis is also influenced by ClpCP and ClpXP [13]. In contrast to the situation in E. coli (for recent review, see [27]), we found that deletion of the ftsH gene is tolerated by C. glutamicum cells very well, although this gene is conserved in all other corynebacterial genome sequences published so far, i. e. in the C. diphtheriae [28], C. efficiens [29] and Corynebacterium jeikeium [30] genome, and although no obvious paralog of the ftsH gene is encoded in the C. glutamicum genome. Obvious detrimental effects of an ftsH deletion were not observed. In this respect the C. glutamicum results resemble the situation in B. subtilis and C. crescentus. Also for these organisms, a less severe effect of ftsH mutation compared to an E. coli mutant was shown. In B. subtilis, FtsH is involved in sporulation, stress adaptation and protein secretion [18, 19], and the effect of its deletion on the cytosolic proteome has been studied [31]. FtsH deletion resulted in increased levels of an arginase, a protein similar to a quinone oxidoreductase, and penicillin binding protein, but for the latter direct proteolytic action could be excluded and for the other two proteins it was not verified. FtsH of M. tuberculosis, which is phylogenetically closely related to C. glutamicum, was heterologously expressed in E. coli, and proteolytic activity against the known E. coli substrates heat shock transcription factor σ32 protein, protein translocation subunit SecY, and bacteriophage λCII repressor protein was observed [32]. For M. tuberculosis no experimental verification exists if SecY is indeed a target of FtsH, and our data for C. glutamicumdoes not support this hypothesis, but it does not completely rule this out, too. For C. crescentus an involvement of FtsH in development, stress response and heat shock control was shown [20]. The ftsH gene is expressed transiently after temperature upshift and in stationary phase in this organism, while during normal growth conditions FtsH is dispensable. In C. crescentus a mutation of ftsH influences chaperones, DnaK is derepressed under normal temperature compared to the wild type, while an influence on GroEL abundance was not observed. In contrast, the ftsH deletion in C. glutamicum had no influence on DnaK and even less GroEL was observed compared to the wild type. Further differences besides chaperone activation are sporulation and cell cycle proteins, processes which are absent in C. glutamicum. The majority of proteins identified to be differentially synthesized in dependence of FtsH C. glutamicum seem to be involved in carbon and energy metabolism.

Conclusion

The data obtained in this study, indicate that C. glutamicum AAA+ metalloprotease FtsH is not involved in the cellular response to heat or osmotic stress as shown in other bacteria. An astonishingly small amount of membrane and cytoplasmic proteins is affected by an ftsH deletion. From these data an involvement of FtsH in regulation of energy and carbon metabolism as well as in amino acid biosynthesis is indicated.

Methods

Strains and growth conditions

C. glutamicum type strain ATCC 13032 [33] and ftsH deletion mutant [13] were routinely grown on a rotary shaker at 30°C. A fresh C. glutamicum culture in BHI medium was used to inoculate minimal medium (per litre 42 g MOPS, 20 g (NH4)2SO4, 5 g urea, 0.5 g K2HPO4 × 3 H2O, 0.5 g KH2PO4, 0.25 g MgSO4 × 7 H2O, 0.01 g CaCl2, 50 g glucose, 0.2 mg biotin, 10 mg FeSO4, 10 mg MnSO4, 1 mg ZnSO4, 0.2 mg CuSO4, 0.02 mg NiCl2 × 6 H2O, 0.09 mg H3BO3, 0.06 mg CoCl2 × 6 H2O, 0.009 mg NaMoO4 × 2 H2O; pH adjusted to pH 7.0 using NaOH; [34]) for overnight growth. This culture, with an overnight OD600 of approximately 25 to 30, was used to inoculate fresh minimal medium to an OD600 of approximately 1, and cells were grown for 4 to 6 hours until the exponential growth phase was reached (OD600 approximately 4–5). To induce nitrogen starvation, cells were harvested by centrifugation and the pellet was suspended in and transferred to pre-warmed minimal medium without nitrogen source. The nitrogen-deprived cells were incubated at 30°C under aeration.

Polymerase chain reaction

To verify the deletion of the ftsH gene, PCR experiments were carried out. Primers were designed to anneal approx. 214 bps up and down stream of ftsH gene (2562 bps) (ftsH+200up fw: 5'-GTG GGC TAC GGA CTT GAT TTC G-3'; ftsH+200down rv: 5'-GAA CCA ACT CTT CAT GGC CCT C-3'). Chromosomal DNA prepared by phenol-chloroform extraction was used as template. PCR was performed using Taq polymerase and the following program: 95°C 5 min; 30 cycles (95°C 30 s; 64°C 30 s; 72°C 3 min) followed by 72°C 10 min and cooling down to 4°C. PCR products were analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis [35].

SDS-PAGE and Western blotting

To demonstrate deletion of ftsH on protein level, cells were disrupted band fractionated as described below or 2-D PAGE. Cytoplasmic proteins and membrane fraction of the wild type ATCC13032 and the deletion strain were separated by Tricine-buffered 9.5% SDS gels as described [36]. After SDS-PAGE proteins were transferred onto a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (PVDF, Immobilon-P, pore size 0.45 μm, Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA) by semi-dry electroblotting. Immunodetection of FtsH was performed with antibodies against peptide fragments of E. coli FtsH, produced in rabbit. Antibody binding was visualised by using appropriate anti-antibodies coupled to alkaline phosphatase (Sigma-Aldrich, Traufkirchen, Germany) and the BCIP/NBT alkaline phosphatase substrate (Sigma-Aldrich, Traufkirchen, Germany).

Membrane proteomics

For analysis of membrane proteins, a combination of anion exchange chromatography and SDS-PAGE was applied as described previously [23]. For this method, cells were disrupted by French Press treatment; the membrane fraction was separated from cell debris and cytoplasm by differential (ultra)centrifugation and washed with 2.5 M NaBr to remove membrane-associated proteins. Membrane proteins were subsequently solubilised in buffer containing 2% ASB-14 and separated by anion exchange chromatography. After TCA precipitation and SDS-PAGE, gels were scanned and analyzed using the LabScan software package (Amersham Biosciences, Freiburg, Germany). The scanner was calibrated with a greyscale marker (Kodak) and the same settings applied for all gels. Scanning was carried out at 300 dpi and 8 bit greyscale. Gel bands were quantified relative to each other by densitometry using the software scion image (version beta 4.0.2; Scion Corporation). Proteins from three independent experiments (biological replicates) were regarded as regulated if a p-value < 0.1 was calculated for a Student's t-test (paired, two-tailed).

2-D PAGE, staining and protein analysis

For 2-D PAGE analyses C. glutamicum cells were disrupted using glass beads and a Q-BIOgene FastPrep FP120 instrument (Q-BIOgene, Heidelberg, Germany) by lyzing the cells four times for 30 sec and 6.5 m sec-1 in the presence of the proteinase inhibitor Complete as recommended by the supplier (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). Proteins were separated by ultracentrifugation in cytoplasmic and membrane-associated protein fractions [37, 21]. For classical 2-D PAGE, only the cytoplasmic proteins were analyzed further. Protein concentrations were determined according to Dulley and Grieve [38]. For isoelectric focusing (IEF) 24 cm pre-cast IPG strips pI 4–7 and an IPGphor IEF unit (Amersham Biosiences, Freiburg, Germany) were used as described [39]. 100 μg and 200 μg of protein were loaded by rehydration for 24 h in a sample buffer containing 6 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 4% CHAPS, 0.5% Pharmalyte (3–10) and 0.4% DTT. The isoelectric focusing was performed for 48 000 Vh. The run for the second dimension was carried out using 12.5% polyacrylamide gels and an Ettan Dalt II system (Amersham Biosiences, Freiburg, Germany). After electrophoresis 2-D gels were stained with Coomassie brilliant Blue [35]. The Coomassie-stained gels were aligned using the Delta2D software, version 3.3 (Decodon, Greifswald, Germany). All samples were separated at least twice by 2-D PAGE to minimize irregularities (technical replicates). To validate the results, each comparison of interest was performed using samples from at least three independent experiments (biological replicates). The Delta2D software (version 3.3) was also used for spot quantification. Proteins were regarded as regulated if (i) the corresponding ratios referring to the relative volumes of the spots changed more than two-fold and if (ii) this regulation pattern was found in all biological and technical replicates. All other proteins were classified as "not regulated". Pearson coefficients for wild type gels were higher than 0.9962, for ftsH gels 0.9929, and for the comparisons of wild type and ftsH mutant 0.9510.

Protein identification

Protein spots or bands with significantly altered abundance in the ftsH mutant compared to the wild type were analyzed by trypric in-gel digest and MALDI-ToF-MS as described earlier [26].

Declarations

Acknowledgements

FtsH-specific antibodies were kindly provided by Teru Ogura (Kumamoto University, Japan). The authors wish to thank C. Lück (Technical University Munich), U. Meyer and S. Morbach (University of Cologne) for providing unpublished data. The financial support of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Sonderforschungsbereich 635, TP17) and the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (Neue Methoden zur Proteomanalyse: Anwendung und Verknüpfung mit Metabolomanalysen am Beispiel von Corynebacterium glutamicum) is gratefully acknowledged.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institut für Biochemie, Universität zu Köln
(2)
Lehrstuhl für Mikrobiologie, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
(3)
Lehrstuhl für Biochemie der Pflanzen, Ruhr-Universität Bochum

References

  1. Hermann T: Industrial production of amino acids by coryneform bacteria. J Biotechnol. 2003, 104: 155-172. 10.1016/S0168-1656(03)00149-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Leuchtenberger W: Amino acids – technical production and use. Products of primary metabolism. Biotechnology. Edited by: Rehm H, Reed G. 1996, VCH Verlagsgesellschaft, Weinheim, Germany, 6: 465-502.Google Scholar
  3. Stackebrandt E, Rainey FA, Ward-Rainey NL: Proposal for a new hierachic classification system, Actinobacteria classis nov. Int J System Bacteriol. 1997, 47: 97-102.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Ikeda M, Nakagawa S: The Corynebacterium glutamicum genome: features and impacts on biotechnological processes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2003, 62: 99-109. 10.1007/s00253-003-1328-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Kalinowski J, Bathe B, Bischoff N, Bott M, Burkovski A, Dusch N, Eggeling L, Eikmanns BJ, Gaigalat L, Goesmann A, Hartmann M, Huthmacher K, Krämer R, Linke B, McHardy AC, Meyer F, Möckel B, Pfefferle W, Pühler A, Rey D, Rückert C, Sahm H, Wendisch VF, Wiegräbe I, Tauch A: The complete Corynebacterium glutamicum ATCC 13032 genome sequence and its impact on the production of L-aspartate-derived amino acids and vitamins. J Biotechnol. 2003, 104: 5-25. 10.1016/S0168-1656(03)00154-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Wendisch VF: Genome-wide expression analysis in Corynebacterium glutamicum using DNA microarrays. J Biotechnol. 2003, 104: 273-285. 10.1016/S0168-1656(03)00147-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Strelkov S, von Elstermann M, Schomburg D: Comprehensive analysis of metabolites in Corynebacterium glutamicum by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Biol Chem. 2004, 385: 853-861. 10.1515/BC.2004.111.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Wittmann C, de Graaf AA: Metabolic flux analysis in Corynebacterium glutamicum. Handbook of Corynebacterium glutamicum. Edited by: Bott M, Eggeling L. 2005, CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, FL, 277-304.Google Scholar
  9. Schaffer S, Burkovski A: Genome-based approaches: proteomics. Handbook of Corynebacterium glutamicum. Edited by: Bott M, Eggeling L. 2005, CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, FL, 99-118.Google Scholar
  10. Burkovski A: Ammonium assimilation and nitrogen control in Corynebacterium glutamicum and its relatives: an example for new regulatory mechanisms in actinomycetes. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2003, 27: 617-628. 10.1016/S0168-6445(03)00067-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Burkovski A: I do it my way: Regulation of ammonium uptake and ammonium assimilation in Corynebacterium glutamicum. Arch Microbiol. 2003, 179: 83-88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Burkovski A: Nitrogen metabolism and its regulation. Handbook of Corynebacterium glutamicum. Edited by: Bott M, Eggeling L. 2005, CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, FL, 333-349.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Strösser J, Lüdke A, Schaffer S, Krämer R, Burkovski A: Regulation of GlnK activity: modification, membrane sequestration, and proteolysis as regulatory principles in the network of nitrogen control in Corynebacterium glutamicum. Mol Microbiol. 2004, 54: 132-147. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04247.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Engels S, Schweitzer J, Ludwig C, Bott M, Schaffer S: clpC and clpP1P2 gene expression in Corynebacterium glutamicum is controlled by a regulatory network involving the transcriptional regulators ClgR and HspR as well as the ECF sigma factor σH. Mol Microbiol. 2004, 52: 285-302. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2003.03979.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Gottesman S: Proteolysis in bacterial regulatory circuits. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2003, 19: 565-587. 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.19.110701.153228.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Sauer RT, Bolon DN, Burton BM, Burton RE, Flynn JM, Grant RA, Hersch GL, Joshi SA, Kenniston JA, Levchenko I, Neher SB, Oakes ESC, Siddiqui SM, Wah DA, Baker TA: Sculpting the proteome with AAA+ proteases and disassembly machines. Cell. 2004, 119: 9-18. 10.1016/j.cell.2004.09.020.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Begg KJ, Tomoyasu T, Donachie WD, Khattar M, Niki H, Yamanaka K, Hiraga S, Ogura T: Escherichia coli mutantY16 is a double mutant carrying thermosensitive ftsH and ftsI mutations. J Bacteriol. 1992, 174: 2516-2417.Google Scholar
  18. Deuerling E, Mogk A, Richter C, Purucker M, Schumann W: The ftsH gene of Bacillus subtilis is involved in major cellular processes such as sporulation, stress adaptation and secretion. Mol Microbiol. 1997, 23: 921-933. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.2721636.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lysenko E, Ogura T, Cutting SM: Characterization of the ftsH gene of Bacillus subtilis. Microbiology. 1997, 143: 971-978.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Fischer B, Rummel G, Aldrige P, Jenal U: The FtsH protease is involved in development, stress response and heat shock control in Caulobacter crescentus. Mol Microbiol. 2002, 44: 461-478. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02887.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hermann T, Finkemeier M, Pfefferle W, Wersch G, Krämer R, Burkovski A: Two-dimensional electrophoretic analysis of Corynebacterium glutamicum membrane fraction and surface proteins. Electrophoresis. 2000, 21: 654-659. 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2683(20000201)21:3<654::AID-ELPS654>3.0.CO;2-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Schaffer S, Weil B, Nguyen VD, Dongmann G, Günther K, Nickolaus M, Hermann T, Bott M: A high-resolution reference map for cytoplasmatic and membrane proteins of Corynebacterium glutamicum. Electrophoresis. 2001, 22: 4404-4422. 10.1002/1522-2683(200112)22:20<4404::AID-ELPS4404>3.0.CO;2-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Schluesener D, Fischer F, Kruip J, Rögner M, Poetsch A: Mapping the membrane proteome of Corynebacterium glutamicum. Proteomics. 2005, 5: 1317-1330. 10.1002/pmic.200400993.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kronemeyer W, Peekhaus N, Krämer R, Sahm H, Eggeling L: Structure of the gluABCD cluster encoding the glutamate uptake system of Corynebacterium glutamicum. J Bacteriol. 1995, 177: 1152-1158.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Rückert C, Pühler A, Kalinowski J: Genome-wide analysis of the L-methionine biosynthetic pathway in Corynebacterium glutamicum by targeted gene deletion and homologous complementation. J Biotechnol. 2003, 104: 213-228. 10.1016/S0168-1656(03)00158-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Silberbach M, Schäfer M, Hüser A, Kalinowski J, Pühler A, Krämer R, Burkovski A: Adaptation of Corynebacterium glutamicum to ammonium-limitation: a global analysis using transcriptome and proteome techniques. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005, 71: 2391-2402. 10.1128/AEM.71.5.2391-2402.2005.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Ito K, Akiyama Y: Cellular functions, mechanism of action, and regulation of FtsH protease. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2005, 59: 211-231. 10.1146/annurev.micro.59.030804.121316.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Cerdeno-Tarraga AM, Efstratiou A, Dover LG, Holden MTG, Pallen M, Bentley SD, Besra GS, Churcher C, James KD, De Zoysa A, Chillingworth T, Cronin A, Dowd L, Feltwell T, Hamlin N, Holroyd S, Jagels K, Moule S, Quail MA, Rabbinowitch E, Rutherford KM, Thomson NR, Unwin L, Whitehead S, Barrell BG, Parkhill J: The complete genome sequence and analysis of Corynebacterium diphtheriae NCTC13129. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31: 6516-6523. 10.1093/nar/gkg874.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Fudou R, Jojima Y, Seto A, Yamada K, Rimura E, Nakamatsu T, Hirashi A, Yamanaka S: Corynebacterium efficiens sp. Nov., a glutamic-acid-producing species from soil and plant material. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2002, 52: 1127-1131. 10.1099/ijs.0.02086-0.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Tauch A, Kaiser O, Hain T, Goesmann A, Weisshaar B, Albersmeier A, Bekel T, Bischoff N, Brune I, Chakraborty T, Kalinowski J, Meyer F, Rupp O, Schneiker S, Viehoever P, Pühler A: Complete genome sequence and analysis of the multiresistant nosocomial pathogen Corynebacterium jeikeium K411, a lipid-requiring bacterium of the human skin flora. J Bacteriol. 2005, 187: 4671-4682. 10.1128/JB.187.13.4671-4682.2005.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Zellmeier S, Zuber U, Schumann W, Wiegert T: The absence of FtsH metalloprotease activity causes overexpression of the sigmaW-controlled pbpE gene, resulting in filamentous growth of Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 2003, 185: 973-982. 10.1128/JB.185.3.973-982.2003.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Srinivasan R, Anilkumar G, Rajeswari H, Ajitkumar P: Functional characterization of AAA family FtsH protease of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2006, 259: 97-105. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00251.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Abe S, Takayama K, Kinoshita S: Taxonomical studies on glutamic acid-producing bacteria. J Gen Microbiol. 1967, 13: 279-301.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Keilhauer C, Eggeling L, Sahm H: Isoleucine synthesis in Corynebacterium glutamicum : molecular analysis of the ilvB-ilvN-ilvC operon. J Bacteriol. 1993, 175: 5595-5603.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T: Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. 1989, Cold Spring Habor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Habor, N.Y, 2Google Scholar
  36. Schägger H, von Jagow G: Tricine-sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel eletrophoresis for the separation of proteins in the range from 1 to 100 kDa. Anal Biochem. 1987, 166: 368-379. 10.1016/0003-2697(87)90587-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Hermann T, Wersch G, Uhlemann E-M, Schmid R, Burkovski A: Mapping and identification of Corynebacterium glutamicum proteins by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and microsequencing. Electrophoresis. 1998, 19: 3217-3221. 10.1002/elps.1150191827.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Dulley JR, Grieve PA: A simple technique for eliminating interference by detergent in the Lowry method of protein determination. Anal Biochem. 1975, 64: 136-141. 10.1016/0003-2697(75)90415-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Büttner K, Bernhardt J, Scharf C, Schmid R, Mäder U, Eymann C, Antelmann H, Völker A, Völker U, Hecker M: A comprehensive two-dimensional map of cytosolic proteins of Bacillus subtilis. Electrophoresis. 2001, 22: 2908-2935. 10.1002/1522-2683(200108)22:14<2908::AID-ELPS2908>3.0.CO;2-M.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Lüdke et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement