Open Access

Characterization of single-stranded DNA-binding proteins from the psychrophilic bacteria Desulfotalea psychrophila, Flavobacterium psychrophilum, Psychrobacter arcticus, Psychrobacter cryohalolentis, Psychromonas ingrahamii, Psychroflexus torquis, and Photobacterium profundum

  • Marta Nowak1,
  • Marcin Olszewski1,
  • Marta Śpibida1 and
  • Józef Kur1Email author
BMC Microbiology201414:91

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2180-14-91

Received: 26 February 2014

Accepted: 31 March 2014

Published: 14 April 2014

Abstract

Background

Single-stranded DNA-binding proteins (SSBs) play essential roles in DNA replication, recombination and repair in Bacteria, Archaea and Eukarya. In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in SSBs, since they find numerous applications in diverse molecular biology and analytical methods.

Results

We report the characterization of single-stranded DNA-binding proteins from the psychrophilic bacteria Desulfotalea psychrophila (Dps SSB), Flavobacterium psychrophilum (Fps SSB), Psychrobacter arcticus (Par SSB), Psychrobacter cryohalolentis (Pcr SSB), Psychromonas ingrahamii (Pin SSB), Photobacterium profundum (Ppr SSB), and Psychroflexus torquis (Pto SSB). The proteins show a high differential within the molecular mass of their monomers and the length of their amino acid sequences. The high level of identity and similarity in respect to the Eco SSB is related to the OB-fold and some of the last amino acid residues. They are functional as homotetramers, with each monomer encoding one single stranded DNA binding domain (OB-fold). The fluorescence titrations indicated that the length of the ssDNA-binding site size is approximately 30 ± 2 nucleotides for the Pin SSB, 31 ± 2 nucleotides for the Dps SSB, and 32 ± 2 nucleotides for the Par SSB, Pcr SSB, Ppr SSB and Pto SSB. They also demonstrated that it is salt independent. However, when the ionic strength was changed from low salt to high, binding-mode transition was observed for the Fps SSB, at 31 ± 2 nucleotides and 45 ± 2 nucleotides, respectively. As expected, the SSB proteins under study cause duplex DNA destabilization. The greatest decrease in duplex DNA melting temperature was observed in the presence of the Pto SSB 17°C. The SSBs in question possess relatively high thermostability for proteins derived from cold-adapted bacteria.

Conclusion

The results showed that SSB proteins from psychrophilic microorganisms are typical bacterial SSBs and possess relatively high thermostability, offering an attractive alternative to other thermostable SSBs in molecular biology applications.

Keywords

DNA replication Expression Psychrophilic microorganism SSB Thermostability Psychrophiles

Background

Single-stranded DNA-binding proteins (SSBs) are indispensable elements in the cells of all living organisms. They interact with ssDNA regardless of sequence, preventing them from forming secondary structures and protecting them from degradation by nucleases[1]. In this way, they participate in all the processes involving ssDNA, such as replication, repair and recombination[25]. Although there are differences in amino acid sequences, SSBs have a high-conservative domain, the oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide–binding fold, referred to as the OB-fold, which is responsible for binding with ssDNA[6]. In the single-stranded DNA-binding proteins described so far, four OB-fold domains form an active protein. These proteins also have the ability to bind RNA and are present in all three branches of live organisms and in viruses. The cooperative binding of single-strand DNA and RNA, which is a property of SSBs, has led to their being used as tools in molecular biology methods and analytics. Thermostable proteins are particularly useful in this respect. To date, only a few thermostable SSB proteins with these valuable applications have been identified.

Information resources on proteins from cold-adapted microorganisms are extremely limited, particularly when the spread of psychrophilic organisms in the environment is taken into account; approximately 85% of the Earth’s Biosphere is an environment with temperatures of below 5°C.

We recently presented a study on the production, purification and molecular characteristics of a single-stranded DNA binding protein from Pseudoalteromonas haloplanktis, the first report of a protein of this kind from a psychrophilic microorganism[7]. The proteins which are the focus of interest in this article come from different phylogenetically-related obligate and facultative psychrophilic Gram-negative bacteria. Photobacterium profundum str. SS9, which belongs to Gammaproteobacteria, Vibrionaceae family, was isolated from the Sulu Trough associated with Amphipoda at a depth of 2551 m. It is a psychrophilic and moderately barophilic bacterium with an optimum growth temperature and pressure of 15°C and 20 MPa, respectively[8]. P. profundum SS9 is a genetically tractable model system for studies of low-temperature and high-pressure adaptation[9]. Desulfotalea psychrophila, which belongs to Deltaproteobacteria, Desulfobulbaceae family, is a sulfate-reducing bacteria isolated from permanently cold Arctic sediments off the coast of Svalbard, Norway[10]. Flavobacterium psychrophilum, belongs to Bacteroidetes, Flavobacteriaceae family, is a facultative psychrophilic bacterium and one of the most serious of the fish pathogens[11]. The Psychrobacter arcticus and Psychrobacter cryohalolentis strains, which belong to Gammaproteobacteria, Moraxellaceae family, were isolated from permafrost samples taken from the Kolyma lowland region of Siberia, Russia[12]. P. arcticus was a model organism for studies on the mechanisms of adaptation to low temperatures[13]. Psychromonas ingrahamii bacterium, which belongs to Gammaproteobacteria, Psychromonadaceae family, was isolated from a sea ice core collected on Point Barrow in Alaska, USA. The bacterium grows well at NaCl concentrations of 1-10% and at temperatures of −12 to 10°C; no growth is observed at 15°C, and the optimal growth temperature is 5°C. Psychromonas ingrahamii is the only bacterium growing at such a low temperature to have been described to date[14]. Psychroflexus torquis, which belongs to Bacteroidetes, Flavobacteriaceae family, is isolated from Antarctic sea ice psychrophilic bacterium. The representatives of this species possess an uncommon characteristic, the ability to synthesize polyunsaturated fatty acids[15].

The aim of this study was to clone and overexpress D. psychrophila, F. psychrophilum, P. arcticus, P. cryohalolentis, P. ingrahamii, P. profundum, and P. torquis ssb-like genes in E. coli, purify the gene products and study their biochemical properties.

Results

Sequence analysis

The sequence analysis of the D. psychrophila (GenBank accession No. NC_006138;[16]), F. psychrophilum (GenBank accession No. NC_009613;[17]), P. arcticus (GenBank accession No. NC_007204;[18]), P. cryohalolentis (GenBank accession No. NC_007969; Gene Bank Project: PRJNA58373), P. ingrahamii (GenBank accession No. NC_008709;[19]), P. profundum (GenBank accession No. NC_006370;[20]) and P. torquis (GenBank accession No. NC_018721;[15]) genomes indicated the presence of a single ssb gene. In the case of F. psychrophilum, P. ingrahamii and P. torquis, there were additional genes possessing sequences similar to the ssDNA binding domain. The product of the additional gene from F. psychrophilum was a protein of unknown function, while that from P. ingrahamii was the PriB. In P. torquis, it was a short (102 aa), single-stranded DNA binding protein without a characteristic sequence of last amino acid residues, in view of which, we omitted that protein from our research. On the basis of the ssb gene organization and the number of ssb genes paralogs, bacteria have been classified in four different groups[21]. P. arcticus, P. cryohalolentis and P. profundum are classified as group III, which contains bacteria with ssb gene organization uvrA-ssb, whereas D. psychrophila, F. psychrophilum, P. ingrahamii, and P. torquis are classified as group IV, which contains bacteria with ssb placed neither between rpsF and rpsR nor divergently located to uvrA.

The Dps SSB, Fps SSB, Par SSB, Pcr SSB, Pin SSB, Ppr SSB, and Pto SSB proteins contain 142, 140, 213, 219, 222, 183, and 151 amino acid residues, respectively, including the N-terminal methionine, as is apparent from the nucleotide sequence. Analysis of the primary structures by RPS-BLAST revealed the presence of two distinctive regions in the proteins in question: one putative OB-fold domain, from amino acid 1 to 105–110, and one C-terminal domain, which contains four conserved terminal amino acid residues common in all known bacterial SSB proteins. The molecular mass of its monomers show a high differential, ranging from 15.6 to 25.1 kDa. Besides the OB-fold, the C-terminal fragment has the characteristic of a highly differential length, ranging from 31 to 112 amino acid residues. At their ends, the C-terminal domains have amino acids which are either similar or identical to the Eco SSB. The computable isoelectric point in these proteins has values in the range of 5–6, which is typical for SSBs with the exception of Pin SSB, pI 7.79 (Table 1).
Table 1

Characteristics resulting from the amino acid sequence analysis of the SSB proteins under study

SSB

Size of monomer [kDa]

Length of sequence [aa]

Length of C-terminal domain [aa]

Sequence of last important amino acid residues

pI

Aliphatic index

No. of Cys residues

Dps SSB

15.6

142

37

DVPF

5.46

61.20

1

Fps SSB

15.9

140

31

DLPF

5.94

73.07

2

Par SSB

22.8

213

105

DIPF

5.91

49.11

0

Pcr SSB

23.3

219

111

DIPF

5.70

43.29

0

Pin SSB

25.1

222

112

DIPF

7.79

41.80

1

Pto SSB

17.1

151

43

DLPF

5.67

61.32

3

PprSSB

20.4

183

76

DIPF

5.43

54.37

0

Eco SSB

18.9

178

73

DIPF

5.44

56.97

0

Figure 1 shows the multiple amino acid alignment of the SSB proteins from the psychrophilic bacteria under study, from Shewanella woodyi (GenBank accession No. NC_010506;[22]), mesophilic E. coli (GenBank Accession No. NC_007779;[23]) and Bacillus subtilis ( GenBank Accession No. NC_000964;[24]), and from the thermophilic Thermoanerobacter tengcongensis (GenBank Accession No. NC_003869;[25]) and Thermotoga maritima (GenBank Accession No. NC_000853;[26]) microorganisms. The protein sequences of the proteins under scrutiny share a 26-70% identity and a 46-75% similarity with the E. coli K12 SSB, a 21-53% identity and 38-66% similarity with the Shewanella woodyi SSB, a 21-31% identity and 37-48% similarity with the B. subtilis SSB, a 21-36% identity and 36-53% similarity with the Thermoanaerobacter tengcongensis SSB3, and a 19-31% identity and 34-52% similarity with the Thermotoga maritima (Table 2). The similarity between these proteins refers primarily to the N-terminal domain and the four or five terminal amino acids of C-terminal domain which are common in all the known bacterial SSB proteins.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2180-14-91/MediaObjects/12866_2014_Article_2237_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

The multiple amino acid alignment of the SSB proteins under study, with the SSBs from psychrophilic, mesophilic and thermophilic bacteria. The alignments were performed by dividing the amino acids into six similarity groups: group 1 V, L, I, M, group 2 W, F, Y, group 3 E, D, group 4 K, R, group 5 Q, D, and group 6 S, T. The capital letters represent single amino acid codes. White fonts on black boxes represent 100% similarity, white fonts on grey boxes denote <80% similarity, and black fonts on grey boxes show <60% similarity. Abbreviations: Dps SSB Desulfotalea psychrophila (NCBI Reference Sequence: WP_011189820.1), Fps SSB Flavobacterium psychrophilum (NCBI Reference Sequence: WP_011963776.1), Par SSB Psychrobacter arcticus (NCBI Reference Sequence: AAZ19531.1), Pcr SSB Psychrobacter cryohalolentis (NCBI Reference Sequence: ABE75735.1), Pin SSB Psychromonas ingrahamii (NCBI Reference Sequence: WP_011771629.1), Ppr SSB Photobacterium profundum (NCBI Reference Sequence: WP_011219846.1), Pto SSB Psychroflexus torquis (NCBI Reference Sequence: WP_015023871.1), Swo SSB Shewanella woodyi (NCBI Reference Sequence: WP_012323283.1), Eco SSB Escherichia coli K12 (NCBI Reference Sequence: YP_492202.1), Bsu SSB Bacillus subtilis (NCBI Reference Sequence: NP_391970.1), Tte SSB3 Thermoanerobacter tengcongensis MB4 (NCBI Reference Sequence: AAM25884.1), and Tma SSB Thermotoga maritima MSB8 (NCBI Reference Sequence: WP_004081225.1). An arrow indicates the boundary between the N-and C-terminal domains.

Table 2

Identity and similarity of the SSB proteins under study to the Eco SSB, Swo SSB, Bsu SSB, Tte SSB3, and Tma SSB

SSB

Dps SSB

Fps SSB

Par SSB

Pcr SSB

Pin SSB

Ppr SSB

Pto SSB

Identity to Eco SSB

41%

26%

49%

45%

45%

70%

33%

Similarity to Eco SSB

56%

46%

57%

56%

58%

75%

49%

Identity to Swo SSB

34%

21%

47%

46%

53%

53%

30%

Similarity to Swo SSB

42%

38%

55%

55%

66%

63%

42%

Identity to Bsu SSB

28%

21%

31%

31%

28%

30%

21%

Similarity to Bsu SSB

46%

37%

47%

47%

40%

48%

38%

Identity to Tte SSB3

36%

29%

23%

22%

21%

22%

29%

Similarity to Tte SSB3

53%

42%

39%

39%

36%

40%

41%

Identity to Tma SSB

31%

25%

20%

21%

19%

25%

23%

Similarity to Tma SSB

52%

46%

34%

34%

34%

43%

41%

The C-terminal domain of bacterial SSBs contains a high number of negatively charged amino acid residues, which are required for the interaction with other proteins but are not essential to DNA binding. In the C-terminal domains of proteins under analysis in this study, the content of negatively charged residues is similar to, or even higher than, that found in the Eco SSB.

The Eco SSB base-stacking residues are Trp-40, Trp-54, Phe-60, and Trp-88. In contrast to the Tma SSB or Tte SSB3, the location of these residues is precisely preserved in the Pin SSB and Ppr SSB. In the Fps SSB and Pto SSB, this location is shifted with one amino acid residue, and instead of tryptophan, they have a tyrosine at position 39, and arginine residues rather than phenylalanine residue at position 59. The displacement of two amino acid residues is observed in the Par SSB and Pcr SSB, where the 86th position is occupied by tyrosine and not by tryptophan. In the Dps SSB, the location of the base-stacking residues is shifted with four residues, namely Trp-36, and then with five; Trp-49, Trp-55, Trp-83, while tryptophan replaces phenylalanine in the 55th position. With the exception of arginine, the amino acids residues thus replaced are also aromatic and, in participating in ssDNA binding, can play an analogous role to those residues in the Eco SSB. Highly conserved His-55, Gln-76 and Gln-110 residues, important for the homotetramerization of the Eco SSB, are present in the Ppr SSB protein. In the other proteins under study, only histidine residues were found, at the 55th position in the Pin SSB, the 54th position in the Fps SSB and Pto SSB, the 54th position in the Par SSB and Pcr SSB, and the 50th position in the Dps SSB.

Oligomerization status

In chemical cross-linking experiments using glutaraldehyde, the Dps SSB, Fps SSB and Pto SSB complexes were found at a position corresponding to a molecular mass of approximately 80 kDa, the Ppr SSB complexes were found at a position corresponding to a molecular mass of about 100 kDa, the Par SSB and Pcr SSB complexes were found at a position corresponding to a molecular mass of around 116 kDa, and the Pin SSB complexes were found at a position corresponding to a molecular mass of approximately 140 kDa (Figure 2A). We observed that the psychrophilic SSB proteins in question have anomalous mobility in SDS-PAGE gels than would be expected on the basis of their predicted molecular masses. This phenomenon has also been observed in SSBs from Shewanella strains[27] and could be a characteristic feature of psychrophilic single-stranded DNA-binding proteins. The SSBs from D. psychrophila, F. psychrophilum and P. torquis were found at a position corresponding to a molecular mass of around 20 kDa (Figure 2A), while their calculated molecular masses are 15.6, 15.9 and 17.1 kDa, respectively. The Ppr SSB was found at a position corresponding to a molecular mass of approximately 25 kDa, while its calculated molecular mass is 20.4 kDa (Figure 2A). The Par SSB, Pcr SSB and Pin SSB were found at positions corresponding to molecular masses of around 25, 27 and 32 kDa, although their predicted molecular masses are 22.8, 23.3 and 25.1 kDa, accordingly (Figure 2A). Taken together, these results confirmed our prediction that the Dps SSB, Fps SSB, Par SSB, Pcr SSB, Pin SSB, Ppr SSB and Pto SSB exist as homotetramers in solution.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2180-14-91/MediaObjects/12866_2014_Article_2237_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Results of chemical cross-linking, ultracentrifugation and gel filtration experiments of SSB proteins. A: The results of chemical cross-linking experiments using 0.5% (v/v) glutaraldehyde with the SSB proteins under study, for 15 min at 25°C (lanes 2) and non-cross-linked samples (lanes 1). The fractions were analyzed by SDS-PAGE. B: Sedimentation analysis of the psychrophilic SSB proteins, Pha SSB, Eco SSB and standard proteins. 50 μl of 300 μM SSBs and standard proteins were centrifuged in linear 15 to 30% (w/v) glycerol gradients, as described in the Methods section. Lane M: Unstained Protein Weight Marker (Fermentas, Lithuania), with the molecular mass of proteins marked. Lane 1–19: fraction number. The fractions with proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE. The fractions at which the maximal amount of protein appears are shown by arrows. The standard proteins used are CA, carbonic anhydrase (29 kDa); BSA, bovine serum albumin (66 kDa); AD, alcohol dehydrogenase (150 kDa), and BA, β-amylase (200 kDa). C: Analytical gel filtration of the psychrophilic SSB proteins under study. A standard linear regression curve is shown. It was generated by plotting the log of the molecular mass of the calibration proteins against their retention times [min]. The calibration proteins include β-amylase (200 kDa), alcohol dehydrogenase (150 kDa), bovine albumin (66 kDa) and carbonic anhydrase (29 kDa).

The oligomerization status of the SSBs was also analyzed by centrifugation in 15 to 30% (w/v) glycerol gradients. To prevent nonspecific aggregation of the proteins during the experiments, NaCl at a final concentration of 0.5 M was added to the solutions used for the gradients. The centrifugation in was carried out three times, and the same sedimentation behaviors were observed in all the independent tests. The sedimentation patterns of the SSB proteins in question, the Pha SSB, the Eco SSB and the standard proteins in the glycerol gradients suggest that all SSB proteins under study form homotetramers in the solution (Figure 2B).

An analytical gel filtration chromatography analysis of the purified psychrophilic SSBs revealed a single peak for each protein. As calculated using a regression curve equation, there was a peak with a molecular mass of 59 kDa for the Dps SSB, 69.5 kDa for the Fps SSB, 94.4 kDa for the Par SSB, 96.1 kDa for the Pcr SSB, 102.8 kDa for the Pin SSB, 85.4 kDa for the Ppr SSB, and 72.3 kDa for the Pto SSB, (Figure 2C). The native molecular mass of each peak represents 3.8 for the Dps SSB mass monomer, 4.4 for the Fps SSB mass monomer, 4.1 for the Par SSB, Pcr SSB and Pin SSB mass monomers, and 4.2 for the Ppr SSB and Pto SSB mass monomers, respectively. Psychrophilic single-stranded DNA binding proteins therefore exist in solution as homotetramers.

ssDNA binding properties

The purified SSB proteins were analyzed for single-stranded DNA binding activity. In these experiments, a fixed concentration of (dT)n (n = 35, 76 or 120 nucleotides in length) were incubated with various SSB concentrations and the resulting complexes were analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis (Figure 3). When dT35 was incubated with increasing concentrations of each of the SSB proteins, a single band of reduced mobility was observed and remained constant even at a higher protein concentration (complex I). A band with the same mobility was observed for (dT)76 at a low protein concentration, but a second band with a lower mobility was observed at a high protein concentration (complex II). When SSB:dT120 complexes were analyzed, a third band with a lower mobility was detected (complex III). This implies that the length of ssDNA required for efficient protein binding is less than 35 nucleotides long.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2180-14-91/MediaObjects/12866_2014_Article_2237_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

Binding of SSB proteins to oligo (dT). Fixed quantities (10 pmol) of 5′-end fluorescein-labelled oligonucleotides (dT)35, (dT)76 and (dT)120 were incubated with 50, 100 and 200 pmol of the SSB proteins in 20 μl reaction mixtures for 10 min at 25°C. Symbols I, II and III describe SSB:dT complexes.

In order to explore the binding properties of all the proteins in question further, we used fluorescence spectroscopy. All the bacterial SSBs which have been studied to date have shown a dramatic decrease of tryptophan fluorescence when binding to ssDNA. With an excitation wavelength of 295 nm, the emission spectrum of SSB proteins at 25°C reached its maximum at 348 nm, which is consistent with tryptophan fluorescence. On the addition of a saturating quantity of (dT)76, the intrinsic fluorescence at 348 nm was quenched by 93±3% for the Dps SSB, Fps SSB, Par SSB, Pcr SSB, and Pto SSB, by 90±3% for the Ppr SSB, and by 81±3% for the Pin SSB. It was salt independent. The estimated binding site was determined as being approximately 30 ± 2 nucleotides long for the Pin SSB, 31 ± 2 nucleotides for the Dps SSB and 32 ± 2 nucleotides for the Par SSB, Pcr SSB, Ppr SSB, and Pto SSB. Practically no binding mode transition was observed when changing the ionic strength from low to high salt (Figure 4). However, for the Fps SSB, a binding-mode transition of 31 ± 2 nucleotides at low salt concentrations and 45 ± 2 at high ones was observed.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2180-14-91/MediaObjects/12866_2014_Article_2237_Fig4_HTML.jpg
Figure 4

Inverse fluorescence titration of SSB proteins with oligo(dT) 76 . The 1.5 nmol samples of the SSB proteins under study were titrated with (dT)76 at 2 mM (Δ), 100 mM (□) and 300 mM () NaCl binding buffer.

dsDNA melting point destabilization

A destabilization of DNA double strands in the presence of SSB must be expected as a thermodynamic consequence of SSB proteins binding specifically to ssDNA and not to dsDNA. The results of duplex DNA (44 bp) destabilization by the Dps SSB, Fps SSB, Par SSB, Pcr SSB, Pin SSB, Ppr SSB, Pto SSB, and Eco SSB are shown in Figure 5. The melting temperature of dsDNA in 0.1 M NaCl is decreased from 75 to 70°C by the Dps SSB, from 75 to 69°C by the Fps SSB and Pin SSB, from 75 to 67°C by the Par SSB, from 75 to 65°C by the Ppr SSB, from 75 to 64°C by the Pcr SSB, and from 75 to 58°C by the Pto SSB. In comparison, the melting temperature of the dsDNA is decreased from 75 to 62°C by the Eco SSB under the same conditions. The experiments were repeated three times with the same results on each occasion.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2180-14-91/MediaObjects/12866_2014_Article_2237_Fig5_HTML.jpg
Figure 5

Melting profiles of dsDNA and its complexes with SSB proteins. A 0.67 nmol sample of duplex DNA (44 bp) was incubated alone (1) and with 4 nmol of the Dps SSB (2), Fps SSB and Pin SSB (3), Par SSB (4), Ppr SSB(5), Pcr SSB (6), Eco SSB (7) and Pto SSB (8), in a standard buffer containing 0.1 NaCl. Absorbance changes were measured at 260 nm.

Thermostability

The results of the indirect thermostability experiments are shown in Figure 6. Although the proteins come from psychrophilic bacteria, they have a high thermostability. The half-lives of the ssDNA-binding activities of the SSBs at 100°C and 95°C are 5 min for the Dps SSB, Fps SSB and Pto SSB, and 15 min for the Pin SSB. The thermostability of the Par SSB and Ppr SSB was 15 min at 100°C and 30 min at 95°C, while for the Pcr SSB, the half-lives were 30 and 45 min at those temperatures. The Dps SSB, Fps SSB and Pin SSB proteins share half-lives of 15 min at 90°C and 30 min at 85°C. A 50% loss of ssDNA-binding activity at 90°C was observed for the Pto SSB after 10 min of incubation, for the Par SSB and Ppr SSB after 45 min, and for the Pcr SSB after 60 min. The thermostability of the P. torquis SSB was 15 min at 85°C and 80°C, 30 min at 70°C, and 45 min at 65°C. There is a 50% decline in the activity of the Par SSB and Ppr SSB after 60 min at a temperature of 85°C and in that the Dps SSB, Fps SSB and Pin SSB after 30, 45 and 60 min at 80°C, respectively. A half-life of 60 min was observed for the Fps SSB at 75°C and for the Dps SSB and Pto SSB at 60°C. In comparison, under the same conditions, the activity of the Eco SSB decreased by 50% after 15 min at 100°C, 30 min at 95°C, 45 min at 90°C, and 60 min at 85°C.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2180-14-91/MediaObjects/12866_2014_Article_2237_Fig6_HTML.jpg
Figure 6

The half-lives of the SSB proteins. A fixed quantity of each SSB protein was incubated at temperatures ranging from 60°C to 100°C for 0, 1, 2.5, 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, and 60 min. 0.05 pmol 5′-end fluorescein-labelled oligonucleotide (dT)35 was then added. The protein-DNA complexes were separated from the free DNA by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis. The incubation periods for each temperature, where 50% of (dT)35 was bound, were noted.

When analyzed by differential scanning microcalorimetry (DSC), the thermal unfolding was found to be an irreversible process in the Pcr SSB, Pin SSB and Ppr SSB, and partially reversible for the Dps SSB, Fps SSB, Par SSB and Pto SSB, as can be seen in the rescan thermograms (Figure 7). At melting temperatures (Tm) of 59.9°C, 63°C, 57.9°C, 59.5°C, and 58.7°C, respectively, the Par SSB, Pcr SSB, Pin SSB, Ppr SSB, and Pto SSB had a lower thermostability than the Eco SSB which had a Tm of 69.0°C. The Dps SSB and Fps SSB, with Tm of 78.5°C and 69.4°C, demonstrated more thermostablity than the Eco SSB, but still had less thermostable than the Tma SSB, at a Tm 109.3°C[28]. The thermograms of these SSB proteins showed no characteristic signs of heavily aggregated proteins after heat denaturation. Although the proteins under study come from psychrophilic microorganisms, they have a relatively high thermostability.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2180-14-91/MediaObjects/12866_2014_Article_2237_Fig7_HTML.jpg
Figure 7

DSC thermograms of SSB proteins. Samples containing 2 mg/ml of the Dps SSB, Par SSB, Pto SSB, Ppr SSB, Pin SSB, Fps SSB, Pcr SSB, Eco SSB, and Tma SSB were analyzed in 50 mM of potassium phosphate buffer pH 7.5 and 150 mM NaCl. The melting temperatures are shown.

Discussion

In this report, we have described the purification and characterization of single-strand DNA-binding proteins from obligate psychrophilic bacteria D. psychrophila, P. ingrahamii, P. profundum and P. torquis and the facultative psychrophilic bacteria F. psychrophilum, P. arcticus and P. cryohalolentis. All the proteins investigated form tetramers in solution, as demonstrated by three methods: chemical cross-linking experiments, sedimentation analysis and gel filtration chromatography. The results of the sequence analysis verified that an ssDNA binding domain in one monomer of each protein possesses a canonical oligonucleotide binding fold (OB-fold) very similar to that observed in the structure of the E. coli SSB. The OB-fold in the proteins in question demonstrated a high level of identity and similarity to Eco SSB, with Dps SSB at 55% and 75%, Fps SSB at 38% and 52%, Par SSB at 57% and 73%, Pcr SSB at 58% and 74%, Pin SSB at 61% and 82%, Ppr SSB at 82% and 90%, and Pto SSB at 42% and 62%, which was somewhat surprising, given that they come from taxonomical distant microorganisms living in different environments. They show a high differential in both the molecular mass of their monomers and the length of their amino acid sequences. Of the known SSBs with one OB-fold, the Dps SSB is the smallest and the Fps SSB is the shortest.

The Par SSB, Pcr SSB, Pin SSB, Ppr SSB and Pto SSB have melting temperatures (Tm) of 59.9°C, 63°C, 57.9°C, 59.5°C and 58.7°C, respectively, which are somewhat lower than for the Eco SSB, at 69.0°C. With Tm of 78.5°C and 69.4°C, the Dps SSB and Fps SSB are more thermostable than the Eco SSB, but their thermostability is not at the level of that for the thermophilic Tma SSB, with a Tm 109.3°C, or even for the Taq SSB, with Tm of 86.8°C[28]. The indirect thermal stability tests showed that both mesophilic and psychrophilic SSBs retain their binding activity at temperatures higher than their melting temperature for specified incubation times. These proteins could thus be used in molecular biology in high-temperature reactions such as nucleic acid amplification.

It is well known that cold-adapted proteins exhibit greater flexibility than their mesophilic counterparts, with a reduced number of weak interactions. This flexibility is often associated with the reduced stability of the psychrophilic protein. In comparison to their mesophilic equivalents, these proteins also often feature a higher Gly content; a lower basic amino acid content, particularly Arg, with a decreased Arg/(Arg + Lys)ratio; a lower Pro content, resulting from Pro deletion or substitution by other small residues such as Ala, for example; fewer hydrogen bonds and aromatic interactions; and residues which are more polar, and less hydrophobic, resulting in the destabilization of the hydrophobic core. All these characteristics work together to increase the number of degrees of conformational freedom by introducing flexible residues on the protein surface and destabilizing the protein core by weakening the intermolecular forces. In this context, the Dps SSB, Fps SSB, Par SSB, Pcr SSB, Pin SSB, Ppr SSB, and Pto SSB proteins have some cold adaptation qualities.

With the exception of the Pcr SSB and Ppr SSB, the proteins under study have a charged residues content of Asp, Glu, Lys, His and Arg, with Dps SSB at 24.5%, Fps SSB at 29.3%, Par SSB at 20.1%, Pcr SSB at 18.3%, Pin SSB at 21.2%, Ppr SSB at 18.0%, and Pto SSB at 30.4%) which is higher than the SSB from E. coli, at 19.7% (Table 3). Furthermore, the Fps SSB and Pto SSB share a charged amino acid residues content which is close to that of the Tte SSB3, at 30.7%. In the thermophilic proteins, these residues may be involved in the ionic networks stabilization of the interdomain surface. In the Dps SSB, Fps SSB, Par SSB, Pcr SSB, Pin SSB, Ppr SSB and Pto SSB, the content of Arg residues and the Arg/(Arg + Lys) ratio are 7.0% and 0.63, 2.9% and 0.22, 4.7% and 0.53, 4.6% and 0.55, 4.5% and 0.43, 4.4% and 0.54, and 2.6% and 0.20, respectively. These factors are definitely lower in the psychrophilic SSBs than in their mesophilic E. coli equivalent, at 5.6% and 0.62, with the exception of Dps SSB, and the thermophilic SSBs Tte SSB3, at 6.0% and 0.53, and Tma SSB, at 10.6% and 0.75). This feature has been considered as a hallmark of psychrozymes[2935]. The ability to form multiple salt bridges with acidic Asp and/or Glu amino acid residues and hydrogen bonds with other amino acids is normal for arginine. The decrease of Arg content, even the conservative replacement of Arg with Lys, entails a reduction in the number of salt bridges.
Table 3

Percentage amino acid content of the SSB proteins under comparison

SSB

Ala

Ile

Leu

Val

Met

Gly

Pro

Lys

Arg

Asp

Glu

Gln

Asn

Ser

Thr

His

Trp

Phe

Tyr

Cys

Dps SSB

7.0

6.3

4.9

3.5

2.8

11.3

4.2

4.2

7.0

4.9

7.7

4.9

6.3

9.2

7.0

0.7

2.8

1.4

2.8

0.7

Fps SSB

4.3

7.9

5.0

6.4

2.1

6.4

2.1

10.0

2.9

5.0

9.3

2.1

7.1

8.0

10.7

2.1

1.4

4.3

3.6

1.4

Par SSB

8.0

5.2

3.3

2.8

1.9

16.4

4.7

4.2

4.7

5.6

4.2

12.2

8.0

5.6

4.2

1.4

0.9

3.3

3.3

0

Pcr SSB

6.8

4.6

2.7

2.7

1.8

16.9

4.6

3.7

4.6

5.0

4.1

12.8

10.0

7.3

4.1

0.9

0.9

3.2

3.2

0

Pin SSB

7.7

1.8

3.6

4.5

3.6

6.8

9.9

5.9

4.5

4.5

5.4

17.6

6.3

3.6

6.3

0.9

1.8

2.3

2.7

0.5

Ppr SSB

7.7

3.3

3.8

6.6

2.7

10.4

7.1

3.8

4.4

3.8

5.5

21.3

4.4

3.8

3.8

0.5

2.2

2.2

2.7

0

Pto SSB

5.3

5.3

4.6

6.0

2.6

6.0

7.3

10.6

2.6

5.3

9.9

5.3

4.6

3.3

9.3

2.0

1.3

3.3

3.3

2.0

Eco SSB

7.3

2.8

4.5

7.3

3.4

16.3

6.7

3.4

5.6

4.5

5.6

10.1

4.5

5.6

5.0

0.6

2.2

2.2

2.2

0

Tte SSB3

4.0

5.3

7.3

8.7

2.0

6.0

6.0

5.3

6.0

10.7

8.0

1.3

4.0

6.7

8.0

0.7

2.0

6.0

1.3

0

Tma SSB

5.0

4.3

5.7

9.2

2.8

4.3

7.1

3.5

10.6

6.4

12.8

0.7

2.1

5.0

10.6

0

0.7

7.8

1.4

0

The glycine content in psychrophilic SSBs, particularly in the Dps SSB, at 11.3%, Par SSB, at 16.4%, Pcr SSB, at 16.9%, and Ppr SSB, at 10.4%, and in the mesophilic Eco SSB, at 16.3%, is much higher than in the thermophilic SSBs, at 6.0% and 4.3% for Tte SSB3 and Tma SSB, respectively. This accords with the known tendency of thermostable proteins to have a preference for a decrease in the Gly content in positions of low structural importance for fold conservation[36, 37].

The high content of glutamine and asparagine residues observed in the Par SSB, at 20.0%, Pcr SSB, at 23.0%, Pin SSB, at 24.93, and Ppr SSB, at 25.4% is one and a half times greater than that of the Eco SSB, at 14.5% and much higher than for the thermophilic SSBs, at 5.3% and 2.8% for the Tte SSB3 and Tma SSB, respectively. Of the 39 glutamine residues in the Pin SSB and Ppr SSB, 34 are located in the C-terminal fragment of the former and 29 in that of the latter, which represents, respectively, 30.4% and 38.2% of that domain. At up to 9 rests side by side, the glutamine residue repetitions in the C-terminal fragment of the Ppr SSB are extremely numerous, endowing the domain with a highly hydrophilic character. This area is reminiscent of the ‘glutamine-rich (Q-rich) regions’ in proteins other than SSBs, which form a ‘polar zipper’ and with which different protein subunits interact in a specific manner.

The ratio of polar to non-polar amino acid residues is one of the major determinants of protein stability and increasing the fraction of polar and charged residues leads to protein disorder[29]. The content of polar amino acid residues N, Q, S, T, and Y in the Dps SSB, Fps SSB, Par SSB, Pcr SSB, Pin SSB, Ppr SSB, and Pto SSB is 30.2%, 31.5%, 33.3%, 37.4%, 36.5%, 36.0% and 25.8%, respectively. With the exception of Pto SSB, this is considerably more than that found in the mesophilic Eco SSB, at 27.4%, and very much more than that found in the thermophilic SSBs, at 21.3% and 19.8% for Tte SSB3 and Tma SSB, accordingly. Russell[35] and Zuber[38] noticed that psychrophilic proteins appear to have more polar residues than thermophiles or mesophiles do, which is consistent with our research. A s mentioned previously, a lower Pro content is one of the features of cold-adapted proteins. In the proteins under study, only the Dps SSB, at 4.2%, Fps SSB, at 2.1%, Par SSB, at 4.7%, and Pcr SSB, at 4.6%, possess a lower proline content than their mesophilic and thermophilic counterparts, with Eco SSB, at 6.7%, Tte SSB3, at 6.0% and Tma SSB, at 7.1%.

Tiny and small amino acids were observed to be significantly increased in the beta sheets and loops of the psychrophilic proteins as compared with their mesophilic counterparts[39]. Their compositions in the SSBs in question are less than in the Eco SSB, at 61.0%. Moreover, the Fps SSB and Pin SSB have a lower content of these residues, at 54%, than the Tte SSB3, at 56%. The composition of the small and tiny residues in the Ppr SSB, at 50%, and the Pto SSB, at 52%, is even less than in the Tma SSB, at 53%.

Aromatic amino acid residues are known to play an important role in stabilizing the three-dimensional structure of proteins. Psychrophilic proteins usually display a decrease in these amino acids. The psychrophilic SSBs deviate from this rule; all of proteins investigated show a higher content of these residues than the Eco SSB, at 6.6%. The Fps SSB has the same number of aromatic amino acids in its sequence as the Tte SSB3, namely 9.3%.

It was also observed that, in psychrophilic proteins, the number of hydrophobic amino acids is lower than for their mesophilic counterparts. The content of hydrophobic amino acid residues in the Dps SSB, Fps SSB, Par SSB, Pcr SSB, Pin SSB, Ppr SSB, and Pto SSB is 44.2%, 39.9%, 46.5%, 44.2%, 42.0%, 46.0% and 41.7%, respectively. The number of these residues in the psychrophilic SSB proteins is less than in the Eco SSB, at 52.7%. Moreover, the aromatic residue content in the Par SSB and Ppr SSB is close to that of the Tma SSB, at 46.9%.

Analysis of the amino acid sequence of the Dps SSB, Fps SSB, Pin SSB and Pto SSB shows the presence of cystein residues to a number of 1, 2, 1, and 3, respectively. To date, these amino acid residues have not been found in any known SSBs. A residue such as proline or cystein has a significant impact on the stability and rigidity of the conformational structure of proteins. The presence of cystein residues in psychrophilic SSBs may affect their stability, particularly if disulphide bridges are formed.

Single strand DNA binding proteins have the property of causing the destabilization of duplex DNA and the same is true of the psychrophilic SSBs under study. The greatest decrease in dsDNA melting temperature was observed in the presence of the Pto SSB, at 17°C, which was a more substantial change than in the presence of the Eco SSB, Taq SSB or Tth SSB, at 13°C in each case[4042].

Studies of other SSBs have often shown that the size of the binding site depends on the salt concentration. At least two distinctly different DNA-binding modes have been described for the Eco SSB, for example[3]. In high salt concentrations, 65 nucleotides bind per Eco SSB tetramer, with a fluorescence quench of almost 90% whereas, in low salt concentrations, 35 nucleotides are sufficient to saturate the protein and quench its fluorescence by only 53%. Our current study has demonstrated that the binding site size of the Dps SSB, Par SSB, Pcr SSB, Pin SSB, Ppr SSB and Pto SSB has a constant value of approximately 30–32 nucleotides per tetramer, with one, salt-independent, DNA-binding mode. Binding-mode transition was only observed for the Fps SSB, at 31 ± 2 nucleotides at low salt concentrations and 45 ± 2 nucleotides at high ones. This is similar to the recently described psychrophilic Pha SSB, with 34 nucleotides per tetramer under low-salt conditions and 54–64 nucleotides at higher ones. This suggests that the Fps SSB and Pha SSB undergo a transition between ssDNA binding modes, something which is observed for the Eco SSB.

Conclusion

The results showed that SSB proteins from psychrophilic microorganisms are typical bacterial SSBs and possess relatively high thermostability, offering an attractive alternative to other thermostable SSBs in molecular biology applications.

Methods

Bacterial strains, plasmids, enzymes and reagents

D. psychrophila LSv54 (DSM 12343), P. arcticus 273–4 (DSM 17307), P. cryohalolentis K5 (DSM 17306) and P. ingrahamii 37 (DSM 17664) were purchased from The Leibniz Institute DSMZ (German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures, Germany). F. psychrophilum JIP02/86 (LMG 13180), P. profundum (LMG 19446) and P. torquis ATCC 700755 (LMG 21429) were purchased from BCCM/LMG (The Belgian Co-ordinated Collections of Micro-organisms, Belgium). Genomic sequences for those strains are available and were published: D. psychrophila (GenBank accession no. NC_006138;[16]), F. psychrophilum (GenBank accession no. NC_009613;[17]), P. arcticus (GenBank accession no. NC_007204;[18]), P. cryohalolentis (GenBank accession no. NC_007969; Gene Bank Project: PRJNA58373), P. ingrahamii (GenBank accession no. NC_008709;[19]), P. profundum (GenBank accession no. NC_006370;[20]) and P. torquis (GenBank accession no. NC_018721;[15]).

The E. coli TOP10 (Invitrogen, USA) was used for genetic constructions and gene expression. The pBAD/myc-HisA plasmid (Invitrogen, USA) was used for constructing the expression system. The reagents for PCR were obtained from Blirt SA - DNA-Gdańsk (Poland). Specific primers, oligodeoxynucleotides and the oligonucleotides 5′-end-labelled with fluorescein were purchased from Sigma (USA). The restriction enzymes were purchased from NEB (USA). Eco SSB, Pha SSB and Tma SSB were produced and purified in our laboratory according to published procedure ([7, 28, 43], respectively).

Cloning of the ssb-like genes from psychrophilic bacteria

DNA from D. psychrophila, F. psychrophilum, P. arcticus, P. cryohalolentis, P. ingrahamii, P. profundum and P. torquis was isolated using an ExtractMe DNA Bacteria Kit (Blirt SA - DNA-Gdańsk, Poland). The specific primers for PCR amplification were designed and synthesized on the basis of the known ssb-like gene sequences. The forward (containing a Nco I recognition site) and reverse (containing a Bgl II or Hin dIII recognition site) primers are shown in Table 4. The boldface parts of primers sequences are complementary to the nucleotide sequences of the ssb-like genes, whereas 5′ overhanging ends of primers contain recognition sites for restriction endonucleases (underlined) and are designed to facilitate cloning. The PCR reaction solution (25 μl) consisted of: 0.2 μg of genomic DNA, 0.4 μM of each primer, 1 mM dNTPs, 2 mM MgCl2, 20 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.8, 50 mM KCl, 10 mM (NH4)2SO4, 0.1% Triton X-100 and 2U Pwo DNA polymerase (Blirt SA DNA-Gdańsk, Poland). 35 cycles were performed, using the Veriti® 96 Well Thermal Cycler (Applied Biosystems, USA), with a temperature profile of 1 min at 94°C, 1 min at 60°C and 1 min at 72°C. The amplification products were analyzed by electrophoresis on 1% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide, at a final concentration of 0.5 μg/ml. Specific PCR products were obtained and purified using the ExtractMe Gel-Out Kit (Blirt SA DNA-Gdańsk, Poland). The PCR products were digested with Nco I and Bgl II or Hin dIII (NEB, USA), then purified, using the ExtractMe Clean-Up Kit (Blirt SA DNA-Gdańsk, Poland) and ligated into pBAD/myc-HisA plasmid (Invitrogen, USA) between the Nco I and Bgl II or Nco I and Hin dIII sites. The E. coli TOP10 cells were transformed with the ligation mixtures and transformants were examined for the presence of the ssb-like genes, using a gel retardation assay and restriction analysis. One clone was selected and sequenced to confirm the presence of the ssb-like genes. The appropriate pBADDps SSB, pBADFps SSB, pBADPar SSB, pBADPcr SSB, pBADPin SSB, pBADPpr SSB, and pBADPto SSB recombinant plasmids were obtained.
Table 4

The specific primers for PCR amplification

Name

Primer sequence

fpsssbNcoI

5′ GGA GGA C CA TGG GGA ACG GAA CGT TAA ATA AAG TCA TG 3′

fpsssbHindIII

5′ TTA AAG CTT TTA AAA AGG CAA ATC ATT TTC TAC AG 3′

pcrssbNcoI

5′ TTA CC A TGG GGC GCG GTG TTA ATA AAG TTA TCA TC 3′

pcrssbHindIII

5′ TTA AAG CTT TCA GAA CGG AAT GTC ATC GTC 3′

ptossbNcoI

5′ GGA GGA CC A TGG CAG GAA CAC TCA ATA AAG TTA TGC 3′

ptossbHindIII

5′ TTA AAG CTT TTA AAA GGG TAG ATC ATC TTC CTC 3′

pprssbNcoI

5′ GGA GGA CC A TGG CCA GTC GTG GTG TAA ATA AGG 3′

pprssbBglII

5′ TTA AGA TCT CTA GAA TGG GAT ATC ATC ATC AAA ATC 3′

dpsssbNcoI

5′ TTA CC A TGG GGA TAA ATA AGG CAA TTT TAA TTG GTA ATC TAG 3′

dpsssbHindIII

5′ TTA AAG CTT CTA GAA GGG TAC GTC GTT AC 3′

parssbNcoI

5′ GGA GGA CC A TGG GGC GCG GTG TTA ATA AAG TTA TCA TC 3′

parssbBglII

5′ TTA AGA TCT CTA GAA AGG AAT GTC ATC GTC 3′

pinssbNcoI

5′ TTA CC A TGG GGT TTA ACC GAA GCG TAA ACA AAG TAG 3′

pinssbHindIII

5′ TTA AAG CTT CTA AAA AGG AAT ATC ATC ATC GAA ATC 3′

The boldface parts of the primers sequences are complementary to the nucleotide sequences of the ssb-like genes and the underlined parts are the recognition sites for restriction endonucleases.

Expression and purification of SSBs

The E. coli TOP10 strain transformed with pBADDps SSB, pBADFps SSB, pBADPar SSB, pBADPcr SSB, pBADPin SSB, pBADPpr SSB or pBADPto SSB was grown at 30°C in Luria-Bertani medium, supplemented with 100 μg/ml of ampicillin, to an OD600 of 0.4, and was induced by incubation in the presence of arabinose, at a final concentration of 0.02%, for 20 h. The cells were then harvested by centrifugation at 4,612 × g for 20 min and the pellets were resuspended in 50 ml of buffer A (20 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA pH 8.0, 0.1% Triton X-100). The samples were sonicated eight times, for 30 s at 4°C, and centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 25 min. The clarified supernatant was applied further directly onto QAE-cellulose column (50 ml bed volume, EMD, USA) preequilibrated with 4 vol buffer B (20 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA pH 8.0). Each of SSB proteins was eluted with linear gradient of 0.05-2 M NaCl in buffer B. The SSB-containing fractions were detected by SDS-PAGE electrophoresis, after which, they were combined and loaded onto a ssDNA-cellulose column (5 ml, USB, USA) equilibrated with buffer C (20 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 0.25 M NaCl, 1 mM EDTA pH 8.0). SSB proteins were eluted with 1.5 M NaCl and 50% ethylene glycol. The elution fractions were dialyzed against D buffer (20 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 0.15 M NaCl) and concentrated to 2 mg/ml, using the Amicon Ultra-15 Filter Device MWCO 10000 (Millipore, USA). The purity of the SSBs was estimated using SDS-PAGE and the amounts were examined spectrophotometrically. The E. coli overexpression systems used in this study produced approximately 20 mg of purified SSB proteins from 1 L of induced culture. The purity of the protein preparations was 95-98%.

Estimation of the native molecular mass

The native molecular mass of examined SSBs was determined by three independent methods: (i) chemical cross-linking, (ii) sedimentation in glycerol gradient and (iii) analytical gel filtration.

Chemical cross-linking experiments were carried out using 0.5% (v/v) glutaraldehyde for 15 min, with SSBs amount of 10 (Par SSB, Pin SSB), 50 (Dps SSB, Pcr SSB, Ppr SSB) or 100 (Fps SSB, Pto SSB) pmol, at 25°C. The reaction was quenched by the addition of 1 M Tris–HCl (pH 8.0), and the cross-linked protein solutions were then analyzed using SDS-PAGE (12%).

Linear 15 to 30% (w/v) glycerol gradients, containing loading buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5, 0.5 M NaCl, 1 mM EDTA and 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol) were prepared in 5 ml Beckman centrifuge tubes. Standard proteins were: carbonic anhydrase (29 kDa), bovine albumin (66 kDa), alcohol dehydrogenase (150 kDa) and β-amylase (200 kDa) taken from Sigma Gel Filtration Markers Kit (Cat no. MWGF1000). 50 μl of a 300 μM Dps SSB, Fps SSB, Par SSB, Pcr SSB, Pin SSB, Ppr SSB and Pto SSB proteins in loading buffer, and the corresponding amounts of Eco SSB, Pha SSB and standard proteins, were layered over 3.5 ml of the glycerol gradient and were centrifuged in individual tubes. The gradients were centrifuged at 4°C in a Beckman SW 60 rotor at 46,000 rpm for 24 h; fractions were collected from the top. The proteins present in fractions were separated by SDS-PAGE.

Analytical gel filtration was carried out on a Superdex 200 HR75 10/300 GL column (Amersham Biosciences, USA), equilibrated with 20 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl and 10 mM EDTA. The samples were eluted with the same buffer at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min. The elution profile was monitored by recording the absorbance at 280 nm. The molecular weight of SSB proteins were determined by comparing the elution patterns with those of standard proteins, taken from Gel Filtration Markers Kit (Sigma, USA), including β-amylase (200 kDa), alcohol dehydrogenase (150 kDa), bovine albumin (66 kDa) and carbonic anhydrase (29 kDa).

Agarose gel electrophoresis mobility shift assays (EMSA)

A fixed quantity (10 pmol) of 5′-end fluorescein-labelled oligonucleotides (dT)35, (dT)76 and (dT)120 were incubated with 50, 100 and 200 pmol of examined SSB proteins for 10 min at 25°C in a binding buffer (20 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 100 mM NaCl and 1 mM EDTA) to a final reaction volume of 20 μl. Subsequently the reaction products with oligos were loaded onto 2% agarose gel without ethidium bromide and separated by electrophoresis in a TAE buffer (40 mM Tris acetate pH 7.5 and 1 mM EDTA). The bands corresponding to the unbound ssDNA and various SSB-ssDNA complexes were visualized under UV light and photographed.

Fluorescence titration

Fluorescence titrations were carried out in a Perkin-Elmer LS-5B luminescence spectrometer as described earlier[44]. The binding reactions were assembled in 2 ml buffer of 20 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA containing 2 mM, 100 mM or 300 mM NaCl and incubated at 25°C. A fixed quantity (1.5 nmol) of examined SSB proteins were incubated in the appropriate buffer at 25°C with increasing quantities of (dT)76 oligonucleotide at excitation and emission wavelengths of 295 and 348 nm, respectively. Binding curve analyses were carried out using Schwarz and Watanabe’s model[45].

Melting point destabilization of dsDNA

Melting point curves were obtained by measuring the change in A260 in a Cary300Bio UV-Visible spectrophotometer (Varian) in 20 mM sodium phosphate buffer pH 7.5 containing 0.1 M NaCl and 1 mM EDTA[46]. A mixture of 0.67 nmol dsDNA and 4 nmol of particular SSB were gradually heated from 25°C to 95°C with heating rate of 1°C/min. The assay was performed using duplex DNA (44 bp) composed of two oligonucleotides: 5′-GAA CCG GAG GAA TGA TGA TGA TGA TGG TGC GGT TTG TCG GAC GG-3′ and 5′-CCG TCC GAC AAA CCG CAC CAT CAT CAT CAT CAT TCC TCC GGT TC-3′.

Thermostability

The thermostability of the SSB proteins was determined by direct (DSC) and indirect methods.

Microcalorimetric measurements were performed using a NanoDSC microcalorimeter (Calorimetry Science Corporation, USA). Samples containing approximately 2.0 mg/ml SSB, in 50 mM of potassium phosphate buffer pH 7.5 and 150 mM NaCl were analyzed. The calorimetric scans were carried out between 0 and 100°C, with a scan rate of 1°C/min. The reversibility of the transition was checked by cooling and reheating the same sample with the scan rate of 1°C/min. Results from the DSC measurements were analyzed with the NanoAnalyze Software V 1.1 (TA Instruments, USA).

The samples contained 0.75 μg of Fps SSB, Ppr SSB and Pto SSB, 1 μg of Dps SSB, Par SSB and Pcr SSB, 1.5 μg of Eco SSB and 3 μg of Pin SSB were incubated at temperatures ranging from 60°C to 100°C for 0, 1, 2.5, 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, 60 min, after which, 0.05 pmol 5′-end fluorescein-labelled oligonucleotide (dT)35 was added. The samples were then loaded onto 2% agarose gels without ethidium bromide and separated by electrophoresis in a TAE buffer as described for EMSA tests. The incubation periods for each temperature, where 50% of (dT)35 was bound, were noted.

Protein sequence analysis

The amino acid sequences of studied SSB proteins were analyzed using standard protein–protein BLAST and RPS-BLAST. Multiple sequence alignment was generated in ClustalX, using a PAM 500 scoring matrix. The results were prepared using the GeneDoc editor program (http://www.psc.edu/biomed/genedoc).

Abbreviations

dsDNA: 

Double-stranded DNA

OB fold: 

Oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide binding fold

RPA: 

Replication protein A

SSB: 

Single-stranded DNA-binding

ssDNA: 

Single-stranded DNA.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Polish National Science Centre Grant NO. N/NZ1/01562 to M.N.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Chemistry, Gdańsk University of Technology

References

  1. Greipel J, Urbanke C, Maass G: The single-stranded DNA binding protein of Escherichia coli. Physicochemical properties and biological functions. Protein-Nucleic Acid Interaction. Edited by: Saenger W, Heinemann U. 1989, London: Macmillan, 61-86.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Alani E, Tresher R, Griffith JD, Kolodner RD: Characterization of DNA-binding and strand-exchange stimulation properties of y-RPA, a yeast single-strand-DNA-binding protein. J Mol Biol. 1992, 227: 54-71. 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90681-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Lohman TM, Overman LB: Two binding modes in Escherichia coli single strand binding protein-single stranded DNA complexes. Modulation by NaCl concentration. J Biol Chem. 1985, 260: 3594-3603.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Meyer RR, Laine PS: The single-stranded DNA-binding protein of Escherichia coli. Microbiol Rev. 1990, 54: 342-380.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Shereda RD, Kozlov AG, Lohman TM, Cox MM, Keck JL: SSB as an organizer/mobilizer of genome maintenance complexes. Crit Rev Biochem Mol. 2009, 43: 289-318.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Murzin AG: OB (oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide binding)-fold: common structural and functional solution for non-homologous sequences. EMBO J. 1993, 2: 861-867.Google Scholar
  7. Olszewski M, Nowak M, Cyranka-Czaja A, Kur J: Identification and characterization of single-stranded DNA-binding protein from the facultative psychrophilic bacteria Pseudoalteromonas haloplanktis. Microbiol Res. 2014, 169: 139-147. 10.1016/j.micres.2013.07.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Nogi Y, Masui N, Kato C: Photobacterium profundum sp. nov., a new, moderately barophilic bacterial species isolated from a deep-sea sediment. Extremophiles. 1998, 2: 1-7. 10.1007/s007920050036.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bartlett D, Wright M, Yayanos AA, Silverman M: Isolation of a gene regulated by hydrostatic pressure in a deep-sea bacterium. Nature. 1989, 342: 572-574. 10.1038/342572a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Knoblauch C, Sahm K, Jorgensen BB: Psychrophilic sulfate-reducing bacteria isolated from permanently cold Arctic marine sediments description of Desulfofrigus oceanense gen. nov., sp. nov., Desulfofrigus fragile sp. nov., Desulfofaba gelida gen. nov., sp. nov., Desulfotalea psychrophila gen. nov., sp. nov. and Desulfotalea arctica sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1999, 49: 1631-1643. 10.1099/00207713-49-4-1631.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Alvarez B, Secades P, McBride M, Guijarro J: Development of genetic techniques for the psychrotrophic fish pathogen Flavobacterium psychrophilum. Appl Envir Microb. 2004, 70: 581-587. 10.1128/AEM.70.1.581-587.2004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Bakermans C, Ayala-del-Rio HL, Ponder MA, Vishnivetskaya T, Gilichinsky D, Thomashow MF, Tiedje JM: Psychrobacter cryohalolentis sp. nov. and Psychrobacter arcticus sp. nov., isolated from Siberian permafrost. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2006, 56: 1285-1291. 10.1099/ijs.0.64043-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Bergholz PW, Bakermans C, Tiedje JM: Psychrobacter arcticus 273–4 Uses resource efficiency and molecular motion adaptations for subzero temperature growth. J Bacteriol. 2009, 191: 2340-2352. 10.1128/JB.01377-08.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Auman AJ, Breezee JL, Gosink JJ, Kämpfer P, Staley JT: Psychromonas ingrahamii sp. nov., a novel gas vacuolate, psychrophilic bacterium isolated from Arctic polar sea ice. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2006, 56: 1001-1007. 10.1099/ijs.0.64068-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Bowman JP, McCammon SA, Lewis T, Skerratt JH, Brown JL, Nichols DS, McMeekin TA: Psychroflexus torquis gen. nov., sp. nov., a psychrophilic species from Antarctic sea ice, and reclassification of Flavobacterium gondwanense (Dobson et al. 1993) as Psychroflexus gondwanense gen. nov., comb. nov. Microbiology. 1998, 144: 1601-1609. 10.1099/00221287-144-6-1601.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Rabus R, Ruepp A, Frickey T, Rattei T, Fartmann B, Stark M, Bauer M, Zibat A, Lombardot T, Becker I, Amann J, Gellner K, Teeling H, Leuschner WD, Glockner F-O, Lupas AN, Amann R, Klenk H-P: The genome of Desulfotalea psychrophila, a sulfate-reducing bacterium from permanently cold Arctic sediments. Environ Microbiol. 2004, 6: 887-902. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2004.00665.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Duchaud E, Boussaha M, Loux V, Bernardet JF, Michel C, Kerouault B, Mondot S, Bossy R, Caron C, Bessieres P, Gibrat JF, Dumetz F, Le Henaff M, Benmansour A: Complete genome sequence of the fish pathogen Flavobacterium psychrophilum. Nat Biotech. 2007, 25: 763-769. 10.1038/nbt1313.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Ayala-del-Rio HL, Chain PS, Grzymski JJ, Ponder MA, Ivanova N, Bergholz PW, Di Bartolo G, Hauser L, Land M, Bakermans C, Rodrigues D, Klappenbach J, Zarka D, Larimer F, Richardson P, Murray A, Thomashow M, Tiedje JM: The genome sequence of Psychrobacter arcticus 273–4, a psychroactive Siberian permafrost bacterium reveals mechanisms for adaptation to low temperature growth. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010, 76: 2304-2312. 10.1128/AEM.02101-09.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Riley M, Staley JT, Danchin A, Wang TZ, Brettin TS, Hauser LJ, Land ML, Thompson LS: Genomics of an extreme psychrophile, Psychromonas ingrahamii. BMC Genomics. 2008, 9: 210-10.1186/1471-2164-9-210.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Vezzi A, Campanaro S, D'Angelo M, Simonato F, Vitulo N, Lauro FM, Cestaro A, Malacrida G, Simionati B, Cannata N, Romualdi C, Bartlett DH, Valle G: Life at depth: Photobacterium profundum genome sequence and expression analysis. Science. 2005, 307: 1459-1461. 10.1126/science.1103341.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Lindner C, Nijland R, van Hartskamp M, Bron S, Hamoen LW, Kuipers OP: Differential expression of two paralogous genes of Bacillus subtilis encoding single-stranded DNA binding protein. J Bacteriol. 2004, 186: 1097-1105. 10.1128/JB.186.4.1097-1105.2004.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Makemson JC, Fulayfil NR, Landry W, Van Ert LM, Wimpee CF, Widder EA, Case JF: Shewanella woodyi sp. nov., an exclusively respiratory luminous bacterium isolated from the Alboran Sea. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1997, 47: 1034-1039. 10.1099/00207713-47-4-1034.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Riley M, Abe T, Arnaud MB, Berlyn MK, Blattner FR, Chaudhuri RR, Glasner JD, Horiuchi T, Keseler IM, Kosuge T, Mori H, Perna NT, Plunkett G, Rudd KE, Serres MH, Thomas GH, Thomson NR, Wishart D, Wanner BL: Escherichia coli K-12: a cooperatively developed annotation snapshot--2005. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34: 1-9. 10.1093/nar/gkj405.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Barbe V, Cruveiller S, Kunst F, Lenoble P, Meurice G, Sekowska A, Vallenet D, Wang T, Moszer I, Médigue C, Danchin A: From a consortium sequence to a unified sequence: the Bacillus subtilis 168 reference genome a decade later. Microbiology. 2009, 155: 1758-1775. 10.1099/mic.0.027839-0.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Bao Q, Tian Y, Li W, Xu Z, Xuan Z, Hu S, Dong W, Yang J, Chen Y, Xue Y, Xu Y, Lai X, Huang L, Dong X, Ma Y, Ling L, Tan H, Chen R, Wang J, Yu J, Yang H: A complete sequence of the T. tengcongensis genome. Genome Res. 2002, 12: 689-700. 10.1101/gr.219302.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Nelson KE, Clayton RA, Gill SR, Gwinn ML, Dodson RJ, Haft DH, Hickey EK, Peterson JD, Nelson WC, Ketchum KA, McDonald L, Utterback TR, Malek JA, Linher KD, Garrett MM, Stewart AM, Cotton MD, Pratt MS, Phillips CA, Richardson D, Heidelberg J, Sutton GG, Fleischmann RD, Eisen JA, White O, Salzberg SL, Smith HO, Venter JC, Fraser CM: Evidence for lateral gene transfer between Archaea and bacteria from genome sequence of Thermotoga maritima. Nature. 1999, 399: 323-329. 10.1038/20601.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Chilukuri LN, Bartlett DH: Isolation and characterization of the gene encoding single-stranded-DNA-binding protein (SSB) from four marine Shewanella strains that differ in their temperature and pressure optima for growth. Microbiology. 1997, 143: 1163-1174. 10.1099/00221287-143-4-1163.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Olszewski M, Grot A, Wojciechowski M, Nowak M, Mickiewicz M, Kur J: Characterization of exceptionally thermostable single-stranded DNA-binding proteins from Thermotoga maritima and Thermotoga neapolitana. BMC Microbiology. 2010, 10: 260-10.1186/1471-2180-10-260.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Feller G, Arpigny JL, Narinx E, Gerday C: Molecular adaptations of enzymes from psychrophilic organisms. Comp Biochem Phys A. 1997, 118: 495-499. 10.1016/S0300-9629(97)00011-X.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Feller G, Payan F, Theys F, Qian M, Haser R, Gerday C: Stability and structural analysis of alpha-amylase from the antarctic psychrophile Alteromonas haloplanctis A23. Eur J Biochem. 1994, 222: 441-447. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1994.tb18883.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Feller G, Thiry M, Gerday C: Nucleotide sequence of the lipase gene lip2 from the antarctic psychrotroph Moraxella TA144 and site-specific mutagenesis of the conserved serine and histidine residues. DNA Cell Biol. 1991, 10: 381-388. 10.1089/dna.1991.10.381.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Feller G, Gerday C: Psychrophilic enzymes: molecular basis of cold adaptation. Cell Mol Life Sci. 1997, 53: 830-841. 10.1007/s000180050103.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Van Petegem F, Collins T, Meuwis MA, Gerday C, Feller G, Van Beeumen J: The structure of a cold-adapted family 8 xylanase at 1.3 A resolution: structural adaptations to cold and investigation of the active site. J Biol Chem. 2003, 278: 7531-7539. 10.1074/jbc.M206862200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Gerday C, Aittaleb M, Bentahir M, Chessa JP, Claverie P, Collins T, D'Amico S, Dumont J, Garsoux G, Georlette D, Hoyoux A, Lonhienne T, Meuwis MA, Feller G: Cold-adapted enzymes: from fundamentals to biotechnology. Trends Biotechnol. 2000, 18: 103-107. 10.1016/S0167-7799(99)01413-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Russell NJ: Toward a molecular understanding of cold activity of enzymes from psychrophiles. Extremophiles. 2000, 4: 83-90. 10.1007/s007920050141.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Matthews BW, Nicholson H, Becktel WJ: Enhanced protein thermostability from site-directed mutations that decrease the entropy of unfolding. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1987, 84: 6663-6667. 10.1073/pnas.84.19.6663.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Korolev S, Nayal M, Barnes WM, Di Cera E, Waksman G: Crystal structure of the large fragment of Thermus aquaticus DNA polymerase I at 2.5-A resolution: structural basis for thermostability. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995, 92: 9264-9268. 10.1073/pnas.92.20.9264.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Zuber H: Temperature adaptation of lactate dehydrogenase. Structural, functional and genetic aspects. Biophys Chem. 1988, 29: 171-179. 10.1016/0301-4622(88)87037-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Metpally RPR, Reddy BVB: Comparative proteome analysis of psychrophilic versus mesophilic bacterial species: Insights into the molecular basis of cold adaptation of proteins. BMC Genomics. 2009, 10: 11-10.1186/1471-2164-10-11.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Williams KR, Murphy JB, Chase JW: Characterization of the structural and functional defect in the Escherichia coli single-stranded DNA binding protein encoded by the ssb-1 mutant gene. Expression of the ssb-1 gene under lambda pL regulation. J Biol Chem. 1984, 259: 11804-11811.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Genschel J, Litz L, Thole H, Roemling U, Urbanke C: Isolation, sequencing and overproduction of the single-stranded DNA binding protein from Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO. Gene. 1996, 182: 137-143. 10.1016/S0378-1119(96)00535-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Dabrowski S, Olszewski M, Piatek R, Brillowska-Dabrowska A, Konopa G, Kur J: Identification and characterization of single-stranded-DNA-binding proteins from Thermus thermophilus and Thermus aquaticus - new arrangement of binding domains. Microbiology. 2002, 148: 3307-3315.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Dabrowski S, Kur J: Cloning, overexpression, and purification of the recombinant His-tagged SSB protein of Escherichia coli and use in polymerase chain reaction amplification. Protein Expr Purif. 1999, 16: 96-102. 10.1006/prep.1999.1044.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Curth U, Greipel J, Urbanke C, Maass G: Multiple binding modes of the single-stranded DNA binding protein from Escherichia coli as detected by tryptophan fluorescence and site-directed mutagenesis. Biochemistry. 1993, 32: 2585-2591. 10.1021/bi00061a016.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Schwarz G, Watanabe F: Thermodynamics and kinetics of co-operative protein-nucleic acid binding. I. General aspects of analysis of data. J Mol Biol. 1983, 163: 467-484. 10.1016/0022-2836(83)90069-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Augustyns K, Van Aerschot A, Van Schepdael A, Urbanke C, Herdewijn P: Influence of the incorporation of (S)-9-(3,4-dihydroxybutyl)adenine on the enzymatic stability and base-pairing properties of oligodeoxynucleotides. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991, 19: 2587-2593. 10.1093/nar/19.10.2587.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Nowak et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.