Open Access

Comparison of CDC and sequence-based molecular typing of syphilis treponemes: tpr and arp loci are variable in multiple samples from the same patient

  • Lenka Mikalová1,
  • Petra Pospíšilová1,
  • Vladana Woznicová2,
  • Ivana Kuklová3,
  • Hana Zákoucká4 and
  • David Šmajs1Email author
BMC Microbiology201313:178

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2180-13-178

Received: 4 March 2013

Accepted: 24 July 2013

Published: 30 July 2013

Abstract

Background

Molecular typing of syphilis-causing strains provides important epidemiologic data. We tested whether identified molecular subtypes were identical in PCR-positive parallel samples taken from the same patient at a same time. We also tested whether subtype prevalence differs in skin and blood samples.

Results

Eighteen syphilis positive patients (showing both positive serology and PCR), with two PCR-typeable parallel samples taken at the same time, were tested with both CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) and sequence-based typing. Samples taken from 9 of 18 patients were completely typed for TP0136, TP0548, 23S rDNA, arp, and tpr loci. The CDC typing revealed 11 distinct genotypes while the sequence-based typing identified 6 genotypes. When results from molecular typing of TP0136, TP0548, and 23S rDNA were analyzed in samples taken from the same patient, no discrepancies in the identified genotypes were found; however, there were discrepancies in 11 of 18 patients (61.1%) samples relative to the arp and tpr loci. In addition to the above described typing, 127 PCR-positive swabs and whole blood samples were tested for individual genotype frequencies. The repetition number for the arp gene was lower in whole blood (WB) samples compared to swab samples. Similarly, the most common tpr RFLP type “d” was found to have lower occurrence rates in WB samples while type “e” had an increased occurrence in these samples.

Conclusions

Differences in the CDC subtypes identified in parallel samples indicated genetic instability of the arp and tpr loci and suggested limited applicability of the CDC typing system in epidemiological studies. Differences in treponemal genotypes detected in whole blood and swab samples suggested important differences between both compartments and/or differences in adherence of treponeme variants to human cells.

Keywords

Treponema pallidum Syphilis Molecular typing Sequence-based typing CDC typing arp gene tpr genes

Background

Syphilis, caused by Treponema pallidum ssp. pallidum (T. pallidum), is a sexually transmitted multistage disease with a diagnosis based on clinical symptoms, serological findings and other methods such as direct detection of treponemes by microscopy. In the 1990s, PCR-based methods for direct detection of treponemal DNA were developed [1]. Since then, several improvements in these tests have been published which have increased sensitivity and specificity [29] as well as the ability to detect the presence of several pathogens simultaneously in the same reaction using multiplex PCR [10, 11]. A major advantage of PCR–based methods in syphilis diagnostics is the potential for subsequent molecular typing of syphilis treponemes. Although several treponemal genomic loci were tested relative to their suitability for molecular typing [1214], most molecular typing studies of treponemal DNA are performed using CDC typing [15]. The method involves detection of the number of 60-bp tandem repeats in the arp (acidic repeat protein) gene and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis of the 3 PCR-amplified tpr genes (tprE, G, J). In 2010, the CDC method was modified by addition of sequencing of TP0548 [14] or by determination of the number of G repeats within the rpsA gene (TP0279) [16].

Recently, a sequencing-based molecular typing scheme based on sequencing of the TP0136, TP0548 and 23S rRNA genes was introduced [17]. Moreover, the sequence variants of TP0136, TP0548 and 23S rRNA genes have been shown to independently combine with variants of the arp and tpr genes [17].

In this communication, we compare CDC typing with sequence-based molecular typing in a group of patients with two or more parallel samples (i.e. taken at the same time) that were PCR-positive for treponemal DNA. Moreover, the variability of gene sequences, length and RFLP genotypes are compared in two types of clinical specimens (i.e. swab and whole blood samples).

Results

PCR detection and molecular typing of syphilis treponemes

A total of 18 patients had two PCR-typeable samples (taken at the same time), which were used for amplification of treponemal TP0136, TP0548, 23S rRNA genes, tpr and arp loci. Two separate PCR-typeable swabs were available for each of 9 patients in one group of patients, while a second group of 9 patients had a single PCR-typeable swab along with a whole blood sample. Four patients were diagnosed with secondary syphilis while the remaining 14 patients had primary syphilis (Table 1).
Table 1

Molecular typing of treponemal DNA isolated from a set of 16 patients with two or more samples positive for treponemal DNA

Patient no.

Syphilis stage

Sample

Material

Genotypes based on TP0136, TP0548, 23S rDNA

CDC subtype

Enhanced CDC subtype*

1

Primary

43K StI

Swab

SSS

14d

14d/f

  

44K StII

Swab

SSS

14d

14d/f

2

Primary

36K St

Swab

SU2R8

14d

14d/g

  

37K

Whole blood

SU2R8

12d

12d/g

3

Primary

93K

Swab

SXS

14k

14k/X

  

94K

Whole blood

XSX

14e

14e/f

4

Primary

891

Swab

SSS

14d

14d/f

  

892

Swab

SSS

14p

14p/f

5

Primary

91K

Swab

SSR8

14d

14d/f

  

92K

Whole blood

SXX

12e

12e/X

6

Primary

C-150

Swab

U1SS

8b

8b/f

  

D-151

Swab

U1SS

8d

8d/f

7

Primary

8032

Swab

SSR9

15d

15d/f

  

8284

Swab

SSR9

15d

15d/f

8

Primary

19512

Swab

SU2R8

14d

14d/g

  

19527

Swab

SU2R8

14b

14b/g

9

Primary

15K St

Swab

SSS

14d

14d/f

  

16K

Whole blood

XSS

XXe

XXe/f

10

Primary

RL104BZ

Swab

SU2R8

14d

14d/g

  

RL104AZ

Whole blood

XU2R8

14X

14X/g

11

Primary

63K

Swab

SSR9

15d

15d/f

  

62K

Whole blood

XSR9

15d

15d/f

12

Primary

4K

Swab

SSS

14d

14d/f

  

5K

Swab

SSS

14d

14d/f

13

Primary

34K St

Swab

SSS

14d

14d/f

  

35K

Whole blood

XXS

XXe

XXe/X

14

Primary

RL116A

Swab

SU2R8

14e

14e/g

  

RL116B

Whole blood

SXR8

14j

14j/X

15

Secondary

15577

Swab

SXS

14d

14d/X

  

15578

Swab

SSS

14d

14d/f

16

Secondary

G-269

Swab

SU1S

14p

14p/f

  

H-270

Swab

SU1S

14d

14d/f

17

Secondary

51K

Swab

SSS

14d

14d/f

  

52K

Swab

SSS

14d

14d/f

18

Secondary

73K

Swab

SU2R8

14d

14d/g

  

74K

Whole blood

XXR8

XXe

XXe/X

X, the exact genotype was not determined.

*subtype identification based on CDC typing enhanced by sequence analysis of TP0548 between position 131–215 [14].

The samples from these 18 patients were typed with both CDC and sequence-based typing schemes [15, 17], the results are shown in Table 1. Samples taken from 9 of 18 patients were completely typed at all loci (TP0136, TP0548, 23S rDNA, arp, and tpr). The remaining 9 patient samples were partially typed (10 samples were partially typed at the TP0136, TP0548, and 23S rDNA loci and 4 samples were partially typed at the arp and tpr loci). CDC typing revealed 11 distinct genotypes while sequence-based typing revealed 6 genotypes. The identified sequences of TP0136, TP0548 and 23S rDNA loci are shown in Additional file 1. Using enhanced CDC typing [14], 13 different genotypes were found (Table 1). When results of molecular typing of TP0136, TP0548, and 23S rDNA were available, no discrepancies in the genotypes were identified in samples taken from the same patients (Table 1). In contrast, samples taken from 11 of 18 patients (61.1%) revealed discrepancies at the arp and tpr loci (1 for arp, 9 for tpr and 1 for both of these loci). The most frequent discrepancies involved the “d” and “e” (4 cases), “d” and “b” (2 cases) and “d” and “p” (2 cases) patterns of the tpr genes. Two of four patients with secondary syphilis had differences at the tpr loci (Table 1).

When analysis of loci used in sequence-based (i.e. analysis of TP0136, TP0548 and 23S rDNA) and CDC typing (i.e. arp and tpr genes) was performed independently, 14 swab/blood paired DNA samples were analyzed in both sequence-based typing and in CDC typing. While no discrepancies were found in sequence-based typing, 8 out of 14 genotypes detected in CDC typing were different. Similarly, analysis of parallel swabs revealed 26 and 18 typed DNA samples for sequence-based and CDC typing, respectively. No discrepancies were found in sequence-based typing while 4 out of 18 genotypes detected in CDC typing were different.

Four of 9 (44.4%) patients (with two positive swabs for treponemal DNA) showed differences in tpr gene patterns while 7 of 9 (77.8%) patients (with swabs and whole blood samples) showed pattern differences at the arp or tpr loci. The 2 differences found in the arp gene were found in patients with both swab and whole blood samples and in both cases the repetitions number of the arp gene was lower in whole blood samples compared to swab samples.

Variability of treponemal genotypes found in whole blood and swab samples

To test whether individual genotype rates differ in swabs vs. whole blood samples, the occurrence rates of individual genotypes was determined in swabs and whole blood samples (Table 2) using the data set from Flasarová et al. [17] augmented by samples collected in 2011 in the Czech Republic. Altogether, 93 swabs and 34 whole blood samples were analyzed. Among the investigated strains, similar proportions of sequences (i.e. SS14-like and unique) were identified for loci TP0136 and TP0548. Similarly, both A2058G and A2059G mutations in the 23S rDNA showed similar occurrence rates in swabs and whole blood samples (Table 2). However, the number of repetitions in the arp gene showed a significant difference between swab and WB samples. The arp gene with a lower number of repetitions was found to occur more often in WB samples. In addition, the most common tpr RFLP type “d” occurred less often in WB samples while type “e” had a higher occurrence rate in WB samples.
Table 2

Genotypes identified in PCR positive swabs and whole blood samples

Genes

 

Type of sample

Statistical significance

 

Locus nucleotide sequences

Swabs (n = 93)

WB samples (n = 34)

 

TP0136

Identical to strain SS14

96.1% (74/77)

100.0% (12/12)

 
 

Unique sequences

3.9% (3/77)

0.0% (0/12)

 

TP0548

Identical to strain SS14

74.4% (58/78)

68.8% (11/16)

 
 

Unique sequences

25.6% (20/78)

31.3% (5/16)

 

23S rDNA

wt

60.4% (55/91)

51.6% (16/31)

 
 

A2058G

28.6% (26/91)

25.8% (8/31)

 
 

A2059G

11.0% (10/91)

22.6% (7/31)

 
 

Number of repetitions in the arp locus

  
  

Swabs

WB samples

 

arp

14

82.4% (56/68)

55.6% (5/9)

p = 0.03

 

15

11.8% (8/68)

11.1% (1/9)

 
 

8-12

5.9% (4/68)

33.3% (3/9)

p = 0.003

tpr E, G, J

tpr E, G, J pattern after Mse I digest

   
  

Swabs

WB samples

 
 

d

91.2% (62/68)

30.8% (4/13)

p < 0.001

 

e

1.5% (1/68)

46.2% (6/13)

p < 0.001

 

b, p, k, j

7.4% (5/68)

23.1% (3/13)

 

Samples isolated in the work of Flasarová et al. [17] augmented by samples collected in 2011 in the Czech Republic were analyzed. Results show both paired and unpaired samples.

wt, wildtype.

Discussion

Molecular detection of treponemal DNA and the subsequent molecular typing of T. pallidum strains have allowed epidemiological mapping of treponemal syphilis strains [15]. In recent years, there has been increasing evidence showing differences in molecular genetic markers among virulent treponemal strains isolated in different countries [14, 1634]. Some studies have shown that predominant treponemal strains in a particular population can change over time [14, 17].

The selection of suitable genetic loci appears to be of enormous importance. Genetic loci suitable for molecular typing should contain a relatively high degree of variability and relatively high stability in future generations of the microbial population. Several genetic loci including tprK, tprC and the intergenic region between TP0126-TP0127 have been tested for their suitability for molecular typing and rejected because of multiallelic sequences [12] or because of a lack of discriminatory power [14].

The most widely used molecular typing system [15] and its improved versions [14, 16] are in principle based on detection of genetic variability in the arp and tpr genes. As shown by Liu et al. [35], the repeat motifs in the arp gene code for highly immunogenic protein sequences and represent a potential fibronectin-binding domain. The arp gene in T. pallidum strains is subject to positive selection and the size variation in repeat motifs in T. pallidum strains is likely connected with mechanisms that treponemes use to escape/evade the host’s immune response, which has been primed against the standard (and the most prevalent repeat number among clinical samples) 14-repeat variant [36]. Genes tprE, G and J are potential virulence factors and belong to tpr subfamily II [37]. These genes are expressed during syphilis infection [38, 39] and the TprEJ proteins are likely located on the outer membrane [40, 41]. Recently, Giacani et al. [40] demonstrated how the number of poly-G repeats effected transcription of tprE, G, and J through a phase variation mechanism, and the modulating effect of the TP0262 gene on the level of transcription of these tpr genes [42]. We have shown that these loci are often variable in samples taken from the same patient. Although coinfection with two genetically different treponemal strains cannot be excluded, it appears unlikely since typing with other markers, including the TP0136, TP0548, and 23S rDNA loci, revealed identical sequences despite the fact that the latter typing scheme identified only 6 different genotypes among the 18 patients sampled in this study.

Under experimental conditions, Pillay et al. [15] showed that the CDC genotype is stable in repeated rabbit passages of T. pallidum Nichols strain and others have confirmed this finding [14]. Moreover, genetic stability has been shown for two additional treponemal strains (Sea 81–4 and Chicago C) using experimental infections of rabbits [14]. However, human infection may differ considerably from experimental rabbit infections. These differences represent differences in IL-2 levels produced by Th1 cells (Helper T cells) during the early cellular response to T. pallidum in the rabbit model, where the mRNA IL-2 levels were considerably lower than IL-10 levels [43]. On the other hand, IL-2 mRNA levels in early human lesions had comparable levels of IL-10 [44]. Moreover, in contrast to rabbit infections, CD8+ T-cells are often the dominant T-cell during human infections [45].

It has been shown that skin and blood represent two immunologically distinct compartments with respect to syphilis infections [45]. Cellular immunity seems to be more important than humoral immunity in the clearance of T. pallidum from early syphilis lesions [46]. The inability of humoral immunity to control the infection is demonstrated by formation of secondary syphilis lesions despite the presence of high antibody titers against treponemal antigens [44]. It is likely that these immunologically different compartments produce different selection forces that act on treponemes living in skin lesions and in whole blood. To confirm this hypothesis, we tested a spectrum of different genotypes from both swabs and whole blood samples. Interestingly, the spectrum of the arp and tpr variant significantly differed between swabs and whole blood samples indicating their instability and differences in selection of treponeme variants in both niches. Alternatively, differences in the arp and tpr loci could result in lowered adherence of these treponemes to human cells prompting increased migration of these treponemes from primary lesions to other human compartments.

There are only a few studies describing the genetic analysis of multiple parallel samples taken from one patient at the same time [24, 34]. Moreover, only a limited number of parallel samples were analyzed in these studies (i.e. involving 2–4 patients) and this fact likely precluded identification of the variability of detected genotypes. In addition, only a limited number of studies used whole blood samples for molecular typing, mainly because of lower frequency of PCR-positive results [18, 4749]. When the published data were analyzed [15, 16, 1820, 22, 2426, 2932], 19 WB and 536 swab samples were fully typed using the CDC typing system. The most prevalent subtype in swab samples was 14d (351 samples, 65.5%), which were similar to our results (14d subtypes in 50 out of 68 fully typed swabs, 73.5%). As with swabs, the 14 repetition version of the arp gene was also the most common in WB samples. The most common tpr profile in WB samples was ‘a’, found in 17 of 19 WB samples [18, 22]. Interestingly, none of the WB subtypes identified in our study (12d, 12e, 14e, 14j, 14k, 15d) were similar to the published WB subtypes.

There are several limitations to this study. One of these is the small number of available parallel PCR-typeable samples taken from the same patient. Therefore, observed differences should be interpreted with caution and more parallel samples need to be tested in future. Another limitation is the small number of fully-typed samples, especially in the sequence-based typing system. The observed lower discriminatory power of sequence-based typing compared to CDC typing is likely a result of genetic variability of tpr and arp loci, however, this explanation needs to be verified.

Taken together, parallel samples taken from the same patient, at the same time, revealed potential instability at the tpr and arp loci, which is often used in molecular typing of treponemes. These loci are likely to show treponemal intra-strain variability and the results of molecular typing should be interpreted with caution, especially in epidemiological studies. Differences in frequencies of genotypes in whole blood and swab samples suggest an antigenic/adherence character for proteins encoded by these loci and also immunological differences between compartments (i.e. skin and whole blood).

Conclusions

The CDC typing scheme revealed subtype differences in parallel samples taken from 11 of 18 tested patients (61.1%). The arp and tpr loci are likely to show treponemal intra-strain variability since the sequence-based typing system revealed identical sequences in the TP0136, TP0548, and 23S rRNA genes. Therefore, the results of CDC typing should be interpreted with caution, especially in epidemiological studies. Differences in treponemal genotypes detected in whole blood and swab samples suggest immunological differences between the skin and whole blood compartments and/or differences in adherence of genetic variants of treponemes to human cells.

Methods

Collection of clinical samples

Clinical samples were collected from 2006 – 2012 in several clinical departments in the Czech Republic (Department of Medical Microbiology and Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, St. Anne’s Hospital and Masaryk University Brno, Department of Dermatology, Faculty Hospital Brno, Department of Dermatology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, the National Reference Laboratory for Diagnostics of Syphilis, and the National Institute for Public Health, Prague).

All clinical samples were collected after patients gave informed consent. Syphilis was diagnosed based on clinical symptoms and results of several serological tests (e.g. Rapid Plasma Reagin (RPR) test, Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL) test, T. pallidum Hemagglutination Assay (TPHA), T. pallidum Particle Agglutination Assay (TPPA), ELISA IgM and IgG tests and Western blot analyses of IgM and IgG levels). The study was approved by the ethics committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Czech Republic.

Two types of clinical samples were used for PCR testing, swabs and whole blood samples. Skin and mucosal swabs were transported to the laboratory in a dry state in a sterile capped tube with no fluid transport medium. Whole blood samples (3 ml) were drawn into commercially available containers supplemented with 5.4 mg of K2EDTA. Samples collected from Prague’s departments were stored at −20°C and transported on dry ice to the laboratory for PCR testing on bimonthly basis. DNA was extracted within 24 hours after transportation of these samples. Samples from hospitals in Brno underwent DNA extraction within 1–5 days after collection.

Several patients provided two parallel samples, which were obtained during the same physician visit. A combination of two swabs, taken from different sites of the same lesion or from two separate lesions, or a swab and a whole blood sample were obtained from syphilis seropositive patients.

Isolation and PCR detection of treponemal DNA

Treponemal DNA was isolated as described previously [17] from swabs, which were submerged in 1.5 ml of sterile water and agitated for 5 min at room temperature (0.2 – 0.4 ml of the liquid phase was used for isolation), and from whole blood (0.2 – 0.8 ml) using a QIAamp DNA Mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and the Blood and Body Fluid Spin Protocol. DNA was eluted to 60 μl with AE buffer.

For detection of treponemal DNA in clinical samples, a nested PCR amplification of polA (TP0105) and tmpC (TP0319) genes was performed as described previously [5, 13, 17, 50].

Molecular typing of treponemal DNA and DNA sequencing

Treponemal loci (TP0136, TP0548 and 23S rRNA genes) were amplified using nested PCR protocols according to Flasarová et al. [17]. Briefly, each PCR reaction contained 0.5 μl of 10 mM dNTP mix, 2.5 μl of 10× ThermoPol Reaction buffer, 0.25 μl of each primer (100 pmol/μl), 0.05 μl of Taq polymerase (5000 U/ml, New England BioLabs, Frankfurt am Main, Germany), 1 or 10 μl of sample and variable amounts of PCR grade water in 25 μl reactions. PCR amplification was performed at the following cycling conditions: 94°C (1 min); 94°C (30 s), 48°C (30 s), 72°C (60 s), 30 cycles; 72°C (7 min) for TP0136, TP0548 and 23S rRNA genes. The second step of nested PCR was performed under the same conditions, but with an increased number of cycles (40 cycles).

PCR products were visualized with 1.5% agarose gels, purified using a QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and sequencing was completed using a Taq DyeDeoxy Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Sequence alignments and assemblies were carried out using the LASERGENE program package (DNASTAR, Madison, USA). For determination of mutations at position 2058 [51, 52] and 2059 [53] in the 23S rRNA gene, a Mbo II/Bsa I restriction digest assay was used [53]. The number of 60-bp repetitions in the arp gene was determined as described previously [14, 15] and amplification of the tprE, G, and J genes, using nested PCR, was done according to Pillay et al. [15] with two modifications described in Flasarová et al. [17]. The RFLP analysis was carried out according to Pillay et al. [15]. DNA isolated from T. pallidum strain Nichols (Houston) was used as a control for CDC (arp/tprEGJ) and sequence-based genotyping (TP0136/TP0548/23S rRNA).

Statistical methods

Standard methods derived from the binomial distribution, including two-tailed tests were used. An interactive calculation tool for chi-square tests of “goodness of fit” and independence was used [54].

Availability of supporting data

All sequences identified by sequence-based typing of TP0136, TP0548 and 23S rDNA loci are described in an Additional file 1.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Pavlína Krečmerová for performing the statistical analysis. This work was supported by grants from the Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic (NT11159-5/2010 to DS and NS10292-3 to IK), by the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic (P302/12/0574 to DS).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University
(2)
Department of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University
(3)
Department of Dermatology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague
(4)
National Reference Laboratory for Diagnostics of Syphilis, The National Institute for Public Health

References

  1. Hay PE, Clarke JR, Strugnell RA, Taylor-Robinson D, Goldmeier D: Use of the polymerase chain reaction to detect DNA sequences specific to pathogenic treponemes in cerebrospinal fluid. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1990, 56: 233-238.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Burstain JM, Grimprel E, Lukehart SA, Norgard MV, Radolf JD: Sensitive detection of Treponema pallidum by using the polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol. 1991, 29: 62-69.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Noordhoek GT, Wolters EC, De Jonge ME, Van Embden JD: Detection by polymerase chain reaction of Treponema pallidum DNA in cerebrospinal fluid from neurosyphilis patients before and after antibiotic treatment. J Clin Microbiol. 1991, 29: 1976-1984.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Centurion-Lara A, Castro C, Shaffer JM, Van Voorhis WC, Marra CM, Lukehart SA: Detection of Treponema pallidum by a sensitive reverse transcriptase PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 1997, 35: 1348-1352.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Liu H, Rodes B, Chen CY, Steiner B: New tests for syphilis: rational design of a PCR method for detection of Treponema pallidum in clinical specimens using unique regions of the DNA polymerase I gene. J Clin Microbiol. 2001, 39: 1941-1946. 10.1128/JCM.39.5.1941-1946.2001.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Koek AG, Bruisten SM, Dierdorp M, Van Dam AP, Templeton K: Specific and sensitive diagnosis of syphilis using a real-time PCR for Treponema pallidum. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2006, 12 (12): 1233-1236. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2006.01566.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Rajan MS, Pantelidis P, Tong CY, French GL, Graham EM, Stanford MR: Diagnosis of Treponema pallidum in vitreous samples using real time polymerase chain reaction. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006, 90: 647-648. 10.1136/bjo.2005.083196.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Šmajs D, Matějková P, Woznicová V, Vališová Z: Diagnosis of syphilis by polymerase chain reaction and molecular typing of Treponema pallidum. Rev Med Microbiol. 2006, 17: 93-99. 10.1097/MRM.0b013e3280ad4150.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Heymans R, van der Helm JJ, De Vries HJ, Fennema HS, Coutinho RA, Bruisten SM: Clinical value of Treponema pallidum real-time PCR for diagnosis of syphilis. J Clin Microbiol. 2010, 48 (2): 497-502. 10.1128/JCM.00720-09.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Orle KA, Gates CA, Martin DH, Body BA, Weiss JB: Simultaneous PCR detection of Haemophilus ducreyi, Treponema pallidum, and herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 from genital ulcers. J Clin Microbiol. 1996, 34: 49-54.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Scott LJ, Gunson RN, Carman WF, Winter AJ: A new multiplex real-time PCR test for HSV1/2 and syphilis: an evaluation of its impact in the laboratory and clinical setting. Sex Transm Infect. 2010, 86 (7): 537-539. 10.1136/sti.2009.040451.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Heymans R, Kolader ME, van der Helm JJ, Coutinho RA, Bruisten SM: TprK gene regions are not suitable for epidemiological syphilis typing. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009, 28 (7): 875-878. 10.1007/s10096-009-0717-5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Flasarová M, Šmajs D, Matějková P, Woznicová V, Heroldová-Dvořáková M, Votava M: Molecular detection and subtyping of Treponema pallidum subsp. pallidum in clinical speciments. Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol. 2006, 55 (3): 105-111.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Marra CM, Sahi SK, Tantalo LC, Godornes C, Reid T, Behets F, Rompalo A, Klausner JD, Yin YP, Mulcahy F, Golden MR, Centurion-Lara A, Lukehart SA: Enhanced molecular typing of Treponema pallidum: geographical distribution of strain types and association with neurosyphilis. J Infect Dis. 2010, 202 (9): 1380-1388. 10.1086/656533.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Pillay A, Liu H, Chen CY, Holloway B, Sturm AW, Steiner B, Morse SA: Molecular subtyping of Treponema pallidum subspecies pallidum. Sex Transm Dis. 1998, 25 (8): 408-414. 10.1097/00007435-199809000-00004.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Katz KA, Pillay A, Ahrens K, Kohn RP, Hermanstyne K, Bernstein KT, Ballard RC, Klausner JD: Molecular epidemiology of syphilis-San Francisco, 2004–2007. Sex Transm Dis. 2010, 37: 660-663.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Flasarová M, Pospíšilová P, Mikalová L, Vališová Z, Dastychová E, Strnadel R, Kuklová I, Woznicová V, Zákoucká H, Šmajs D: Sequencing-based molecular typing of Treponema pallidum strains in the Czech Republic: all identified genotypes are related to the sequence of the SS14 strain. Acta Derm Venereol. 2012, 92: 669-674. 10.2340/00015555-1335.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Sutton MY, Liu H, Steiner B, Pillay A, Mickey T, Finelli L, Morse S, Markowitz LE, St Louis ME: Molecular subtyping of Treponema pallidum in an Arizona County with increasing syphilis morbidity: use of specimens from ulcers and blood. J Infect Dis. 2001, 183 (11): 1601-1606. 10.1086/320698.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Pillay A, Liu H, Ebrahim S, Chen CY, Lai W, Fehler G, Ballard RC, Steiner B, Sturm AW, Morse SA: Molecular typing of Treponema pallidum in South Africa: cross-sectional study. J Clin Microbiol. 2002, 40 (1): 256-258. 10.1128/JCM.40.1.256-258.2002.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Pope V, Fox K, Liu H, Marfin AA, Leone P, Seña AC, Chapin J, Fears MB, Markowitz L: Molecular subtyping of Treponema pallidum from North and South Carolina. J Clin Microbiol. 2005, 43 (8): 3743-3746. 10.1128/JCM.43.8.3743-3746.2005.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Molepo J, Pillay A, Weber B, Morse SA, Hoosen AA: Molecular typing of Treponema pallidum strains from patients with neurosyphilis in Pretoria, South Africa. Sex Transm Infect. 2007, 83 (3): 189-192.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Florindo C, Reigado V, Gomes JP, Azevedo J, Santo I, Borrego MJ: Molecular typing of Treponema pallidum clinical strains from Lisbon, Portugal. J Clin Microbiol. 2008, 46 (11): 3802-3803. 10.1128/JCM.00128-08.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Castro R, Prieto E, Aguas MJ, Manata MJ, Botas J, Pereira FM: Molecular subtyping of Treponema pallidum subsp. pallidum in Lisbon, Portugal. J Clin Microbiol. 2009, 47: 2510-2512. 10.1128/JCM.00287-08.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Cole MJ, Chisholm SA, Palmer HM, Wallace LA, Ison CA: Molecular epidemiology of syphilis in Scotland. Sex Transm Infect. 2009, 85: 447-451. 10.1136/sti.2009.036301.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Martin IE, Gu W, Yang Y, Tsang RSW: Macrolide resistance and molecular types of Treponema pallidum causing primary syphilis in Shanghai, China. Clin Infect Dis. 2009, 49 (4): 515-521. 10.1086/600878.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Cruz AR, Pillay A, Zuluaga AV, Ramirez LG, Duque JE, Aristizabal GE, Fiel-Gan MD, Jaramillo R, Trujillo R, Valencia C, Jagodzinski L, Cox DL, Radolf JD, Salazar JC: Secondary syphilis in Cali, Colombia: new concepts in disease pathogenesis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010, 4 (5): e690-10.1371/journal.pntd.0000690.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Martin IE, Tsang RSW, Sutherland K, Anderson B, Rear R, Roy C, Yanow S, Fonseca K, White W, Kandola K, Kouadjo E, Singh AE: Molecular typing of Treponema pallidum strains in Western Canada: predominance of 14d subtypes. Sex Transm Dis. 2010, 37: 544-548. 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181d73ce1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Peng RR, Wang AL, Li J, Tucker JD, Yin YP, Chen XS: Molecular typing of Treponema pallidum: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011, 5 (11): e1273-10.1371/journal.pntd.0001273.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Tipple C, McMlure MO, Taylor GP: High prevalence of macrolide resistant Treponema pallidum strains in a London centre. Sex Transm Infect. 2011, 87 (6): 486-488. 10.1136/sextrans-2011-050082.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Azzato F, Ryan N, Fyfe J, Leslie DE: Molecular subtyping of Treponema pallidum during a local syphilis epidemic in men who have sex with men in Melbourne, Australia. J Clin Microbiol. 2012, 50: 1895-1899. 10.1128/JCM.00083-12.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Dai T, Li K, Lu H, Gu X, Wang Q, Zhou P: Molecular typing of Treponema pallidum: five-year surveillance in Shanghai, China. J Clin Microbiol. 2012, 50 (11): 3674-3677. 10.1128/JCM.01195-12.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Müller EE, Paz-Bailey G, Lewis DA: Macrolide resistance testing and molecular subtyping of Treponema pallidum strains from southern Africa. Sex Transm Infect. 2012, 88 (6): 470-474. 10.1136/sextrans-2011-050322.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Peng RR, Yin YP, Wei WH, Wang HC, Zhu BY, Liu QZ, Zheng HP, Zhang JP, Huang SJ, Chen XS: Molecular typing of Treponema pallidum causing early syphilis in China: a cross-sectional study. Sex Transm Dis. 2012, 39 (1): 42-45. 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e318232697d.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Wu H, Chang SY, Lee NY, Huang WC, Wu BR, Yang CJ, Liang SH, Lee CH, Ko WC, Lin HH, Chen YH, Liu WC, Su YC, Hsieh CY, Wu PY, Hung CC: Evaluation of macrolide resistance and enhanced molecular typing of Treponema pallidum in patients with syphilis in Taiwan: a prospective multicenter study. J Clin Microbiol. 2012, 50 (7): 2299-2304. 10.1128/JCM.00341-12.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Liu H, Rodes B, George R, Steiner B: Molecular characterization and analysis of a gene encoding the acidic repeat protein (Arp) of Treponema pallidum. J Med Microbiol. 2007, 56 (Pt6): 715-721.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Harper KN, Liu H, Ocampo PS, Steiner BM, Martin A, Levert K, Wang D, Sutton M, Armelagos GJ: The sequence of the acidic repeat protein (arp) gene differentiates venereal from nonvenereal Treponema pallidum subspecies, and the gene has evolved under positive selection in the subspecies that cause syphilis. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2008, 53 (3): 322-332. 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2008.00427.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Centurion-Lara A, Castro C, Barrett L, Cameron C, Mostowfi M, Van Voorhis WC, Lukehart SA: Treponema pallidum major sheath protein homologue Tpr K is a target of opsonic antibody and protective immune response. J Exp Med. 1999, 189: 647-656. 10.1084/jem.189.4.647.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Stamm LV, Greene SR, Bergen HL, Hardham JM, Barnes NY: Identification and sequence analysis of Treponema pallidum tprJ, a member of a polymorphic multigene family. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1998, 169 (1): 155-163. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1998.tb13312.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Giacani L, Molini B, Godornes C, Barrett L, Van Voorhis W, Centurion-Lara A, Lukehart SA: Quantitative analysis of tpr gene expression in Treponema pallidum isolates: Differences among isolates and correlation with T-cell responsiveness in experimental syphilis. Infect Immun. 2007, 75 (1): 104-112. 10.1128/IAI.01124-06.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Giacani L, Centurion-Lara A, Lukehart SA: Length of guanosine homopolymeric repeats modulates promotor activity of subfamily II tpr genes of Treponema pallidum ssp. pallidum. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2007, 51 (2): 289-301. 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2007.00303.x.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Cox DL, Luthra A, Dunha-Ems S, Desrosiers DC, Salazar JC, Caimano MJ, Radolf JD: Surface immunolabeling and consensus computational framework to identify candidate rare outer membrane proteins of Treponema pallidum. Infect Immun. 2010, 78: 5178-5194. 10.1128/IAI.00834-10.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Giacani L, Godornes C, Puray-Chavez M, Guerra-Giraldez C, Tompa M, Lukehart SA, Centurion-Lara A: TP0262 is a modulator of promotor activity of the tpr Subfamily II genes of Treponema pallidum ssp. pallidum. Mol Microbiol. 2009, 72 (5): 1087-1099. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06712.x.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Leader BT, Godornes C, Van Voorhis WC, Lukehart SA: CD4+ lymphocytes and gamma interferon predominate in local immune responses in early experimental syphilis. Infect Immun. 2007, 75 (6): 3021-3026. 10.1128/IAI.01973-06.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Van Voorhis WC, Barrett LK, Koelle DM, Nasio JM, Plummer FA: Primary and secondary syphilis lesions contain mRNA for Th1 cytokines. J Infect Dis. 1996, 173 (2): 491-495. 10.1093/infdis/173.2.491.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Cruz AR, Ramirez LG, Zuluaga AV, Pillay A, Abreu C, Valencia CA, La Vake C, Cervantes JL, Dunham-Ems S, Cartun R, Mavilio D, Radolf JD, Salazar JC: Immune evasion and recognition of the syphilis spirochete in blood and skin of secondary syphilis patients: two immunologically distinct compartments. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012, 6 (7): e1717-10.1371/journal.pntd.0001717.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Lukehart SA: Activation of macrophages by products of lymphocytes from normal and syphilitic rabbits. Infect Immun. 1982, 37 (1): 64-69.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Gayet-Ageron A, Ninet B, Toutous-Trellu L, Lautenschlager S, Furrer H, Piguet V, Schrenzel J, Hirschel B: Assessment of a real-time PCR test to diagnose syphilis from diverse biological samples. Sex Transm Infect. 2009, 85: 264-269. 10.1136/sti.2008.034314.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Grange PA, Gressier L, Dion PL, Farhi D, Benhaddou N, Gerhardt P, Morini JP, Deleuze J, Pantoja C, Bianchi A, Lassau F, Avril MF, Janier M, Dupin N: Evaluation of a PCR test for detection of Treponema pallidum in swabs and blood. J Clin Microbiol. 2012, 50 (3): 546-552. 10.1128/JCM.00702-11.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Martin IE, Tsang RSW, Sutherland K, Tillay P, Read R, Anderson B, Roy C, Singh AE: Molecular characterization of syphilis in pacients in Canada: Azitromycin resistance and detection of Treponema pallidum DNA in whole-blood samples versus ulcerative swabs. J Clin Microbiol. 2009, 47 (6): 1668-1673. 10.1128/JCM.02392-08.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Woznicová V, Šmajs D, Wechsler D, Matějková P, Flasarová M: Detection of Treponema pallidum subsp. pallidum from skin lesions, serum, and cerebrospinal fluid in an infant with congenital syphilis after clindamycin treatment of the mother during pregnancy. J Clin Microbiol. 2007, 45: 659-661. 10.1128/JCM.02209-06.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Stamm LV, Bergen HL: A point mutation associated with bacterial macrolide resistance is present in both 23S rRNA genes of an erythromycin-resistant Treponema pallidum clinical isolate. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000, 44: 806-807. 10.1128/AAC.44.3.806-807.2000.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Lukehart SA, Godornes C, Molini BJ, Sonnett P, Hopkins S, Mulcahy F, Engelman J, Mitchell SJ, Rompalo AM, Marra CM, Klausner JD: Macrolide resistance in Treponema pallidum in the United States and Ireland. N Engl J Med. 2004, 351: 154-158. 10.1056/NEJMoa040216.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Matějková P, Flasarová M, Zákoucká H, Bořek M, Křemenová S, Arenberger P, Woznicová V, Weinstock GM, Šmajs D: Macrolide treatment failure in a case of secondary syphilis: a novel A2059G mutation in the 23S rRNA gene of Treponema pallidum subsp. pallidum. J Med Microbiol. 2009, 58: 832-836. 10.1099/jmm.0.007542-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Preacher KJ: Calculation for the chi-square test: An interactive calculation tool for chi-square tests of goodness of fit and independence [Computer software]. 2001,http://quantpsy.org,Google Scholar

Copyright

© Mikalová et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement