Open Access

Proteomics of Streptococcus gordonii within a model developing oral microbial community

  • Erik L Hendrickson1,
  • Tiansong Wang1, 2,
  • Brittany C Dickinson3,
  • Sarah E Whitmore4,
  • Christopher J Wright4,
  • Richard J Lamont4 and
  • Murray Hackett1Email author
BMC Microbiology201212:211

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-211

Received: 15 May 2012

Accepted: 17 September 2012

Published: 18 September 2012

Abstract

Background

Streptococcus gordonii is one of several species that can initiate the formation of oral biofilms that develop into the complex multispecies microbial communities referred to as dental plaque. It is in the context of dental plaque that periodontal pathogens such as Porphyromonas gingivalis cause disease. We have previously reported a whole cell quantitative proteomics investigation of P. gingivalis in a model dental plaque community of S. gordonii, P. gingivalis, and Fusobacterium nucleatum. Here we report the adaptation of S. gordonii to the same model.

Results

1122 S. gordonii proteins were detected in S. gordonii control samples, 915 in communities with F. nucleatum, 849 with P. gingivalis, and 649 with all three organisms. Quantitative comparisons showed extensive proteome changes in association with F. nucleatum or P. gingivalis individually or both P. gingivalis and F. nucleatum together. The changes were species specific, though the P. gingivalis interaction may be dominant, indicated by large differences between the proteomes with F. nucleatum or P. gingivalis but limited changes between communities with P. gingivalis or both P. gingivalis and F. nucleatum. The results were inspected manually and an ontology analysis conducted using DAVID. Extensive changes were seen in nutrition pathways with increases in energy metabolism and changes in the resulting byproducts, while the acid and sugar repressed PTS (phosphoenolpyruvate dependent phosphotransferase system) sugar transport systems showed decreases. These results were seen across all the multispecies samples, though with different profiles according to the partner species. F. nucleatum association decreased proteins for the metabolic end products acetate and ethanol but increased lactate, the primary source of acidity from streptococcal cultures. P. gingivalis containing samples had a reduction in levels of proteins for ethanol and formate but increased proteins for both acetate and lactate production. The communities also showed increases in exopolysaccharide synthesis, amino acid biosynthesis, and oxidative stress protection and decreases in adhesion and transporter proteins.

Conclusion

This study showed that S. gordonii demonstrates species specific responses during interactions with F. nucleatum or P. gingivalis. Extensive changes were seen in energy metabolism and byproduct production implicating nutrient transfer as an important community interaction.

Keywords

Streptococcus gordonii Oral biofilm Proteomics Model community Porphyromonas gingivalis Fusobacterium nucleatum

Background

Oral infections, such as caries and periodontal disease, are among the most common instances of bacterial pathogenesis in humans. Current models of oral disease development center around the microbial communities found in dental plaque biofilms. Development of the dental plaque biofilm involves competition and cooperation among hundreds of different organisms. Early colonizing organisms, dominated by streptococci such as S. gordonii[1], bind to a variety of host derived molecules coating oral surfaces known as the acquired pellicle. Secondary colonizing species then adhere to those bound to the pellicle. Fusobacterium nucleatum can bind these early colonizing organisms and later additions to the biofilm [2]. In addition, F. nucleatum is aerotolerant and metabolic activity can reduce the concentration of oxygen to levels that can be tolerated by more pathogenic organisms such as P. gingivalis[3]. P. gingivalis can bind to both F. nucleatum and S. gordonii[4, 5], and these organisms are metabolically compatible when associated [3, 6]. While destruction of periodontal tissue is generally associated with later colonizers like P. gingivalis, pathogenicity is expressed within the context of the microbial community.

It has recently been shown that nutrient transfer within a community can play an important role in pathogenicity [7]. Co-culture with S. gordonii resulted in increased virulence of the periodontal pathogen Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans. The increase was dependent on the ability of A. actinomycetemcomitans to utilize L-lactate, a byproduct of S. gordonii energy metabolism, as an energy source. Furthermore, a mutant strain unable to utilize L-lactate showed significantly decreased virulence in the co-culture highlighting the importance of metabolite cross-feeding.

Oral microbial communities are also known for altering their local environment. The most striking example occurs in dental caries where species such as Streptococcus mutans significantly reduce the pH to a point where enamel is demineralized [8]. This shift in ecology also effects the development of the dental plaque, selecting for more aciduric organisms such as lactobacilli. While S. gordonii does not produce acid at the same levels or at lower pH as does S. mutans, S. gordonii has been found to produce acid down to pH 5.5 [9] and may also change the local ecology during formation of dental plaque.

The large number of species involved, the heterogeneity between hosts as well as within the oral cavity, and the small sample sizes that can be harvested from the oral cavity compared to laboratory grown samples, all present significant experimental challenges in examining microbial interactions in dental plaque development. In order to investigate these interactions in a more experimentally tractable system [10], we have developed a model of nascent community interactions [11] using three representative species of oral bacteria, S. gordonii, F. nucleatum, and P. gingivalis. We have previously reported our results for P. gingivalis protein expression, which showed extensive changes in 18 hour pellets with S. gordonii and F. nucleatum, especially in the cell envelope proteome and in vitamin synthesis pathways [11]. Here we report changes in S. gordonii protein levels in model nascent communities with F. nucleatum, P. gingivalis, and all three species combined.

Results and discussion

Bacteria in the oral cavity assemble into complex heterotypic communities that engage in multilevel signaling and response interactions [12, 13]. Bacteria can communicate through direct contact; soluble secreted factors such as autoinducers; and detection and utilization of metabolic products of partner species [14, 15]. Proteomic investigation of such communities in vitro presents numerous challenges including sample size and relevance to the in vivo situation. We have developed a model that includes elements from three major species of dental biofilms that represent early (S. gordonii) mid (F. nucleatum) and late (P. gingivalis) colonizers, organisms that form close associations with one another, as illustrated using scanning confocal microscopy (Figure 1). By generating pellets of these organisms, we have provided conditions under which they are in close contact, thus allowing signaling through contact dependent mechanisms and short range chemical mediators. This model also allows separation of the interaction stage of community development (our major interest) from community development through bacterial growth and division. By avoiding growth cycles influenced by nutrient diffusion, there is less opportunity for results to be confounded by differential protein expression due to different physiological microniches.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2180-12-211/MediaObjects/12866_2012_Article_1794_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Multispecies community of S. gordonii , P. gingivalis and F. nucleatum . Confocal laser scanning analysis of heterotypic communities of S. gordonii (red), F. nucleatum (green) and P. gingivalis (yellow). Bacterial accumulations were analysed on an Olympus FV500 laser scanning confocal microscope. A series of 1 μm fluorescent slices were re-constructed using Volocity software. The area shown measures approximately 40 × 50 μm.

Protein detection

The whole cell proteome of S. gordonii was measured either alone in a single species assembled 18 hour biofilm or in communities with F. nucleatum (SgFn), P. gingivalis (SgPg), or both P. gingivalis and F. nucleatum (SgPgFn). Table 1 shows the number of S. gordonii proteins identified by three or more unique peptides across two biological replicates of each sample. The number of identified proteins is lower in the mixed samples relative to the single species control as the percentage of the extracted proteins originating from S. gordonii is lower in the mixed community than in a pure Sg sample.
Table 1

S. gordonii proteins detected in communities

Organism(s)

Proteins detected

S. gordonii

1122

SgFn

915

SgPg

849

SgPgFn

649

Protein levels, as measured by spectral counting (see Methods), were compared among all samples. Proteins were considered significantly altered between conditions at q values of 0.005 and lower. Table 2 shows numbers of increased, decreased, and unchanged proteins for all six comparisons. Relative abundance calculations were only carried out for proteins detected in both conditions being compared, i.e. no artificial baselines in place of missing data were used. Therefore increased and decreased protein levels are also expressed as a percentage of the shared proteins detected in both states. The S. gordonii proteome undergoes substantial changes when exposed to Fn or Pg with 45 to 54% of the detected proteins showing altered levels compared to Sg alone (SgFn vs Sg, SgPg vs Sg, and SgPgFn vs Sg). While Sg showed many relative abundance changes with either Fn or Pg, the responses are distinct and species specific as seen in the large differences between the SgPg and SgFn preparations (SgPg vs SgFn). However, the response to Pg appears to be dominant. Sg in a community with both Pg and Fn shows significant differences compared to the SgFn community but is very similar to the SgPg community (SgPgFn vs SgFn, SgPgFn vs SgPg). This is in keeping with models of dental plaque development whereby the pathogenic potential alters as later colonizers become established [16]. A short format summary table of all data presented in this report can be found in Additional file 1. Additional files 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 present the data in somewhat greater detail for each proteome quantitative comparison, including both raw and normalized spectral counts and associated statistics. Qualitative protein coverage information is summarized in Additional file 8. Additional file 9 shows a whole genome plot of the SgPgFn vs Sg comparison. Plots comparing spectral counts for technical replicates and spectral counts for each biological replicate are found in Additional file 10, as well as additional remarks about data reproducibility and the effects of normalization. The high correlations shown suggest that the detected changes are due primarily to differences between the conditions being compared rather than random variability in the measurements. The original FileMaker™ database from which additional files 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 were derived is available from the corresponding author. The raw data has been archived in a remote secure location as part of the University of Washington’s lolo file retrieval system, and will also be made available through the United States Department of Energy’s Joint Genome Institute (JGI), and possibly other sites pending ongoing discussions in the proteomics community with respect to best practices for permanent archival storage.
Table 2

Relative abundance changes observed for the S. gordonii expressed proteome

Comparison

Unchanged

Increased

Decreased

SgFn vs S. gordonii

421

188 (24%)

160 (21%)

SgPg vs S. gordonii

389

212 (25%)

200 (26%)

SgPgFn vs S. gordonii

287

163 (26%)

174 (28%)

SgPg vs SgFn

375

161 (23%)

177 (25%)

SgPg Fn vs SgFn

327

111 (19%)

146 (25%)

SgPg Fn vs SgPg

556

15 (2%)

56 (9%)

Energy metabolism and sugar transport

Changes to pathways for energy metabolism and sugar transport in the multispecies communities were consistent with a higher level of available energy metabolites and a lower pH. Oral streptococcal species primarily derive their energy from the breakdown of carbohydrates. Figures 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 compare energy metabolism pathway proteins between the different communities (2 SgFn vs Sg, 3 SgPg vs Sg, 4 SgPgFn vs Sg, 5 SgPg vs SgFn, 6 SgPgFn vs SgFn, 7 SgPgFn vs SgPg). Compared to Sg alone the multispecies communities showed increased levels for both the glycolysis pathway and the pentose phosphate pathway, implying higher energy availability (Figures 2, 3, 4). The presence of Pg appeared to be dominant as SgPgFn was very similar to SgPg (Figure 7). Even though both pathways were increased in the presence of Fn or Pg there was a difference in emphasis (Figure 5). Sg in contact with Pg had larger increases in the glycolysis pathway while Sg with Fn had larger increases in the pentose phosphate pathway. SgFn and SgPg also showed increased levels of malate oxidoreductase that converts malate to pyruvate (Figures 2, 3) with SgFn showing a larger increase (Figure 5).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2180-12-211/MediaObjects/12866_2012_Article_1794_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

SgFn vs Sg Energy metabolism and end products. The diagram shows a schematic of the glycolysis and pentose phosphate pathways for Sg including the end products of the metabolism, formate, acetate, L-lactate, and ethanol for the S. gordonii with F. nucleatum sample compared to S. gordonii. Proteins catalyzing each step are shown by their S. gordonii SGO designation, some include a protein abbreviation. Red numbers indicate increased levels in the first condition compared to the second condition, green decreased levels, yellow no statistical change, and black undetected in at least one of the conditions. Abbreviations: acdH: alcohol-acetaldehyde dehydrogenase; ackA: acetate kinase A; acoA: acetoin dehydrogenase; dld: dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase; eno: enolase; fba: fructose-1,6-bisphosphate aldolase; fbp: fructose-bisphosphatase; fruA: fructose specific phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent phosphotransferase systems component II; fruB: 1-phosphofructokinase; galM: aldose 1-epimerase; gap: glyceraldehydes-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; glcK: glucokinase; gnd: 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase; gpmA: 2,3-bisphosphoglycerate-dependent phosphoglycerate mutase; hicdh: L-2-hydroxyisocaproate dehydrogenase; ldh: lactate dehydrogenase; pfk: phosphofructokinase; pfl: pyruvate formate lyase; pgi: glucose-6-phosphate isomerase; pgk: phosphoglycerate kinase; pgls: 6-phosphogluconolactonase; pta: phosphate acetlytransferase; pyk: pyruvate kinase; rpe: ribulose-phosphate 3-epimerase; scrK: fructokinase; spxB: pyruvate oxidase; sucB: dihydrolipoamide S-acetyltransferase; tpiA: triosephosphate isomerase; xfp: D-xululose 5-phosphate/ D-fructose 6-phosphate phosphoketolase; zwf: glucose-6-phosphate 1-dehydrogenase.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2180-12-211/MediaObjects/12866_2012_Article_1794_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

SgPg vs Sg Energy metabolism and end products. Labels, abbreviations and color coding as described for Figure 2, for the S. gordonii with P. gingivalis comparison to S. gordonii.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2180-12-211/MediaObjects/12866_2012_Article_1794_Fig4_HTML.jpg
Figure 4

SgPgFn vs Sg energy metabolism and end products. Labels, abbreviations and color coding as described for Figure 2, for the S. gordonii with P. gingivalis and F. nucleatum comparison to S. gordonii.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2180-12-211/MediaObjects/12866_2012_Article_1794_Fig5_HTML.jpg
Figure 5

SgPg vs SgFn Energy metabolism and end products. Labels, abbreviations and color coding as described for Figure 2, for the S. gordonii with P. gingivalis comparison to S. gordonii with F. nucleatum.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2180-12-211/MediaObjects/12866_2012_Article_1794_Fig6_HTML.jpg
Figure 6

SgPgFn vs SgFn Energy Metabolism and End Products. Labels, abbreviations and color coding as described for Figure 2, for the S. gordonii with P. gingivalis and F. nucleatum comparison to S. gordonii with F. nucleatum.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2180-12-211/MediaObjects/12866_2012_Article_1794_Fig7_HTML.jpg
Figure 7

SgPg Fn vs SgPg Energy metabolism and end products. Labels, abbreviations and color coding as described for Figure 2, for the S. gordonii with P. gingivalis and F. nucleatum comparison to S. gordonii with P. gingivalis.

Higher levels of available sugars could explain the increase in energy pathways, but would require importing the sugars into the cell. Oral streptococci transport sugar using two primary systems: the phosphoenolpyruvate mediated phosphotransferase (PTS) system, which moves sugars across the membrane with concomitant phosphorylation; and the proton motive force (PMF) system [8, 17], though the specific proteins for the PMF system have not yet been identified. Both systems are known to be regulated. While the lactose-PTS in S. mutans is induced by lactose, PTS activity is generally repressed under sugar excess. The PTS is also repressed at low pH while the PMF system is induced under low pH. Together the systems are believed to provide Streptococcus species with a high affinity scavenger system under sugar limited conditions, and a low affinity system taking advantage of the proton motive force available under low environmental pH.

Figures 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 show comparisons between the communities for PTS transport systems and pathways feeding sugars into glycolysis. These are a subset of annotated systems including only those with detected proteins. The multispecies communities show a reduction in almost all detected PTS components compared to Sg alone (Figures 8, 9, 10). The exceptions are one protein in the multiple protein complex for transporting mannose, either SGO_1680 (SgPgFn vs Sg) or SGO_1892 (SgFn vs Sg, SgPg vs Sg) depending on the comparison, and SGO_1555, PtsI, the sugar non-specific component of the PTS that provides the phosphoryl group for the reaction to a carrier protein. These are increased in SgFn and show no change in SgPg and SgPgFn (Figures 8, 9, 10). Overall, the indication is a reduction in transport from the PTS system, consistent with sugar excess and/ or low pH.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2180-12-211/MediaObjects/12866_2012_Article_1794_Fig8_HTML.jpg
Figure 8

SgFn vs Sg Sugar transport. The diagram shows a schematic of sugar transport across the cell membrane and reactions feeding into the glycolysis pathway for Sg for the S. gordonii with F. nucleatum samples compared to S. gordonii. Proteins catalyzing each step are shown by their S. gordonii SGO designation, some include a protein abbreviation. The purple box represents the glycolysis pathway and the blue line the cell membrane. Red numbers indicate increased levels in the first condition compared to the second condition, green decreased levels, yellow no statistical change, and black undetected in at least one of the conditions. Abbreviations: β-gal: β-galactosidase; fruA: fructose specific phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent phosphotransferase systems component II; fruB: 1-phosphofructokinase; galE-1: UDP-glucose 4-epimerase; galE-2: UDP-glucose 4-epimerase; galK: galactokinase; galM: aldose 1-epimerase; galT: galactose-1-phosphate uridylytransferase; galU: UTP-glucose-1-phosphate uridylytransferase; glcK: glucokinase; malQ: 4-alpha-glucanotransferase; manA: mannose-6-phosphate isomerase; manB: phosphomannomutase; manX: mannose-specific phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent phosphotransferase systems component IIB; manY: mannose-specific phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent phosphotransferase systems component IIC; manZ: mannose-specific phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent phosphotransferase systems component IID; ptsI: phosphoenolpyruvate-protein phosphotransferase; scrK: fructokinase; treP: trehalose phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent phosphotransferase systems component II.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2180-12-211/MediaObjects/12866_2012_Article_1794_Fig9_HTML.jpg
Figure 9

SgPg vs Sg Sugar transport. Labels, abbreviations and color coding as described for Figure 8, for the S. gordonii with P. gingivalis comparison to S. gordonii.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2180-12-211/MediaObjects/12866_2012_Article_1794_Fig10_HTML.jpg
Figure 10

SgPgFn vs Sg Energy metabolism and end products. Labels, abbreviations and color coding as described for Figure 8, for the S. gordonii with P. gingivalis and F. nucleatum comparison to S. gordonii.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2180-12-211/MediaObjects/12866_2012_Article_1794_Fig11_HTML.jpg
Figure 11

SgPg vs SgFn Energy metabolism and end products. Labels, abbreviations and color coding as described for Figure 8, for the S. gordonii with P. gingivalis comparison to S. gordonii with F. nucleatum.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2180-12-211/MediaObjects/12866_2012_Article_1794_Fig12_HTML.jpg
Figure 12

SgPgFn vs SgFn Energy metabolism and end products. Labels, abbreviations and color coding as described for Figure 8, for the S. gordonii with P. gingivalis and F. nucleatum comparison to S. gordonii with F. nucleatum.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2180-12-211/MediaObjects/12866_2012_Article_1794_Fig13_HTML.jpg
Figure 13

SgPgFn vs SgPg Energy metabolism and end products. Labels, abbreviations and color coding as described for Figure 8, for the S. gordonii with P. gingivalis and F. nucleatum comparison to S. gordonii with P. gingivalis.

In contrast to the PTS system proteins, many of the proteins feeding sugars into the glycolysis and pentose phosphate pathways show increased levels in mixed communities (Figures 8, 9, 10). This is consistent with the higher protein levels in the energy pathways as well as high levels of available sugar. The implication is that the second, low pH induced, pathway has high activity under the mixed community conditions. Induction of the second sugar transport system would again be consistent with a low pH environment. While Sg does not commonly reduce pH to levels where demineralization occurs, it can produce acid at pH’s as low as 5.5 and so could be responsible for a lower pH in the mixed communities [9]. It is important to note that these experiments were conducted in media without exogenous nutrients and thus Sg may be undergoing a programmed response to the presence of the other species, rather than a response to altered nutrient levels.

Alcohols and acidic end products

In mixed species communities Sg showed an extensive shift in pathways for byproduct production. The end products of energy metabolism are often important components of pathogenicity and community development. Changes in pH can select for different organisms [3]. End products can also provide nutrients for other community members. S. gordonii has been shown to increase A. actinomycetemcomitans pathogenicity through metabolic cross-feeding of L-lactate [7].

Figures 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 show the end products of Sg energy metabolism, formate, acetate, L-lactate, and ethanol. Compared to Sg alone, SgFn showed a reduction in the proteins for ethanol and acetate production and an increase in those for lactate (Figure 2). SgPg and SgPgFn also had an increase in proteins for lactate production and a decrease in the ethanol pathway (Figures 3, 4). However, neither was as strong as that seen in SgFn (Figure 5). In contrast, SgPg and SgPgFn displayed an increase rather than a decrease in the pathway to acetate (Figures 3, 4). These combinations also showed a decrease in the enzyme for decarboxylation of pyruvate that produces formate as a byproduct (Figures 3, 4).

Overall, exposure to Pg caused a shift away from ethanol and formate towards acetate and lactate, while SgFn shifted away from acetate and ethanol heavily towards lactate formation. While an asaccharolytic organism like Pg is unlikely to make use of L-lactate it is interesting to see a shift in all the mixed cultures towards lactate production. Given the increased A. actinomycetemcomitans pathogenicity in Sg co-culture from L-lactate transfer [7], shifting to higher lactate production might be a typical Sg response to the presence of other oral species.

The presence of excess sugars and rapid growth have also been associated with a shift towards lactate in S. mutans[18]. However, as mentioned above, the cultures were not provided with exogenous nutrients so the likelihood of rapid growth under our experimental conditions was low. Hence, these results are more consistent with S. gordonii utilizing the presence of other organisms as a proxy for nutritional availability in developing plaque.

Adhesion

Proteins that enhance bacterial binding to dental surfaces and other bacteria are important for the formation of dental plaque [19]. Table 3 shows the protein ratios for adhesion proteins across the six comparisons. Almost all detected proteins showed statistically significant decreases compared to levels in Sg alone. This includes amylase binding protein, SGO_2105, which plays an important role in plaque formation by binding salivary amylase [20]. Streptococcal surface proteins (Ssp) A and B, SGO_0210 and SGO_0211, are important for binding Pg via the Mfa1 receptor [5]. Table 3 shows that SspA is down in SgPg vs Sg and SspB is down in SgFn vs Sg. Cell surface protein CshA, SGO_0854, has been shown to be important in binding the oral microbes Actinomyces naeslundii and Streptococcus oralis as well as the host adhesion target human fibronectin [21]. CshA was down in SgFn, SgPg, and SgPgFn compared to Sg. Mutations in CshB, SGO_1148, also decreased binding but reduced CshA levels and that may account for the binding differences [21]. CshB was down in SgFn vs Sg and undetected in the other samples. In contrast, the fibronectin binding protein SGO_0855 showed no statistical differences between samples. Streptococcal hemagglutinin, Hsa SGO_0966, which binds to erythrocytes and plays a role in infective endocarditis [22], was down-regulated in the one comparison where it was detected, SgFn vs Sg.
Table 3

Regulation of adhesion proteins

Protein

SgFn vs Sg

SgPg vs Sg

SgPgFn vs Sg

SgPg vs SgFn

SgPgFn vs SgFn

SgPgFn vs SgPg

SGO_0210

−1.0

−5.4

nd

−4.5

nd

nd

SGO_0211

−4.1

nd

nd

nd

nd

nd

SGO_0854

−2.7

−5.3

−5.4

−2.6

−2.7

−0.1

SGO_0855

−0.7

−0.5

nd

0.3

nd

nd

SGO_0966

−1.3

nd

nd

nd

nd

nd

SGO_1148

−2.7

nd

nd

nd

nd

nd

SGO_2105

−1.9

−6.9

−6.4

−5.0

−4.4

0.6

Bold: statistically significant difference, all ratios are log2.

nd: not detected in one or more of the compared samples.

While the short fimbriae of Pg have been found to bind to Sg via SspB, the long fimbriae bind to streptococci using the metabolic protein glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, Gap [23]. Sg GAPDH, SGO_0207, shows increased protein levels with SgFn, SgPg, and SgPgFn vs Sg and may indicate an increased need for Gap mediated inter-species adhesion in the mixed samples. However, Gap functions not only as an adhesin but is also part of the glycolysis pathway. The rest of the pathway showed increased levels and the increases in GAPDH may be related to its metabolic function rather than binding. This would be consistent with the reduced levels seen with the other adhesins.

Despite the inconsistent detection of many of the known adhesins, overall, adhesion protein levels appear to be down in the mixed species samples. This is consistent with earlier studies showing that after initial contact, organisms in communities down-regulate adhesin expression [24].

Surface proteins and cell wall synthesis

In addition to proteins with known functions in binding, many proteins predicted to be located on the cell surface were found at significantly different levels in the community samples. Table 4 shows significant differences, mostly lower, in many of the detected surface proteins between the community samples and Sg alone. There are also numerous changes in proteins predicted to participate in cell wall biosynthesis (Table 4). Comparing community to Sg samples both increased and decreased protein levels are seen, though SgPgFn vs Sg was skewed towards reduced levels. Proteins for synthesis and attachment of the cell membrane sugar rhamnose show an interesting pattern. The results for these proteins are shown in Table 5. Rhamnose synthesizing proteins show generally increased levels with SgFn, SgPg, and SgPgFn compared to Sg alone with even higher levels in the Fn community than with Pg or PgFn. However, the rhamnosyltransferase, SGO_1026, which would attach rhamnose to the cell membrane, is down compared to Sg. One possible explanation is a shift between different rhamnosyltransferases. Sg has three, SGO_1021, SGO_1022, and SGO_1026. We failed to detect SGO_1021 or SGO_1022 in all but the Sg single species controls.
Table 4

Predicted surface and cell wall biosynthesis proteins

Category

Change

SgFn vsSg

SgPg vs Sg

SgPgFn vs Sg

SgPg vs SgFn

SgPgFn vs SgFn

SgPgFn vs SgPg

Other Surface Proteins a

Total

27

16

12

17

12

12

Unchanged

16

4

2

11

9

11

Increase

3

3

1

2

1

0

Decrease

8

9

9

4

2

1

Cell Wall Metabolism b

Total

36

26

23

29

23

23

Unchanged

16

15

8

17

15

18

Increase

11

6

5

4

0

0

Decrease

9

5

10

8

8

5

a Covers SGO_0004, 0068, 0208, 0233, 0388, 0430, 0455, 0494, 0502, 0521, 0707, 0721, 0825, 0890, 1069, 1082, 1110, 1189, 1347, 1355, 1381, 1487, 1651, 1898, 2004, 2005, 2082.

b Covers SGO_0054, 0056, 0057, 0327, 0393, 0515, 0586, 0631, 0671, 0672, 0763, 0804, 0886, 0948, 0969, 0975, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1013, 1020, 1025, 1026, 1400, 1446, 1447, 1623, 1624, 1638, 1676, 1717, 1768, 1854, 2010, 2104, 2037.

Table 5

Protein ratios for rhamnose synthesis and attachment

Protein

SgFn vs Sg

SgPg vs Sg

SgPgFn vs Sg

SgPg vs SgFn

SgPgFn vs SgFn

SgPgFn vs SgPg

SGO_1009

2.1

1.5

1.1

−0.6

−0.9

−0.4

SGO_1010

0.8

0.9

0.9

0.1

0.1

0

SGO_1011

2.4

1.2

0.6

−1.2

−1.7

−0.5

SGO_1020

1.1

0.7

0.5

−0.5

−0.6

−0.1

SGO_1026

−1.9

−2.2

−3.2

−0.2

−1.3

−1.0

Bold: statistically significant difference, all ratios are log2.

Transport and export

As mentioned above, PTS sugar transport systems are almost all reduced in the mixed organism samples. The other transport and export proteins are also generally reduced in the mixed samples as shown in Table 6. Some exceptions show increases compared to Sg alone and are shown in detail in Table 7. Two, SGO_0006 and SGO_2100, are ABC transporter proteins with unknown substrates. SGO_1059 is a phosphate transport protein showing significantly lower levels in SgFn vs Sg but higher levels with SgPg or SgPgFn. Interestingly, the phosphate transport system regulatory protein, SGO_1060, is significantly down in SgFn and SgPgFn implying another level of regulation for SGO_1059. In contrast to the phosphate transporter, the predicted Trk potassium uptake system protein, SGO_1666, is up in SgFn but significantly reduced in SgPgFn.
Table 6

Export and non-PTS transport proteins a

 

SgFn vs Sg

SgPg vs Sg

SgPgFn vs Sg

SgPg vs SgFn

SgPgFn vs SgFn

SgPgFn vs SgPg

Total

61

58

45

58

45

44

Unchanged

18

15

6

26

19

38

Increased

3

5

4

24

18

1

Decreased

40

38

35

8

8

5

a Proteins covered SGO_0006, 0015, 0104, 0255, 0291, 0352, 0353, 0398, 0415, 0457, 0458, 0460, 0488, 0505, 0538, 0548, 0579, 0750, 0751, 0767, 0798, 0805, 0808, 0851, 0856, 0955, 0982, 1024, 1036, 1037, 1059, 1060, 1118, 1123, 1216, 1338, 1342, 1458,1465,1572, 1580, 1605, 1619, 1626, 1630, 1634, 1666, 1708, 1709, 1711, 1712, 1713, 1715, 1716, 1727, 1728, 1744, 1763, 1802, 1936, 2100.

Table 7

Protein ratios of selected export and transport proteins

Protein

SgFn vs Sg

SgPg vs Sg

SgPgFn vs Sg

SgPg vs SgFn

SgPgFn vs SgFn

SgPgFn vs SgPg

SGO_0006

0.2

0.5

0.1

0.3

−0.1

−0.4

SGO_0255

−1.9

−1.6

−2.2

0.3

−0.2

−0.1

SGO_0415

−1.1

−1.0

−1.2

0.1

−0.1

−0.1

SGO_1059

−1.6

0.5

0.8

2.1

2.4

0.3

SGO_1060

−1.6

−0.2

−1.3

1.4

0.4

−1.0

SGO_1123

1.0

1.2

1.0

0.3

0.0

−0.2

SGO_1216

1.4

1.8

1.2

0.4

−0.2

−0.6

SGO_1338

−0.7

−3.0

nd

−2.3

nd

nd

SGO_1666

0.8

−1.0

−2.5

−1.8

−3.3

−1.5

SGO_2100

−0.9

2.6

2.7

3.5

3.6

0.1

Bold: statistically significant difference, all ratios are log2.

nd: not detected in one or more of the compared samples.

The signal recognition particle protein, Ffh SGO_1123, is also increased in all of the mixed communities. Ffh binds to protein’s signal sequences when they emerge from the ribosome and is necessary for efficient extracytoplasmic protein export. Both SecA, SGO_0415, the only detected sec protein, and SGO_0255, one of two detected signal peptidases, showed significant reduction in the mixed communities (Table 7). SGO_1338, the other detected signal peptidase, showed reduced levels but did not make the statistical cutoff. The implication is that the mixed communities had an increase in integral membrane proteins, primarily those processed by Ffh and often SecA independent, but a decrease in periplasmic and extracellular proteins, primarily those processed via the sec pathway [25].

Bacteriocins, toxins that kill or inhibit closely related species, may experience increased export. The predicted bacteriocin transport accessory protein, SGO_1216, showed increased levels in all mixed communities. Bacteriocin production could be part of a strategy adopted by Sg to influence its mixed species environment, explaining the increase in all mixed organism samples. However, none of the other annotated bacteriocin proteins were detected. Also, SGO_1216 is not associated with the other bacteriocin proteins and may be a mis-annotation.

Transcriptional regulation

Table 8 summarizes the results for predicted transcriptional regulators. Approximately a third of the detected regulators show statistically altered levels in the mixed communities. A subset of the regulatory proteins, those discussed below, is shown in Table 9. Most of these proteins have only a general prediction of transcriptional regulatory function, though they may be interesting targets for further investigation.
Table 8

Transcriptional Regulators a

 

SgFn vs Sg

SgPg vs Sg

SgPgFn vs Sg

SgPg vs SgFn

SgPgFn vs SgFn

SgPgFn vs SgPg

Total

31

24

14

24

14

14

Unchanged

20

17

10

14

10

14

Increased

9

3

1

2

1

0

Decreased

2

4

3

8

3

0

a Covers proteins SGO_0042, 0100, 0182, 0202, 0237, 0252, 0374, 0400, 0431, 0484, 0508, 0535, 0603, 0755, 0773, 0779, 0981, 1072, 1073, 1228, 1257, 1281, 1365, 1699, 1731, 1739, 1792, 1814, 1816, 1878, 1993.

Table 9

Protein Ratios of Selected Transcriptional Regulators and Regulated Proteins

Protein

SgFn vs Sg

SgPg vs Sg

SgPgFn vs Sg

SgPg vs SgFn

SgPgFn vs SgFn

SgPgFn vs SgPg

SGO_0237

0.8

1.3

0.2

0.5

−0.6

−1.1

SGO_0773

−2.3

−2.4

−2.5

−0.1

−0.2

−0.1

SGO_1072

3.9

1.3*

nd

−2.6

nd

nd

SGO_1073

−0.8

−2.1

nd

−1.3

nd

nd

SGO_1800

nd

−2.2

−2.8

nd

nd

−0.7

SGO_1801

nd

nd

nd

nd

nd

nd

SGO_1802

−6.2

−2.7

−3.4

3.4

2.8

−0.6

SGO_1816

0.9

0.1

nd

−0.7

nd

nd

Bold: statistically significant difference, all ratios are log2.

nd: not detected in one or more of the compared samples.

* insufficient detection to determine significance.

Two of those proteins with functional predictions from the annotation, SGO_0237 and SGO_0773, have homology to catabolite control protein A, CcpA. CcpA is a transcriptional regulator primarily involved in controlling carbon metabolism, especially catabolic repression [26], though a ccpA mutant in S. mutans was found to have 60% impairment in biofilm formation [27]. SGO_0237 shows increased levels in SgPg compared to Sg but SGO_0773 shows decreased levels in all mixed communities (Table 9). Given the reduction seen in PTS sugar transport and the formation of communities, a CcpA protein would be expected to be increased across all of the communities. It is unlikely that both SGO_0237 and SGO_0773 are functioning as classical CcpA regulatory proteins. The increased SGO_0237 may be the actual catabolite control protein A for Sg. However, the PTS transport systems do not seem to be responding to a traditional catabolic repression and the binding proteins that play an important role in biofilm formation are down as well. As with the binding proteins, CcpA may play an early role in biofilm formation and be reduced at 18 hours when the samples were collected. It is also possible that despite the homology neither protein acts like CcpA in Sg.

SGO_1816 encodes for ScaR, a manganese dependent regulator of a high affinity ABC manganese transporter, SGO_1800-1802 [28]. However, the name Sca actually refers to streptococcal coaggregation adherence because one of the regulated transporter proteins, ScaA, SGO_1801, was originally identified as an adhesin important for aggregation with A. neaslundii[29]. ScaA was not detected in any of the samples, though that is not unusual for a membrane protein, but ScaR showed increased levels in SgFn while the other members of the operon with ScaA, SGO_1800 and SGO_1802, showed reduced levels in all the mixed communities. It seems unlikely that Sg is seeing higher levels of manganese in the mixed communities to account for down-regulation of the ABC transporter. However, there are some indications that, like the PTS sugar transporters, Sg has a second manganese transport system driven by the proton motive force [28]. This would once again be consistent with a low pH environment. Also, we see a significant reduction in other adhesin proteins and the Sca operon may be down-regulated to reduce the adhesin ScaA.

SGO_1072 and SGO_1073 have homology to the sensor and kinase proteins of the two-component signaling-transducing system CiaR-CiaH from S. pneumoniae[30]. In S. pneumoniae Cia has been shown to regulate a number of genes involved in the biochemical make up of the cell wall, including activation of the genes for D-alanylation of lipoteichoic acid, dlt. Detection of the regulatory protein CiaR, SGO_1072, was poor and statistical significance could only be calculated for the SgFn vs Sg and SgPg vs SgFn comparisons. CiaR showed a significant increase in SgFn vs Sg and a decrease in SgPg vs SgFn implying a large increase in the presence of Fn. The sensor kinase, SGO_1073, remained statistically unchanged. Despite the high levels of CiaR in SgFn the Dtl proteins did not show any coherent change. CiaR may control a different set of genes in Sg than S. pneumoniae. Increases in the amounts of the regulator protein also do not necessarily cause regulatory effects. However, given the changes to cell wall biosynthesis proteins it is interesting that a cell wall biosynthetic regulator showed increased levels in the presence of Fn.

Translation, ribosomal proteins, and tRNA synthetases

In a previous report on P. gingivalis results from these same experiments we noted that Pg had significant increases in translational machinery and ribosomal protein levels in a community with Sg and Fn [11]. Table 10 shows a summary of the translational machinery proteins, ribosomal and accessory proteins, and tRNA synthetases for Sg. The translational proteins showed some increase in the mixed communities with increases in approximately half of the detected proteins. SgFn vs Sg showed one reduced protein. The ribosomal proteins showed a general increase compared to Sg in the SgPg and SgPgFn communities, again approximately half of the detected proteins, with a small number showing a decrease. In contrast, ribosomal proteins in SgFn were mostly unchanged and most of the changed proteins showed decreased levels compared to Sg. Similar results were seen with tRNA synthetases where SgPg and SgPgFn showed a significant number of increased proteins and few or no decreased proteins. SgFn showed few changes of tRNA synthetase protein levels. Taken together the data imply that translation is increased in Sg, similar to what was seen with Pg when exposed to SgFn, but only in communities with Pg or PgFn and not with Fn alone. Hence Fn-Sg interactions may be less synergistic than occur in the three species community.
Table 10

Translation, ribosomal, and tRNA synthetase proteins

  

SgFn vs Sg

SgPg vs Sg

SgPgFn vs Sg

SgPg vs SgFn

SgPgFn vs SgFn

SgPgFn vs SgPg

Translationa

Total

10

10

9

10

9

9

Unchanged

5

5

5

5

5

9

Increased

4

5

4

3

2

0

Decreased

1

0

0

2

2

0

Ribosomal Proteinsb

Total

58

57

53

57

53

52

Unchanged

43

26

21

27

25

44

Increased

5

28

30

28

28

5

Decreased

10

2

2

2

0

3

tRNA Synthetasesc

Total

22

22

21

22

21

21

Unchanged

18

9

9

11

13

17

Increased

2

13

9

8

6

0

Decreased

2

0

3

3

2

4

a covers SGO_0206, 0321, 0546, 0761, 1090, 1154, 1441, 1617, 1863, 2000.

b covers SGO_0027, 0183, 0204, 0205, 0333, 0355, 0358, 0359, 0523, 0573, 0610, 0719, 0818, 0820, 0848, 1033, 1034, 1191, 1192, 1234, 1276, 1316, 1323, 1364, 1383, 1451, 1455, 1456, 1669, 1824, 1879, 1881, 1958, 1960, 1961, 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1971, 1973, 1974, 1975, 1976, 1977, 1978, 1979, 1980, 1981, 1982, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1986, 2001, 2066, 2088.

c covers SGO_0007, 0174, 0349, 0407, 0434, 0568, 0569, 0639, 0681, 0753, 0778, 0859, 0861, 1293, 1570, 1683, 1784, 1851, 1929, 2058, 2060, 2062.

Stress proteins

A syntropic community might be expected to be less stressful to the organisms involved due to support from other species. One result of stressful conditions is DNA damage. Table 11 shows a summary of the DNA repair proteins. Most remain unchanged but a number of DNA repair proteins show reduced levels in the mixed communities, and in the SgPg and SgPgFn communities compared to SgFn. There is one striking exception however, recombinase A. RecA, SGO_ 2045, is significantly down in SgFn but up in SgPg and SgPgFn compared to Sg alone (Table 12). RecA is important for both DNA recombination and DNA repair. An increase in RecA but a decrease in other DNA repair proteins might indicate increased homologous recombination rather than DNA repair. However, the proteins associated with bacterial competence that we detected showed many significant reductions in all mixed pellets (Table 12).
Table 11

Stress proteins

  

SgFn vs Sg

SgPg vs Sg

SgPgFn vs Sg

SgPg vs SgFn

SgPgFn vs SgFn

SgPgFn vs SgPg

DNA Repair a

Total

21

17

12

17

12

11

Unchanged

13

12

6

11

8

9

Increased

2

2

1

1

1

0

Decreased

6

3

5

5

3

2

Oxidative Stress b

Total

7

6

6

6

6

6

Unchanged

1

1

3

2

3

6

Increased

6

5

3

2

1

0

Decreased

0

0

0

2

2

0

Other Stress Proteins c

Total

18

17

15

17

15

14

Unchanged

9

8

5

8

8

10

Increased

7

6

4

2

0

0

Decreased

2

3

6

7

7

4

a Covers SGO_0105, 0171, 0260, 0286, 0626, 0685, 0698, 0830, 1000, 1038, 1044, 1250, 1390, 1413, 1414, 1531, 1865, 2045, 2050, 2053, 2056.

b Covers SGO_0263, 0278, 0749, 1599, 1685, 1803, 1990.

c Covers SGO_0368, 0401, 0402, 0404, 0495. 0688, 0722, 1140, 1625, 1632, 1736, 1862, 1885, 1886, 1991, 1998, 2150.

Table 12

RecA and competence proteins

Protein

SgFn vs Sg

SgPg vs Sg

SgPgFn vs Sg

SgPg vs SgFn

SgPgFn vs SgFn

SgPgFn vs SgPg

SGO_0200

−1.4

−1.2

−1.8

0.3

−0.3

−0.6

SGO_0981

−1.1

−0.8

nd

0.3

Nd

nd

SGO_1924

nd

−2.0

−2.5

nd

Nd

−0.5

SGO_2045

−2.3

0.8

0.9

3.2

3.2

0.1

SGO_2097

nd

−5.5

−6.6

nd

Nd

−1.1

SGO_2145

nd

−0.3

−0.3

nd

Nd

0.0

SGO_2146

nd

−1.7

−2.7

nd

Nd

−1.0

Bold: statistically significant difference, all ratios are log2.

nd: not detected in one or more of the compared samples.

Sg also has a number of proteins to deal with oxidative stress. Most of these proteins showed increased levels in the mixed communities compared to Sg alone (Table 11). This may indicate an increased exposure to oxidative stress. However, while Sg can grow aerobically and anaerobically, other oral microbes like Pg are strict anaerobes. The increased protein levels may serve the purpose of providing oxygen protection for anaerobic community members.

Other stress response proteins include chaperones such as GroES, SGO_1886, and proteases such as Clp protease P (ClpP), SGO_1632, that degrades misfolded proteins. Table 11 summarizes the changes in other stress proteins. Both increased and decreased protein levels were seen in all of the multispecies samples compared to the Sg control, though there was a general trend towards lower levels in SgPg and even lower levels in SgPgFn compared to SgFn.

Conclusions

Both dental caries and periodontal disease are community diseases that ensue from the action of complex multispecies biofilms. Both synergistic and competitive interactions occur among the biofilm constituent species, and biofilm development is a complex interaction involving attachment, recruitment, maturation and detachment. In this study we used quantitative whole cell proteomics to compare proteomes in a simplified model of dental plaque, from a mono-culture of the early colonizer S. gordonii, to a mixed community of S. gordonii with the intermediate colonizer F. nucleatum, to a three-species model nascent community of S. gordonii, F. nucleatum, and the late colonizing periodontal pathogen P. gingivalis.

S. gordonii displayed extensive changes in communities with F. nucleatum and P. gingivalis, especially related to pathways for metabolite utilization and production. The observed changes were species specific depending on the interaction partner. The P. gingivalis interaction appeared to be dominant as protein levels in S. gordonii paired with P. gingivalis and F. nucleatum were very similar to those observed with P. gingivalis only. All of the mixed species samples showed evidence of increased energy metabolism and decreased PTS sugar transport compared to S. gordonii alone, consistent with high metabolite availability in mixed communities in vivo. There was also a shift in end product pathways for energy metabolism, altering the products available from S. gordonii to the community away from ethanol and towards L-lactate. Such a shift would be consistent with the production of a more acidic environment in vivo.

While contact with both F. nucleatum and P. gingivalis resulted in extensive changes to the proteome of S. gordonii, the dominant P. gingivalis interaction was consistent with models whereby P. gingivalis can influence the virulence properties of the microbial community as a whole [31, 32]. The mixed communities showed significant quantitative changes in 45 to 54% of the detected proteome compared to the S. gordonii single organism control. The F. nucleatum or P. gingivalis interactions appeared to be quite distinct, with approximately 48% of the detected proteome differing between the two two-species communities. However, only a small quantitative relative abundance difference, 11% of the detected proteome, occurred between pellets containing P. gingivalis and pellets with P. gingivalis and F. nucleatum, implying that in the present experimental model the contribution of P. gingivalis to a nascent heterotypic community supersedes that of other gram-negative anaerobes, such as F. nucleatum.

Methods

Bacteria and culture conditions

Fusobacterium nucleatum subsp. nucleatum ATCC 25586 and Porphyromonas gingivalis ATCC 33277 were grown anaerobically (85% N2, 10% H2, 5% CO2) at 37°C in trypticase soy broth supplemented with 1 mg/ml yeast extract, 1 μg/ml menadione and 5 μg/ml hemin (TSB).S. gordonii DL1 was grown anaerobically at 37°C in Todd-Hewitt broth (THB).

Chemicals

HPLC grade acetonitrile was from Burdick & Jackson (Muskegon, MI, USA); high purity acetic acid (99.99%) and ammonium acetate (99.99%), from Aldrich (Milwaukee, WI, USA). High purity water was generated with a NANOpure UV system (Barnstead, Dubuque, IA, USA).

Proteomics of model bacterial communities

Harvesting and pelleting of bacteria, proteomic analysis, mass spectrometry and statistical methods were handled as described in Kuboniwa et al.[11]. In brief, bacteria were cultured to mid-log phase, harvested by centrifugation and resuspended in pre-reduced PBS (rPBS). 1 x 109 cells of S. gordonii were mixed with an equal number of P. gingivalis, F. nucleatum, or both as combinations of the species. S. gordonii cells alone were also used as a control. Two independent biological replicates from separate experiments comprised of at least two technical replicates were analyzed. Bacteria were centrifuged at 3000 g for 5 min, and pelleted mixtures of bacteria were held in 1 ml pre-reduced PBS in an anaerobic chamber at 37°C for 18 h [10]. Bacterial cells were lysed in resuspension buffer (15 mM Tris HCl pH 9.5, 0.02% Rapigesttm Waters, Milford, MA) in a boiling water bath followed by sonication and bead beating and proteins were digested with trypsin then fractionated into five pre-fractions [33]. The 2D capillary HPLC/MS/MS analyses were conducted on a Thermo LTQ mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Corp. San Jose, CA, USA). Peptides were eluted with a seven step salt gradient (0, 10, 25, 50, 100, 250 and 500 mM ammonium acetate) followed by an acetonitrile gradient elution (Solvent A: 99.5% water, 0.5% acetic acid. Solvent B: 99.5% acetonitrile, 0.5% acetic acid). The MS1 scan range for all samples was 400–2000 m/z. Each MS1 scan was followed by 10 MS2 scans in a data dependent manner for the 10 most intense ions in the MS1 scan. Default parameters under Xcalibur 1.4 data acquisition software (Thermo Fisher) were used, with the exception of an isolation width of 3.0 m/z units and normalized collision energy of 40%.

Data processing and protein identification

Data processing was handled as described in Kuboniwa et al.[11]. In brief, raw data were searched by SEQUEST [34] against a FASTA protein ORF database consisting of the P. gingivalis W83 (2006, TIGR-CMR [35]) [GenBank: AE015924], S. gordonii Challis NCTC7868 (2007, TIGR-CMR [36]) [GenBank: CP00725.1], F. nucleatum ATCC 25586 (2002, TIGR-CMR [37]) [GenBank: AE009951.1], bovine (2005, UC Santa Cruz), nrdb human subset (NCBI, as provided with Thermo Bioworks ver. 3.3) and the MGC (Mammalian Gene collection, 2004 curation, NIH-NCI [38]) concatenated with the reversed sequences. The reversed sequences were used for purposes of calculating a qualitative FDR using the published method [39, 40]. The SEQUEST peptide level search results were filtered and grouped by protein using DTASelect [41], then input into a FileMaker script developed in-house [42, 43] for further processing, including peak list generation. Only peptides that were unique to a given ORF were used in the calculations, ignoring tryptic fragments that were common to more than one ORF or more than one organism, or both. The qualitative peptide level FDR was controlled to approximately 5% for all conditions by selecting a minimum non-redundant spectral count (unique peptide) cut-off number appropriate to the complexity of each condition. Using our methods, this implies a protein level qualitative FDR in the range of approximately 0.01 to 2%, depending on the specific experiment. A minimum of three unique peptides were used for any qualitative protein identification. Substitution of a database based on P. gingivalis 33277 [GenBank: AP009380] rather than W83 had no substantive effect on the calculations [44], so the original W83 entries were retained in the database for purposes of the work described here.

Protein abundance ratio calculations

Protein relative abundances were estimated on the basis of spectral count values for proteins meeting the requirements for qualitative identification described above [42, 43]. For spectral counts, the redundant numbers of peptides uniquely associated with each ORF were taken from the DTAselect filter table (t = 0). Spectral counting is a frequency measurement that has been demonstrated in the literature to correlate with protein abundance [45]. To calculate protein abundance ratios, a normalization scheme was applied such that the total spectral counts for all S. gordonii proteins in each condition were set equal for each comparison. The normalized data for each abundance ratio comparison was tested for significance using a global paired t-test for each condition, the details of which have been published for this type of proteomics data in which all biological replicates are compared against each other [33, 46], see also the explanatory notes in Kuboniwa et al. [11]. The testing procedure weighs deviation from the null hypothesis of zero abundance change and random scatter in the data to derive a probability or p-value that the observed change is a random event, i.e. that the null hypothesis of no abundance change is true. Each hypothesis test generated a p-value that in turn was used to generate a q-value as described [42, 47], using the R package QVALUE [48]. The q-value in this context is a measure of quantitative FDR [49] that contains a correction for multiple hypothesis testing. A q cut-off value of 0.005 was used for all ratios reported in the relative abundance tables shown in Additional files 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7. All statistical calculations were done using R (Ver. 2.5.0). Only proteins with data consisting of confirmed high scoring MS2 mass spectra (high scoring qualitative database matches as described above) present in both the numerator and denominator of the abundance ratio comparison were listed as significantly changed in the relative abundance data tables (see Additional files 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7).

Ontology analysis

An overall list of detected proteins, as well as lists of proteins that showed increased or decreased levels in the community comparisons, were prepared using Entrez gene identifiers. Ontology analyses were then conducted using the DAVID [50] functional annotation clustering feature with the default databases. Both increased and decreased protein level lists were analyzed using the overall list of detected proteins as the background. Potentially interesting clusters identified by DAVID were then examined manually.

Confocal microscopy

S. gordonii stained with hexidium iodide 15 μg ml-1, (Molecular Probes, Carlsbad, CA), F. nucleatum stained 5- (and 6-) carboxyfluorescein (4 μg ml-1, Molecular Probes) and P. gingivalis (2 x 108 cells of each species) were added together, centrifuged and incubated under anaerobic conditions for 18 h before removal of the supernatant and gentle re-suspension of the cells. The cell suspension (0.5 ml) was added to a glass coverslip before fixing with 4% paraformaldehyde. Detection of P. gingivalis was achieved using a specific anti-whole cell P. gingivalis antibody and anti-rabbit alexa 547 (Molecular Probes) conjugated secondary. Coverslips were imaged using an Olympus FV500 laser scanning confocal microscope. A series of XYZ image stacks were digitally reconstructed using Volocity image analysis program (Improvision, Waltham, MA).

Abbreviations

ATCC: 

American type culture collection

DAVID: 

Database for annotation, visualization and integrated discovery

FDR: 

False discovery rate

Fn: 

Fusobacterium nucleatum

LANL: 

Los Alamos National Laboratory

MS: 

Mass spectrometry

ORF: 

Open reading frame

Pg: 

Porphyromonas gingivalis

PTS: 

Phosphoenolpyruvate dependent phosphotransferase system

Sg: 

Streptococcus gordonii

TIGR-CMR: 

The Institute for Genomic Research Comprehensive Microbial Resource, now part of the J. Craig Venter Institute.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the NIH NIDCR under grants DE014372, DE12505 and DE11111. Additional funding was provided by the UW Office of Research, College of Engineering and the Department of Chemical Engineering. We thank Qiangwei Xia and Fred Taub for the FileMaker database, David A. C. Beck for help with the computations.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Washington
(2)
Department of Microbiology, University of Washington
(3)
Department of Oral Biology, University of Florida
(4)
Center for Oral Health and Systemic Disease, University of Louisville

References

  1. Nyvad B, Kilian M: Microbiology of the early colonization of human enamel and root surfaces in vivo. Scand J Dent Res. 1987, 95: 369-380.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Kolenbrander PE, London J: Adhere today, here tomorrow: oral bacterial adherence. J Bacteriol. 1993, 175: 3247-3252.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Bradshaw DJ, Marsh PD: Analysis of pH-Driven Disruption of Oral Microbial Communities in vitro. Caries Res. 1998, 32: 456-462. 10.1159/000016487.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Kolenbrander PE, Andersen RN, Moore LV: Coaggregation of Fusobacterium nucleatum, Selenomonas flueggei, Selenomonas infelix. Selenomonas noxia, and Selenomonas sputigena with strains from 11 genera of oral bacteria. Infect Immun. 1989, 57: 3194-3203.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Park Y, Simionato MR, Sekiya K, Murakami Y, James D, Chen W, Hackett M, Yoshimura F, Demuth DR, Lamont RJ: Short Fimbriae of Porphyromonas gingivalis and Their Role in Coadhesion with Streptococcus gordonii. Infect Immun. 2005, 73: 3983-3989. 10.1128/IAI.73.7.3983-3989.2005.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Periasamy S, Kolenbrander PE: Mutualistic biofilm communities develop with Porphyromonas gingivalis and initial, early, and late colonizers of enamel. J Bacteriol. 2009, 191: 6804-6811. 10.1128/JB.01006-09.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Ramsey MM, Rumbaugh KP, Whiteley M: Metabolite Cross-Feeding Enhances Virulence in a Model Polymicrobial Infection. PLoS Pathogens. 2011, 7: e1002012-10.1371/journal.ppat.1002012.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Loesche WJ: Role of Streptococcus mutans in Human Dental Decay. Microbiol Rev. 1986, 50: 353-380.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. de Soet JJ, Nyvad B, Kilian M: Strain-Related Acid Production by Oral Streptococci. Caries Res 2000. 1999, 34: 486-490.Google Scholar
  10. Merritt J, Kreth J, Shi W, Qi F: LuxS controls bacteriocin production in Streptococcus mutans through a novel regulatory component. Mol Microbiol. 2005, 57: 960-969. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04733.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Kuboniwa M, Hendrickson EL, Xia Q, Wang T, Xie H, Hackett M, Lamont RJ: Proteomics of Porphyromonas gingivalis within a model oral microbial community. BMC Microbiol. 2009, 9: 98-10.1186/1471-2180-9-98.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Kuboniwa M, Lamont RJ: Subgingival biofilm formation. Periodontol. 2010, 52: 38-52. 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2009.00311.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Kuramitsu HK, He X, Lux R, Anderson MH, Shi W: Interspecies interactions within oral microbial communities. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2007, 71: 653-670. 10.1128/MMBR.00024-07.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Kolenbrander PE, Palmer RJ, Periasamy S, Jakubovics NS: Oral multispecies biofilm development and the key role of cell-cell distance. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010, 8: 471-480. 10.1038/nrmicro2381.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Jenkinson HF, Lamont RJ: Oral microbial communities in sickness and in health. Trends Microbiol. 2005, 13: 589-595. 10.1016/j.tim.2005.09.006.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Whitmore SE, Lamont RJ: The pathogenic persona of community-associated oral streptococci. Mol Microbiol. 2011, 81: 305-314. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07707.x.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Jacobson GR, Lodge J, Poy F: Carbohydrate uptake in the oral pathogen Streptococcus mutans: mechanisms and regulation by protein phosphorylation. Biochimie. 1989, 71: 997-1004. 10.1016/0300-9084(89)90103-X.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Mikx FHM, van der Hoeven JS: Symbiosis of Streptococcus mutans and Veillonella alcalescens in Mixed Continuous Cultures. Archs Oral Biol. 1975, 20: 407-410. 10.1016/0003-9969(75)90224-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Rosan B, Lamont RJ: Dental plaque formation. Microbes Infect. 2000, 2: 1599-1607. 10.1016/S1286-4579(00)01316-2.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Scannapiece FA, Solomon L, Wadenya RO: Emergence in Human Dental Plaque and Host Distribution of Amylase-binding Streptococci. J Dent Res. 1994, 73: 1627-1635.Google Scholar
  21. McNab R, Holmes AR, Clarke JM, Tannock GW, Jenkinson HF: Cell Surface Polypeptide CshA Mediates Binding of Streptococcus gordonii to Other Oral Bacteria and to Immobilized Fibronectin. Infect Immun. 1996, 64: 4204-4210.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Yajima A, Urano-Tashiro Y, Shimazu K, Takashima E, Takahashi Y, Konishi K: Hsa, an adhesin of Streptococcus gordonii DL1, binds to a2-3-linked sialic acid on glycophorin A of the erythrocyte membrane. Microbiol Immunol. 2008, 52: 69-77.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Maeda K, Nagata H, Yamamoto Y, Tanaka M, Tanaka J, Minamino N, Shizukuishi S: Glyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase of Streptococcus oralis Functions as a Coadhesin for Porphyromonas gingivalis Major Fimbriae. Infect Immun. 2004, 72: 1341-1348. 10.1128/IAI.72.3.1341-1348.2004.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Park Y, James CE, Yoshimura F, Lamont RJ: Expression of the short fimbriae of Porphyromonas gingivalis is regulated in oral bacterial consortia. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2006, 262: 65-71. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00357.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Frekkes P, Driessen AJM: Protein Targeting to the Bacterial Cytoplasmic Membrane. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1999, 63: 161-173.Google Scholar
  26. Moreno MS, Schneider BL, Maile RR, Weyler W, Saier MH: Catabolite repression mediated by the CcpA protein in Bacillus subtilis: novel modes of regulation revealed by whole-genome analyses. Mol Microbiol. 2001, 39: 1366-1381. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2001.02328.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Wen ZT, Burne RA: Functional Genomics Approach to Identifying Genes Required for Biofilm Development by Streptococcus mutans. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002, 68: 1196-1203. 10.1128/AEM.68.3.1196-1203.2002.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Kolenbrander PE, Andersen RN, Baker RA, Jenkinson HF: The Adhesion-Associated sca Operon in Streptococcus gordonii Encodes an Inducible High-Affinity ABC Transporter for Mn2+ Uptake. J Bact. 1998, 180: 290-295.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Andersen RN, Ganeshkumar N, Kolenbrander PE: Cloning of the Streptococcus gordonii PK488 Gene, Encoding an Adhesin Which Mediates Coaggregation with Actinomyces naeslundii PK606. Infect Immun. 1993, 61: 981-987.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Mascher T, Zahner D, Merai M, Balmelle N, de Saizieu AB, Hakenbeck R: The Streptococcus pneumoniae cia Regulon: CiaR Target Sites and Transcription Profile Analysis. J Bacteriol. 2003, 185: 60-70. 10.1128/JB.185.1.60-70.2003.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Darveau RP, Belton CM, Reife RA, Lamont RJ: Local Chemokine Paralysis, a Novel Pathogenic Mechanism for Porphyromonas gingivalis. Infect Immun. 1998, 66: 1660-1665.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Hajishengallis G, Liang S, Payne MA, Hashim A, Jotwani R, Eskan MA, McIntosh ML, Alsam A, Kirkwood KL, Lambris JD, Darveau RP, Curtis MA: Low-abundance biofilm species orchestrates inflammatory periodontal disease through the commensal microbiota and complement. Cell Host Microbe. 2011, 10: 497-506. 10.1016/j.chom.2011.10.006.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Bosch G, Skovran E, Xia Q, Wang T, Taub F, Miller JA, Lidstrom ME, Hackett M: Comprehensive proteomics of Methylobacterium extorquens AM1 metabolism under single carbon and nonmethylotrophic conditions. Proteomics. 2008, 8: 3494-3505. 10.1002/pmic.200800152.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Eng JK, McCormack AL, Yates JR: An approach to correlate tandem mass-spectral data of peptides with amino-acid-sequences in a protein database. J American Soc Mass Spectrom. 1994, 5: 976-989. 10.1016/1044-0305(94)80016-2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35.  : Porphyromonas gingivalis W83 Genome Page. [http://cmr.jcvi.org/tigr-scripts/CMR/GenomePage.cgi?org=gpg]
  36.  : Streptococcus gordonii Challis NCTC7868 Genome Page. [http://cmr.jcvi.org/cgi-bin/CMR/GenomePage.cgi?org=gsg]
  37.  : Fusobacterium nucleatum ATCC. 25586, [http://cmr.jcvi.org/cgi-bin/CMR/GeneomePage.cgi?org=ntfn01], Genome Page
  38.  : Mammalian Gene Collection. [http://mgc.nci.nih.gov]
  39. Peng J, Elias JE, Thoreen CC, Licklider LJ, Gygi SP: Evaluation of multidimensional chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC/LC-MS/MS) for large-scale protein analysis: the yeast proteome. J Proteome Res. 2003, 2: 43-50. 10.1021/pr025556v.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Elias JE, Gibbons FD, King OD, Roth FP, Gygi SP: Intensity-based protein identification by machine learning from a library of tandem mass spectra. Nat Biotechnol. 2004, 22: 214-219. 10.1038/nbt930.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Tabb DL, McDonald WH, Yates JR: DTASelect and Contrast: tools for assembling and comparing protein identifications from shotgun proteomics. J Proteome Res. 2002, 1: 21-26. 10.1021/pr015504q.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Xia Q, Wang T, Park Y, Lamont RJ, Hackett M: Differential quantitative proteomics of Porphyromonas gingivalis by linear ion trap mass spectrometry: non-label methods comparison, q-values and LOWESS curve fitting. Int J Mass Spectrom. 2007, 259: 105-116. 10.1016/j.ijms.2006.08.004.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Xia Q, Wang T, Taub F, Park Y, Capestany CA, Lamont RJ, Hackett M: Quantitative proteomics of intracellular Porphyromonas gingivalis. Proteomics. 2007, 7: 4323-4337. 10.1002/pmic.200700543.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Hendrickson EL, Xia Q, Wang T, Lamont RJ, Hackett M: Pathway analysis for intracellular Porphyromonas gingivalis using a strain ATCC 33277 specific database. BMC Microbiol. 2009, 9: 185-10.1186/1471-2180-9-185.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Liu H, Sadygov RG, Yates JR: A model for random sampling and estimation of relative protein abundance in shotgun proteomics. Anal Chem. 2004, 76: 4193-4201. 10.1021/ac0498563.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ: Biometry, the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. 1995, New York: WH Freeman, 715-724.Google Scholar
  47. Storey JD, Tibshirani R: Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003, 100: 9440-9445. 10.1073/pnas.1530509100.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Storey Research Group: Qvalue. [http://genomics.princeton.edu/storeylab/qvalue/]
  49. Benjamini Y, Yekutieli D: Quantitative trait Loci analysis using the false discovery rate. Genetics. 2005, 171: 783-790. 10.1534/genetics.104.036699.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. da Huang W, Sherman BT, Tan Q, Kir J, Liu D, Bryant D, Guo Y, Stephens R, Baseler MW, Lane HC: DAVID Bioinformatics Resources: expanded annotation database and novel algorithms to better extract biology from large gene lists. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35: W169-W175. 10.1093/nar/gkm415.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Hendrickson et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.