No detectable effect of RNA-binding protein Hfq absence in Staphylococcus aureus
© Bohn et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
Received: 18 October 2006
Accepted: 09 February 2007
Published: 09 February 2007
The RNA-binding protein Hfq is involved in stress and virulence of several pathogens, probably due to its role as mediator in small RNA (sRNA)-mRNA interactions. In this study, we investigate the function of Hfq in the Gram-positive pathogen Staphylococcus aureus, by constructing hfq null mutant derivatives.
We report that unexpectedly, in S. aureus, Hfq does not seem to play a crucial role in stress response, RNAIII or spa mRNA quantity and exoprotein expression, as tested in three virulent genetic backgrounds. Moreover, a global analysis of the RN6390 hfq mutant, which tests ~ 2000 phenotypes, supports our results concerning the non-implication of Hfq in stress response, and shows that Hfq is also not involved in resistance to several chemical agents and antibiotics and does not seem to be implicated in metabolic pathways.
Our data suggest that although sRNA-mRNA interactions in S. aureus are decisive for gene expression regulation, they do not require the RNA-chaperone protein Hfq. These interactions possibly require an RNA-chaperone protein other than Hfq, which remains to be found.
The small RNA-binding protein Hfq was first identified in Escherichia coli as a required factor for replication of phage Qβ RNA . In E. coli, Hfq is a global regulator that modulates the stability, translation and polyadenylation of numerous mRNAs (for review, see ). It is proposed that Hfq acts as a RNA chaperone protein by mediating interactions between many regulatory small RNAs (sRNAs) and their mRNAs targets (for review, see [2, 3]). Inactivation of the hfq gene in E. coli results in lower growth and sensitivity to various environmental stresses [4, 5]. Genome analyses show that Hfq-like proteins are conserved in many (but not all) Gram-negative and -positive bacteria . Hfq is involved in stress response and/or virulence of several Gram-negative pathogens (Vibrio cholerae, Brucella abortus, Yersinia enterocolitica, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Shigella flexneri, Salmonella enterica [7–13] and the Gram-positive pathogen, Listeria monocytogenes .
Staphylococcus aureus is a Gram-positive pathogen responsible for a wide variety of human infections, ranging from superficial skin and wound infections to deep abscesses (endocarditis and meningitis), septicemia, or toxin-associated syndromes (e.g. food poisoning and toxic shock syndrome) . S. aureus is also a leading cause of hospital and community-acquired infections whose treatment is becoming increasingly difficult due to the emergence of multiple antibiotic resistance determinants . The type of infection caused by S. aureus depends on virulence factors and stress response pathways present in infectious strains, and reflects the coordinated action of numerous regulators (for review, see ). The best-characterized regulator of virulence gene expression is the agr (accessory gene regulator) quorum sensing system (for review, see ), which comprises two divergent transcripts, RNAII and RNAIII. The small RNAIII transcript (514 pb) is a key regulator that modulates production of S. aureus extracellular proteins at the transcriptional and post-transcriptional level (for review, see ).
S. aureus encodes one Hfq-like protein (8.9 kDa), whose structure has been described . Under in vitro conditions, it specifically binds RNAIII and spa mRNA . More recent studies revealed the expression of other regulatory sRNAs among S. aureus infectious strains [20–22], which may be involved in the regulation of virulence. These observations suggest that RNA-RNA interactions are decisive for virulence regulation in S. aureus, while the role of Hfq in these interactions remains to be elucidated.
In this study, we constructed hfq derivatives in three S. aureus backgrounds that differ in their virulence capacities (RN6390, COL and Newman; ), and compared them to their respective WT strains, in order to determine the Hfq function(s). In the experimental conditions and the genetic backgrounds tested, Hfq does not display any detectable role in stress tolerance, RNA stability or exoprotein expression. To provide a more complete analysis of the hfq associated phenotypes, we also compared the RN6390 WT and hfq mutant strains using the Phenotype Microarray (PM) Technology, which tests ~ 2000 phenotypes simultaneously (including utilization of several sources of carbon, nitrogen, phosphate and sulfur, and sensitivity to different stresses and chemical agents). Based on our results, we can postulate that in S. aureus, RNA-RNA interactions do probably not require the involvement of RNA chaperone proteins, or that at least a protein other than Hfq, as yet unidentified, is responsible for the modulation of RNA interactions.
Results and discussion
Inactivation and expression of hfq in S. aureus
In E. coli, Hfq is one of the most abundant intracellular proteins, whose level in exponential growth phase is reportedly around 30,000 to 60,000 molecules per cell . Hfq levels further increase during the transition to stationary phase . These data suggest that Hfq likely plays a crucial role in controlling expression of numerous growth-related genes. In view of the described properties of Hfq, we asked whether hfq expression levels in S. aureus were as high as in E. coli. We first followed hfq expression during bacterial growth in BHI medium, by northern blot experiments, using an hfq-specific fragment as probe. No transcript corresponding to hfq mRNA was detected in RN6390, Newman or COL WT backgrounds (from total RNAs extracted from both exponential and stationary phase cultures; data not shown). In these experiments, an E. coli hfq strain containing a plasmid carrying the S. aureus hfq gene under control of a tetracycline inducible promoter system was used as positive control of hfq mRNA expression. We then compared hfq expression using RT-PCR, which is a more sensitive detection method than northern blotting. Steady state levels obtained from RN6390 WT and hfq post-exponential RNA extracts are represented on Figure 1B. A band corresponding in size to the hfq amplicon (which is comparable in size to the fragment amplified from chromosomal DNA) was detected in the WT profile, suggesting that hfq is expressed in S. aureus. As expected, no amplification from both hfq mutant strain chromosomal DNA (not shown) and cDNAs (Fig. 1B) was observed, which confirms the hfq ORF deletion. Positive amplification from cDNAs of the RN6390 hfq strain was visualized with PCR using spa specific primers, confirming the quality of these extracts (Fig. 1B). Similar results were obtained with RT-PCR experiments realized with Newman strain.
These results indicate that hfq gene is expressed in S. aureus in the experimental conditions tested but at a very low level, as no transcript could be visualized by northern blot experiments. In view of these data, we speculate that Hfq protein is probably less abundant in S. aureus than in E. coli.
hfq inactivation has no effects on growth and stress resistance
We first compared growth of hfq mutants of RN6390, COL and Newman, with their respective WT strains in aerated BHI rich medium or in aerated RPMI synthetic medium at 37°C. No growth differences were noticed in any of the genetic backgrounds tested (data not shown) in either media. As Hfq is reportedly involved in stress tolerance in many pathogens [8, 10, 14], we also tested the ability of staphylococcal hfq mutants to resist to several environmental stresses: Under osmotic (NaCl), oxidative stress (H2O2) or heat-shock (44°C) conditions, the hfq mutant grew as well as the WT strain in all genetic backgrounds (data not shown). In L. monocytogenes, the contribution of Hfq in stress response depends on the alternative sigma factor σB pathway, as σB controls hfq stress-inducible transcription . In S. aureus, Hfq does not seem to be implicated in stress resistance, regardless of the presence or absence of the σB pathway, as the same results were obtained in both σB pathway functional (COL, Newman) and defective (RN6390) strains.
Hfq does not affect RNAIII or spa mRNA quantity in vivo
Hfq does not affect exoprotein expression profiles
S. aureus secretes numerous virulence factors, which are mainly produced during the post-exponential phase, and whose expression involves the coordination of many regulators, including agr RNAIII (for review, see ). To test the possible role of Hfq in the production of secreted virulence factors, we compared exoprotein profiles in RN6390, Newman, and COL WT strains and their Δhfq derivatives. No differences were observed in the various genetic backgrounds tested (data not shown). Hemolysins and proteases are major secreted virulence factors in some S. aureus virulent strains, such as RN6390. To test the effect of Hfq on production of those secreted enzymes, we compared hemolytic and proteolytic activities in RN6390 and Newman WT and hfq mutant strains. Stationary cultures were streaked onto BHI medium containing rabbit blood (which reveals α-hemolytic activity), sheep blood (corresponding to β-hemolytic activity) and horse blood (δ-hemolytic activity), or onto NB medium containing skimmed milk (to reveal proteolytic activities). No differences were observed in halos corresponding to the different enzymatic activities in the two genetic backgrounds tested (data not shown), which suggests that the lack of Hfq does not affect production of either hemolysins or secreted proteases.
Altogether, these results suggest that deletion of hfq does not affect exoprotein expression profiles. It is thus likely that Hfq is not decisive for the production of secreted virulence factors.
PM analysis of RN6390 hfq mutant
Metabolism tests (PM1 toPM8), performed in a synthetic medium, showed negative differences for utilization of several amino acids or dipeptides as nitrogen source (PM3 and PM6 to PM8); although the signal decreases were very weak. These data seemed to suggest that the hfq mutant strain could be defective for nitrogen metabolism. To test this hypothesis, we compared growth of RN6390 WT and hfq mutant strains in a synthetic complete medium or in a synthetic minimal medium (containing the essential amino acids for auxotrophy, glutamate and leucine; Elise Durant, INRA, personal communication) with or without several nitrogen sources, including different combinations of amino acids (including glutamate and/or aspartate) as used in the PM assay. No differences in growth were observed between the two strains (data not shown), suggesting that the hfq mutant uses different nitrogen sources as well as the WT strain. The weak differences detected by PM analysis (PM3, PM6 to PM8) may reflect the use in PM of a standard chemically minimal medium that lacks the essential amino acids, where only residual growth of both strains occurred. In this case, it is likely that phenotypes observed result from residual respiration of surviving bacteria in the medium and not from real bacterial growth.
Stress or chemical agent sensitivity PM tests (PM9 to PM20) were performed in rich medium, similar to LB. Essentially no differences were observed in osmotic (PM9) and pH (PM10) stress panels between the RN6390 WT and hfq mutant strains (Fig. 3), which confirmed some results obtained by conventional stress tests (see above). Positive or negative differences were observed for some chemical agents or antibiotics (PM11 to PM20; see Fig. 3, and Additional file 1) but signals were weak (see Additional file 1). The only real signal concerned Cm resistance of the hfq mutant, a consequence of the strain construction (PM11, F3-4 and PM 14, F4, and derivative thiamphenicol, PM18, A10-12). We compared sensitivity of some chemical agents or antibiotics that gave negative responses (cobalt chloride, PM13, G3; cefotaxime, PM16, A3-4), or positive signals (domiphen bromide, PM15, D6; dodine, PM20, E7) on MH broth by measuring the MIC or on agar plates using disk-specific antibiotics. Again, no significant differences were observed between WT and hfq mutant strains (data not shown).
This comparative analysis showed that among ~ 2000 phenotypes, essentially no reproducible phenotypic differences between S. aureus RN6390 WT and its hfq derivative mutant were detected. For metabolic tests, the few phenotypes that were noted likely have no physiological significance, and may result from the poor growth of both strains. We thus conclude that Hfq has no role on stress response and on chemical agent sensitivity and probably no impact on metabolic pathways in S. aureus.
In this study, we tried to elucidate the roles of the RNA-binding protein Hfq in S. aureus cell physiology and regulation. Our results indicate that Hfq does not seem to contribute to the adaptation to stress responses, RNAIII or spa mRNA levels, or to general exoprotein production in S. aureus. Some of these data have been recently suggested . A more general approach, which tests ~ 2000 phenotypes simultaneously confirmed our observations (e.g., no implication of Hfq in stress sensitivity) and also showed that Hfq has likely no impact on metabolic pathways or on resistance to different chemical agents or antibiotics. Nevertheless, it remains possible that Hfq has a role in environmental conditions that differ from those tested; for example, those encountered to proliferate inside the host during the infection process. We compared growth in rabbit serum between a wild type and its hfq derivative mutant, in the three different genetic contexts; no differences were observed (data not shown). This result suggests that Hfq may not be crucial for survival inside the host.
In E. coli, Hfq contributes to interactions between regulatory sRNAs and their mRNA targets (for review, see ). It also forms a ribonucleoprotein complex with RNase E that affects mRNAs turnover . Staphylococcal genome analyses indicate the lack of an RNase E-like protein. In Bacillus subtilis, RNases J1 and J2 have functional homologies with RNase E but no sequence similarity [32, 33]; homolog of these RNases are present in S. aureus. However, it has never been demonstrated that RNases J1 and J2 functions are dependant of Hfq. Although RNA-RNA interactions appear to be decisive for regulatory pathways in S. aureus, regulation mechanisms are likely to occur independently of Hfq and RNase E.
Searches for Hfq conservation through bacterial species have shown that Hfq homologs are absent in several low GC Gram-positive bacteria, such as Lactococcus lactis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Streptococcus pyogenes . In Borrelia burgdoferi, genome analyses reveal the lack of both Hfq and RNase E proteins . We propose that in S. aureus, under conditions known to involve Hfq in other bacteria, RNA-RNA interactions do not require Hfq. An as yet uncharacterized RNA-chaperone protein might be responsible for the modulation of RNA interactions in this bacterium. Database searches in S. aureus genomes for Sm-like domains, which are characteristic of RNA-binding protein like Hfq, reveal no other candidates than Hfq. If S. aureus sRNAs are important for mRNA turnover, we suggest the existence of alternative mechanism that substitute for Hfq and RNase E that remains to be discovered.
Bacterial strains, plasmids and growth conditions
Strains and plasmids used in this study.
E. coli DH5αZ1
Δ(argF-lac)169 ϕ80Δlac Z58(M15) gln V44 (AS) rfb D1 gyr A96 (NalR) rec A1 end A1 spo T1 thi-1 hsdR1 7 Z1(lacR tetR SpR)
S. aureus RN4220
Avirulent mutant of NCTC 8325-4 that accepts foreign DNA
S. aureus RN6390
Laboratory virulent strain derived from NCTC 8325
S. aureus COL
Highly methicillin resistant clinical isolate
S. aureus Newman
Virulent strain containing a high level of Clumping Factor
S. aureus RN4220 hfq
RN4220, Δhfq::cat, CmR
S. aureus RN6390 hfq
RN6390, Δhfq::cat, CmR
S. aureus COL hfq
COL, Δhfq::cat, CmR
S. aureus Newman hfq
Newman, Δhfq::cat, CmR
Thermosensitive plasmid in S. aureus derived from pRN5101 and containing the bgaB gene, EryR, AmpR
pMAD containing up- and downstream regions from hfq gene cloned on either side of the Cm cassette (cat); used for construction of the S. aureus RN4220 hfq mutant, EryR, AmpR, CmR, bgaB
For stress studies, staphylococcal cultures were prepared as follows: serial dilutions of exponential cultures were spotted on BHI plates containing or not an osmotic stress agent (NaCl, 0.5 to 2 M) or an oxidative stress agent (H2O2, 1 to 2 mM), and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. Growth at high temperature was examined by plating cells on BHI medium and incubating at 44°C for 24 h.
Plasmid and chromosomal DNA preparations, PCR amplifications, and DNA modifications were performed according to commonly used techniques or suppliers' instructions. Lysis of S. aureus cell suspensions was achieved by treatment with 100 μg/ml of lysostaphin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 1 hour at 37°C, followed by standard methods for DNA preparation. DNA transformation for E. coli  and for S. aureus  was performed as described.
Chromosomal deletion of hfq
Primers used in this study*.
SA-hfq 5up (BamH1)
Used for cloning upstream region of hfq
SA-hfq 5down (KpnI)
SA-hfq 3up (SmaI)
Used for cloning downstream region of hfq
SA-hfq 3down (EcoRI)
SA-cat 5 (KpnI)
Used for cat amplification
SA-cat 3 (SmaI)
SA-hfq verif up
Used for verification of hfq deletion
SA-hfq verif down
Used for RNA III probe amplification
Used for spa probe amplification
Used for hu probe amplification
SA-hfq 5 (NdeI)
Used for hfq probe amplification, RT-PCR
SA-hfq 3 (HindIII)
Overnight cultures of staphylococcal strains in BHI medium were diluted 1000-fold in the same medium and grown at 37°C. Total RNAs of mid-or post- exponential or stationary phase cultures were extracted as previously described  or using the RNA spin mini Kit (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK). Northern blot experiments were performed using hfq, RNAIII- and spa specific fragments as probes (see Table 2 for primers list), which were α32-P labelled, as described . RNA transcripts were quantified, using hu mRNA as positive control of constitutive expression. For hfq expression studies, random RT-PCR experiments were performed using the Thermoscript RT-PCR System (Invitrogen, Eugene, USA); primers used for successive PCR are in Table 2.
Protein extract preparation, protein profile analysis and determinations of extra-cellular enzymatic activities
Overnight cultures of staphylococcal strains in BHI medium were diluted 100-fold in the same medium and grown at 37°C. Supernatant protein extracts from post-exponential or stationary phase cultures were prepared as described  and protein profiles were compared by PAGE after staining with Coomassie blue reagent . For hemolytic or proteolytic activities, staphylococcal stationary phase cultures were streaked on BHI medium containing 5% rabbit, sheep, or horse blood, or on NB medium containing 10% skimmed milk. Enzymatic halos were compared after overnight growth at 37°C.
S. aureus RN6390 WT and hfq mutant strains were subject to full profile (20 panels) PM analysis, as described elsewhere [28, 29, 41]. This extensive analysis contains ~ 2000 tests which include utilization of different sources of carbon (PM1 and PM2; ~ 200 tests), nitrogen (PM3 and PM6 to PM8; ~ 400 tests) phosphorus and sulfur (PM4; ~ 100 tests), nutrient stimulation (PM5; ~ 100 tests) as well as sensitivity to several stresses (PM9 and PM10; ~ 200 tests) and to chemical agents that affect various biological pathways (PM11 to PM20; ~ 1000 tests). Detailed information of PM experimental conditions is available . Briefly, respiration during bacterial growth under different conditions is monitored by NADH production, measured with a tetrazolium dye and evaluated for intensity of color formation. Phenotypic data were recorded over a 24-hour period. Differences in measurements of WT and hfq mutant strains are calculated. The WT strain is recorded as a red tracing, and the hfq mutant as a green tracing. Areas of overlap (no changes) between the two measurements are colored in yellow, whereas differences are colored in red or green for WT or hfq mutant respectively. The consensus profile presented is the result of two independent comparative analyses.
To confirm some of the observations with the nitrogen metabolic arrays (PM3 and PM6 to PM8), growth of RN6390 WT and hfq mutant strains was compared in a chemically defined medium  containing or not different sources of nitrogen. Sensitivity to selected chemical agents (cobalt chloride, dodine, domiphen bromide) or antibiotics (cefotaxime) was tested by determining the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration, (MIC) or by using the agar disk diffusion method (Cefotaxime, Fluka). Both of these experiments were performed in Mueller Hinton broth.
Brain Heart Infusion
Roswell Park Memorial Institute
- spa :
Staphylococcal protein A gene
Open Reading Frame.
We thank Pascale Romby for communicating unpublished results. We are very grateful to Sandy Gruss for helpful discussions and critical reading of the manuscript. We thank Michelle David for technical assistance. We thank Elise Durant, Vincent Juillard and Brice Felden for helpful advice and discussion, and Mac Cabee for warm support. This work was supported by a grant "Microbiologie-Immunologie-Maladies Emergentes" from the "Agence Nationale pour la Recherche" (ANR). CR is the recipient of a fellowship from CNRS/Conseil Général de l'Essonne.
- Franze de Fernandez MT, Eoyang L, August JT: Factor fraction required for the synthesis of bacteriophage Qbeta-RNA. Nature. 1968, 219 (154): 588-590. 10.1038/219588a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Valentin-Hansen P, Eriksen M, Udesen C: The bacterial Sm-like protein Hfq: a key player in RNA transactions. Mol Microbiol. 2004, 51 (6): 1525-1533. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2003.03935.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang A, Wassarman KM, Rosenow C, Tjaden BC, Storz G, Gottesman S: Global analysis of small RNA and mRNA targets of Hfq. Mol Microbiol. 2003, 50 (4): 1111-1124. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03734.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Muffler A, Traulsen DD, Fischer D, Lange R, Hengge-Aronis R: The RNA-binding protein HF-I plays a global regulatory role which is largely, but not exclusively, due to its role in expression of the sigmaS subunit of RNA polymerase in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1997, 179 (1): 297-300.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tsui HC, Leung HC, Winkler ME: Characterization of broadly pleiotropic phenotypes caused by an hfq insertion mutation in Escherichia coli K-12. Mol Microbiol. 1994, 13 (1): 35-49. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1994.tb00400.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sun X, Zhulin I, Wartell RM: Predicted structure and phyletic distribution of the RNA-binding protein Hfq. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30 (17): 3662-3671. 10.1093/nar/gkf508.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ding Y, Davis BM, Waldor MK: Hfq is essential for Vibrio cholerae virulence and downregulates sigma expression. Mol Microbiol. 2004, 53 (1): 345-354. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04142.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Robertson GT, Roop RM: The Brucella abortus host factor I (HF-I) protein contributes to stress resistance during stationary phase and is a major determinant of virulence in mice. Mol Microbiol. 1999, 34 (4): 690-700. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01629.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nakao H, Watanabe H, Nakayama S, Takeda T: yst gene expression in Yersinia enterocolitica is positively regulated by a chromosomal region that is highly homologous to Escherichia coli host factor 1 gene (hfq). Mol Microbiol. 1995, 18 (5): 859-865. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1995.18050859.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sonnleitner E, Hagens S, Rosenau F, Wilhelm S, Habel A, Jager KE, Blasi U: Reduced virulence of a hfq mutant of Pseudomonas aeruginosa O1. Microb Pathog. 2003, 35 (5): 217-228. 10.1016/S0882-4010(03)00149-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Figueroa-Bossi N, Lemire S, Maloriol D, Balbontin R, Casadesus J, Bossi L: Loss of Hfq activates the sigma-dependent envelope stress response in Salmonella enterica. Mol Microbiol. 2006Google Scholar
- Sharma AK, Payne SM: Induction of expression of hfq by DksA is essential for Shigella flexneri virulence. Mol Microbiol. 2006, 62 (2): 469-479. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05376.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sittka A, Pfeiffer V, Tedin K, Vogel J: The RNA chaperone Hfq is essential for the virulence of Salmonella typhymurium. Mol Microbiol. 2007, 63 (1): 193-217. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05489.x.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Christiansen JK, Larsen MH, Ingmer H, Sogaard-Andersen L, Kallipolitis BH: The RNA-binding protein Hfq of Listeria monocytogenes: role in stress tolerance and virulence. J Bacteriol. 2004, 186 (11): 3355-3362. 10.1128/JB.186.11.3355-3362.2004.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Höök M, Foster TJ: Staphylococcal surface proteins. Edited by: Fischetti et al. 2000, Washington: ASM pressGoogle Scholar
- Hiramatsu K: Vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a new model of antibiotic resistance. Lancet Infect Dis. 2001, 1 (3): 147-155. 10.1016/S1473-3099(01)00091-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Novick RP: Autoinduction and signal transduction in the regulation of staphylococcal virulence. Mol Microbiol. 2003, 48 (6): 1429-1449. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03526.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schumacher MA, Pearson RF, Moller T, Valentin-Hansen P, Brennan RG: Structures of the pleiotropic translational regulator Hfq and an Hfq-RNA complex: a bacterial Sm-like protein. EMBO J. 2002, 21 (13): 3546-3556. 10.1093/emboj/cdf322.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Huntzinger E, Boisset S, Saveanu C, Benito Y, Geissmann T, Namane A, Lina G, Etienne J, Ehresmann B, Ehresmann C: Staphylococcus aureus RNAIII and the endoribonuclease III coordinately regulate spa gene expression. EMBO J. 2005, 24 (4): 824-835. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600572.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Anderson KL, Roberts C, Disz T, Vonstein V, Hwang K, Overbeek R, Olson PD, Projan SJ, Dunman PM: Characterization of the Staphylococcus aureus heat shock, cold shock, stringent, and SOS responses and their effects on log-phase mRNA turnover. J Bacteriol. 2006, 188 (19): 6739-6756. 10.1128/JB.00609-06.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pichon C, Felden B: Small RNA genes expressed from Staphylococcus aureus genomic and pathogenicity islands with specific expression among pathogenic strains. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005, 102 (40): 14249-14254. 10.1073/pnas.0503838102.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Roberts C, Anderson KL, Murphy E, Projan SJ, Mounts W, Hurlburt B, Smeltzer M, Overbeek R, Disz T, Dunman PM: Characterizing the effect of the Staphylococcus aureus virulence factor regulator, SarA, on log-phase mRNA half-lives. J Bacteriol. 2006, 188 (7): 2593-2603. 10.1128/JB.188.7.2593-2603.2006.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rigoulay C, Entenza JM, Halpern D, Widmer E, Moreillon P, Poquet I, Gruss A: Comparative analysis of the roles of HtrA-like surface proteases in two virulent Staphylococcus aureus strains. Infect Immun. 2005, 73 (1): 563-572. 10.1128/IAI.73.1.563-572.2005.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kajitani M, Kato A, Wada A, Inokuchi Y, Ishihama A: Regulation of the Escherichia coli hfq gene encoding the host factor for phage Q beta. J Bacteriol. 1994, 176 (2): 531-534.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vytvytska O, Jakobsen JS, Balcunaite G, Andersen JS, Baccarini M, von Gabain A: Host factor I, Hfq, binds to Escherichia coli ompA mRNA in a growth rate-dependent fashion and regulates its stability. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998, 95 (24): 14118-14123. 10.1073/pnas.95.24.14118.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sambrook J, Russel DW: Molecular cloning – a laboratory manual. 2001, Cold Spring Harbor, New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 3Google Scholar
- Biswas S, Biswas I: Role of HtrA in surface protein expression and biofilm formation by Streptococcus mutans. Infect Immun. 2005, 73 (10): 6923-6934. 10.1128/IAI.73.10.6923-6934.2005.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- von Eiff C, McNamara P, Becker K, Bates D, Lei XH, Ziman M, Bochner BR, Peters G, Proctor RA: Phenotype microarray profiling of Staphylococcus aureus menD and hemB mutants with the small-colony-variant phenotype. J Bacteriol. 2006, 188 (2): 687-693. 10.1128/JB.188.2.687-693.2006.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhou L, Lei XH, Bochner BR, Wanner BL: Phenotype microarray analysis of Escherichia coli K-12 mutants with deletions of all two-component systems. J Bacteriol. 2003, 185 (16): 4956-4972. 10.1128/JB.185.16.4956-4972.2003.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Geisinger E, Adhikari RP, Jin R, Ross HF, Novick RP: Inhibition of rot translation by RNAIII, a key feature of agr function. Mol Microbiol. 2006, 61 (4): 1038-1048. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05292.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Morita T, Maki K, Aiba H: RNase E-based ribonucleoprotein complexes: mechanical basis of mRNA destabilization mediated by bacterial noncoding RNAs. Genes Dev. 2005, 19 (18): 2176-2186. 10.1101/gad.1330405.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Britton RA, Wen T, Schaefer L, Pellegrini O, Uicker WC, Mathy N, Tobin C, Daou R, Szyk J, Condon C: Maturation of the 5' end of Bacillus subtilis 16S rRNA by the esential ribonuclease YkqC/RNase J1. Mol Microbiol. 2007, 63 (1): 127-138. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05499.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Even S, Pellegrini O, Zig L, Labas V, Vinh J, Brechemmier-Baey D, Putzer H: Ribonucleases J1 and J2: two novel endoribonucleases in B. subtilis with functional homology to E. coli RNase E. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33 (7): 2141-2152. 10.1093/nar/gki505.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ostberg Y, Bunikis I, Bergstrom S, Johansson J: The etiological agent of Lyme disease, Borrelia burgdorferi, appears to contain only a few small RNA molecules. J Bacteriol. 2004, 186 (24): 8472-8477. 10.1128/JB.186.24.8472-8477.2004.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Taylor D, Holland KT: Amino acid requirements for the growth and production of some exocellular products of Staphylococcus aureus. J Appl Bacteriol. 1989, 66 (4): 319-329.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lutz R, Bujard H: Independent and tight regulation of transcriptional units in Escherichia coli via the LacR/O, the TetR/O and AraC/I1-I2 regulatory elements. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25 (6): 1203-1210. 10.1093/nar/25.6.1203.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Inoue H, Nojima H, Okayama H: High efficiency transformation of Escherichia coli with plasmids. Gene. 1990, 96 (1): 23-28. 10.1016/0378-1119(90)90336-P.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Arnaud M, Chastanet A, Debarbouille M: New vector for efficient allelic replacement in naturally nontransformable, low-GC-content, gram-positive bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004, 70 (11): 6887-6891. 10.1128/AEM.70.11.6887-6891.2004.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Horinouchi S, Weisblum B: Nucleotide sequence and functional map of pC194, a plasmid that specifies inducible chloramphenicol resistance. J Bacteriol. 1982, 150 (2): 815-825.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Oh ET, So JS: A rapid method for RNA preparation from Gram-positive bacteria. J Microbiol Methods. 2003, 52 (3): 395-398. 10.1016/S0167-7012(02)00218-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bochner BR, Gadzinski P, Panomitros E: Phenotype microarrays for high-throughput phenotypic testing and assay of gene function. Genome Res. 2001, 11 (7): 1246-1255. 10.1101/gr.186501.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Biolog Phenotype MicroArrays.http://www.biolog.com/
- Novick RP: Molecular biology of the staphylococci. 1990, New York: VCH publishers, 1: 40.
- Wu S, de Lencastre H, Tomasz A: Sigma-B, a putative operon encoding alternate sigma factor of Staphylococcus aureus RNA polymerase: molecular cloning and DNA sequencing. J Bacteriol. 1996, 178 (20): 6036-6042.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Duthie ES, Lorenz LL: Staphylococcal coagulase; mode of action and antigenicity. J Gen Microbiol. 1952, 6 (1–2): 95-107.PubMedGoogle Scholar