The alkylation response protein AidB is localized at the new poles and constriction sites in Brucella abortus
© Dotreppe et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 25 May 2011
Accepted: 23 November 2011
Published: 23 November 2011
Brucella abortus is the etiological agent of a worldwide zoonosis called brucellosis. This alpha-proteobacterium is dividing asymmetrically, and PdhS, an essential histidine kinase, was reported to be an old pole marker.
We were interested to identify functions that could be recruited to bacterial poles. The Brucella ORFeome, a collection of cloned predicted coding sequences, was placed in fusion with yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) coding sequence and screened for polar localizations in B. abortus. We report that AidB-YFP was systematically localized to the new poles and at constrictions sites in B. abortus, either in culture or inside infected HeLa cells or RAW264.7 macrophages. AidB is an acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (ACAD) homolog, similar to E. coli AidB, an enzyme putatively involved in destroying alkylating agents. Accordingly, a B. abortus aidB mutant is more sensitive than the wild-type strain to the lethality induced by methanesulphonic acid ethyl ester (EMS). The exposure to EMS led to a very low frequency of constriction events, suggesting that cell cycle is blocked during alkylation damage. The localization of AidB-YFP at the new poles and at constriction sites seems to be specific for this ACAD homolog since two other ACAD homologs fused to YFP did not show specific localization. The overexpression of aidB, but not the two other ACAD coding sequences, leads to multiple morphological defects.
Data reported here suggest that AidB is a marker of new poles and constriction sites, that could be considered as sites of preparation of new poles in the sibling cells originating from cell division. The possible role of AidB in the generation or the function of new poles needs further investigation.
Brucella is the etiologic agent of brucellosis, a worldwide zoonosis that affects a broad range of mammals, including humans . Brucella is considered as a facultative intracellular pathogen that enters various cell types during the infection process, including macrophages and epithelial cells, and ultimately survives and multiplies inside these cells . After internalization, intracellular Brucella resides within a vacuole (BCV for Brucella-containing vacuole) that interacts with early endosomes  and then transiently acquire markers of late endosomes such as LAMP1. In epithelial cells and macrophages, non-opsonized bacteria replicate finally in a compartment characterized by the presence of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) markers [4–7].
The mechanisms used by Brucella to sense and respond to changes within the intracellular environment are poorly understood. Brucella spp. seem well adapted to cope with nutritional  and various physicochemical stresses encountered in non-professional and especially professional phagocytes . For example, Brucella spp. are adapted to oxidative and nitrosative stresses  that have been shown to affect genome integrity in other bacterial species. In 2002, Köhler et al. identified an attenuated mutant with a mini-transposon in the aidB gene, proposed to encode an acyl-CoA dehydrogenase homolog . In Escherichia coli, AidB protein takes part of the adaptative response to alkylating agents that could damage the genome , suggesting that AidB homolog could play a similar role in B. abortus. Moreover, a Brucella melitensis mutant in the alkA gene was found to be attenuated in mice (Pascal Lestrate, Ph.D. thesis, 2003). The alkA gene is homologous to E. coli alkA, another gene involved in the adaptative response to alkylating stress [12, 13]. In summary, these data suggests that DNA alkylation repair systems could play a role in intracellular persistence, possibly by preventing DNA damage that might be induced by alkylating agents, either produced from endogenous sources  or induced by the host during the infection process.
Here we report that while screening Brucella ORFeome for polar proteins in Brucella abortus, AidB was found to localize at the new pole, as well as at the constriction site in dividing cells. This pattern of localization is maintained in B. abortus infecting epithelial cells and macrophages at different times post-infection. Analysis of an aidB mutant revealed on one hand no effect on virulence, and on the other hand that the aidB mutant was more sensitive to the alkylating agent methanesulfonic acid ethyl ester (EMS), suggesting a function of AidB in the defence against DNA methylation damage. While EMS was found to block cell cycle before cell constriction, a B. abortus strain overexpressing aidB was found to generate multipolar morphologies, suggesting a link between the response to alkylating agents and cell growth and/or division.
Screen for polarly localized proteins in Brucella abortus
To identify polar proteins at the genomic scale, we took advantage of the Brucella melitensis ORFeome , a collection of all predicted coding sequences (pCDSs) from B. melitensis genome cloned in a donor vector (pDONR201) allowing the Gateway recombinational cloning. The resulting ~3200 entry clones are physically organized in 96-well plates (34 plates), each well containing one entry clone (one cloned B. melitensis pCDS). For some large-scale experiments, the Brucella ORFeome is also organized in 68 pools , each pool being a mix of clones from one half-plate of the original ORFeome. Each of the 68 pools was used to transfer the pCDSs in a destination vector allowing pCDS-yfp fusions under the control of E. coli lac promoter, on a low copy number plasmid. More than 1000 transformants (> 10 times the diversity of the pool) were generated for each cloned pool of pCDSs. The pools of constructions were transformed into E. coli strain S17-1 (> 1000 transformants/pool) and were transferred in a Brucella abortus XDB1155 strain  by mating. The XDB1155 strain produces the PdhS-CFP (cyan fluorescent protein) fusion protein from the chromosomal pdhS locus. This strain allows the quick determination of the nature of the pole marked by the protein-YFP fusion since PdhS-CFP is known to specifically label the old pole . The diversity of the pCDSs in the pools was checked by PCR and restriction analysis on isolated clones from 5 different pools with various average pCDSs sizes, in E. coli S17-1 and B. abortus XDB1155 strains. The analysis of restriction profiles suggests that there is no main over-representation of a given clone in the examined pools.
For the screening strategy, we observed the 68 pools using fluorescence microscopy, and we selected pools in which a fraction of the clones exhibit a polar YFP fusion. The pooled clones were examined after cultivation on solid medium and > 1000 bacteria were observed on agarose pads. Afterwards, pools bearing polar localization were observed clone by clone in the same way to identify clones producing polar proteins. The pCDS allowing polar localization were amplified by PCR and sequenced to allow their identification.
Before analysing the 68 pools, we first screened a pool supposed to contain the pdhS coding sequence (CDS), as a positive control. The complete procedure was applied and six clones were identified as polarly localized, and all of them contained the pdhS CDS fused to YFP. This pilot study suggested that the screening procedure was working, and that PdhS was the main polar protein in this pool. The analysis of the 67 remaining pools led to the selection of 8 pools for which a significant proportion of bacteria showed polar foci. The average size of the pCDSs contained in the 8 pools was heterogeneous, varying from 450 to 2000 bp. In one of these 8 pools, we identified a pCDS of interest (BMEII0671 and BAB2_0642 in B. melitensis 16M and B. abortus 2308 genomes, respectively), that we named aidB by homology with E. coli aidB.
Brucella AidB is member of the acyl-CoA dehydrogenase family
Deduced AidB sequence is 551 amino acids long, with a predicted molecular mass of 60 kDa and without predicted transmembrane segments. The AidB sequence is similar to acyl-CoA dehydrogenases (ACADs), proteins generally involved in the fatty acid β-oxidation. In the B. melitensis 16M genome, eight pCDSs are proposed to encode enzymes similar to ACADs. B. melitensis and B. abortus AidB deduced sequences are 100% identical. Brucella AidB presents 42% identity to the Escherichia coli AidB (E value of 4 10-117 when B. abortus AidB deduced sequence is blasted against E. coli genomes), suggesting a functional conservation between these enzymes. This is further supported (1) by the conservation of the Glu-Gly catalytic pair at positions 425 and 426 (433 and 434 in Brucella AidB), (2) by the conservation of 9 of the 10 residues involved in FAD binding, the non-conserved residue being a Ser residue replaced by a Thr at position 198 of B. abortus AidB, and (3) the similarity of the regions involved in the formation of the tetrameric structure of E. coli AidB (10 residues identical on 19 residues). Moreover, a specific feature of E. coli AidB, compared to other members of the ACADs family, is the presence of a Trp424 residue, involved in the shaping of the substrate-binding pocket. This residue is conserved in B. abortus AidB (Trp432). Altogether, these data suggest that B. abortus AidB could play a similar role as E. coli AidB, except that the region of E. coli AidB involved in DNA binding (about 100 C-terminal residues, Additional file 1 for sequence alignment and Additional file 2 for three-dimensional model), is not conserved in B. abortus AidB. This suggests that B. abortus AidB could be unable to bind DNA, or would bind a very different sequence. Indeed, in E. coli AidB is a multifunctional protein proposed to be involved in the destruction of alkylating agents before they reach DNA  and in the transcriptional control of the aidB promoter . It is thus possible that only the enzymatic activity of AidB is conserved in B. abortus, and not its ability to bind a specific DNA sequence in the aidB promoter. In E. coli, exposition to alkylating agents stimulates expression of aidB, ada, alkA and alkB genes , Ada, AlkA and AlkB proteins being actively involved in the repair of alkylated DNA . Ada, AlkA and AlkB homologs are found in the Brucella genomes (data not shown), suggesting that these bacteria are able to resist to an alkylation stress.
The aidB mutation leads to increased sensitivity to the DNA-alkylating agent EMS
Strains and plasmids
Relevant Genotype or Description
Reference or Source
Nalidixic acid-resistant B. abortus 544
B. abortus 544 pdhS-cfp
XDB1155 + pDD001
Disrupted aidB in B. abortus 544 NalR
XDB1155 + pDD003
XDB1155 + pDD007
XDB1155 + pDD008
XDB1121 + pDD001
B. abortus 544 with integrated pCVDH07
This study and 
XDB1118 + pDD001
RP4-2, Tc::Mu,Km-Tn7, for plasmid mobilization
Relevant Genotype or Description
Reference or Source
BP cloning vector
Gateway-compatible YFP low copy vector
pRH005 carrying aidB
pDONR201 carrying aidB
pRH016 carrying aidB
pRH016 carrying acaD1
pRH016 carrying acaD2
AidB-YFP is localized at the new pole, and at the constriction site in dividing cells
Furthermore, the localization of AidB-YFP is still at the new pole after 4 h of exposure with 0.4% EMS (80% of the bacteria exhibited PdhS-mCherry at one pole and AidB-YFP at the opposite pole, n = 237). This observation indicated that AidB-YFP is not released from the new pole in the presence of an alkylating stress with EMS, further suggesting that AidB is active at the new pole, because in these conditions an aidB mutant is killed. Interestingly, bacteria exposed to EMS displayed detectable constriction at the much less frequency (2 constrictions observed among 254 bacteria) compared to the untreated control (44 constrictions observed among 254 bacteria). Moreover, bacteria treated with 0.4% EMS for 4 h and were significantly (p < 0.001) longer on average than unconstricted bacteria that were not exposed to EMS (Figure 3B). This suggests that growth is not arrested by the presence of EMS, while constriction is clearly inhibited. This is consistent with a replication arrest caused by alkylation of the bacterial genome, as previously reported for E. coli .
AidB polar localization persists inside host cells
B. abortus is an intracellular pathogen that encounters various stresses during its life cycle . Since these stresses could result in the alkylation of DNA, e.g. through nitrosative stress , we tested the localization pattern of AidB-YFP in B. abortus (XDB1120 strain) during an infection of human epithelial cells (HeLa cells). At 6 h and 24 h post-infection, infected cells were fixed, and bacteria were detected using a monoclonal anti-lipopolysaccharide antibody. The polar foci of AidB-YFP were similar to those observed in bacteriological culture, suggesting that in these conditions, there is no systematic delocalization of AidB-YFP. Similar results were also obtained with XDB1120 strain in RAW264.7 macrophage infection. At 2 h, 4 h, 6 h and 24 h post-infection, AidB-YFP fusion proteins were still polar (Figure 2B).
Morphological analysis of aidB disruption and overexpression mutants
The growth curve of the strain expressing aidB-yfp (XDB1120) in rich media (2YT or tryptic soy broth) is abnormal compared to the wild-type strain (Figure 4). Indeed, the OD during the stationary phase is lower OD with the XDB1120 strain compared to the wild-type control. In stationary phase in 2YT medium, the OD of the aidB overexpression strain is even decreasing while the OD of the wild-type control remained stable. This correlates with a higher frequency of dead cells in the aidB overexpression strain XDB1122 (22.8% in stationary phase, n = 400) compared to the wild-type strain (5.2% dead cells, n = 400) or the wild-type strain with an empty pBBR1 plasmid (6.7% dead cells, n = 400), the backbone of the aidB overexpression plasmid in XDB1122 strain. This observation suggests that aidB overexpression is partially lethal in stationary phase. In stationary phase cultures of the XDB1120 strain, the bacteria display abnormal morphologies at much higher frequency (22%; n = 200) than the wild-type strain (< 1%; n = 200). This phenotype is probably due to the overproduction of AidB-YFP because the aidB overexpression strain (XDB1122) displayed similar morphological defects (61%; n = 200) (Figure 5). Among these abnormal morphologies, bacteria with multipolar shapes were very frequent, swollen cells were often observed, as well as Y-shaped bacteria, elongated cells and minicells. The morphological phenotype of this strain is thus pleiotropic. The analysis of AidB-YFP and PdhS-CFP localization in XDB1120 bacteria with aberrant morphologies, during the exponential growth phase, did not yield a systematic localization pattern, the AidB-YFP and PdhS-CFP fusions being often diffuse in the bacterium (data not shown).
Subcellular localization and overproduction effects of AidB are specific to this acyl-CoA dehydrogenase homolog
Since AidB is a member of the 8 ACADs paralogs, we wondered if the particular localization of AidB-YFP and the presence of multipolar forms for the aidB overexpression mutant were specific characteristics of this ACAD homolog. We chose two B. abortus ACAD homologs that are stably produced at a detectable level using Western blot (data not shown). Both paralogs were annotated (BAB2_0433 and BAB2_0216, respectively named AcaD1 and AcaD2) as ACADs and would be involved in the fatty acid β-oxidation pathway. We observed that both ACADs homologs had a diffuse localization in the cytoplasm when fused to YFP (XDB1123 and XDB1124 strains, data not shown), suggesting that the particular localization of AidB-YFP (at young poles and at the constriction site in dividing cells) is not a common characteristic shared by all ACADs homologs in B. abortus. The phenotype of the strains overproducing one of these two ACADs homologs is similar to the B. abortus pdhS-cfp control strain (Figure 5), with a very low frequency (< 1%) of morphological defects. This suggests that overexpression of any ACAD gene does not produce a morphological defect in B. abortus, further supporting a specific -although probably indirect- role of aidB in events related to morphogenesis.
In the conditions tested, overexpression of aidB leads to bacteria with aberrant morphology (Figure 5). This could be due to defects in cell division, cell growth or coordination between both. One hypothesis would be that AidB could indirectly contribute to the generation of new poles, and overexpression of aidB would result in the generation of additional new poles, forming bacteria with abnormal morphology, e.g. multipolar shapes (Figure 5). The selective advantage of the polar localization of AidB is unknown, but it could be related to its role in the adaptative response to alkylating agents, suggested here to block cell cycle before cell division (Figure 3B). This would be consistent with a role of AidB in limiting alkylating damage to DNA, which would logically block replication initiation and/or progression.
The B. abortus AidB protein has a high level of identity (42%) to E. coli AidB, suggesting functional conservation between the two proteins. This prediction is supported by the increased sensitivity of the B. abortus aidB mutant strain to the alkylating agent EMS compared to the wild-type control (Figure 1). Brucella genomes contain the ada, alkA and alkB genes necessary for an adaptative response to alkylation damage similar to the one reported for E. coli . We propose that one possible function of AidB would be to help in the detoxification of some alkylating agents, like in E. coli. These alkylating agents could be found at particular stages of the infection in the natural hosts, or generated by the bacteria themselves . The absence of attenuation of the aidB mutant in HeLa cells or in RAW264.7 macrophages suggests that such alkylating agents are not crucial for the control of the number of c.f.u. during infection of these cell lines. Our data do not confirm the previous observation that a transpositional aidB mutant was attenuated in THP-1 macrophages , unless these specific macrophages have specific features differentiating them from RAW264.7 macrophages for the generation of an alkylating stress. In Salmonella enterica, an aidB mutant was more sensitive than the wild-type strain to several alkylating agents but presented no effect on the virulence in the mouse model. Indeed, the virulence of a S. enterica mutant defective in all genes specifically involved in DNA alkylation damage repair was not affected .
Recently, in C. crescentus, Radhakrishnan et al. reported that KidO, an NAD(P)-binding oxidoreductase homolog with conserved residues in its NAD(P)-binding pocket, acts directly on the FtsZ tubulin . Localization of KidO to the Z-ring is disrupted by mutations in the cofactor-binding pocket that disturb the association with NAD(P), implying that NAD(P) binding is important for the recruitment of KidO to the Z-ring . In this context, it should be interesting to construct a mutated AidB defective for FAD binding and observe the impact of this mutation on the AidB-YFP localization. Finally, the selective advantage of AidB recruitment at the new pole remains to be discovered. One possibility would be that crucial regions of the nucleoid located close to the new pole, such as replication origins, could be more protected from alkylating agents. This would resemble the proposed specific protection of genes by AidB in E. coli  that would be dependent on subcellular localization of AidB in B. abortus. The aberrant morphology of the strain overexpressing aidB indicates that either growth or division are affected, which suggest that AidB could be (indirectly) involved in the control of these processes, for example by providing a checkpoint for cell division.
AidB is induced during alkylation damage response in E. coli, however its molecular function is mostly unknown. Here we report that a B. abortus aidB mutant is more sensitive to EMS, suggesting that AidB is playing a functional role in the response to alkylation damage. The AidB-YFP fusion is a marker of new poles (Figures 2 and 6). The AidB-YFP fusion is also localized to constriction sites, which could be considered as preparation sites for new poles in dividing cells. AidB molecular function at the new pole is unknown, but it is expected to be active at this site, since its new pole localization is preserved in B. abortus exposed to EMS. Our data also suggest that exposure to EMS blocks the cell cycle before the constriction event, presumably before or during genome replication. The characteristic multipolar morphology of the aidB overexpression strain suggests that AidB could (indirectly) play a role in growth or cell division of B. abortus.
Strains, plasmids and cell growth
All Brucella strains used in this study (Table 1) were derived from B. abortus 544 NalR (a spontaneous nalidixic acid-resistant mutant of B. abortus 544 strain), and were routinely cultivated in rich medium 2YT (1% yeast extract, 1.5% tryptone and 0.5% NaCl, with 1.5% agar for solid medium). E. coli strains DH10B (Invitrogen Life-Technologies) and S17-1  were cultivated in LB broth (0.5% yeast extract, 1% tryptone, 0.5% NaCl) with streptomycin. Antibiotics were used at the following concentrations when appropriate: nalidixic acid, 25 μg/ml; kanamycin, 20 μg/ml; chloramphenicol, 20 μg/ml. Plasmids were mobilized from E. coli strain S17-1 into B. abortus as previously described . Growth curves were monitored using a Bioscreen system (Thermo Fisher, ref. 110001-536), allowing continuous monitoring for growth curves in a multiwell format. B. abortus liquid cultures in 2YT medium with the appropriate antibiotic were centrifuged, washed once with PBS and diluted to an OD600 of 0.1 in 2YT (or tryptic soy broth) to start the culture in the Bioscreen system. Each culture (200 μl per well) was performed at 37°C.
Control of the B. abortus strain used for the localization screen
The fact that the XDB1155 strain is viable and does not present any apparent morphological defects or growth delay suggests that the CFP fusion at the C-terminal of PdhS is not affecting PdhS essential functions. Control immunoblots with anti-GFP antibodies revealed that this fusion protein was stable (data not shown). Observation using fluorescence microscopy showed that PdhS-CFP accumulated at one pole in more than 90% of the cells as previously described .
Sequence 5' to 3'
Sequencing of coding sequence after ORFeome screening
Sequencing of coding sequence after ORFeome screening
PCR amplification for checking aidB disruption
PCR amplification for checking aidB disruption
Amplification of B. abortus aidB internal fragment
Amplification of B. abortus aidB internal fragment
For every fluorescent observations reported in this study, we carried out Western blot analyses with antibodies against YFP and CFP. These results allowed us to rule out the possibility that a particular localization pattern could result from protein degradation or from a deficiency in fusion protein production. Western blot analysis was carried out as described previously  with monoclonal antibodies against GFP (JL8, BD Biosciences) at 1/1000 dilution to check the stability of translational fusions to YFP or CFP.
For fluorescence imaging, cell populations of B. abortus strains were immobilized on a microscope slide that was layered with a pad of 1% agarose containing phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) . These slides were placed on a microscope stage at room temperature. Samples were observed on a Nikon i80 fluorescence microscope through a differential interference contrast (DIC, Normarski) 100X objective with a Hamamatsu Orca-ER LCD camera. Images acquisition and processing were done with NIS element (Nikon) software.
The detection of dead cells was performed with the Live/Dead BacLight kit L7007 (Invitrogen), according to manufacturer instructions.
Treatment of B. abortus strains with a DNA-alkylating agent
B. abortus strains were grown in 2YT at 37°C overnight, centrifuged and the pellet was resuspended in PBS to a cell density of 109 c.f.u./ml (optical density of 0.33 at 600 nm). 500 μl of these cell suspensions were diluted into 5 ml of 2YT and exposed to methanesulphonic acid ethyl ester (EMS) at final concentrations of 0, 0.2, 0.4 and 1.0%. These suspensions were incubated at 37°C with shaking for 1 h or 4 h, and aliquots (1 ml) were recovered, washed once in PBS, and serially diluted in PBS. 100 μl of these cell suspensions were spread on individual 2YT agar plates. These plates were incubated for 72 h at 37°C, and the c.f.u. were enumerated.
Cellular infection and immunofluorescence labelling
Infections and immunofluorescence of HeLa cells and RAW264.7 macrophages by the different B. abortus strains were performed as described previously . Anti-Brucella lipopolysaccharide O-chain monoclonal antibody 12G12  was used. The secondary antibody used was Texas red-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (Molecular Probes) diluted 500 times.
List of abbreviations
cyan fluorescent protein
differential interference contrast
methanesulphonic acid ethyl ester
predicted coding sequence
reactive oxygen species
yellow fluorescent protein
Acknowledgements and funding
We thank M. Deghelt and C. Van der Henst for critical reading of the manuscript. This work was supported by FRFC (Fonds de la Recherche Fondamentale Collective, conventions n°2.4521.04 and 2.4541.08), by ARC fellowship (Actions de Recherche Concertée, conventions 04/09-325 and 08/13-015, French-Speaking Community of Belgium) and by the University of Namur (FUNDP). D. Dotreppe and C. Mullier were holding a Ph.D. fellowship from the FRIA (Fonds pour la formation à la Recherche dans l'Industrie et dans l'Agriculture).
- Boschiroli ML, Foulongne V, O'Callaghan D: Brucellosis: a worldwide zoonosis. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2001, 4: 58-64.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gorvel JP, Moreno E: Brucella intracellular life: from invasion to intracellular replication. Vet Microbiol. 2002, 90: 281-297.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Arenas GN, Staskevich AS, Aballay A, Mayorga LS: Intracellular trafficking of Brucella abortus in J774 macrophages. Infect Immun. 2000, 68: 4255-4263.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pizarro-Cerda J, Meresse S, Parton RG, van der Goot G, Sola-Landa A, Lopez-Goni I, Moreno E, Gorvel JP: Brucella abortus transits through the autophagic pathway and replicates in the endoplasmic reticulum of nonprofessional phagocytes. Infect Immun. 1998, 66: 5711-5724.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Pizarro-Cerda J, Moreno E, Sanguedolce V, Mege JL, Gorvel JP: Virulent Brucella abortus prevents lysosome fusion and is distributed within autophagosome-like compartments. Infect Immun. 1998, 66: 2387-2392.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Delrue RM, Martinez-Lorenzo M, Lestrate P, Danese I, Bielarz V, Mertens P, De Bolle X, Tibor A, Gorvel JP, Letesson JJ: Identification of Brucella spp. genes involved in intracellular trafficking. Cell Microbiol. 2001, 3: 487-497.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Starr T, Ng TW, Wehrly TD, Knodler LA, Celli J: Brucella intracellular replication requires trafficking through the late endosomal/lysosomal compartment. Traffic. 2008, 9: 678-694.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dozot M, Boigegrain RA, Delrue RM, Hallez R, Ouahrani-Bettache S, Danese I, Letesson JJ, De Bolle X, Kohler S: The stringent response mediator Rsh is required for Brucella melitensis and Brucella suis virulence, and for expression of the type IV secretion system virB. Cell Microbiol. 2006, 8: 1791-1802.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Roop RM, Gaines JM, Anderson ES, Caswell CC, Martin DW: Survival of the fittest: how Brucella strains adapt to their intracellular niche in the host. Med Microbiol Immunol. 2009, 198: 221-238.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kohler S, Foulongne V, Ouahrani-Bettache S, Bourg G, Teyssier J, Ramuz M, Liautard JP: The analysis of the intramacrophagic virulome of Brucella suis deciphers the environment encountered by the pathogen inside the macrophage host cell. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002, 99: 15711-15716.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Volkert MR, Nguyen DC: Induction of specific Escherichia coli genes by sublethal treatments with alkylating agents. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1984, 81: 4110-4114.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nakabeppu Y, Kondo H, Sekiguchi M: Cloning and characterization of the alkA gene of Escherichia coli that encodes 3-methyladenine DNA glycosylase II. J Biol Chem. 1984, 259: 13723-13729.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yamamoto Y, Katsuki M, Sekiguchi M, Otsuji N: Escherichia coli gene that controls sensitivity to alkylating agents. J Bacteriol. 1978, 135: 144-152.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Taverna P, Sedgwick B: Generation of an endogenous DNA-methylating agent by nitrosation in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1996, 178: 5105-5111.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Dricot A, Rual JF, Lamesch P, Bertin N, Dupuy D, Hao T, Lambert C, Hallez R, Delroisse JM, Vandenhaute J, et al: Generation of the Brucella melitensis ORFeome version 1.1. Genome Res. 2004, 14: 2201-2206.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mignolet J, Van der Henst C, Nicolas C, Deghelt M, Dotreppe D, Letesson JJ, De Bolle X: PdhS, an old-pole-localized histidine kinase, recruits the fumarase FumC in Brucella abortus. J Bacteriol. 2010, 192: 3235-3239.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hallez R, Mignolet J, Van Mullem V, Wery M, Vandenhaute J, Letesson JJ, Jacobs-Wagner C, De Bolle X: The asymmetric distribution of the essential histidine kinase PdhS indicates a differentiation event in Brucella abortus. EMBO J. 2007, 26: 1444-1455.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bowles T, Metz AH, O'Quin J, Wawrzak Z, Eichman BF: Structure and DNA binding of alkylation response protein AidB. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008, 105: 15299-15304.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rippa V, Amoresano A, Esposito C, Landini P, Volkert M, Duilio A: Specific DNA binding and regulation of its own expression by the AidB protein in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 2010, 192: 6136-6142.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sedgwick B: Repairing DNA-methylation damage. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2004, 5: 148-157.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Volkert MR: Adaptive response of Escherichia coli to alkylation damage. Environ Mol Mutagen. 1988, 11: 241-255.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lawley PD, Brookes P: Cytotoxicity of alkylating agents towards sensitive and resistant strains of Escherichia coli in relation to extent and mode of alkylation of cellular macromolecules and repair of alkylation lesions in deoxyribonucleic acids. Biochem J. 1968, 109: 433-447.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Alvarez G, Campoy S, Spricigo DA, Teixido L, Cortes P, Barbe J: Relevance of DNA alkylation damage repair systems in Salmonella enterica virulence. J Bacteriol. 2010, 192: 2006-2008.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Radhakrishnan SK, Pritchard S, Viollier PH: Coupling prokaryotic cell fate and division control with a bifunctional and oscillating oxidoreductase homolog. Dev Cell. 2010, 18: 90-101.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rippa V, Duilio A, di Pasquale P, Amoresano A, Landini P, Volkert MR: Preferential DNA damage prevention by the E. coli AidB gene: A new mechanism for the protection of specific genes. DNA Repair (Amst). 2011, 10: 934-941.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Simon R, Priefer U, Pühler A: A broad host range mobilisation system for in vivo genetic engineering: transposon mutagenesis in gram negative bacteria. Biotechnology. 1983, 10: 783-791.Google Scholar
- Ely B: Genetics of Caulobacter crescentus. Methods Enzymol. 1991, 204: 372-384.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ausubel FM: Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. 1989, New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- Haine V, Sinon A, Van Steen F, Rousseau S, Dozot M, Lestrate P, Lambert C, Letesson JJ, De Bolle X: Systematic targeted mutagenesis of Brucella melitensis 16M reveals a major role for GntR regulators in the control of virulence. Infect Immun. 2005, 73: 5578-5586.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jacobs C, Domian IJ, Maddock JR, Shapiro L: Cell cycle-dependent polar localization of an essential bacterial histidine kinase that controls DNA replication and cell division. Cell. 1999, 97: 111-120.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cloeckaert A, Jacques I, Bowden RA, Dubray G, Limet JN: Monoclonal antibodies to Brucella rough lipopolysaccharide: characterization and evaluation of their protective effect against B. abortus. Res Microbiol. 1993, 144: 475-484.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kovach ME, Phillips RW, Elzer PH, Roop RM, Peterson KM: pBBR1MCS: a broad-host-range cloning vector. Biotechniques. 1994, 16: 800-802.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Van der Henst C, Charlier C, Deghelt M, Wouters J, Matroule JY, Letesson JJ, De Bolle X: Overproduced Brucella abortus PdhS-mCherry forms soluble aggregates in Escherichia coli, partially associating with mobile foci of IbpA-YFP. BMC Microbiol. 2010, 10: 248-PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hallez R, Letesson JJ, Vandenhaute J, De Bolle X: Gateway-based destination vectors for functional analyses of bacterial ORFeomes: application to the Min system in Brucella abortus. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007, 73: 1375-1379.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar