Open Access

No detectable effect of RNA-binding protein Hfq absence in Staphylococcus aureus

Contributed equally
BMC Microbiology20077:10

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2180-7-10

Received: 18 October 2006

Accepted: 09 February 2007

Published: 09 February 2007

Abstract

Background

The RNA-binding protein Hfq is involved in stress and virulence of several pathogens, probably due to its role as mediator in small RNA (sRNA)-mRNA interactions. In this study, we investigate the function of Hfq in the Gram-positive pathogen Staphylococcus aureus, by constructing hfq null mutant derivatives.

Results

We report that unexpectedly, in S. aureus, Hfq does not seem to play a crucial role in stress response, RNAIII or spa mRNA quantity and exoprotein expression, as tested in three virulent genetic backgrounds. Moreover, a global analysis of the RN6390 hfq mutant, which tests ~ 2000 phenotypes, supports our results concerning the non-implication of Hfq in stress response, and shows that Hfq is also not involved in resistance to several chemical agents and antibiotics and does not seem to be implicated in metabolic pathways.

Conclusion

Our data suggest that although sRNA-mRNA interactions in S. aureus are decisive for gene expression regulation, they do not require the RNA-chaperone protein Hfq. These interactions possibly require an RNA-chaperone protein other than Hfq, which remains to be found.

Background

The small RNA-binding protein Hfq was first identified in Escherichia coli as a required factor for replication of phage Qβ RNA [1]. In E. coli, Hfq is a global regulator that modulates the stability, translation and polyadenylation of numerous mRNAs (for review, see [2]). It is proposed that Hfq acts as a RNA chaperone protein by mediating interactions between many regulatory small RNAs (sRNAs) and their mRNAs targets (for review, see [2, 3]). Inactivation of the hfq gene in E. coli results in lower growth and sensitivity to various environmental stresses [4, 5]. Genome analyses show that Hfq-like proteins are conserved in many (but not all) Gram-negative and -positive bacteria [6]. Hfq is involved in stress response and/or virulence of several Gram-negative pathogens (Vibrio cholerae, Brucella abortus, Yersinia enterocolitica, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Shigella flexneri, Salmonella enterica [713] and the Gram-positive pathogen, Listeria monocytogenes [14].

Staphylococcus aureus is a Gram-positive pathogen responsible for a wide variety of human infections, ranging from superficial skin and wound infections to deep abscesses (endocarditis and meningitis), septicemia, or toxin-associated syndromes (e.g. food poisoning and toxic shock syndrome) [15]. S. aureus is also a leading cause of hospital and community-acquired infections whose treatment is becoming increasingly difficult due to the emergence of multiple antibiotic resistance determinants [16]. The type of infection caused by S. aureus depends on virulence factors and stress response pathways present in infectious strains, and reflects the coordinated action of numerous regulators (for review, see [17]). The best-characterized regulator of virulence gene expression is the agr (accessory gene regulator) quorum sensing system (for review, see [17]), which comprises two divergent transcripts, RNAII and RNAIII. The small RNAIII transcript (514 pb) is a key regulator that modulates production of S. aureus extracellular proteins at the transcriptional and post-transcriptional level (for review, see [17]).

S. aureus encodes one Hfq-like protein (8.9 kDa), whose structure has been described [18]. Under in vitro conditions, it specifically binds RNAIII and spa mRNA [19]. More recent studies revealed the expression of other regulatory sRNAs among S. aureus infectious strains [2022], which may be involved in the regulation of virulence. These observations suggest that RNA-RNA interactions are decisive for virulence regulation in S. aureus, while the role of Hfq in these interactions remains to be elucidated.

In this study, we constructed hfq derivatives in three S. aureus backgrounds that differ in their virulence capacities (RN6390, COL and Newman; [23]), and compared them to their respective WT strains, in order to determine the Hfq function(s). In the experimental conditions and the genetic backgrounds tested, Hfq does not display any detectable role in stress tolerance, RNA stability or exoprotein expression. To provide a more complete analysis of the hfq associated phenotypes, we also compared the RN6390 WT and hfq mutant strains using the Phenotype Microarray (PM) Technology, which tests ~ 2000 phenotypes simultaneously (including utilization of several sources of carbon, nitrogen, phosphate and sulfur, and sensitivity to different stresses and chemical agents). Based on our results, we can postulate that in S. aureus, RNA-RNA interactions do probably not require the involvement of RNA chaperone proteins, or that at least a protein other than Hfq, as yet unidentified, is responsible for the modulation of RNA interactions.

Results and discussion

Inactivation and expression of hfq in S. aureus

We first constructed an hfq mutant in the S. aureus avirulent strain RN4220, in which the region corresponding to the hfq ORF was replaced by a cassette conferring Cm resistance (see Methods and Fig. 1A). Gene inactivation was verified by Southern blot (data not shown) and the hfq mutation was then transferred by phage transduction into three virulent strains that differ in their virulence regulation pathways, RN6390, Newman and COL. Gene transfer was confirmed by PCR and RT-PCR (Fig. 1B).
Figure 1

Inactivation of hfq in S. aureus (1A) and expression of hfq in S. aureus RN6390 (1B). The complete hfq ORF is removed and replaced by the cat gene (1A). Genes directly up-(mia) and downstream (gpxA1) of hfq are shown, and primers used for RT-PCR experiments are indicated by arrows. Positions of ORFs related to the N315 annotated genome are respectively: mia (13022047-1302982); hfq (1302997-1303230), gpxA1 (c1303928-1303452). Total RNAs from post-exponential growth phase cultures of RN6390 WT and hfq mutant strains were first retro-transcribed using random hexamer primers. PCR amplification specific to the hfq ORF was realized from the cDNAs, obtained from random retro-transcription (RT) (1B). Chromosomal DNA of WT (WT chrom. DNA) was used as positive control of PCR amplification. PCR amplification of the spa gene was also used as a positive control of cDNA quality from the RN6390 hfq strain. Negative controls of RT-PCR reactions were also shown (neg. ctl).

In E. coli, Hfq is one of the most abundant intracellular proteins, whose level in exponential growth phase is reportedly around 30,000 to 60,000 molecules per cell [24]. Hfq levels further increase during the transition to stationary phase [25]. These data suggest that Hfq likely plays a crucial role in controlling expression of numerous growth-related genes. In view of the described properties of Hfq, we asked whether hfq expression levels in S. aureus were as high as in E. coli. We first followed hfq expression during bacterial growth in BHI medium, by northern blot experiments, using an hfq-specific fragment as probe. No transcript corresponding to hfq mRNA was detected in RN6390, Newman or COL WT backgrounds (from total RNAs extracted from both exponential and stationary phase cultures; data not shown). In these experiments, an E. coli hfq strain containing a plasmid carrying the S. aureus hfq gene under control of a tetracycline inducible promoter system was used as positive control of hfq mRNA expression. We then compared hfq expression using RT-PCR, which is a more sensitive detection method than northern blotting. Steady state levels obtained from RN6390 WT and hfq post-exponential RNA extracts are represented on Figure 1B. A band corresponding in size to the hfq amplicon (which is comparable in size to the fragment amplified from chromosomal DNA) was detected in the WT profile, suggesting that hfq is expressed in S. aureus. As expected, no amplification from both hfq mutant strain chromosomal DNA (not shown) and cDNAs (Fig. 1B) was observed, which confirms the hfq ORF deletion. Positive amplification from cDNAs of the RN6390 hfq strain was visualized with PCR using spa specific primers, confirming the quality of these extracts (Fig. 1B). Similar results were obtained with RT-PCR experiments realized with Newman strain.

These results indicate that hfq gene is expressed in S. aureus in the experimental conditions tested but at a very low level, as no transcript could be visualized by northern blot experiments. In view of these data, we speculate that Hfq protein is probably less abundant in S. aureus than in E. coli.

hfq inactivation has no effects on growth and stress resistance

We first compared growth of hfq mutants of RN6390, COL and Newman, with their respective WT strains in aerated BHI rich medium or in aerated RPMI synthetic medium at 37°C. No growth differences were noticed in any of the genetic backgrounds tested (data not shown) in either media. As Hfq is reportedly involved in stress tolerance in many pathogens [8, 10, 14], we also tested the ability of staphylococcal hfq mutants to resist to several environmental stresses: Under osmotic (NaCl), oxidative stress (H2O2) or heat-shock (44°C) conditions, the hfq mutant grew as well as the WT strain in all genetic backgrounds (data not shown). In L. monocytogenes, the contribution of Hfq in stress response depends on the alternative sigma factor σB pathway, as σB controls hfq stress-inducible transcription [14]. In S. aureus, Hfq does not seem to be implicated in stress resistance, regardless of the presence or absence of the σB pathway, as the same results were obtained in both σB pathway functional (COL, Newman) and defective (RN6390) strains.

Hfq does not affect RNAIII or spa mRNA quantity in vivo

In vitro studies showed that Hfq specifically binds the spa mRNA regulatory region, and more tightly, RNAIII [19]. spa encodes the Staphylococcal protein A (Spa), a major surface protein. Its expression is known to be repressed by RNAIII at the transcriptional level by an undetermined mechanism, but additional studies have shown that RNAIII also inhibits spa expression by affecting its translation and stability [19]. To elucidate the involvement of Hfq in the stability of RNAIII and spa mRNA in vivo, we compared their steady state levels in WT and hfq mutant strains. No significant differences were observed in RNAIII expression in the hfq mutant, compared to the WT strain, whether in the RN6390 or Newman context (Fig. 2A). When we compared spa RNA transcript profiles in RN6390, Newman and COL backgrounds, no differences between Δhfq and WT were detected (Fig. 2B). Variation of spa mRNA expression visualized between strain backgrounds reflects differences in virulence regulatory pathways, as previously described [23]. Amounts of protein A were also analysed in staphylococcal strains by western blot experiments [26] using a monoclonal anti-protein A antibody (Sigma, Saint Louis, MO, USA); again no differences were observed (data not shown). The results described above show that Hfq does not affect the quantities of RNAIII or of spa mRNA in vivo. In view of these observations, we speculate that in the natural context of the bacterium, Hfq does not contribute to the quantities of RNAIII and spa mRNA and likely has no effect on the formation of the RNAIII-spa mRNA complex. This is relevant to previous in vitro results showing that increasing concentrations of Hfq have no effect on the formation of RNAIII-spa mRNA complex [19].
Figure 2

Northern blot analysis of RNAIII (2A) or spa mRNA (2B) expression in S. aureus WT and Δhfq strains. Total RNA was extracted from post-exponential phase cultures of RN6390, Newman and COL, WT and Δhfq strains. 15 μg of total RNA of RN6390 and Newman strains were analysed by northern blot, using an RNAIII-specific probe (2A). Total RNA from RN6390, Newman and COL strains was also compared for spa mRNA expression, using a spa-specific probe (2B). Results from three independent experiments were identical.

Hfq does not affect exoprotein expression profiles

S. aureus secretes numerous virulence factors, which are mainly produced during the post-exponential phase, and whose expression involves the coordination of many regulators, including agr RNAIII (for review, see [17]). To test the possible role of Hfq in the production of secreted virulence factors, we compared exoprotein profiles in RN6390, Newman, and COL WT strains and their Δhfq derivatives. No differences were observed in the various genetic backgrounds tested (data not shown). Hemolysins and proteases are major secreted virulence factors in some S. aureus virulent strains, such as RN6390. To test the effect of Hfq on production of those secreted enzymes, we compared hemolytic and proteolytic activities in RN6390 and Newman WT and hfq mutant strains. Stationary cultures were streaked onto BHI medium containing rabbit blood (which reveals α-hemolytic activity), sheep blood (corresponding to β-hemolytic activity) and horse blood (δ-hemolytic activity), or onto NB medium containing skimmed milk (to reveal proteolytic activities). No differences were observed in halos corresponding to the different enzymatic activities in the two genetic backgrounds tested (data not shown), which suggests that the lack of Hfq does not affect production of either hemolysins or secreted proteases.

Altogether, these results suggest that deletion of hfq does not affect exoprotein expression profiles. It is thus likely that Hfq is not decisive for the production of secreted virulence factors.

PM analysis of RN6390 hfq mutant

PM assay is a relatively new technology in which ~ 2000 phenotypes are tested simultaneously, and has already been used for comparative analysis between strains in several bacterial species [2729]. Strains are grown in microtiter plate, each well containing different media. This technology may help to determine gene functions. Respiration is used in PM as an indication of bacterial growth, and was compared between strains in media containing different sources of carbon (PM1 to PM2), nitrogen (PM3 and PM6 to PM8), phosphorus and sulfur (PM4), nutrients or cofactors (PM5), or in the presence of different stresses or chemical agents (PM9 to PM20). Consensus PM results of comparative analysis of RN6390 WT and hfq mutant strains are shown on Figure 3. Additional file 1 indicates values of phenotypes gained or lost. Briefly, slight or no differences between strains were observed under any metabolic conditions, and differences in sensitivity to chemical agents observed could not be reproduced by independent experimentation.
Figure 3

PM comparative analysis of RN6390 WT and hfq strains. The WT and the hfq mutant were subject to PM analysis of ~ 2000 phenotypes. Incubation and time course curves for respiration (tetrazolium color formation) in specific conditions were generated with Omnilog-PM software (see for more details [42]). The PM kinetics shows consensus data comparing the RN6390 hfq mutant (green) to its respective WT strain (red). Red indicates a stronger response by the parental strain and green indicates a stronger response by the hfq mutant. When the two strains have equivalent metabolism or sensitivity to a stress or chemical agent, the red and green kinetic graphs overlap and are yellow. Boxes surrounding a specific condition indicate a significant difference in response. Values of gain or loss of phenotypes are in Table 1 of supplementary data.

Metabolism tests (PM1 toPM8), performed in a synthetic medium, showed negative differences for utilization of several amino acids or dipeptides as nitrogen source (PM3 and PM6 to PM8); although the signal decreases were very weak. These data seemed to suggest that the hfq mutant strain could be defective for nitrogen metabolism. To test this hypothesis, we compared growth of RN6390 WT and hfq mutant strains in a synthetic complete medium or in a synthetic minimal medium (containing the essential amino acids for auxotrophy, glutamate and leucine; Elise Durant, INRA, personal communication) with or without several nitrogen sources, including different combinations of amino acids (including glutamate and/or aspartate) as used in the PM assay. No differences in growth were observed between the two strains (data not shown), suggesting that the hfq mutant uses different nitrogen sources as well as the WT strain. The weak differences detected by PM analysis (PM3, PM6 to PM8) may reflect the use in PM of a standard chemically minimal medium that lacks the essential amino acids, where only residual growth of both strains occurred. In this case, it is likely that phenotypes observed result from residual respiration of surviving bacteria in the medium and not from real bacterial growth.

Stress or chemical agent sensitivity PM tests (PM9 to PM20) were performed in rich medium, similar to LB. Essentially no differences were observed in osmotic (PM9) and pH (PM10) stress panels between the RN6390 WT and hfq mutant strains (Fig. 3), which confirmed some results obtained by conventional stress tests (see above). Positive or negative differences were observed for some chemical agents or antibiotics (PM11 to PM20; see Fig. 3, and Additional file 1) but signals were weak (see Additional file 1). The only real signal concerned Cm resistance of the hfq mutant, a consequence of the strain construction (PM11, F3-4 and PM 14, F4, and derivative thiamphenicol, PM18, A10-12). We compared sensitivity of some chemical agents or antibiotics that gave negative responses (cobalt chloride, PM13, G3; cefotaxime, PM16, A3-4), or positive signals (domiphen bromide, PM15, D6; dodine, PM20, E7) on MH broth by measuring the MIC or on agar plates using disk-specific antibiotics. Again, no significant differences were observed between WT and hfq mutant strains (data not shown).

This comparative analysis showed that among ~ 2000 phenotypes, essentially no reproducible phenotypic differences between S. aureus RN6390 WT and its hfq derivative mutant were detected. For metabolic tests, the few phenotypes that were noted likely have no physiological significance, and may result from the poor growth of both strains. We thus conclude that Hfq has no role on stress response and on chemical agent sensitivity and probably no impact on metabolic pathways in S. aureus.

Conclusion

In this study, we tried to elucidate the roles of the RNA-binding protein Hfq in S. aureus cell physiology and regulation. Our results indicate that Hfq does not seem to contribute to the adaptation to stress responses, RNAIII or spa mRNA levels, or to general exoprotein production in S. aureus. Some of these data have been recently suggested [30]. A more general approach, which tests ~ 2000 phenotypes simultaneously confirmed our observations (e.g., no implication of Hfq in stress sensitivity) and also showed that Hfq has likely no impact on metabolic pathways or on resistance to different chemical agents or antibiotics. Nevertheless, it remains possible that Hfq has a role in environmental conditions that differ from those tested; for example, those encountered to proliferate inside the host during the infection process. We compared growth in rabbit serum between a wild type and its hfq derivative mutant, in the three different genetic contexts; no differences were observed (data not shown). This result suggests that Hfq may not be crucial for survival inside the host.

In E. coli, Hfq contributes to interactions between regulatory sRNAs and their mRNA targets (for review, see [2]). It also forms a ribonucleoprotein complex with RNase E that affects mRNAs turnover [31]. Staphylococcal genome analyses indicate the lack of an RNase E-like protein. In Bacillus subtilis, RNases J1 and J2 have functional homologies with RNase E but no sequence similarity [32, 33]; homolog of these RNases are present in S. aureus. However, it has never been demonstrated that RNases J1 and J2 functions are dependant of Hfq. Although RNA-RNA interactions appear to be decisive for regulatory pathways in S. aureus, regulation mechanisms are likely to occur independently of Hfq and RNase E.

Searches for Hfq conservation through bacterial species have shown that Hfq homologs are absent in several low GC Gram-positive bacteria, such as Lactococcus lactis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Streptococcus pyogenes [6]. In Borrelia burgdoferi, genome analyses reveal the lack of both Hfq and RNase E proteins [34]. We propose that in S. aureus, under conditions known to involve Hfq in other bacteria, RNA-RNA interactions do not require Hfq. An as yet uncharacterized RNA-chaperone protein might be responsible for the modulation of RNA interactions in this bacterium. Database searches in S. aureus genomes for Sm-like domains, which are characteristic of RNA-binding protein like Hfq, reveal no other candidates than Hfq. If S. aureus sRNAs are important for mRNA turnover, we suggest the existence of alternative mechanism that substitute for Hfq and RNase E that remains to be discovered.

Methods

Bacterial strains, plasmids and growth conditions

Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1. S. aureus strains were routinely grown in BHI medium with aeration at 37°C, or at 30°C for the RN4220 strain harboring the thermosensitive plasmid. Defined synthetic medium used for staphylococcal growth was either RPMI medium 1640 (Gibco-Invitrogen, Eugene, USA) or as published [35]. E. coli DH5αZ1 [36], which was used for cloning experiments, was grown in LB broth at 37°C. Antibiotics were added to media as needed at the following concentrations: Cm, 5 μg/ml for S. aureus and 10 μg/ml for E. coli; Ery, 2 μg/ml for S. aureus and Amp, 100 μg/ml for E. coli. X-Gal was added as needed to BHI plates at a final concentration of 150 μg/ml.
Table 1

Strains and plasmids used in this study.

 

Key features

Reference

Strains

  

E. coli DH5αZ1

Δ(argF-lac)169 ϕ80Δlac Z58(M15) gln V44 (AS) rfb D1 gyr A96 (NalR) rec A1 end A1 spo T1 thi-1 hsdR1 7 Z1(lacR tetR SpR)

[36]

S. aureus RN4220

Avirulent mutant of NCTC 8325-4 that accepts foreign DNA

[43]

S. aureus RN6390

Laboratory virulent strain derived from NCTC 8325

[43]

S. aureus COL

Highly methicillin resistant clinical isolate

[44]

S. aureus Newman

Virulent strain containing a high level of Clumping Factor

[45]

S. aureus RN4220 hfq

RN4220, Δhfq::cat, CmR

This work

S. aureus RN6390 hfq

RN6390, Δhfq::cat, CmR

This work

S. aureus COL hfq

COL, Δhfq::cat, CmR

This work

S. aureus Newman hfq

Newman, Δhfq::cat, CmR

This work

Plasmids

  

PMAD

Thermosensitive plasmid in S. aureus derived from pRN5101 and containing the bgaB gene, EryR, AmpR

[38]

pMADΔhfq::cat

pMAD containing up- and downstream regions from hfq gene cloned on either side of the Cm cassette (cat); used for construction of the S. aureus RN4220 hfq mutant, EryR, AmpR, CmR, bgaB

This work

For stress studies, staphylococcal cultures were prepared as follows: serial dilutions of exponential cultures were spotted on BHI plates containing or not an osmotic stress agent (NaCl, 0.5 to 2 M) or an oxidative stress agent (H2O2, 1 to 2 mM), and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. Growth at high temperature was examined by plating cells on BHI medium and incubating at 44°C for 24 h.

DNA manipulations

Plasmid and chromosomal DNA preparations, PCR amplifications, and DNA modifications were performed according to commonly used techniques or suppliers' instructions. Lysis of S. aureus cell suspensions was achieved by treatment with 100 μg/ml of lysostaphin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 1 hour at 37°C, followed by standard methods for DNA preparation. DNA transformation for E. coli [37] and for S. aureus [23] was performed as described.

Chromosomal deletion of hfq

hfq was inactivated using the pMAD plasmid, which is thermosensitive for replication [38], as described [23]. Briefly, regions up- and downstream of hfq were amplified, fused to flank the pC194 cat amplified gene [39] (see primer list in Table 2) and cloned into the pGEM-T-Easy vector (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). The segment of interest was then subject to appropriate digestions and cloned into pMAD. The resulting plasmid, pMAD Δhfq::cat was introduced into the RN4220 strain and hfq mutant derivatives were selected as described [23]. Gene inactivation was confirmed by Southern blotting [26], after HaeIII digestion of RN4220 WT and hfq chromosomal DNA, using a PCR product corresponding to the Hfq ORF region as a probe (see Table 2 for primers used). The hfq mutation was then transferred into RN6390, Newman and COL S. aureus strains by ϕ11 phage-mediated transduction [23]. Mutation transfer was confirmed by PCR and RT-PCR (see primers list in Table 2).
Table 2

Primers used in this study*.

Name

Position

Sequence

Use

SA-hfq 5up (BamH1)

F

5'CGGGATCC ATGACGATTCTTTAGGTGA3'

Used for cloning upstream region of hfq

SA-hfq 5down (KpnI)

R

5'GGGGTACC TGTCGGACTCCTTTTACT3'

 

SA-hfq 3up (SmaI)

F

5'TCCCCCGGG ATGGGCACGATTTAATGAC3'

Used for cloning downstream region of hfq

SA-hfq 3down (EcoRI)

R

5'CGGAATTC TACTTGAAACACCTGATT

 

SA-cat 5 (KpnI)

F

5'GGGGTACC GCACAGACAGGACAAAATCG

Used for cat amplification

SA-cat 3 (SmaI)

R

5'TCCCCCGGG TTCCGAGGCTCAACGTC3'

 

SA-hfq verif up

F

5'ATCATAGCAGGTGGAACAG3'

Used for verification of hfq deletion

SA-hfq verif down

R

5'CGAAAGAGAAATAGAAAAAT3'

 

SA-RNAIII 5

F

5'CAGAGATGTGATGGAAAATAGTTG3'

Used for RNA III probe amplification

SA-RNAIII 3

R

5'ATTAAGGGAATGTTTTACAGTTATT3'

 

SA-spa 5

F

5'TTAGCATCTGCATGGTTTGC3'

Used for spa probe amplification

SA-spa 3

R

5'ACAACGTAACGGCTTCATCC3'

 

SA-hu 5

F

5'AGATTTAATCAATGCAGTTGCAGA3'

Used for hu probe amplification

SA-hu 3

R

5'AATGCTTTACCAGCTTTG AATGCT3'

 

SA-hfq 5 (NdeI)

F

5'GGAATTCCATATG ATTGCAAACGAAAAC3'

Used for hfq probe amplification, RT-PCR

SA-hfq 3 (HindIII)

R

5'CCCAAGCTT ATTCTTCACTTTCAGTAG3'

 

*F: forward; R: reverse. Restriction enzyme sites are underlined.

RNA manipulations

Overnight cultures of staphylococcal strains in BHI medium were diluted 1000-fold in the same medium and grown at 37°C. Total RNAs of mid-or post- exponential or stationary phase cultures were extracted as previously described [40] or using the RNA spin mini Kit (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK). Northern blot experiments were performed using hfq, RNAIII- and spa specific fragments as probes (see Table 2 for primers list), which were α32-P labelled, as described [26]. RNA transcripts were quantified, using hu mRNA as positive control of constitutive expression. For hfq expression studies, random RT-PCR experiments were performed using the Thermoscript RT-PCR System (Invitrogen, Eugene, USA); primers used for successive PCR are in Table 2.

Protein extract preparation, protein profile analysis and determinations of extra-cellular enzymatic activities

Overnight cultures of staphylococcal strains in BHI medium were diluted 100-fold in the same medium and grown at 37°C. Supernatant protein extracts from post-exponential or stationary phase cultures were prepared as described [23] and protein profiles were compared by PAGE after staining with Coomassie blue reagent [26]. For hemolytic or proteolytic activities, staphylococcal stationary phase cultures were streaked on BHI medium containing 5% rabbit, sheep, or horse blood, or on NB medium containing 10% skimmed milk. Enzymatic halos were compared after overnight growth at 37°C.

PM analysis

S. aureus RN6390 WT and hfq mutant strains were subject to full profile (20 panels) PM analysis, as described elsewhere [28, 29, 41]. This extensive analysis contains ~ 2000 tests which include utilization of different sources of carbon (PM1 and PM2; ~ 200 tests), nitrogen (PM3 and PM6 to PM8; ~ 400 tests) phosphorus and sulfur (PM4; ~ 100 tests), nutrient stimulation (PM5; ~ 100 tests) as well as sensitivity to several stresses (PM9 and PM10; ~ 200 tests) and to chemical agents that affect various biological pathways (PM11 to PM20; ~ 1000 tests). Detailed information of PM experimental conditions is available [42]. Briefly, respiration during bacterial growth under different conditions is monitored by NADH production, measured with a tetrazolium dye and evaluated for intensity of color formation. Phenotypic data were recorded over a 24-hour period. Differences in measurements of WT and hfq mutant strains are calculated. The WT strain is recorded as a red tracing, and the hfq mutant as a green tracing. Areas of overlap (no changes) between the two measurements are colored in yellow, whereas differences are colored in red or green for WT or hfq mutant respectively. The consensus profile presented is the result of two independent comparative analyses.

To confirm some of the observations with the nitrogen metabolic arrays (PM3 and PM6 to PM8), growth of RN6390 WT and hfq mutant strains was compared in a chemically defined medium [35] containing or not different sources of nitrogen. Sensitivity to selected chemical agents (cobalt chloride, dodine, domiphen bromide) or antibiotics (cefotaxime) was tested by determining the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration, (MIC) or by using the agar disk diffusion method (Cefotaxime, Fluka). Both of these experiments were performed in Mueller Hinton broth.

Notes

Abbreviations

WT: 

Wild Type

BHI: 

Brain Heart Infusion

RPMI: 

Roswell Park Memorial Institute

LB: 

Luria-Bertani

NB: 

Nutrient Broth

MH: 

Mueller Hinton

Ery: 

Erythromycin

Cm: 

Chloramphenicol

Amp: 

Ampicillin

X-Gal: 

5 bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D-galactopyranoside

spa

Staphylococcal protein A gene

ORF: 

Open Reading Frame.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Pascale Romby for communicating unpublished results. We are very grateful to Sandy Gruss for helpful discussions and critical reading of the manuscript. We thank Michelle David for technical assistance. We thank Elise Durant, Vincent Juillard and Brice Felden for helpful advice and discussion, and Mac Cabee for warm support. This work was supported by a grant "Microbiologie-Immunologie-Maladies Emergentes" from the "Agence Nationale pour la Recherche" (ANR). CR is the recipient of a fellowship from CNRS/Conseil Général de l'Essonne.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Signalisation et Réseaux de Régulations Bactériens. Institut de Génétique et MicrobiologieCNRS/UMR 8621, Centre scientifique d'Orsay, Université Paris Sud

References

  1. Franze de Fernandez MT, Eoyang L, August JT: Factor fraction required for the synthesis of bacteriophage Qbeta-RNA. Nature. 1968, 219 (154): 588-590. 10.1038/219588a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Valentin-Hansen P, Eriksen M, Udesen C: The bacterial Sm-like protein Hfq: a key player in RNA transactions. Mol Microbiol. 2004, 51 (6): 1525-1533. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2003.03935.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Zhang A, Wassarman KM, Rosenow C, Tjaden BC, Storz G, Gottesman S: Global analysis of small RNA and mRNA targets of Hfq. Mol Microbiol. 2003, 50 (4): 1111-1124. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03734.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Muffler A, Traulsen DD, Fischer D, Lange R, Hengge-Aronis R: The RNA-binding protein HF-I plays a global regulatory role which is largely, but not exclusively, due to its role in expression of the sigmaS subunit of RNA polymerase in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1997, 179 (1): 297-300.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Tsui HC, Leung HC, Winkler ME: Characterization of broadly pleiotropic phenotypes caused by an hfq insertion mutation in Escherichia coli K-12. Mol Microbiol. 1994, 13 (1): 35-49. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1994.tb00400.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Sun X, Zhulin I, Wartell RM: Predicted structure and phyletic distribution of the RNA-binding protein Hfq. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30 (17): 3662-3671. 10.1093/nar/gkf508.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Ding Y, Davis BM, Waldor MK: Hfq is essential for Vibrio cholerae virulence and downregulates sigma expression. Mol Microbiol. 2004, 53 (1): 345-354. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04142.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Robertson GT, Roop RM: The Brucella abortus host factor I (HF-I) protein contributes to stress resistance during stationary phase and is a major determinant of virulence in mice. Mol Microbiol. 1999, 34 (4): 690-700. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01629.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Nakao H, Watanabe H, Nakayama S, Takeda T: yst gene expression in Yersinia enterocolitica is positively regulated by a chromosomal region that is highly homologous to Escherichia coli host factor 1 gene (hfq). Mol Microbiol. 1995, 18 (5): 859-865. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1995.18050859.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Sonnleitner E, Hagens S, Rosenau F, Wilhelm S, Habel A, Jager KE, Blasi U: Reduced virulence of a hfq mutant of Pseudomonas aeruginosa O1. Microb Pathog. 2003, 35 (5): 217-228. 10.1016/S0882-4010(03)00149-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Figueroa-Bossi N, Lemire S, Maloriol D, Balbontin R, Casadesus J, Bossi L: Loss of Hfq activates the sigma-dependent envelope stress response in Salmonella enterica. Mol Microbiol. 2006Google Scholar
  12. Sharma AK, Payne SM: Induction of expression of hfq by DksA is essential for Shigella flexneri virulence. Mol Microbiol. 2006, 62 (2): 469-479. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05376.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Sittka A, Pfeiffer V, Tedin K, Vogel J: The RNA chaperone Hfq is essential for the virulence of Salmonella typhymurium. Mol Microbiol. 2007, 63 (1): 193-217. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05489.x.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Christiansen JK, Larsen MH, Ingmer H, Sogaard-Andersen L, Kallipolitis BH: The RNA-binding protein Hfq of Listeria monocytogenes: role in stress tolerance and virulence. J Bacteriol. 2004, 186 (11): 3355-3362. 10.1128/JB.186.11.3355-3362.2004.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Höök M, Foster TJ: Staphylococcal surface proteins. Edited by: Fischetti et al. 2000, Washington: ASM pressGoogle Scholar
  16. Hiramatsu K: Vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a new model of antibiotic resistance. Lancet Infect Dis. 2001, 1 (3): 147-155. 10.1016/S1473-3099(01)00091-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Novick RP: Autoinduction and signal transduction in the regulation of staphylococcal virulence. Mol Microbiol. 2003, 48 (6): 1429-1449. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03526.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Schumacher MA, Pearson RF, Moller T, Valentin-Hansen P, Brennan RG: Structures of the pleiotropic translational regulator Hfq and an Hfq-RNA complex: a bacterial Sm-like protein. EMBO J. 2002, 21 (13): 3546-3556. 10.1093/emboj/cdf322.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Huntzinger E, Boisset S, Saveanu C, Benito Y, Geissmann T, Namane A, Lina G, Etienne J, Ehresmann B, Ehresmann C: Staphylococcus aureus RNAIII and the endoribonuclease III coordinately regulate spa gene expression. EMBO J. 2005, 24 (4): 824-835. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600572.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Anderson KL, Roberts C, Disz T, Vonstein V, Hwang K, Overbeek R, Olson PD, Projan SJ, Dunman PM: Characterization of the Staphylococcus aureus heat shock, cold shock, stringent, and SOS responses and their effects on log-phase mRNA turnover. J Bacteriol. 2006, 188 (19): 6739-6756. 10.1128/JB.00609-06.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Pichon C, Felden B: Small RNA genes expressed from Staphylococcus aureus genomic and pathogenicity islands with specific expression among pathogenic strains. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005, 102 (40): 14249-14254. 10.1073/pnas.0503838102.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Roberts C, Anderson KL, Murphy E, Projan SJ, Mounts W, Hurlburt B, Smeltzer M, Overbeek R, Disz T, Dunman PM: Characterizing the effect of the Staphylococcus aureus virulence factor regulator, SarA, on log-phase mRNA half-lives. J Bacteriol. 2006, 188 (7): 2593-2603. 10.1128/JB.188.7.2593-2603.2006.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Rigoulay C, Entenza JM, Halpern D, Widmer E, Moreillon P, Poquet I, Gruss A: Comparative analysis of the roles of HtrA-like surface proteases in two virulent Staphylococcus aureus strains. Infect Immun. 2005, 73 (1): 563-572. 10.1128/IAI.73.1.563-572.2005.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kajitani M, Kato A, Wada A, Inokuchi Y, Ishihama A: Regulation of the Escherichia coli hfq gene encoding the host factor for phage Q beta. J Bacteriol. 1994, 176 (2): 531-534.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Vytvytska O, Jakobsen JS, Balcunaite G, Andersen JS, Baccarini M, von Gabain A: Host factor I, Hfq, binds to Escherichia coli ompA mRNA in a growth rate-dependent fashion and regulates its stability. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998, 95 (24): 14118-14123. 10.1073/pnas.95.24.14118.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Sambrook J, Russel DW: Molecular cloning – a laboratory manual. 2001, Cold Spring Harbor, New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 3Google Scholar
  27. Biswas S, Biswas I: Role of HtrA in surface protein expression and biofilm formation by Streptococcus mutans. Infect Immun. 2005, 73 (10): 6923-6934. 10.1128/IAI.73.10.6923-6934.2005.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. von Eiff C, McNamara P, Becker K, Bates D, Lei XH, Ziman M, Bochner BR, Peters G, Proctor RA: Phenotype microarray profiling of Staphylococcus aureus menD and hemB mutants with the small-colony-variant phenotype. J Bacteriol. 2006, 188 (2): 687-693. 10.1128/JB.188.2.687-693.2006.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Zhou L, Lei XH, Bochner BR, Wanner BL: Phenotype microarray analysis of Escherichia coli K-12 mutants with deletions of all two-component systems. J Bacteriol. 2003, 185 (16): 4956-4972. 10.1128/JB.185.16.4956-4972.2003.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Geisinger E, Adhikari RP, Jin R, Ross HF, Novick RP: Inhibition of rot translation by RNAIII, a key feature of agr function. Mol Microbiol. 2006, 61 (4): 1038-1048. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05292.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Morita T, Maki K, Aiba H: RNase E-based ribonucleoprotein complexes: mechanical basis of mRNA destabilization mediated by bacterial noncoding RNAs. Genes Dev. 2005, 19 (18): 2176-2186. 10.1101/gad.1330405.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Britton RA, Wen T, Schaefer L, Pellegrini O, Uicker WC, Mathy N, Tobin C, Daou R, Szyk J, Condon C: Maturation of the 5' end of Bacillus subtilis 16S rRNA by the esential ribonuclease YkqC/RNase J1. Mol Microbiol. 2007, 63 (1): 127-138. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05499.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Even S, Pellegrini O, Zig L, Labas V, Vinh J, Brechemmier-Baey D, Putzer H: Ribonucleases J1 and J2: two novel endoribonucleases in B. subtilis with functional homology to E. coli RNase E. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33 (7): 2141-2152. 10.1093/nar/gki505.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Ostberg Y, Bunikis I, Bergstrom S, Johansson J: The etiological agent of Lyme disease, Borrelia burgdorferi, appears to contain only a few small RNA molecules. J Bacteriol. 2004, 186 (24): 8472-8477. 10.1128/JB.186.24.8472-8477.2004.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Taylor D, Holland KT: Amino acid requirements for the growth and production of some exocellular products of Staphylococcus aureus. J Appl Bacteriol. 1989, 66 (4): 319-329.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Lutz R, Bujard H: Independent and tight regulation of transcriptional units in Escherichia coli via the LacR/O, the TetR/O and AraC/I1-I2 regulatory elements. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25 (6): 1203-1210. 10.1093/nar/25.6.1203.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Inoue H, Nojima H, Okayama H: High efficiency transformation of Escherichia coli with plasmids. Gene. 1990, 96 (1): 23-28. 10.1016/0378-1119(90)90336-P.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Arnaud M, Chastanet A, Debarbouille M: New vector for efficient allelic replacement in naturally nontransformable, low-GC-content, gram-positive bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004, 70 (11): 6887-6891. 10.1128/AEM.70.11.6887-6891.2004.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Horinouchi S, Weisblum B: Nucleotide sequence and functional map of pC194, a plasmid that specifies inducible chloramphenicol resistance. J Bacteriol. 1982, 150 (2): 815-825.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Oh ET, So JS: A rapid method for RNA preparation from Gram-positive bacteria. J Microbiol Methods. 2003, 52 (3): 395-398. 10.1016/S0167-7012(02)00218-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Bochner BR, Gadzinski P, Panomitros E: Phenotype microarrays for high-throughput phenotypic testing and assay of gene function. Genome Res. 2001, 11 (7): 1246-1255. 10.1101/gr.186501.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Biolog Phenotype MicroArrays.http://www.biolog.com/
  43. Novick RP: Molecular biology of the staphylococci. 1990, New York: VCH publishers, 1: 40.Google Scholar
  44. Wu S, de Lencastre H, Tomasz A: Sigma-B, a putative operon encoding alternate sigma factor of Staphylococcus aureus RNA polymerase: molecular cloning and DNA sequencing. J Bacteriol. 1996, 178 (20): 6036-6042.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Duthie ES, Lorenz LL: Staphylococcal coagulase; mode of action and antigenicity. J Gen Microbiol. 1952, 6 (1–2): 95-107.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Bohn et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.