New probes used for IS1245 and IS1311 restriction fragment length polymorphism of Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium and Mycobacterium avium subsp. hominissuis isolates of human and animal origin in Norway
© Johansen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
Received: 12 September 2006
Accepted: 05 March 2007
Published: 05 March 2007
Mycobacterium avium is an environmental mycobacterium that can be divided into the subspecies avium, hominissuis, paratuberculosis and silvaticum. Some M. avium subspecies are opportunistic pathogens for animals and humans. They are ubiquitous in nature and can be isolated from natural sources of water, soil, plants and bedding material. Isolates of M. avium originating from humans (n = 37), pigs (n = 51) and wild birds (n = 10) in Norway were examined by IS1245 and IS1311 RFLP using new and specific probes and for the presence of IS901 and ISMpa1 by PCR. Analysis and generation of a dendrogram were performed with the software BioNumerics.
IS1311 RFLP provided clear results that were easy to interpret, while IS1245 RFLP generated more complex patterns with a higher discriminatory power. The combination of the two methods gave additional discrimination between isolates. All avian isolates except one were M. avium subsp. avium with two copies of IS1311 and one copy of IS1245, while the isolates of human and porcine origin belonged to M. avium subsp.hominissuis. The isolates from human patients were distributed randomly among the clusters of porcine isolates. There were few identical isolates. However, one isolate from a human patient was identical to a porcine isolate. Regional differences were detected among the porcine isolates, while there was no clustering of human isolates according to type of clinical symptoms or geographical location of the patient's home addresses.
The results demonstrate that a wide range of M. avium subsp.hominissuis are present in pigs and humans in Norway, and that some of these isolates are very similar. It remains to be determined whether humans are infected from pigs or if they are infected from common environmental sources.
Mycobacterium avium is an environmental mycobacterium that can be divided into the subspecies avium, hominissuis, paratuberculosis and silvaticum [1, 2]. M. avium is ubiquitous in nature and can be isolated from natural sources of water, soil, plants and bedding material [3, 4].
M. avium subsp. avium and hominssuis are opportunistic pathogens for animals and humans [3, 5]. They can cause generalised tuberculosis in poultry and wild birds, while mammals, especially pigs, usually develop localised lesions limited to the lymph nodes of the digestive tract . Previously, lung infections were the most common manifestation of disease due to M. avium in humans. Most of these patients had predisposing lung disorders or underlying immunodeficiency. Since the emergence of AIDS, disseminated disease has become more common [3, 6]. However, the bacterium can also infect otherwise healthy people, and children can develop subacute lymphadenitis. In Norway, about 100 people get infected with mycobacteria other than those of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex each year. The majority of these are infected with M. avium .
The M. avium subspecies are a heterogeneous group and strain identification and classification has been based on serotyping and also on molecular methods based on different genomic targets including the presence and distribution of various insertion sequences (IS). Differences between isolates of M. avium from birds and the human and porcine isolates have been described. Most avian isolates belong to serotype 1–3 , contain IS901, and have a distinct pattern by IS1245 and IS1311 RFLP. They have one copy of IS1245 and two copies of IS1311 when using the shorter and more specific probes as previously described . Occasionally, humans and pigs may get infected with strains with the classical bird pattern, but generally isolates from humans and pigs do not harbour IS901, might harbour ISMpa1  and show another distribution of IS1311 and IS1245 elements [2, 9, 11–13]. It was recently proposed to reserve the term M. avium subsp. avium for strains with the bird pattern, and to call the other strains for M. avium subsp. hominissui s . Both IS1245 and IS1311 RFLP have been used to compare isolates from humans and animals in different regions of the world [2, 13–15], and their discriminatory power has been judged to be almost equal [12, 16–18]. Information about what kind of M. avium strains that infect human patients, animals and birds in Norway has not been obtained until now.
IS1245 shares an 85% DNA sequence homology with IS1311  and the 427 bp IS1245 probe used for RFLP by the proposed standardised method  share an identity of 82% with IS1311 at the DNA level. A problem with the standardised IS1245 RFLP method in M. avium has been the occurrence of several weak and inconsistent bands, probably due to cross hybridisation [8, 16, 20]. We previously designed specific probes for IS1245 and IS1311 that eliminated the possibility of cross hybridisation. Both probes were chosen from the 5' end of each insertion element where there is a 75% homology between the two elements .
The aim of this study was to investigate and compare the typing potential of the new probes for IS1245 and IS1311 RFLP , by typing a large number of isolates from different hosts. Furthermore we wanted to examine isolates of M. avium subsp. avium and hominssuis from humans, pigs and wild birds in Norway, in order to determine which type of strains that infect the different hosts. The isolates were compared both by IS1245 and IS1311 RFLP, and the presence of IS901 and ISMpa1 . The study demonstrated that the new probes for IS1245 and IS1311 RFLP performed well, and that a wide range of M. avium subsp. hominissuis strains were present in pigs and humans in Norway, and that some of these isolates were very similar.
Nine bird isolates and the reference strain R13 had identical banding profile with two copies of IS1311 and one copy of IS1245. This profile is illustrated by only one isolate (#1247) in figure 1, cluster N. The last isolate, #989, which originated from a black grouse, was of the multibanded type with both probes. By use of RFLP, we identified 26 copies of IS1245, in addition to 6 copies of IS1311. The RFLP patterns of this isolate clustered with two porcine isolates, #1646 and #1879 (Fig. 1, cluster D). The three isolates were identical by IS1311 RFLP but slight differences were observed when IS1245 RFLP was used. The cluster analysis from the composite data set showed 92% similarity between isolate #989 and isolate #1646 and 89% similarity between #989 and #1879 (Fig. 1). All bird isolates except #989 harboured IS901, and none harboured the ISMpa1 element.
Porcine and human isolates
All isolates from swine and humans were M. avium subsp. hominissuis; they lacked IS901, and none of them showed the bird pattern on IS1245 and IS1311 RFLP. The majority of the isolates were multibanded; however, some had only one or two copies of IS1311 that could be identified by RFLP. One copy of IS1245 and two copies of IS1311 were observed for the porcine isolate #1631, but the pattern was different from that observed in isolates from birds.
The remaining 12 clusters, A-D and F-M, included 2–4 isolates. Two clusters included three porcine isolates (cluster K and M) that carried 100% identical IS1311 and IS1245 RFLP patterns. Also, cluster A included two porcine isolates that were identical by both RFLP methods. The identical isolates originated from the same counties, but not from the same farms.
Among the porcine isolates, ten were positive for ISMpa1, none of the isolates of human or avian origin harboured this element. All ISMpa1 positive isolates were grouped separately from most of the other isolates. The branch that includes these ten isolates is labelled with an asterisk (*) in figure 1. The porcine isolates in this branch all came from the same part of Norway, mainly from Vestfold, but also from the two neighbouring counties Akershus and Buskerud (Fig. 3).
Four farms were represented by more than one porcine isolate. Of these, #1591 and #1603 were isolated from one farm, #1618, #1626 and #1627 from a second farm, #1619 and #1670 from a third farm and #1649 and #1878 from a fourth farm. None of them were identical to other isolates from the same farm, and the similarity between them was quite low, ranging from 66% (#1626 and #1627) to 28% (#1649 and #1878). Interestingly, among these nine isolates, four carried RFLP patterns that were 100% identical to at least one isolate from another farm in the same county.
The table illustrates all isolates of Mycobacterium avium examined, their host and county of origin.
County of origin
Møre og Romsdal
1668, 1839, VI101
1571, 1572, 1573, 1576, 1577, 1578, 1579, 1606, 1812, 1851, 1872, 1873, 1874, 1875, 1876, 1877, VI102, VI103, VI104, VI105, VI106, VI132, VI133
H6, H20, H27, H36, H38
H4, H7, H17, H30, H31
1555, 1591, 1603, 1618, 1619, 1626, 1627, 1638, 1655, 1656, 1667, 1670
1632, 1649, 1878
H5, H23, H25, H26, H29, H33, H34, H35, H39
H2, H3, H19
The table illustrates the clinical site from which the human isolates of Mycobacterium avium were isolated.
Expectorate or lungs
H1, H5, H6, H9, H10, H12, H15, H18, H361, H371, H381, H391, H47
Head lymph nodes
H3, H4, H7, H8, H13, H19, H20, H21, H22, H23, H24, H25, H26, H27, H281, H29
H301, H311,2, H331,2, H341,2, H351,2
The new short probes performed well for typing M. avium isolates. Based on these probes, it was demonstrated for the first time in Norway that isolates from birds were mainly M. avium subsp. avium and that isolates from humans and pigs were M. avium subsp. hominissui s. A geographical distribution of isolates of porcine origin was found, and similar isolates from humans and pigs were common.
The two probes differed in their typing potential and could have different areas of application. The IS1311 RFLP gave fewer bands than the IS1245 RFLP on the majority of the human and porcine isolates. This made the interpretation of the analysis easier, but the discriminatory power was weaker than for the IS1245 RFLP. In other studies the discriminatory power of the two RFLP methods have been almost equal [12, 16–18]. The IS1311 RFLP patterns can be analysed manually, if expensive software is not available. Comparison of IS1311 RFLP and IS1245 RFLP showed that IS1311 RFLP can be a good choice for several typing purposes. One can improve the separation of M. avium isolates by combining the two methods. For example, the IS1311 RFLP could be useful when comparing isolates of M. avium from different countries or parts of the world. The interpretation of results from this method is fairly easy to calibrate, since it generates fewer bands and because low intensity bands are uncommon. In an international setting the IS1311 RFLP may be applied to detect major differences between isolates within M. avium. The IS1311 RFLP is also considered to be well suited for a primary screening when isolate comparison is needed. When the discrimination of isolates has to be of a higher level, such as in outbreak investigations, inquiries of possible laboratory contamination and in contact tracing, the combination of the two RFLP methods appears to be the ideal.
Nine of ten avian isolates in our material belonged to the well described bird type of M. avium subsp.avium. The isolate #989 that originated from a black grouse was negative for IS901 and had a multibanded profile with IS1311 and IS1245 RFLP. The finding of a M. avium subsp. hominissuis isolate from birds seems to be an exception, but has been described earlier [11, 21, 22]. M. avium subsp. avium is the cause of avian tuberculosis and is known to be a contagious disease among birds , while M. avium subsp. hominissuis probably behaves as an opportunistic environmental pathogens in birds like it does in mammals.
The isolates of human and porcine origin in our material were all M. avium subsp. hominissuis. Most of these isolates had multibanded RFLP profiles on both IS1311 and IS1245 and none harboured IS901. A few isolates showed a low copy number, especially with IS1311 RFLP, and one isolate (#1631) had only one copy of IS1245. However, these isolates were all easily differentiated from the bird type. M. avium subsp.avium has been detected in human patients [21, 22], pigs and other animals [12, 21, 22], however this seems to be rare. Many M. avium subsp. hominissuis isolates of human and porcine origin were clustered together when the cut off was set at 80%, and one porcine and one human isolate were identical (H20 and #1576).
The isolates from human patients did not show any significant clustering with respect to clinical symptoms, age or immune status. This was in accordance with earlier studies; since differences between isolates from children and adults and isolates from HIV infected and not HIV infected patients could not be detected [21, 22].
The porcine isolates that were grouped into the same clusters with 80% or greater similarity generally originated from the same geographical areas. A total of 17 of 23 isolates from Rogaland (73.9%) belonged to the largest cluster, cluster E. In this county, there was a special focus on environmental mycobacteria in the period from 1986 to 2000. An unusual number of children at the schools of Karmøy, Rogaland showed hypersensitivity reactions when challenged with the tuberculin skin test without any signs of infection with bacteria in the M. tuberculosis complex. The reactions were suspected to be due to a sensitisation to environmental mycobacteria, especially M. avium. At the same time personnel at a slaughter house in Rogaland showed increased reactions to the skin test following a period of an unusually high occurrence of mycobacteriosis in swine at the same slaughterhouse . The number of swine with tuberculous lesions in Norway varies between areas and from year to year. There have been few investigations to find the prevalence of these lesions, but one investigation at the meat inspection in Haugesund (also in Rogaland county) performed between 1986 and 1990 found tuberculous lesions in about 0.5–1.5% of the swine slaughtered .
Our data suggest that birds are not a natural source of infection with M. avium for humans or swine in Norway, and our findings are similar to those reported in other studies [2, 12, 13, 15]. However, in a Swedish study, about half of the isolates from pigs were of the bird type, indicating that birds might be the cause of infection for pigs . In the present study, humans and swine might have infected each other, although we consider it more likely that the two species are infected from similar environmental sources. This was strengthened by the observation that among animals from the same farms, different M. avium subsp.hominissuis isolates were found. The geographical clustering of the porcine isolates in our material also suggest that bacteria in the same area are more closely related to each other than to bacteria in another areas, and that pigs on different farms may have been infected from the same environmental source. M. avium has been isolated from different kinds of vegetables [25, 26], and a food isolate was identical to an isolate from a human patient when compared by a PCR based typing method . Other potential environmental sources of mycobacteria for both humans and swine are soil and water. M. avium has been isolated from potted plants , and from peat [22, 28]. Identical isolates of M. avium have been found in samples from peat and human patients  and in samples from peat and pigs . It appears that soil and water may represent the M. avium reservoir for mammals, including humans, in Norway as in other countries [29, 30].
Our study demonstrated that the new probes for IS1311 and IS1245 RFLP performed well for typing the isolates, and that M. avium subsp. avium were detected only among birds in Norway. In pigs and humans, however, a wide range of M. avium subsp.hominissuis are present and some of these isolates are very similar. It remains to be determined whether humans are infected from pigs or if they are infected from common environmental sources.
Ninety-eight isolates of M. avium were examined. The isolates were collected from humans (n = 37), pigs from 46 farms (n = 51) and birds (n = 10). All isolates and their origin are shown in tables 1 and 2. The human isolates were received from Rikshospitalet University Hospital and from The Norwegian Institute of Public Health. The isolates from the latter institution originated from various hospitals in Norway. The isolates originated from immunocompromised patients with and without HIV and from non-immunocompromised patients, including children with lymphadenitis and adults with pulmonal disease (Table 2). The porcine isolates came from slaughter house material from different parts of Norway. Eight avian isolates came from wild birds of prey and two isolates from other wild birds. They originated from diseased birds from different parts of the country (Table 1). Avian tuberculosis in poultry has not been diagnosed in Norway during the last 20 years (M. Kalhusdal, personal communication), and no such isolates were therefore available. All samples of animal origin were isolated at The National Veterinary Institute of Norway, the bird isolates in the period 1989 to 2004 and the porcine isolates between 1994 and 2002. Primary isolation was performed as described by Valheim et al . Briefly, approximately two grams of tissue from lymph nodes or internal organs were homogenized and decontaminated with 5% oxalic acid, centrifuged, redissolved in saline water, inoculated on Petragani medium, Stonebrinks medium and Middlebrook 7H10 (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI) and incubated at 37°C for up to two months. Ziehl-Neelsen positive isolates were confirmed as M. avium by Accu Probe (GenProbe Inc., San Diego, CA) and stored in Middlebrook 7H9 supplemented with 10% (v/v) OADC (Difco) and 0.2% (v/v) glycerine (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) at -70°C. For examination, the isolates were cultured on Løwenstein Jensen medium (Difco) or on Middlebrook 7H10 supplemented with 10% (v/v) OADC Enrichment (Difco) at 37°C until sufficient growth.
All isolates were examined for the presence of ISMpa1 and IS901 by PCR using 1 U AmpliTaq® DNA polymerase (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Primers P2 and P3 were used for amplification of ISMpa1 , and primers 901a and 901c for the amplification of IS901 . The amplification of ISMpa1 was performed by an initial denaturation step at 94°C for 3 min followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 60°C for 30 s and extension at 72°C for 1 min. The IS901 PCR was performed with a different annealing temperature, 55°C, and with 35 cycles instead of 30. Otherwise, the conditions were identical for both PCRs. The PCR products were analysed on a 2% (w/v) agarose gel.
Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP)
The IS1245 and IS1311 RFLP analyses were performed as previously described [9, 10, 19]. The bird strain R13 was used as a positive control and run on each gel . The probes used for IS1245 and IS1311 RFLP were described earlier .
The resulting RFLP patterns were analysed by visual inspection and by using the BioNumerics software (version 3.5; Applied Maths, Kortrijk, Belgium). Normalisation of the fingerprints was done using the molecular weight standard 1 Kb DNA Ladder (Invitrogen™, Carlsbad, Calif.), which wasrun in three lanes per gel. The software was used to calculate Dice coefficients of similarity, to cluster the isolates and to generate dendrograms by the unweighted-pair group method using average linkages. This was done for each RFLP (IS1245 and IS1311) separately. The most appropriate settings for optimization and tolerance, as determined by the software, were calculated. For IS1311 RFLP the calculated optimization and tolerance settings were 0.40% and 0.87%, respectively, while for the IS1245 RFLP the settings were 0.30% and 0.21%, respectively. These settings were considered too strict by visual analysis. The control strain (R 13) clustered at less than 100% similarity, and other isolates that seemed identical by manual analysis, did not cluster with 100% similarity. Instead, both the optimization and tolerance settings of 1.5% were chosen for IS1311 RFLP and of 0.7% for the IS1245 RFLP. With these settings, R13 clustered at 100% similarity. A final dendrogram of the composite dataset of the two RFLP experiments was calculated using the similarity by the average from experiments, and the UPGMA clustering method. Correction for internal weights was used. The cluster cut off was set at 80%.
The degree of diversity was calculated by dividing the number of different RFLP patterns by the number of isolates analysed. The degree of clustering was calculated by dividing the total number of isolates that clustered by the number of isolates analysed [33, 34]. PCR results for IS901 and ISMpa1 are not included in the cluster analysis.
We would like to thank Prof. Tone Tønjum (Rikshospitalet, Norway) for providing human isolates and Dr. Dick van Soolingen (National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands) for providing the plasmid pMA12 and the reference strain R13. We would also like to thank Dr. Finn Saxegaard for collecting isolates, Vivi Myrann and Sigrun Fredsvold Nilsen for excellent technical assistance and Hannah Jørgensen for proofreading of the manuscript. This study is partly funded by the Norwegian Research Council project "Science for preparedness" and the National Veterinary Institute of Norway.
- Thorel MF, Krichevsky M, Levy-Frebault VV: Numerical taxonomy of mycobactin-dependent mycobacteria, emended description of Mycobacterium avium, and description of Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium subsp. nov., Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis subsp. nov., and Mycobacterium avium subsp. silvaticum subsp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1990, 40: 254-260.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mijs W, de Haas P, Rossau R, van der LT, Rigouts L, Portaels F, van Soolingen D: Molecular evidence to support a proposal to reserve the designation Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium for bird-type isolates and 'M. avium subsp. hominissuis' for the human/porcine type of M. avium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2002, 52: 1505-1518. 10.1099/ijs.0.02037-0.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Inderlied CB, Kemper CA, Bermudez LE: The Mycobacterium avium complex. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1993, 6: 266-310.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Falkinham JO: Epidemiology of infection by nontuberculous mycobacteria. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1996, 9: 177-215.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thorel MF, Huchzermeyer H, Weiss R, Fontaine JJ: Mycobacterium avium infections in animals. Literature review. Vet Res. 1997, 28: 439-447.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ashford DA, Whitney E, Raghunathan P, Cosivi O: Epidemiology of selected mycobacteria that infect humans and other animals. Rev Sci Tech. 2001, 20: 325-337.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Atypical mycobacterial infections (in Norwegian). 2005,http://www.fhi.no/artikler/?id=55552
- Ritacco V, Kremer K, van der LT, Pijnenburg JE, de Haas PE, van Soolingen D: Use of IS901 and IS1245 in RFLP typing of Mycobacterium avium complex: relatedness among serovar reference strains, human and animal isolates. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 1998, 2: 242-251.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Johansen TB, Djonne B, Jensen MR, Olsen I: Distribution of IS1311 and IS1245 in Mycobacterium avium subspecies revisited. J Clin Microbiol. 2005, 43: 2500-2502. 10.1128/JCM.43.5.2500-2502.2005.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Olsen I, Johansen TB, Billman-Jacobe H, Nilsen SF, Djonne B: A novel IS element, ISMpa1, in Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis. Vet Microbiol. 2004, 98: 297-306. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2003.10.025.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Guerrero C, Bernasconi C, Burki D, Bodmer T, Telenti A: A novel insertion element from Mycobacterium avium, IS1245, is a specific target for analysis of strain relatedness. J Clin Microbiol. 1995, 33: 304-307.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- O'Grady D, Flynn O, Costello E, Quigley F, Gogarty A, McGuirk J, O'Rourke J, Gibbons N: Restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of Mycobacterium avium isolates from animal and human sources. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2000, 4: 278-281.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Komijn RE, de Haas PE, Schneider MM, Eger T, Nieuwenhuijs JH, van den Hoek RJ, Bakker D, Zijd Erveld FG, van Soolingen D: Prevalence of Mycobacterium avium in slaughter pigs in The Netherlands and comparison of IS1245 restriction fragment length polymorphism patterns of porcine and human isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 1999, 37: 1254-1259.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bono M, Jemmi T, Bernasconi C, Burki D, Telenti A, Bodmer T: Genotypic characterization of Mycobacterium avium strains recovered from animals and their comparison to human strains. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995, 61: 371-373.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Oliveira RS, Sircili MP, Oliveira EM, Balian SC, Ferreira-Neto JS, Leao SC: Identification of Mycobacterium avium genotypes with distinctive traits by combination of IS1245-based restriction fragment length polymorphism and restriction analysis of hsp65. J Clin Microbiol. 2003, 41: 44-49. 10.1128/JCM.41.1.44-49.2003.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Roiz MP, Palenque E, Guerrero C, Garcia MJ: Use of restriction fragment length polymorphism as a genetic marker for typing Mycobacterium avium strains. J Clin Microbiol. 1995, 33: 1389-1391.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Devallois A, Rastogi N: Computer-assisted analysis of Mycobacterium avium fingerprints using insertion elements IS1245 and IS1311 in a Caribbean setting. Res Microbiol. 1997, 148: 703-713. 10.1016/S0923-2508(99)80069-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Collins DM, Cavaignac S, de Lisle GW: Use of four DNA insertion sequences to characterize strains of the Mycobacterium avium complex isolated from animals. Mol Cell Probes. 1997, 11: 373-380. 10.1006/mcpr.1997.0131.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- van Soolingen D, Bauer J, Ritacco V, Leao SC, Pavlik I, Vincent V, Rastogi N, Gori A, Bodmer T, Garzelli C, Garcia MJ: IS1245 restriction fragment length polymorphism typing of Mycobacterium avium isolates: proposal for standardization. J Clin Microbiol. 1998, 36: 3051-3054.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Picardeau M, Vincent V: Typing of Mycobacterium avium isolates by PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 1996, 34: 389-392.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thegerstrom J, Marklund BI, Hoffner S, Axelsson-Olsson D, Kauppinen J, Olsen B: Mycobacterium avium with the bird type IS1245 RFLP profile is commonly found in wild and domestic animals, but rarely in humans. Scand J Infect Dis. 2005, 37: 15-20. 10.1080/00365540510026850.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bauer J, Andersen AB, Askgaard D, Giese SB, Larsen B: Typing of clinical Mycobacterium avium complex strains cultured during a 2-year period in Denmark by using IS1245. J Clin Microbiol. 1999, 37: 600-605.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Alfredsen SA, Slinning KS: Mycobacterium avium, "pirquet-epidemi" og multippel sklerose. Miljø & helse. 1999, 18: 30-31.Google Scholar
- Alfredsen S, Skjerve E: An abattoir-based case-control study of risk factors for mycobacteriosis in Norwegian swine. Preventive Veterinary Medicine. 1993, 15: 253-259. 10.1016/0167-5877(93)90097-D.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Argueta C, Yoder S, Holtzman AE, Aronson TW, Glover N, Berlin OG, Stelma GN, Froman S, Tomasek P: Isolation and identification of nontuberculous mycobacteria from foods as possible exposure sources. J Food Prot. 2000, 63: 930-933.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yajko DM, Chin DP, Gonzalez PC, Nassos PS, Hopewell PC, Reingold AL, Horsburgh CR, Yakrus MA, Ostroff SM, Hadley WK: Mycobacterium avium complex in water, food, and soil samples collected from the environment of HIV-infected individuals. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol. 1995, 9: 176-182.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yoder S, Argueta C, Holtzman A, Aronson T, Berlin OG, Tomasek P, Glover N, Froman S, Stelma G: PCR comparison of Mycobacterium avium isolates obtained from patients and foods. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999, 65: 2650-2653.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Matlova L, Dvorska L, Ayele WY, Bartos M, Amemori T, Pavlik I: Distribution of Mycobacterium avium complex isolates in tissue samples of pigs fed peat naturally contaminated with mycobacteria as a supplement. J Clin Microbiol. 2005, 43: 1261-1268. 10.1128/JCM.43.3.1261-1268.2005.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- von Reyn CF, Waddell RD, Eaton T, Arbeit RD, Maslow JN, Barber TW, Brindle RJ, Gilks CF, Lumio J, Lahdevirta J: Isolation of Mycobacterium avium complex from water in the United States, Finland, Zaire, and Kenya. J Clin Microbiol. 1993, 31: 3227-3230.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- von Reyn CF, Maslow JN, Barber TW, Falkinham JO, Arbeit RD: Persistent colonisation of potable water as a source of Mycobacterium avium infection in AIDS. Lancet. 1994, 343: 1137-1141. 10.1016/S0140-6736(94)90239-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Valheim M, Djonne B, Heiene R, Caugant DA: Disseminated Mycobacterium celatum (type 3) infection in a domestic ferret (Mustela putorius furo). Vet Pathol. 2001, 38: 460-463. 10.1354/vp.38-4-460.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ahrens P, Giese SB, Klausen J, Inglis NF: Two markers, IS901-IS902 and p40, identified by PCR and by using monoclonal antibodies in Mycobacterium avium strains. J Clin Microbiol. 1995, 33: 1049-1053.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Small PM, Hopewell PC, Singh SP, Paz A, Parsonnet J, Ruston DC, Schecter GF, Daley CL, Schoolnik GK: The epidemiology of tuberculosis in San Francisco. A population-based study using conventional and molecular methods. N Engl J Med. 1994, 330: 1703-1709. 10.1056/NEJM199406163302402.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dahle UR, Sandven P, Heldal E, Caugant DA: Continued low rates of transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Norway. J Clin Microbiol. 2003, 41: 2968-2973. 10.1128/JCM.41.7.2968-2973.2003.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar