Campylobacter jejuni CsrA complements an Escherichia coli csrAmutation for the regulation of biofilm formation, motility and cellular morphology but not glycogen accumulation
© Fields and Thompson; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 22 May 2012
Accepted: 1 October 2012
Published: 11 October 2012
Although Campylobacter jejuni is consistently ranked as one of the leading causes of bacterial diarrhea worldwide, the mechanisms by which C. jejuni causes disease and how they are regulated have yet to be clearly defined. The global regulator, CsrA, has been well characterized in several bacterial genera and is known to regulate a number of independent pathways via a post transcriptional mechanism, but remains relatively uncharacterized in the genus Campylobacter. Previously, we reported data illustrating the requirement for CsrA in several virulence related phenotypes of C. jejuni strain 81–176, indicating that the Csr pathway is important for Campylobacter pathogenesis.
We compared the Escherichia coli and C. jejuni orthologs of CsrA and characterized the ability of the C. jejuni CsrA protein to functionally complement an E. coli csrA mutant. Phylogenetic comparison of E. coli CsrA to orthologs from several pathogenic bacteria demonstrated variability in C. jejuni CsrA relative to the known RNA binding domains of E. coli CsrA and in several amino acids reported to be involved in E. coli CsrA-mediated gene regulation. When expressed in an E. coli csrA mutant, C. jejuni CsrA succeeded in recovering defects in motility, biofilm formation, and cellular morphology; however, it failed to return excess glycogen accumulation to wild type levels.
These findings suggest that C. jejuni CsrA is capable of efficiently binding some E. coli CsrA binding sites, but not others, and provide insight into the biochemistry of C. jejuni CsrA.
KeywordsCampylobacter Escherichia CsrA Complementation Glycogen Motility Biofilm Morphology
Since its emergence as a pathogen of interest, Campylobacter jejuni has consistently been listed as one of the leading causes of infectious diarrhea throughout the developed world [1, 2], and is the most common antecedent infection associated with onset of the neurological disorder, Guillain-Barré Syndrome . Despite more than thirty years of rigorous investigation, the exact mechanisms by which C. jejuni causes disease in humans have eluded researchers. Publications of the genome sequences of various strains of C. jejuni revealed a surprising absence of many genes encoding proteins required for signal transduction and gene regulation. Although C. jejuni regulates gene expression in response to oxidative stress, iron availability, pH, and growth temperature, it does so with only three sigma factors, six sensor histidine kinases, and eleven response regulators [4–11]. This limited repertoire of regulatory elements and its overall lack of virulence factors has placed considerable importance on identifying novel mechanisms of pathogenesis and gene regulation to gain insight into the disease-causing mechanisms and capabilities of the organism in an effort to prevent and treat C. jejuni infections.
Observations reported by our laboratory and others have suggested an important role for the post-transcriptional regulator, CsrA (Carbon storage regulator), in the expression of several virulence-associated phenotypes in C. jejuni[12–15]. In other bacteria, CsrA (or its ortholog RsmA) is a small, regulatory protein capable of both activating and repressing the translation of mRNA into protein (reviewed by Romeo ). CsrA regulation is mediated by binding mRNA, often at or near the ribosome binding site (RBS), resulting in altered translation and stability of the message. CsrA, in turn, is regulated by the action of competitively binding two small, non-coding RNA molecules, csrB and csrC[16–20], whose expression is activated by the BarA/UvrY two-component system [19, 21]. The CsrA pathway and the mechanism of regulation have been studied extensively in the γ-proteobacteria and further studies of the role of CsrA in various pathogens have extended its importance to the expression of virulence factors and the regulation of pathogenesis [22–26]. Despite these advances, very little is known about the mechanism of action of CsrA in the ε-proteobacteria. Examination of the C. jejuni genome [7, 27–29] suggests that this bacterium lacks several genes in the CsrA pathway, including apparent orthologs of the small RNA molecules csrB and csrC, the barA/uvrY two-component signal transduction system, and csrD which is responsible for csrB and csrC turnover . One report describing the role of CsrA in the gastric pathogen Helicobacter pylori indicated that CsrA was required for motility, survival under oxidative stress, and host colonization, and plays a role in the expression of several virulence and oxidative stress related proteins . It was also suggested that the H. pylori ortholog was unable to function when exogenously expressed in E. coli because it failed to complement the glycogen accumulation phenotype of an E. coli csrA mutant .
Considering these observations in H. pylori, the phenotypes of a C. jejuni csrA mutant, and the lack of knowledge concerning the functions of CsrA within the ε-proteobacteria, we examined the ability of C. jejuni CsrA to complement the phenotypes of an E. coli csrA mutant with the hope of gaining further insight into the molecular mechanism of C. jejuni CsrA. Phylogenetic comparison revealed that C. jejuni CsrA exhibits variability in amino acids that constitute the published RNA binding domains, as well as in other residues that are important for CsrA-mediated regulation in E. coli. Surprisingly, although the C. jejuni ortholog was unable to complement the glycogen accumulation phenotype of E. coli, successful rescue of several other E. coli mutant phenotypes was achieved, demonstrating both similarities and differences in the C. jejuni and E. coli Csr systems.
Bacterial strains and routine growth conditions
Strains and plasmids used in this study
Strain or plasmid
Source or Reference
C. jejuni 81-176
Cloning vector containing araBAD promoter
E. coli csrA cloned into pBAD-TOPO
C. jejuni csrA cloned into pBAD-TOPO
DNA and protein techniques
Primers used in this study
#GAG GAA TAA TAA ATG CTG ATT CTG ACT CGT CGA GTT GGT GAG
*TTA ATG ATG ATG ATG ATG ATG GTA ACT GGA CTG CTG GGA TTT
#GAG GAA TAA TAA TTA ATA TTA TCA AGA AAA GAA A
*TTA ATG ATG ATG ATG ATG ATG TTT GAT TAG TTT TTT GCT TA
#Underlined nucleotides indicate a manufacturer recommended addition to remove vector encoded N-terminal leader sequence for expression of the native protein.
*Underlined nucleotides indicate a manufacturer recommended addition to remove vector encoded C-terminal V5 epitope and add a polyhistidine tag for expression of the native protein.
Plasmids used in this study (Table 1) were constructed using the pBAD-TOPO® TA Expression Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and initially cloned into One Shot® TOP10 E. coli. The E. coli CsrA complementation plasmid, pBADcsrAEC, was constructed by amplifying the endogenous E. coli csrA allele from MG1655 genomic DNA using primers JAF401 and JAF402. The resulting amplicon was then TA cloned into the pBAD-TOPO vector such that CsrA expression was inducible by arabinose and detectable for western blot analysis by the addition of a C-terminal hexahistidine tag. The C. jejuni complementation vector, pBADcsrACJ, was constructed by amplifying the C. jejuni csrA allele from 81–176 genomic DNA using primers JAF403 and JAF404 and cloning the resulting amplicon into pBAD-TOPO. Both complementation vectors and empty pBAD-TOPO plasmid were then transformed into the E. coli csrA mutant strain, TRMG1655, and recovered on LB agar containing ampicillin and kanamycin. In all phenotypic testing, we performed arabinose titration experiments (including samples without added arabinose) to determine the dose-responsiveness of CsrA expression and complementation ability.
Glycogen accumulation was assessed using previously described methodologies . Strains were grown at 37°C on Kornberg agar (1.10% K2HPO4, 0.85% KH2PO4, 0.6% yeast extract, 1.5% agar) with or without 2% (v:v) glycerol or 2% (w/v) sodium pyruvate; either glycerol or pyruvate was used as a carbon source as opposed to glucose due to the inhibitory effect of glucose on the araBAD promoter . Briefly, cultures were spotted on agar in the presence or absence of a carbon source and grown overnight at 37°C. Following incubation the cultures were stained by exposure to iodine vapor by inverting the plates over iodine crystals.
Motility was quantitated as previously described , inoculating semi-solid LB agar (0.35% agar) by stabbing with an inoculating needle dipped into overnight cultures and incubating for 14 hours at 30°C in a humidified incubator. After incubation, the diameter of the zone of motility was measured. Experiments were performed a minimum of three times with no fewer than three replicates per experiment.
Quantitative biofilm formation was assessed as previously described . Briefly, overnight cultures were diluted 1:100 into LB broth. 100 μl aliquots were inoculated into a 96-well, round bottomed polystyrene microtiter plate and incubated statically at 26°C for 48 hours. Following incubation, biofilm accumulation was assessed by the addition of 25 μl of 1% crystal violet (in 95% ethanol) and incubating at room temperature for 15 minutes, followed by rinsing the wells three times with distilled H2O. Stained biofilms were quantitated by measuring the OD570 after solubilization in 80% DMSO for 24 hours at room temperature. Biofilm formation was also assessed qualitatively by aliquoting 1 ml of diluted culture into 5 ml polystyrene culture tubes and incubating statically at 26°C for 24 hours. Biofilms were then stained by the addition of 250 μl of crystal violet and incubated for 15 minutes, washed three times with distilled H2O, and photographed.
Cellular morphology was assessed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Briefly, cultures were grown at 37°C for 18 hours in the presence or absence of arabinose. The cultures were then pelleted, and washed twice and resuspended in PBS (pH 7.2) and submitted to the GHSU Electron Microsocopy Core Facility for SEM. Twelve fields of view for each sample were randomly chosen for analysis and imaged at 10000x magnification. The resulting micrographs where then analyzed to determine the average length of the cells from each culture (n ≥ 150). Cells that were obviously undergoing cell division or those which were positioned on an inappropriate axis for assessing length were excluded from analysis. The resulting data were then analyzed by one-way analysis of variables (ANOVA) to assess statistical significance among the strains and to rule out variation within the twelve fields of view for each strain as a source of error.
Results are presented as means ± standard error of means. Statistical significance was determined using ANOVA. P values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
jejuni CsrA is evolutionarily divergent from E. coli CsrA and exhibits diversity in amino acid residues important for proper function in E. coli.
Alignment of CsrA orthologs from a number of pathogenic and non-pathogenic bacteria (Figure 1A) showed that CsrA proteins of the ε-proteobacteria C. jejuni and H. pylori clustered distantly from most of the more thoroughly characterized enterobacterial orthologs. Furthermore, ε-proteobacterial CsrA proteins were of a larger size (75–76 amino acids) compared to those most closely related to E. coli (61–67 amino acids). The size difference was largely attributable to an C-terminal extension in the larger CsrA proteins (Figure 1B). In contrast to the high degree of amino acid conservation of CsrA orthologs of E. coli, S. typhimurium, P. aeruginosa, V. cholerae, and L. pneumophila, the CsrA proteins of C. jejuni and H. pylori exhibited substantial divergence from E. coli CsrA throughout (Figure 1B). This diversity was also apparent in two domains that were shown to be critical for RNA binding in E. coli CsrA . In the most N-terminal RNA binding region (amino acids 2–7), C. jejuni CsrA shared four of six identical (two of six similar) amino acids with E. coli CsrA (Figure 1B). The C-terminal RNA binding region (amino acids 40–47) showed greater diversity, with only two of eight identical (three of eight similar) amino acids. Two additional amino acids that were shown to be important for regulation by E. coli CsrA (positions 19 and 35, marked by asterisks in Figure 1B) also were not conserved in C. jejuni CsrA. Together, these differences suggested the possibility that C. jejuni CsrA may regulate protein expression by binding to somewhat different RNA sequences than those bound by E. coli CsrA.
C. jejuni CsrA is unable to repress E. coli glycogen biosynthesis
Expression of C. jejuni CsrA rescues the motility defect of an E. coli csrA mutant
C. jejuni CsrA complements the biofilm formation phenotype of an E. coli csrA mutant
C. jejuni CsrA expression restores the E. coli csrA mutant to wild-type morphology
Presently, studies from C. jejuni and the closely related gastric pathogen, H. pylori, report mostly the phenotypic effects of csrA mutation [13, 23]. Furthermore, in C. jejuni as well as H. pylori the small RNA molecules (e.g. csrB, csrC) and the other proteins (e.g. CsrD) known to be involved in the Csr pathway in E. coli are either unidentified or absent [7, 27–30, 39]. This suggests that the molecular mechanisms may be somewhat different than those in E. coli. In this study, we sought to determine the capability of the C. jejuni CsrA ortholog to complement the phenotypes of an E. coli csrA mutant to gain insight into the mechanisms of C. jejuni CsrA function.
The E. coli csrA mutation has several phenotypes that can be used as tools for determining the capability of CsrA orthologs from other bacteria to complement the well-characterized E. coli strain. For instance, mutation of csrA in E. coli alters glycogen biosynthesis, biofilm accumulation, motility, and cellular morphology, as well as several other cellular processes. Mercante and colleagues  used the glycogen, biofilm, and motility phenotypes as a means to analyze the effects of comprehensive alanine-scanning mutagenesis of E. coli CsrA. In that study, the authors were able to identify which amino acids were most important for regulating glycogen biosynthesis, biofilm production, and motility, while also defining two regions of CsrA that are responsible for RNA binding.
When we compared representative CsrA orthologs from other bacteria, we found that C. jejuni CsrA is considerably divergent, as it clustered distantly from the E. coli ortholog. In part this is due to the significantly larger size of CsrA orthologs in the C. jejuni cluster (75–76 amino acids) as compared to the E. coli cluster (61–67 amino acids, Figure 1A). Considering the phylogenetic divergence of C. jejuni CsrA, we also examined the amino acid sequences of several CsrA orthologs of the pathogenic bacteria represented in Figure 1A to investigate the conservation of individual residues known to be important for the function of E. coli CsrA , and found that C. jejuni CsrA is considerably divergent in several key amino acid residues. Variability is found in both RNA binding domains, region 1 and region 2, although greater variation is found in region 2. The first region, residues 2–8, contains only two conservative substitutions (T5S and R7K) while the other four residues are identical. RNA binding region 2 is highly variable consisting of two residues that are identical to E. coli (R44 and E46), three similar amino acids (V40L, V42I, and I47L), and three non-conservative substitutions (S41M, H43L, and E45K). Between the defined binding regions, there were two non-conservative substitutions (T19E and N35E) we found to be particularly interesting because of their reported ability to improve the regulatory functions of CsrA in E. coli. Presently, we are not able to draw any specific conclusions as to the significance of the individual amino acid substitutions in C. jejuni as compared to E. coli; however, it is likely that this divergence from E. coli plays a role in the ability of the C. jejuni ortholog to bind to E. coli targets appropriately.
In several studies, researchers characterizing the CsrA orthologues of different bacteria have used the glycogen biosynthesis phenotype of the E. coli csrA mutant to determine the functional similarities. One such study, of particular interest to our laboratory, reported that the H. pylori ortholog of CsrA would not functionally complement the E. coli mutant as it failed to repress glycogen biosynthesis . It is likely that the H. pylori CsrA complementation failure was due to differences in the functional mechanism of ε-proteobacterial CsrA, however, this may have been specific to the two CsrA-binding sites of the glgCAP mRNA but not to other CsrA targets. To test this for C. jejuni CsrA, we examined the ability of CsrACJ to complement multiple E. coli csrA mutant phenotypes. We first expressed the C. jejuni ortholog in the E. coli csrA mutant and assessed its ability to repress glycogen biosynthesis under gluconeogenic conditions. Similar to H. pylori CsrA, the C. jejuni CsrA ortholog was incapable of repressing glycogen accumulation in the E. coli csrA mutant.
We next examined the ability of the C. jejuni protein to complement the motility, biofilm accumulation, and cellular morphology phenotypes of the E. coli mutant as well. As with glycogen biosynthesis, CsrA-mediated regulation of biofilm formation in E. coli is based on repression of a synthetic pathway, in this case the pgaABCD operon . However, CsrA mediated expression of PgaABCD appears to be more complicated than that of glycogen biosynthesis, as it was reported that the mRNA leader sequence of the operon contains as many as six CsrA binding sites compared to the two binding sites observed on the glg leader sequence. Regardless of the complexity of the molecular mechanism of CsrA regulation of PGA we found that, when expressed in the E. coli csrA mutant, C. jejuni CsrA successfully complemented the biofilm formation phenotype (p<0.001).
Considering that the regulation of the glg and pga operons are both examples of CsrA-mediated repression of a biosynthetic pathway, we wanted to determine the ability of C. jejuni CsrA to substitute for its E. coli ortholog when the activation of gene expression is required. Wei and colleagues demonstrated that CsrA is a potent activator of flhDC expression and is therefore required for synthesis of the E. coli flagellum . When we expressed C. jejuni CsrA within the non-motile E. coli csrA mutant the phenotype was completely rescued (p<0.001) suggesting that the C. jejuni ortholog is capable of promoting FlhDC expression.
Finally, we assessed the ability of C. jejuni CsrA to rescue an uncharacterized phenotype such as the altered cellular morphology of the E. coli csrA mutant. When CsrA was discovered, Romeo and colleagues reported that the csrA mutant displayed a greater cellular size as compared to the wild type, which was most obvious in early stationary phase . This phenotype was explained as a possible indirect effect of endogenous glycogen accumulation. When we grew the wild type, csrA mutant, and complemented E. coli strains in LB media and observed their morphology via scanning electron microscopy, we observed a modest but significant decrease in the size of the mutant as compared to the wild-type as reported by Romeo  in the absence of arabinose; however, in the presence of arabinose we observed a marked decrease in the size of the mutant as compared to the wild type (p<0.001). This decrease in size was complemented by both orthologs of CsrA (p<0.001). As Romeo suggested that the size differences between the mutant and wild type may be due to the role of endogenous glycogen cellular morphology, it is possible that the presence of arabinose used for protein expression may play a separate metabolic role within the cell leading to the observed phenotype.
A number of studies have shown that regulation of mRNA targets by E. coli CsrA is complex [12, 15, 35, 41]. Mercante et al.  showed that proper regulation depends on simultaneous binding of E. coli CsrA to multiple sites on target mRNAs, involving both of the RNA-binding surfaces of CsrA, using a multi-site bridging mechanism, and also the formation of higher order ribonucleoprotein complexes. Therefore, it is possible that the lack of regulation of the E. coli glg genes by C. jejuni CsrA is not due just to simple binding of one glg site vs. another, but rather due to changes in the dynamics (i.e. not ‘all or nothing’) of one or more of these bridging or ribonucleoprotein formation processes. For example, even moderately decreased affinity of C. jejuni CsrA for one of the glg sites may inhibit the formation of multi-site bridges and ribonucleoprotein complexes and therefore not result in productive regulation.
Finally, the binding of some but not all E. coli CsrA binding sites by C. jejuni CsrA infers that ε-proteobacterial CsrA binding sites are likely to show at least subtle differences from such sites in E. coli. It further underscores that predictive algorithms based solely or primarily on E. coli CsrA binding sites may be problematic for identifying CsrA binding sites in ε-proteobacteria and other divergent bacteria (Figure 1), and that experimental approaches are preferable (such studies are ongoing in our lab).
This study has shown that CsrA from the ε-proteobacteria C. jejuni exhibits substantial sequence divergence compared to previously studied CsrA regulators from other bacteria, including in the RNA-binding domains. The ability of C. jejuni CsrA to complement some, but not all, phenotypes of an E. coli csrA mutant demonstrates both conservation and divergence of function, and suggests that the C. jejuni ortholog may have differences in binding specificity relative to its E. coli counterpart. Studies to define the C. jejuni CsrA RNA binding site are ongoing.
We are grateful to Dr. Tony Romeo (University of Florida) and Dr. Adrianne Edwards (Emory University) for providing E. coli strains MG1655 and TRMG1655. We are also grateful to the members of the Thompson laboratory, Mr. Robert Smith (GHSU Electron Microscopy Core), and Dr. Tiffany L. Floyd (Georgia Health Sciences University) for assistance with these studies. This work was supported by U.S. National Institutes of Health grants AI058284, AI084160, and an intramural grant from the Georgia Health Sciences University Research Institute.
- Butzler JP, Skirrow MB: Campylobacter enteritis. Clin Gastroenterol. 1979, 8 (3): 737-765.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sanders JW, Isenbarger DW, Walz SE, Pang LW, Scott DA, Tamminga C, Oyofo BA, Hewitson WC, Sanchez JL, Pitarangsi C, et al: An observational clinic-based study of diarrheal illness in deployed United States military personnel in Thailand: presentation and outcome of Campylobacter infection. AmJTrop Med Hyg. 2002, 67 (5): 533-538.Google Scholar
- Parkin R, Davies-Cole J, Balbus J: A definition for chronic sequelae applied to Campylobacter and Guillian-Barre Syndrome (GBS). Ann Epidemiol. 2000, 10 (7): 473-PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Brás AM, Chatterjee S, Wren BW, Newell DG, Ketley JM: A novel Campylobacter jejuni two-component regulatory system important for temperature-dependent growth and colonization. J Bacteriol. 1999, 181 (10): 3298-3302.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Pajaniappan M, Hall JE, Cawthraw SA, Newell DG, Gaynor EC, Fields JA, Rathbun KM, Agee WA, Burns CM, Hall SJ, et al: A temperature-regulated Campylobacter jejuni gluconate dehydrogenase is involved in respiration-dependent energy conservation and chicken colonization. Mol Microbiol. 2008, 68 (2): 474-491.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Palyada K, Threadgill D, Stintzi A: Iron acquisition and regulation in Campylobacter jejuni. J Bacteriol. 2004, 186 (14): 4714-4729.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Parkhill J, Wren BW, Mungall K, Ketley JM, Churcher C, Basham D, Chillingworth T, Davies RM, Feltwell T, Holroyd S, et al: The genome sequence of the food-borne pathogen Campylobacter jejuni reveals hypervariable sequences. Nature. 2000, 403 (6770): 665-668.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Raphael BH, Pereira S, Flom GA, Zhang Q, Ketley JM, Konkel ME: The Campylobacter jejuni response regulator, CbrR, modulates sodium deoxycholate resistance and chicken colonization. J Bacteriol. 2005, 187 (11): 3662-3670.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Reid AN, Pandey R, Palyada K, Naikare H, Stintzi A: Identification of Campylobacter jejuni genes involved in the response to acidic pH and stomach transit. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008, 74 (5): 1583-1597.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Stintzi A, Marlow D, Palyada K, Naikare H, Panciera R, Whitworth L, Clarke C: Use of genome-wide expression profiling and mutagenesis to study the intestinal lifestyle of Campylobacter jejuni. Infect Immun. 2005, 73 (3): 1797-1810.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- van Vliet AH, Ketley JM, Park SF, Penn CW: The role of iron in Campylobacter gene regulation, metabolism and oxidative stress defense. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2002, 26 (2): 173-186.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Baker CS, Morozov I, Suzuki K, Romeo T, Babitzke P: CsrA regulates glycogen biosynthesis by preventing translation of glgC in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol. 2002, 44 (6): 1599-1610.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fields JA, Thompson SA: Campylobacter jejuni CsrA mediates oxidative stress responses, biofilm formation, and host cell invasion. J Bacteriol. 2008, 190 (9): 3411-3416.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liu MY, Romeo T: The global regulator CsrA of Escherichia coli is a specific mRNA-binding protein. J Bacteriol. 1997, 179 (14): 4639-4642.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Wang X, Dubey AK, Suzuki K, Baker CS, Babitzke P, Romeo T: CsrA post-transcriptionally represses pgaABCD, responsible for synthesis of a biofilm polysaccharide adhesin of Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol. 2005, 56 (6): 1648-1663.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Romeo T: Global regulation by the small RNA-binding protein CsrA and the non-coding RNA molecule CsrB. Mol Microbiol. 1998, 29 (6): 1321-1330.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fortune DR, Suyemoto M, Altier C: Identification of CsrC and characterization of its role in epithelial cell invasion in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Infect Immun. 2006, 74 (1): 331-339.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- MY L, Gui G, Wei B, Preston JF, Oakford L, Yuksel U, Giedroc DP, Romeo T: The RNA molecule CsrB binds to the global regulatory protein CsrA and antagonizes its activity in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1997, 272 (28): 17502-17510.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Suzuki K, Wang X, Weilbacher T, Pernestig AK, Melefors O, Georgellis D, Babitzke P, Romeo T: Regulatory circuitry of the CsrA/CsrB and BarA/UvrY systems of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 2002, 184 (18): 5130-5140.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Weilbacher T, Suzuki K, Dubey AK, Wang X, Gudapaty S, Morozov I, Baker CS, Georgellis D, Babitzke P, Romeo T: A novel sRNA component of the carbon storage regulatory system of Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol. 2003, 48 (3): 657-670.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chavez RG, Alvarez AF, Romeo T, Georgellis D: The physiological stimulus for the BarA sensor kinase. J Bacteriol. 2010, 192 (7): 2009-2012.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Altier C, Suyemoto M, Lawhon SD: Regulation of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium invasion genes by csrA. Infect Immun. 2000, 68 (12): 6790-6797.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Barnard FM, Loughlin MF, Fainberg HP, Messenger MP, Ussery DW, Williams P, Jenks PJ: Global regulation of virulence and the stress response by CsrA in the highly adapted human gastric pathogen Helicobacter pylori. Mol Microbiol. 2004, 51 (1): 15-32.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dongre M, Tripathi R, Jain V, Raychaudhuri S: Functional independence of a variant LuxOPL91 from a non-O1 non-O139 Vibrio cholerae over the activity of CsrA and Fis. J Med Microbiol. 2008, 57 (8): 1041-1045.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fettes PS, Forsbach-Birk V, Lynch D, Marre R: Overexpresssion of a Legionella pneumophila homologue of the E. coli regulator csrA affects cell size, flagellation, and pigmentation. Int J Med Microbiol. 2001, 291 (5): 353-360.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Forsbach-Birk V, McNealy T, Shi C, Lynch D, Marre R: Reduced expression of the global regulator protein CsrA in Legionella pneumophila affects virulence-associated regulators and growth in Acanthamoeba castellanii. Int J Med Microbiol. 2004, 294 (1): 15-25.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gundogdu O, Bentley SD, Holden MT, Parkhill J, Dorrell N, Wren BW: Re-annotation and re-analysis of the Campylobacter jejuni NCTC11168 genome sequence. BMC Genomics. 2007, 8: 162-PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hofreuter D, Tsai J, Watson RO, Novik V, Altman B, Benitez M, Clark C, Perbost C, Jarvie T, Du L, et al: Unique features of a highly pathogenic Campylobacter jejuni strain. Infect Immun. 2006, 74 (8): 4694-4707.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Poly F, Read T, Tribble DR, Baqar S, Lorenzo M, Guerry P: Genome sequence of a clinical isolate of Campylobacter jejuni from Thailand. Infect Immun. 2007, 75 (7): 3425-3433.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kulkarni PR, Cui X, Williams JW, Stevens AM, Kulkarni RV: Prediction of CsrA-regulating small RNAs in bacteria and their experimental verification in Vibrio fischeri. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34 (11): 3361-3369.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Suzuki K, Babitzke P, Kushner SR, Romeo T: Identification of a novel regulatory protein (CsrD) that targets the global regulatory RNAs CsrB and CsrC for degradation by RNase E. Genes Dev. 2006, 20 (18): 2605-2617.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Black RE, Levine MM, Clements ML, Hughes TP, Blaser MJ: Experimental Campylobacter jejuni infection in humans. J Infect Dis. 1988, 157 (3): 472-479.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jackson DW, Suzuki K, Oakford L, Simecka JW, Hart ME, Romeo T: Biofilm formation and dispersal under the influence of the global regulator CsrA of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 2002, 184 (1): 290-301.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chenna R, Sugawara H, Koike T, Lopez R, Gibson TJ, Higgins DG, Thompson JD: Multiple sequence alignment with the Clustal series of programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31 (13): 3497-3500.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mercante J, Suzuki K, Cheng X, Babitzke P, Romeo T: Comprehensive alanine-scanning mutagenesis of Escherichia coli CsrA defines two subdomains of critical functional importance. J Biol Chem. 2006, 281 (42): 31832-31842.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Romeo T, Gong M, Liu MY, Brun-Zinkernagel AM: Identification and molecular characterization of csrA, a pleiotropic gene from Escherichia coli that affects glycogen biosynthesis, gluconeogenesis, cell size, and surface properties. J Bacteriol. 1993, 175 (15): 4744-4755.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ogden S, Haggerty D, Stoner CM, Kolodrubetz D, Schleif R: The Escherichia coli L-arabinose operon: binding sites of the regulatory proteins and a mechanism of positive and negative regulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1980, 77 (6): 3346-3350.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wei BL, Brun-Zinkernagel AM, Simecka JW, Pruss BM, Babitzke P, Romeo T: Positive regulation of motility and flhDC expression by the RNA-binding protein CsrA of Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol. 2001, 40 (1): 245-256.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tomb JF, White O, Kerlavage AR, Clayton RA, Sutton GG, Fleischmann RD, Ketchum KA, Klenk HP, Gill S, Dougherty BA, et al: The complete genome sequence of the gastric pathogen Helicobacter pylori. Nature. 1997, 388 (6642): 539-547.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Romeo T, Gong M: Genetic and physical mapping of the regulatory gene csrA on the Escherichia coli K-12 chromosome. J Bacteriol. 1993, 175 (17): 5740-5741.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Mercante J, Edwards AN, Dubey AK, Babitzke P, Romeo T: Molecular geometry of CsrA (RsmA) binding to RNA and its implications for regulated expression. J Mol Biol. 2009, 392 (2): 511-528.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.