Skip to main content
Download PDF

Brucella suis urease encoded by ure 1 but not ure 2 is necessary for intestinal infection of BALB/c mice

BMC Microbiology volume 7, Article number: 57 (2007) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

In prokaryotes, the ureases are multi-subunit, nickel-containing enzymes that catalyze the hydrolysis of urea to carbon dioxide and ammonia. The Brucella genomes contain two urease operons designated as ure 1 and ure 2. We investigated the role of the two Brucella suis urease operons on the infection, intracellular persistence, growth, and resistance to low-pH killing.

Results

The deduced amino acid sequence of urease-α subunits of operons-1 and -2 exhibited substantial identity with the structural ureases of alpha- and beta-proteobacteria, Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, fungi, and higher plants. Four ure deficient strains were generated by deleting one or more of the genes encoding urease subunits of B. suis strain 1330 by allelic exchange: strain 1330Δure 1K (generated by deleting ureD and ureA in ure 1 operon), strain 1330Δure 2K (ureB and ureC in ure 2 operon), strain 1330Δure 2C (ureA, ureB, and ureC in ure 2 operon), and strain 1330Δure 1KΔure 2C (ureD and ureA in ure 1 operon and ureA, ureB, and ureC in ure 2 operon). When grown in urease test broth, strains 1330, 1330Δure 2K and 1330Δure 2C displayed maximal urease enzyme activity within 24 hours, whereas, strains 1330Δure 1K and 1330Δure 1KΔure 2C exhibited zero urease activity even 96 h after inoculation. Strains 1330Δure 1K and 1330Δure 1KΔure 2C exhibited slower growth rates in tryptic soy broth relative to the wild type strain 1330. When the BALB/c mice were infected intraperitoneally with the strains, six weeks after inoculation, the splenic recovery of the ure deficient strains did not differ from the wild type. In contrast, when the mice were inoculated by gavage, one week after inoculation, strain 1330Δure 1KΔure 2C was cleared from livers and spleens while the wild type strain 1330 was still present. All B. suis strains were killed when they were incubated in-vitro at pH 2.0. When the strains were incubated at pH 2.0 supplemented with 10 mM urea, strain 1330Δure 1K was completely killed, strain 1330Δure 2C was partially killed, but strains 1330 and 1330Δure 2K were not killed.

Conclusion

These findings suggest that the ure 1 operon is necessary for optimal growth in culture, urease activity, resistance against low-pH killing, and in vivo persistence of B. suis when inoculated by gavage. The ure 2 operon apparently enhances the resistance to low-pH killing in-vitro.

Background

A number of environmentally and medically important bacteria produce the enzyme urease (urea amidohydrolase) [1], which catalyzes the hydrolysis of urea, leading to the production of carbamate and ammonia. In an aqueous environment, the carbamate rapidly and spontaneously decomposes to yield a second molecule of ammonia and one of carbonic acid. The carbonic acid equilibrates in water, as do the two molecules of ammonia, which become protonated to yield ammonium hydroxide ions. The reaction results in an increased pH of the environment [reviewed in [2–5]]. In sites where microorganisms colonize epithelial surfaces, such as the normal flora of the oral cavity or intestines, or when certain pathogenic bacteria infect tissues, the metabolism of urea by microbial ureases can have a profound impact on tissue integrity, microbial ecology, and the overall health of the host.

The ureases of most microbes are composed of three subunits α, β, and γ that are encoded by ureA, ureB and ureC genes respectively. The plant jack bean produces a single-subunit urease [12], whereas, in gastroduodenal pathogen H. pylori, the ureA and ureB genes are sufficient to encode urease. Nevertheless the UreAB subunits of H. pylori can be aligned with the UreABC subunits of other ureolytic bacteria and with the single polypeptide of the jack bean urease. The crystal structure of the Klebsiella aerogenes urease reveals a trimeric configuration [13]. Biochemical analyses of ureases by gel filtration have shown that other bacterial ureases are multimeric and probably have similar stoichiometry [4].

Ureases are structurally complex enzymes, and additional urease subunits are required for the production of a catalytically active holoenzyme in-vivo. Ureases are among the few enzymes that require nickel for activity. Biogenesis of a functional urease in prokaryotes requires the presence and expression of four urease accessory genes, ureDEFG. In vitro experiments using purified accessory proteins support the idea that UreE likely acts as a carrier of nickel [14] and that UreDFG form a chaperone-like complex that keeps the apoenzyme in a configuration competent to accept nickel [15].

Urease activity can be a critical factor in the colonization, persistence and pathogenesis of bacteria. Considering the products produced by urease, it would be logical to assume that one of the enzyme's functions is to allow nitrogen assimilation. In fact, urea represents an assimilable nitrogen source for bacteria that can colonize the human body and there is evidence suggesting that ammonia assimilation from urea occurs in-vivo. A significant proportion of the urea produced in the liver ends up in the intestines, where it can be hydrolyzed and assimilated by several different species of anaerobic, ureolytic bacteria [3]. Similarly, the oral bacterium, Actinomyces naeslundii can use urea as a primary nitrogen source for growth [6]. So there is little doubt that nitrogen acquisition as the result of urease activity can be important in the ecology of complex populations colonizing the human body. However, it is an open question as to whether the capacity to assimilate ammonia produced by urease contributes to the pathogenic potential of bacteria. Instead, it appears that the release of the strongly alkaline ammonia released by urease is a major cause of the damage to the host tissue, and in some cases, a key factor in persistence of pathogens [reviewed in [2]]. Jubier-Maurin et al., (30) identified the nikABCDE operon encoding the specific transport system for nickel in B. suis. Insertional inactivation of nikA strongly reduced the activity of the nickel metalloenzyme urease, which was restored by addition of nickel excess. Intracellular growth rates of the B. suis wild-type and nikA mutant strains in human monocytes were similar, indicating that nikA was not essential for this type of infection.

The Brucellae are gram-negative, facultative intracellular bacterial pathogens of a wide range of vertebrates [7]. This pathogen is the etiologic agent of the disease brucellosis and the pathological manifestations of brucellosis include abortion and sterility in animals [7], and meningitis, endocarditis, spondylitis and arthritis in humans [8]. Paulsen et al., [9] annotated the genome of B. suis strain 1330 (biovar 1), and discovered that unlike many other organisms, Brucella have two urease gene operons located on chromosome I (GenBank accession no. NC_004310). Urease activity is important for the nitrogen assimilation and persistence of other bacterial species like Helicobacter pylori [10, 11]. We investigated the role of the two B. suis urease operons on the infection, intracellular persistence, growth, and resistance to low-pH killing. We report that the B. suis ure 1 operon, in contrast to ure 2, appears to be principally responsible for determining urease activity, optimum growth and resistance to low-pH killing in-vitro and persistence in-vivo.

Results

Organization, and nucleotide and amino acid sequences of urease genes

The ure 1 and ure 2 operons are located on the chromosome I of B. suis strain 1330 (GenBank accession number NC_004310). The ure 1 operon is 5284-bp long and composed of seven coding sequences (CDS). The ure 2 operon is 6571-bp long and comprised eight CDS (Figure 1). The ureA gene was the same in size in both operons (302-bp). All the other genes of ure 2 operon were slightly longer than their counterparts in ure 1 operon. The ureC gene was the longest in each operon (1712-bp in operon-1 and 1721-bp in operon-2). The G+C content of each ure gene was compared with that of its counterpart of the other operon and found not differ substantially between ure genes of operon-1 and operon-2 (Table 1). The identity of each ure gene was compared with that of its counterpart of the other operon. The ureA, ureB, ureC, and ureG genes of the two operons exhibited 52 to 60% identity, whereas the ureD, ureE, and ureF genes did not share significant identity (Table 1).

Table 1 Sequence identities between the two B. suis urease operons
Full size table
Figure 1
figure 1

The schematic representations of the ure operons with corresponding Ure subunits, and deletion sites of mutant strains 1330Δure 1K, 1330Δure 2K and 1330Δure 2C. A: ure 1 operon. B: ure 2 operon. The numbers represent the location of the genes in the chromosome I.

Full size image

The deduced amino acid sequences encoded by the ureA, ureB, and ureC genes in both operons displayed great identity with the structural urease subunits of a vast range of organisms including Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria, photosynthetic bacteria, fungi, and higher plants (see Table 5). For instance, urease subunits of other organisms exhibited up to 81% identity with the UreC of ure 1 and up to 69% identity with the UreC of ure 2. The ureases of alpha and beta-proteobacteria exhibited the greatest identity with UreC of operon-1, whereas, the ureases of all species of Yersinia exhibited the greatest identity with the UreC of operon-2.

Real-time PCR assays produced amplicons in sizes exactly similar to the expected sizes for each ure gene (data not shown). The UreB subunit in the ure 2 operon contains a predicted hydrophobic signal sequence and suggests that the subunit may localize in the periplasmic space. All other Ure subunits lack any signal sequences and were predicted to localize in the cytoplasm (data not shown).

Genomic characterization of generated mutant B. suis strains

Four mutant B. suis strains were generated by allelic exchange, i.e., 1330Δure 1K, 1330Δure 2K, 1330Δure 2C, and 1330Δure 1KΔure 2C. The PCR assays produced a predicted 2.2-kb amplicon from the wild type B. suis strain 1330 and an approximately 3.2-kb amplicon from the mutant strain 1330Δure 1Kwith the ureONE-Forward and ureONE-Reverse primers (see Table 6); a predicted 2.2-kb-size amplicon from the strain 1330 and an approximately 2.8-kb product from strain1330Δure 2K with ureTWO-Forward and ureTWo-Reverse primers; and a predicted 2.9-kb-sizeamplicon from the strain 1330 and an approximately 3.4-kb product from strain1330Δure 2C with primers Ure-2-AB-Forward and Ure-2-AB-Reverse. The PCR assays with the primer pairs ureONE-Forward/ureONE-Reverse and Ure-2-AB-Forward/Ure-2-AB-Reverse confirmed that the double-mutant strain 1330Δure 1KΔure 2C carried a 575-bp deletion from the ure1DA region and a 1.2-kb deletion from the ure2ABC region (Figures 1A and 1B).

Expression of urease, urease enzyme activity and growth rates of B. suis strains

Native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis revealed urease activity at approximately 95-kDa from strains 1330, 1330Δure 2K and 1330Δure 2C, but not from strains 1330Δure 1K or 1330Δure 1KΔure 2C (Figure 2).

Figure 2
figure 2

Native 8% polyacrylamide gel assay with B. suis extracts. Lanes-1: ladder; 2: B. suis strain 1330Δure 1K; 3: strain 1330Δure 2K; 4: strain 1330Δure 2C; 5: strain 1330Δure 1KΔure 2C; and 6: strain 1330.

Full size image

In a quantitative urease assay, mutants 1330Δure 1K and 1330Δure 1KΔure 2C exhibited 0 activity, the wild type and the mutant 1330Δure 2K displayed maximal activity, and mutant 1330Δure 2C showed slightly reduced activity (Table 2). In qualitative urease assay, urease test broth started turning positive within 4 h after either strain 1330, 1330Δure 2K, or 1330Δure 2C were introduced, and acquired a bright pink color after approximately 24 h (Figure 3 and Table 2). In contrast, strains 1330Δure 1K and 1330Δure 1KΔure 2C failed to cause a pink color in the urease test broth even after 96 h of incubation (Figure 3 and Table 2).

Table 2 B. suis strains: generation time (doubling time, h) in TSB and urease activity in urease test broth.
Full size table
Figure 3
figure 3

Urease test broth 24 hours after inoculation with B. suis strains. Tube-1: strain 1330 (positive), 2: 1330Δure 1K (negative), and 3: 1330Δure2 K (positive).

Full size image

Strains 1330Δure 1K and 1330Δure 1KΔure 2C, both urease negative, grew approximately 25% slower than wild type strain 1330. In contrast, strains 1330Δure 2K and 1330Δure 2C, both urease positive, did not display any measurable differences in growth rate compared to strain 1330 (Table 2).

Survival of B. suis strains in macrophage cell lines

When used to infect J774A.1 or H36.12a [Pixie 12a] mouse macrophage cell lines, the recovery of all the B. suis strains declined 2–3 log10 cfu between 0 and 4 h post-inoculation. During the next 20 h, all the B. suis strains increased 1–2 log10 cfu. There were no significant differences between the wild type and the urease mutant strains in terms of their ability to replicate in macrophages (data not shown).

Survival of B. suis strains in BALB/c mice

Following an intraperitoneal inoculation, the recovery of ure mutants from spleens did not differ from the wild type strain at 6 wks post-infection (Table 3). When the mice were inoculated by gavage, one week after inoculation, strain 1330 was recovered from spleens (Figure 4) as well as from livers (Figure 5). When the mice were inoculated with strain 1330 supplemented with 10 mM urea, nearly 2.2 log10 greater cfu was recovered from spleens and nearly 3.5 log10 greater cfu was recovered from livers. However, when the mice were inoculated with strain 1330Δure 1KΔure 2C, with or without urea supplementation, no cfu were recovered from spleens (Figure 4) but nearly 2.5 log10 cfu was recovered from livers only when the inoculum was supplemented with 10 mM urea (Figure 5).

Table 3 Splenic recovery of B. suis strains six weeks after intraperitoneal inoculation in BALB/c mice
Full size table
Figure 4
figure 4

Recovery of Brucella cfu from spleens one week after BALB/c mice were inoculated by gavage with wild type strain 1330 or strain 1330Δure 1KΔure 2C with or without urea supplementation. P value for the difference among mean values was <0.01. The mean values that share the same symbol do not differ from one another significantly; and the mean values designated by different symbols differ from one another significantly.

Full size image
Figure 5
figure 5

Recovery of Brucella cfu from livers one week after BALB/c mice were inoculated by gavage with the wild type strain 1330 or strain 1330Δure 1KΔure 2C with or without urea supplementation. P value for the difference among mean values was <0.025. The mean values that share the same symbol do not differ one another significantly; and the mean values designated by different symbols differ one another significantly.

Full size image

Resistance of B. suis strains against low-pH killing

The wild type and the ure mutants did not differ with respect to the survival after 90 min incubation at pH 4.0 or 7.0 (data not shown). All the strains including the wild type were killed when incubated at pH 2.0 for 90 min (Figure 6). When the strains were supplemented with 5 mM urea during incubation at pH 2.0, more than 6.0 log10 cfu of strains 1330 and 1330Δure 2K were recovered. In comparison to strain 1330, the recovery of the strain 1330Δure 2C was nearly 1.5 log10 lower at 5 mM urea concentration and nearly 1.0 log10 lower at 10 mM urea. In contrast to strains 1330, 1330Δure 2K and 1330Δure 2C, strain 1330Δure 1K was not recovered after incubation at pH 2.0 supplemented at any urea concentration (Figure 6). Addition of urea did not change the pH of the incubation media.

Figure 6
figure 6

Survival of B. suis strains 1330, 1330Δure 1K, 1330Δure 2K, and 1330Δure 2C after incubation at pH 2.0 with or without urea. At each urea concentration, the P value for the difference among mean cfu was <0.005. At each urea concentration, the mean values designated by different symbols differ one from another significantly; and the mean values that share the same symbol do not differ one from another significantly.

Full size image

Discussion

The ure A, ure B, and ure C genes of B. suis (Figure 1) encode the γ, β, and α subunits respectively, and the urease holoenzyme of B. suis is likely to be assembled in a trimeric configuration. The total predicted mass of the B. suis urease holoenzyme (UreA+B+C) is 91-kDa. The native polyacrylamide gel reveals urease activity at approximately 95-kDa (Figure 2) and supports a trimeric configuration of this enzyme. The Brucella genome also contains ure DEFG genes (Figure 1) in each of ure 1 and ure 2 operons and are predicted to produce the UreD, UreE, UreF and UreG proteins. Unlike many other microorganisms, Brucella contains two operons encoding urease subunits (Figure 1) located on the chromosome I. Based on the similarities of G+C contents among genes in ure1 and ure2 operons, it is unlikely that any of the operons were acquired by horizontal gene transfer. The genes of the ure 1 operon shared less than 60% identity with their counterparts of the ure 2 operon (Table 1). In particular, the ureE and ureF genes of the ure 1 operon did not share considerable similarity with those genes in the ure 2 operon. Based on the relatively low identity among genes between ure 1 and ure 2 operons, it seems unlikely that they were the result of a recent duplication event. However, further analyses are required to confirm these predictions.

We generated a series of mutants by disrupting the first few genes encoding structural subunits of each urease. All seven genes of ure1 operon appear to be transcribed in a single direction. The gaps between individual ure genes are extremely small (Figure 1), so that all or most of the genes are possibly expressed under a single, common promoter – leading to a polycistronic mRNA. The ure G is the last gene of the ure1 operon. All three genes downstream of the ure G are transcribed in the opposite direction, from the complementary strand (Figure 1). The closest non-ure gene to ureG encodes an Arg-tRNA. The genes downstream of this tRNA gene encode a serine histidine kinase (CDS Shk) and a hypothetical protein. The distance from the stop codon of ureG to the stop codon of Arg-tRNA (transcribed in opposite direction) is 124-bp. Thus it does not seem likely that the insertion of the antibiotic resistance gene into ure1 influences the expression of genes downstream of the operon. In addition, it is not apparent that these genes have any regulatory role on urease expression.

The deletion of genes within the ure 1 operon caused the disappearance of urease activity on a native polyacrylamide gel (Figure 2). Even though the ure2 operon was present in the ure1 mutant, it failed to produce urease activity as measured by either of two assays. In addition, a disruption of the ure2 operon did not have any impact on production of a detectable urease activity.

The deletion of genes within the ure 1 operon caused the slower growth and loss of urease activity (Table 2) suggesting that the genes are necessary for maximal growth and urease activity of B. suis. Strains 1330Δure 2K and 1330Δure 2C made by deleting genes of ure 2 operon did not display any change in growth rate or urease activity, suggesting that the genes of ure 2 operon are not required for these functions. Overall, B. suis is apparently capable of exhibiting urease activity even without involvement of ure 2 operon. This observation raises the question as to whether the genes within ure 2 are actually being expressed. Our measurements using RT-PCR of RNA extracted from B. suis 1330 cultured in TSB (data not shown) suggest that all the genes in ure 2 are being expressed. It is apparent that much more work will have to be done to determine the role of the ure 2 operon. Except for a detectable role in resistance to acidic pH in-vitro, there were no other detectable phenotypes associated with the ure 2 mutants under the various conditions employed. One obvious question is whether there is any post-translational interaction going on between the subunits of both ure operons. Given that there is no urease activity in an ure 1 mutant, it is possible to conclude that the corresponding Ure2 subunits are not acting to restore Ure1 activity.

In addition to the ureolytic bacteria [3] that can use urea as a primary nitrogen source for growth, the urinary tract pathogen Ureaplasma ureolyticum [16] and some alkalophilic bacteria [17] can use ureolysis to generate ATP. Urea, particularly at millimolar concentrations can readily enter the cell [4]. Thus, in bacteria that utilize urea for nitrogen assimilation or ATP generation, the urease activity is expected to occur intracellularly. In most organisms, the ureases are found in the cytoplasm, although there is a report of urease membrane association and cell surface localization as well [4]. The ureases for which primary sequence information is available do not have characteristics consistent with being integral membrane proteins or secreted through the general secretory pathways. Consistent with the ureases of other bacteria, the deduced B. suis ure encoded subunits (with exception of UreB encoded by the ure 2 operon) are predicted to localize in the cell cytoplasm (data not shown). Thus it may be possible that urease functions within the cytoplasm in order to assimilate nitrogen. Further work is needed to characterize the exact location of urease subunits and whether they play a role in nitrogen uptake.

The ure mutants did not exhibit any decline in persistence in BALB/c mice when inoculated intraperitoneally (Table 3), suggesting that the urease activity is not critical once the pathogen has entered the host. Using ure mutants of Bordetella bronchiseptica, Monack and Falkow [18] reported that urease is not essential for the colonization of the guinea-pig respiratory and digestive tracts. One of the common ways that humans acquire brucellosis is through consumption of contaminated milk. Brucella needs to have a mechanism to resist the low-pH killing in the gastrointestinal tract. When the mice were inoculated by gavage, the wild type strain was recovered from livers and spleens, whereas, strain 1330Δure 1KΔure 2C was not. It is noteworthy that when the infecting doses of B. suis were supplemented with urea, the recovery of strain 1330 from livers and spleens was increased, but the mutant strain 1330Δure 1KΔure 2C was recovered only from livers. These findings suggest that the urease activity and sufficient substrate is needed for B. suis to cope with the low pH in the gastrointestinal tract i.e. either stomach or upper intestine. Similar observations have been recently reported by Sangari et al., [37] in ure-mutant strains of B. abortus. Thus, similar to the urease of H. pylori [10, 11], that of B. suis appears to be a factor in coping with the pH of the gastrointestinal tract. Even though the ure1, ure2 mutant B. suis exhibited no urease activity, urea supplementation raised the recovery of this strain from livers. This is possible because other bacterial species in stomach and gastro-intestinal tract may have utilized the supplemented urea to reduce the acidity and facilitated enhanced survival of Brucella. It is worth noting that inoculation via an oral route versus direct inoculation in the stomach may be more representative of a natural infection. However, we chose to deliver a known dose of Brucella and measure uptake through the gastro-intestinal tract (i.e., into the spleen and liver).

For an intracellular bacterium like Brucella that replicates inside phagocytic cells associated with the various tissues including the reproductive tract [19], urease may not be important for regulating the pH in an intracellular milieu. Correspondingly, the lack of differences between wild type and ure mutants inoculated intraperitoneally during splenic clearance was not surprising (Table 3). Nevertheless, in the case of H. pylori and perhaps other organisms, urease is an important factor in survival in severely acidified environments, probably because neutralization of the extracellular milieu around the cells is needed to prevent irreversible membrane damage. Acidification and subsequent alkalinization in the phagosomal compartment is a prerequisite for a successful Brucella infection in-vitro [20]. However, the amount of urea present in macrophages maybe low enough as not to cause a significant pH change. As such, the impact of urease activity on macrophage pH can be considered insignificant, and therefore, similar survival rates in macrophages between wild-type and ure mutants was not unexpected.

Conclusion

The B. suis genome contains two operons encoding urease. The genes in the ure 1 operon are important for optimal growth in culture, and indispensable for urease activity, resistance to low-pH killing and survival of the pathogen when inoculated by gavage. The genes in the ure 2 operon seem to be dispensable for the above functions, but slightly enhance the resistance to low-pH killing measured in-vitro. The apparent lack of urease activity encoded by ure2 is consistent with the observation by Hooper and Berg who reviewed over 20 microbial genomes with respect to gene innovation following gene duplication (38). They concluded that most gene copies are deleted but of the ones retained, they function in weak or ancillary roles. Thus it is possible that ure 2 in B. suis is diverged enough to encode a new function that has yet to be defined.

Methods

DNA and protein sequence analyses

The nucleotide sequence of the urease genes was analyzed with DNASTAR software (DNASTAR, Inc., Madison, Wis.). The destination of the deduced proteins upon translation and processing was predicted using the Subloc v1.0 server of the Institute of Bioinformatics of the Tsinghua University http://www.bioinfo.tsinghua.edu.cn/. Identity of the ureA, ureB, and ureC genes of B. suis ure1 and ure2 operons with sequences of the EMBL/GenBank/DDBJ databases was analyzed using the BLAST software [22] at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (Bethesda, MD).

Bacterial strains, plasmids, and reagents

B. suis strain 1330 was obtained from our culture collection. Escherichia coli strain Top10 (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, Calif.) was used for producing plasmid constructs. E. coli were grown in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth or on LB agar (Difco Laboratories, Sparks, MD). Brucella were grown either in Trypticase soy broth(TSB) or on Trypticase soy agar (TSA) plates (Difco) at 37°C in the presence of 5% CO2 as previously described [23]. Theplasmids used in this study are listed in Table 4. Bacteria containing plasmids were grown in the presence of ampicillinor kanamycin at a 100-μg/ml concentration (Table 4).

Table 4 Description of the plasmids and bacterial strains used in this study
Full size table

All experiments with live Brucella were performed in a Biosafety Level 3 facility in the Infectious Disease Unit of the Virginia-Maryland Regional College of Veterinary Medicine per standard operating procedures approved by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Recombinant DNA methods

Genomic DNA was isolated from B. suis strain 1330 by use ofa QIAGEN blood and tissue DNA kit (QIAGEN Inc., Valencia, CA). Plasmid DNA was isolated using either plasmid Mini- or Midiprep purification kits (QIAGEN). Restriction digests, Klenow reactions, and ligations of DNA were performed as described elsewhere [24]. Restriction enzymes, Klenow fragment, and T4 DNA ligase enzyme were purchased from Promega Corporation (Madison, WI). Ligated plasmid DNAwas transformed into E. coli Top10 cells by heat shock per the guidelines of the supplier (Invitrogen). Plasmid DNA was electroporated into B. suis with a BTX ECM-600electroporator (BTX, San Diego, CA), as described previously[25].

Mutation of ure 1 operon

A 2,241-bp region including the whole length of the ure1D, ure1A, and ure1B genes and a portion of ure1C gene (Figure 1) was amplified via PCR using the genomic DNA of B. suis strain 1330 and the primers UreaseONE-Forward and UreaseONE-Reverse (RansomHill Bioscience, Inc., Ramona, CA) (see Table 6). The amplified gene fragment was cloned into the pCR2.1 vector of the TA cloning system (Invitrogen) to produce plasmid pCRure1. From this plasmid the ure1 region was isolated by EcoR I digestion and cloned into pGEM-3Z (Promega) and the resulting 5.0-kb plasmid was designated pGEMure1. The suicide vector pGEMure1 K was constructed as follows: the plasmid pGEMure1 was digested with Nco I to delete a 575-bp region from the ure1 region. The Nco I sites on the 4.4-kb plasmid were filled in by reaction with Klenow enzyme and ligated to the1.6-kb Pvu II fragment of pUC4K (also blunt ended) containing the Tn903 npt gene [26], which confers kanamycin resistance(Kanr) to B. suis. The resulting suicide vector was designated pGEMure1 K. The E. coli Top10 cells carrying the recombinant plasmid were picked from TSA plates containing kanamycin (100 μg/ml).

One ug of pGEMure1 K was used to electroporate B. suis strain 1330; several colonies of strain 1330 were obtained from a TSA plate containing kanamycin (100 μg/ml). These colonies were streaked on TSA plates containing ampicillin (100 μg/ml) to determine whether a single- or double-crossover event had occurred. Five of the colonies did not grow on ampicillin-containingplates, suggesting that a double-crossover event had occurred. PCR with the primers UreaseONE-Forward and UreaseONE-Reverse (see Table 6) confirmed that a double-crossover event had taken place in all five transformants. One of these strains was chosen for further analyses and designated 1330Δure 1K.

Mutation of ure2B and ure2C

A 2,214-bp region including the whole length of the ure2A and ure2B genes, and a portion of the ure2C gene was amplified via PCR using the primers UreaseTWO-Forward and ureaseTWO-Reverse (see Table 6). The amplified gene fragment was cloned into the pCR2.1 vector to produce plasmid pCRure2ABC. From this plasmid, the ure2 ABC region was isolated by BamH I and Xba I digestion and cloned into the same sites of plasmid pGEM-3Z (Promega). The resulting 5.0-kb plasmid was designated pGEMure2 ABC. The suicide vector pGEMure2 ABCK was constructed as follows: the plasmid pGEMure2 ABC was digested with Sac II to delete a 940-bp region from the ure2 ABC region, sticky sites filled in with Klenow enzyme, and ligated to the 1.6-kb Pvu II fragment of pUC4K. The resulting suicide vector was designated pGEMure2 ABCK. One microgram of pGEMure2 ABCK was used to electroporate B. suis strain 1330, and a transformed strain containing a double-crossover event was verified by PCR and designated 1330Δure 2K.

Mutation of ure2A, ure2B and ure2C

A 2,923-bp region including the whole length of ure2 A and ure2 B genes, and a portion of ure2 C gene (Figure 1) was amplified via PCR using the primers Ure-2-AB-Forward and Ure-2-AB-reverse (see Table 6). The amplified gene fragment was purified using a Qiagen PCR purification kit (Qiagen), digested with BamH I and Xba I, cloned into the same sites of plasmid pGEM-3Z (Promega) to produce the 5.7-kb plasmid pGEMure2 ABC-2. The suicide vector pGEMure2 ABCC was constructed as follows: the plasmid pGEMure2 ABC-2 was digested with Cla I and Mfe I to delete a 1215-bp region from the ure2 ABC region, and the ends were filled in with Klenow enzyme. The 1.7-kb gene encoding resistance to chloramphenicol (Cmr) was isolated by digesting the plasmid pBBR1MCS [27] with Eco52 I plus Kpn I, and the ends were filled in with Klenow enzyme. The larger fragment of the plasmid pGEMure2 ABC-2 was ligated with the Cmr gene, to make the suicide vector pGEMure2 ABCC. One ug of pGEMure2 ABCC was used to electroporate B. suis strain 1330 and the transformants were picked from TSA plates containing chloramphenicol (30 μg/ml). A transformed B. suis strain with a double-crossover event was verified by PCR and designated 1330Δure 2C.

Generation of an ure1, ure2 strain

One ug of suicide vector pGEMure2 ABCC was used to electroporate mutant B. suis strain 1330Δure 1K. The transformants were picked from TSA plates containing kanamycin (100 μg/ml) plus chloramphenicol (30 μg/ml). A transformant B. suis strain with a double-crossover event was verified by PCR and designated 1330Δure 1KΔure 2C.

Real-time PCR assays

RNA was isolated from broth cultures of B. suis strain 1330 by the procedure described previously [31]. After a 75% ethanol wash, the dried RNA pellet was resuspended in RNase- and DNase-free water (Sigma). The concentration of the RNA was be determined with the RiboGreen RNA Quantitation kit (Molecular Probes). Genomic DNA was digested with RNase-free DNase (Ambion), and precipitated with GlycoBlue (Ambion). RNA samples not treated with reverse transcriptase was also subjected to PCR to measure the level of contamination from genomic DNA. For each RNA sample, the control transcript (sig A) and the target mRNA were reverse-transcribed using the ReverTra Dash kit (Toyobo). The cDNA was amplified using the Light Cycler (Roche) in conjunction with the DNA Master SYBR Green I kit (Roche). Primers specific for the internal standard of ure genes were purchased from Sigma-Genosys. The target cDNA was normalized internally to the sigA cDNA level in the same sample [32, 33].

Growth rates of B. suis

Single colonies of strains 1330, 1330Δure 1K, 1330Δure 2K, 1330Δure 2C and 1330Δure 1KΔure 2C were grown at 37°C for 72 h to stationary phase in 5 ml of TSB. These cultures were used to inoculate 25 ml of TSB in a Klett side-arm flask to 12 to 16 Klett units. Cultures were grown at 37°C at 200 rpm; Klett readings were recorded every 2 h in a Klett-Summerson colorimeter (New York, NY).

Native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

Extracts were prepared from B. suis strains 1330,1330Δure 1K, 1330Δure 2K, 1330Δure 2C and 1330Δure 1KΔure 2C using glass beads and vortex, in Tris-HCl 30 mM, pH 8.0). Buffer without SDS or mercaptoethanol were added to the extracts and the extracts were loaded into the gel that did not contain SDS. After running was complete, the gel was placed in 0.02% cresol red-0.1 EDTA, washed several times until it became yellow, and incubated with 1.5% urea at room temperature until pink bands appeared, i.e., the positive urease reaction.

Urease enzyme activity of strains-qualitative

Fifty μl of culture (grown for 72 h in TSB) volumes of strains 1330, 1330Δure 1K, 1330Δure 2K, 1330Δure 2C and 1330Δure 1KΔure 2C were used to inoculate 5 ml volumes of urease test broth (Difco). The contents were incubated at 37°C with 200 rpm shaking. At 8, 24 and 48 hours after incubation, the cultures were centrifuged to remove the cells. The color change in the clarified urease test broth was measured using a Klett-Summerson colorimeter. The native color of the urease test broth was used as a blank.

Urease enzyme activity of strains-quantitative

The Coomassie Brilliant Blue G, TRIS, NADPH, 2-oxoglutarate and glutamate dehydrogenase (from bovine liver) were from Sigma-Aldrich. Urea was obtained from Qiagen. All other reagents were of analytical grade.

The concentration of protein in the extracts was determined using a Bradford-modified assay [34]. All assays (final volume of 2 mL) were performed in 31 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0 buffer at 28°C, using a Beckman DU 800 UV/Vis spectrophotometer, with a stirred, temperature-controlled multi-cell holder. Urease activity was determined using a coupled assay with glutamate dehydrogenase [35] Glutamate dehydrogenase 12 U/mL was incubated with 250 μM NADPH for 5 min. 2-Oxoglutarate (1 mM) and B. suis extracts were added and the reaction was followed at 340 nm. The observed decrease in absorbance monitored during this period is due to nonspecific oxidation of NADPH by several enzymes in the extract. When the absorbance was stable, urea (10 mM) was added and the decrease in absorbance at 340 due to urease activity was measured for 5 min. Initial rates were calculated from the linear portion of the curves, by linear regression using the least squares method. The absorption coefficient used for NADPH was 6.22 M-1cm-1 [36]. The volume of extracts was varied and the specific activity of urease was calculated. One unit of urease activity was defined as the amount of enzyme that hydrolyzes 1 μmol of urea per min. Specific activities were calculated as units of urease per mg of protein in the extract.

Preparation of B. suis infection innocula

TSA plates were inoculated with single colonies of B. suis strains. After 4 days of incubation at 37°C with 5% CO2, the cells were harvested from plates, washed with phosphate-buffered saline(PBS), resuspended in 20% glycerol, and frozen at -80°C. The number of viable cells or cfu was determined by counting after spreading of dilutions of the cell suspensions on TSA that were incubated at 37C with 5% CO2. The cultures from these were used to inoculate mice and macrophages as described below.

Persistence of recombinant B. suis strains in macrophages

The mouse macrophage-like cell lines J774 and H36.12a [Pixie 12a] were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). The macrophage cells were seeded at a density of 5 × 105/ml in Dulbecco's modified essential medium (DMEM) (Sigma-Aldrich) into 24-well tissue culture dishes and cultured at 37°C with 5% CO2 until confluent. The tissue culture medium was removed, 200 μl (108 cells) of the bacterial suspension in PBS was added, and the cells were incubated at 37°C for 4 h. The suspension above the cell monolayer was removed, and the macrophages washed three times with PBS. One milliliter of DMEM containing 25 μg of gentamicin was added, and the cells were incubated for 48 h at 37°C. At various time points (0, 1, 4, 24, and 48 h of incubation), the growth medium was removed, the cells were washed with PBS, and 500 μl of 0.25% sodium deoxycholate was added to lyse the infected macrophages. After 5 min the lysate was diluted in PBS, and the number of B. suis cfu was determined after growth at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 72 h on TSA. Triplicate samples were taken at all time points, and the assay was repeated two times.

Survival of B. suis strains inoculated intraperitoneally

The Animal Care Committee of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University approved the procedures used in handling research animals. Six-week-old female BALB/c mice (Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, MA) were allowed 1 week of acclimatization. Groups of seven or eight mice each were intraperitoneally injected with 4.1 to 5.2 log10 cfu of B. suis strains 1330,1330Δure 1K, 1330Δure 2K, 1330Δure 2C and 1330Δure 1KΔure 2C. Six weeks after inoculation, mice were killed using CO2 asphixiation, and the Brucella cfu per spleen determined as described previously [23]. Briefly, spleens were collected and homogenized in TSB. Serial dilutions of each splenic homogenate were plated on TSA and the number ofcfu was determined after 4 days of incubation at 37°C with 5% CO2.

Survival of B. suis strains in spleens and liver when inoculated by gavage

Groups of seven to eight BALB/c mice each were dosed by gavage with 8.6 log10 cfu of B. suis strain 1330 or strain 1330Δure 1KΔure 2C, with or without supplementation of 10 mM urea in approximately 0.5 ml PBS. Mice were sacrificed 1 week after inoculation, and the Brucella cfu per spleen or per liver was determined as described previously [23].

In-vitro pH sensitivity of strains

The pH of the phosphate buffered saline (PBS) was adjusted to 2, 4 or 7 by adding 1N HCl. The urea concentration of the PBS was adjusted to 5, 10, or 20 mM by adding urea. The PBS with different pH and urea contents were inoculated with 8.0 log10 cfu of strains 1330,1330Δure 1K, 1330Δure 2K or 1330Δure 2C, and incubated at 37°C. At the end of 90 min incubation, serial dilutions of each culture were plated on TSA. The number of cfu on plates was determined after 4 days of incubation at 37°C with 5% CO2.

Data analyses

The mean and the standard deviation values from the mouse tissue clearance studies were calculated using the Microsoft Excel 2001 program (Microsoft Corporation). The Student t test was performed in the analysis of cfu data in the macrophage study. The cfu data from the splenic and liver clearance studies, and in vitro pH sensitivity study were analyzed by performing analysis of variance. The mean cfu counts among treatments were compared using the least-significance pair-wise comparison procedure [29].

References

  1. Collins CM, D'Orazio SEF: Bacterial ureases: structure, regulation of expression and role in pathogenesis [Review]. Mol Microbiol. 1993, 9: 907-913. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1993.tb01220.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Burne RA, Chen YM: Bacterial ureases in infectious diseases. Microbes and Infection. 2000, 2 (5): 533-542. 10.1016/S1286-4579(00)00312-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. McLean RJC, Nickel JC, Cheng KJ, Costerton JW: The ecology and pathogenicity of urease-producing bacteria in the urinary tract [Review]. Crit Rev Microbiol. 1988, 16: 37-79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mobley HLT, Hausinger RP: Microbial ureases: significance, regulation, and molecular characterization [Review]. Microbiol Rev. 1989, 53: 85-108.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mobley HLT, Island MD, Hausinger RP: Molecular biology of microbial ureases [Review]. Microbiol Rev. 1995, 59: 451-480.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Morou-Bermudez E, Burne RA: Genetic and physiologic characterization of urease of Actinomyces naeslundii. Infect Immun. 1999, 67: 504-512.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Corbel MJ, Brinley Morgan WJ: Genus Brucella Meyer and Shaw 173AL. Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. Edited by: Krieg NR, Holt JG. 1920, Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, Md, 1: 377-390.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ko J, Splitter GA: Molecular Host-Pathogen Interaction in Brucellosis: Current Understanding and Future Approaches to Vaccine Development for Mice and Humans. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2003, 16 (1): 65-78. 10.1128/CMR.16.1.65-78.2003.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Paulson IT, Sheshadri R, Nelson KE: The Brucella suis genome reveals fundamental similarities between animal and plant pathogens and symbionts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002, 99: 13148-13153. 10.1073/pnas.192319099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen G, Fournier RL, Varanasi S, Mahama-Relue PA: Helicobacter pylori survival in gastric mucosa by generation of a pH gradient. Biophys J. 1997, 73: 1081-1088.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Scott DR, Weeks D, Hong C, Postius S, Melchers K, Sachs G: The role of internal urease in acid resistance of Helicobacter pylori. Gastroenterology. 1998, 114: 58-70. 10.1016/S0016-5085(98)70633-X.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Riddles PW, Whan V, Blakeley RL, Zerner B: Cloning and sequencing of a jack bean urease encoding cDNA. Gene. 1991, 108: 265-267. 10.1016/0378-1119(91)90443-F.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jabri E, Carr MB, Hausinger RP, Karplus PA: The crystal structure of urease from Klebsiella aerogenes. Science. 1995, 268: 998-1004. 10.1126/science.7754395.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee MH, Pankratz HS, Wang S, Scott RA, Finnegan MG, Johnson MK, Ippolito JA, Christianson DW, Hausinger RP: Purification and characterization of Klebsiella aerogenes UreE protein: a nickel-binding protein that functions in urease metallocenter assembly. Prot Sci. 1993, 2: 1042-1052.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Park IS, Carr MB, Hausinger RP: In vitro activation of urease apoprotein and role of UreD as a chaperone required for nickel metallocenter assembly. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994, 91: 3233-3237. 10.1073/pnas.91.8.3233.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Smith DG, Russell WC, Ingledew WJ, Thirkell D: Hydrolysis of urea by Ureaplasma urealyticum generates a transmembrane potential with resultant ATP synthesis. J Bacteriol. 1993, 175: 3253-3258.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jahns T: Ammonium/urea-dependent generation of a proton electrochemical potential and synthesis of ATP in Bacillus pasteurii. J Bacteriol. 1996, 178: 403-409.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Monack DM, Falkow S: Cloning of Bordetella bronchiseptica urease genes and analysis of colonization by a urease-negative mutant strain in a guinea-pig model. Mol Microbiol. 1993, 10: 545-553. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1993.tb00926.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Corbel MJ: Brucellosis: an overview. Emerg Infect Dis. 1997, 3: 213-221.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Porte F, Liautard JP, Kohler S: Early acidification of phagosomes containing Brucella suis is essential for intracellular survival in murine macrophages. Infect Immun. 1999, 67 (8): 4041-4047.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bonnet M, Rafi MM, Chikindas ML, Montville TJ: Bioenergetic mechanism for nisin resistance, induced by the acid tolerance response of Listeria monocytogenes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006, 72 (4): 2556-2563. 10.1128/AEM.72.4.2556-2563.2006.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Altschul S, Gish W, Miller W, Myers E, Lipman D: Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990, 215: 403-410.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Schurig GG, Roop RM, Bagchi T, Boyle SM, Buhrman D, Sriranganathan N: Biological properties of RB51: a stable rough strain of Brucella abortus. Vet Microbiol. 1991, 28: 171-188. 10.1016/0378-1135(91)90091-S.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T: Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. 1989, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y, 2

    Google Scholar 

  25. McQuiston JR, Schurig GG, Sriranganathan N, Boyle SM: Transformation of Brucella species with suicide and broad host-range plasmids. Methods Mol Biol. 1995, 47: 143-148.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ried JL, Colmer A: An npt-sac B-sac R cartridge for constructing directed, unmarked mutations in gram-negative bacteria by marker exchange-eviction mutagenesis. Gene. 1987, 57: 239-246. 10.1016/0378-1119(87)90127-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kovach ME, Phillips RW, Elzer PH, Roop RM, Peterson KM: pBBR1MCS: a broad-host range cloning vector. BioTechniques. 1994, 16: 800-802.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Plommet M: Minimal requirements for growth of Brucella suis and other Brucella species. Zbl Bakt. 1991, 275: 436-450.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Lentner M, Bishop T: Experimental Design and Analysis. 1993, Valley Book Company, Blacksburg, VA, Second

    Google Scholar 

  30. Jubier-Maurin V, Rodrigue A, Ouahrani-Bettache S, Layssac M, Mandrand-Berthelot M, Köhler S, Liautard J: Identification of the nik gene cluster of Brucella suis: regulation and contribution to urease activity. J Bacteriol. 2001, 183 (2): 426-434. 10.1128/JB.183.2.426-434.2001.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mangan JA, Sole KM, Mitchison DA, Butcher PD: An effective method of RNA extraction from bacteria refractory to disruption, including mycobacteria. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25: 675-676. 10.1093/nar/25.3.675.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Manganelli RE, Dubnau S, Tyagi FR, Smith I: Differential expression of 10 sigma factor genes in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Mol Microbiol. 1999, 31: 715-724. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01212.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Timm J, Post FA, Bekker LG, Walther GB, Wainwright HC, Manganelli R, Chan WT, Tsenova L, Gold B, Smith I, Kaplan G, McKinney JD: Differential expression of iron-, carbon-, and oxygen-responsive mycobacterial genes in the lungs of chronically infected mice and tuberculosis patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003, 100: 14321-14326. 10.1073/pnas.2436197100.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Cordeiro C, Ponces Freire A: Protein determination in permeabilized yeast cells using the Coomassie brilliant blue dye binding assay. Anal Biochem. 1994, 223 (2): 321-323. 10.1006/abio.1994.1591.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Dunn BE, Campbell GP, Perez-Perez GI, Blaser MJ: Purification and characterization of urease from Helicobacter pylori. J Biol Chem. 1990, 265 (16): 9464-9469.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Klingenberg M: Methods in Enzymatic Analysis. Edited by: Bergmeyer HU. 1974, Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  37. Sangari FJ, Seoane A, Rodriguez MC, Aguero J, Garcia Lobo JM: Characterization of the urease operon of Brucella abortus and assessment of its role in virulence of the bacterium. Infect Immun. 2007, 75 (2): 774-80. 10.1128/IAI.01244-06.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hooper SD, Berg OG: On the nature of gene innovation: duplication patterns in microbial genomes. Mol Biol Evol. 2003, 20 (6): 945-54. 10.1093/molbev/msg101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Betty Mitchell for help in determining mouse splenic cfu, Nancy Tenpenny and Kay Carlson for technical assistance, and Chris Wakley and the staff of the Virginia-Maryland Regional College of Veterinary Medicine non-client animal facility for the expert handling of the mice.

Table 5 Identity of B. suis urease-1α and urease-2α sequences with the urease α subunits or urease proteins in GenBank
Full size table
Table 6 Sequences of primers (5’ to 3’) used to amplify ure genes
Full size table

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biomedical Sciences & Pathobiology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, 24061, USA

    Aloka B Bandara, Andrea Contreras, Araceli Contreras-Rodriguez, Ana M Martins, Victor Dobrean, Sherry Poff-Reichow, Parthiban Rajasekaran, Nammalwar Sriranganathan, Gerhardt G Schurig & Stephen M Boyle

Authors
  1. Aloka B Bandara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andrea Contreras
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Araceli Contreras-Rodriguez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ana M Martins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Victor Dobrean
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Sherry Poff-Reichow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Parthiban Rajasekaran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Nammalwar Sriranganathan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Gerhardt G Schurig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Stephen M Boyle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen M Boyle.

Additional information

Authors' contributions

AB and VD constructed mutant strains, and carried out part of growth and splenic clearance assays. AC carried out part of splenic and hepatic clearance assays and acid tolerance assays. SP and PR carried out macrophage assays. GS, NS and SB conceived of the study and participated in its design and coordination. AC-R carried out native gel electrophoresis, and AM performed quantitative urease activity.

Electronic supplementary material

12866_2006_374_MOESM1_ESM.doc

Additional File 1: Identity of B. suis urease-1α and urease-2α sequences with the urease α subunits or urease proteins in GenBank. (DOC 36 KB)

Additional File 2: Sequences of primers (5' to 3') used to amplify ure genes. (DOC )

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bandara, A.B., Contreras, A., Contreras-Rodriguez, A. et al. Brucella suis urease encoded by ure 1 but not ure 2 is necessary for intestinal infection of BALB/c mice. BMC Microbiol 7, 57 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-7-57

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-7-57

Keywords

BMC Microbiology

ISSN: 1471-2180

Contact us