The Sinorhizobium meliloti RNA chaperone Hfq influences central carbon metabolism and the symbiotic interaction with alfalfa
© Torres-Quesada et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 4 December 2009
Accepted: 6 March 2010
Published: 6 March 2010
The bacterial Hfq protein is able to interact with diverse RNA molecules, including regulatory small non-coding RNAs (sRNAs), and thus it is recognized as a global post-transcriptional regulator of gene expression. Loss of Hfq has an extensive impact in bacterial physiology which in several animal pathogens influences virulence. Sinorhizobium meliloti is a model soil bacterium known for its ability to establish a beneficial nitrogen-fixing intracellular symbiosis with alfalfa. Despite the predicted general involvement of Hfq in the establishment of successful bacteria-eukaryote interactions, its function in S. meliloti has remained unexplored.
Two independent S. meliloti mutants, 2011-3.4 and 1021Δhfq, were obtained by disruption and deletion of the hfq gene in the wild-type strains 2011 and 1021, respectively, both exhibiting similar growth defects as free-living bacteria. Transcriptomic profiling of 1021Δhfq revealed a general down-regulation of genes of sugar transporters and some enzymes of the central carbon metabolism, whereas transcripts specifying the uptake and metabolism of nitrogen sources (mainly amino acids) were more abundant than in the wild-type strain. Proteomic analysis of the 2011-3.4 mutant independently confirmed these observations. Symbiotic tests showed that lack of Hfq led to a delayed nodulation, severely compromised bacterial competitiveness on alfalfa roots and impaired normal plant growth. Furthermore, a large proportion of nodules (55%-64%) elicited by the 1021Δhfq mutant were non-fixing, with scarce content in bacteroids and signs of premature senescence of endosymbiotic bacteria. RT-PCR experiments on RNA from bacteria grown under aerobic and microoxic conditions revealed that Hfq contributes to regulation of nifA and fixK1/K2, the genes controlling nitrogen fixation, although the Hfq-mediated regulation of fixK is only aerobiosis dependent. Finally, we found that some of the recently identified S. meliloti sRNAs co-inmunoprecipitate with a FLAG-epitope tagged Hfq protein.
Our results support that the S. meliloti RNA chaperone Hfq contributes to the control of central metabolic pathways in free-living bacteria and influences rhizospheric competence, survival of the microsymbiont within the nodule cells and nitrogen fixation during the symbiotic interaction with its legume host alfalfa. The identified S. meliloti Hfq-binding sRNAs are predicted to participate in the Hfq regulatory network.
Hfq is a ubiquitous and abundant bacterial protein which assembles into ~12 kDa ring-shaped homohexamers that resemble those formed by the Sm proteins of the eukaryotic splicing complex [1, 2]. It was originally identified in the model bacterium Escherichia coli as a host factor essential for Qβ RNA bacteriophage replication . In uninfected bacteria Hfq retains the ability to bind many mRNAs and trans-acting antisense small non-coding regulatory RNAs (sRNAs), thereby influencing, directly or indirectly, on the stability and/or translation of functionally diverse RNA molecules [4–6]. This variety of interactions place Hfq at a crucial node in bacterial post-transcriptional regulatory networks underlying a wide range of cellular processes and pathways [6–8]. Consequently, mutations in the hfq gene were early observed to have a severe impact on bacterial physiology resulting in alterations in growth rate, cell morphology and tolerance to harsh environments . In several enterobacteria and other facultative intracellular mammal pathogens these deficiencies ultimately compromise virulence traits such as motility, host invasion or growth/survival in the intracellular niche [10–16]. The virulence-related phenotypes of the hfq mutants have been shown to be largely dependent on the deregulation of the membrane homeostasis and RpoS- or RpoE-mediated stress response pathways, which have been reported to involve the activity of sRNAs in some of these pathogenic bacteria [15, 17–19].
The α subdivision of the proteobacteria includes diverse species which share the capacity to establish a variety of long-term interactions with higher eukaryotes . The pleiotropic phenotype conferred by hfq mutations is also common to all α-proteobacteria representatives in which the Hfq function has been genetically addressed. For example, in Brucella spp. the Hfq defective mutants showed osmosensitivity, reduction in the fitness of long-term cultures and impaired survival into host macrophages, further supporting the relevant role of this protein in the establishment and maintenance of chronic intracellular infections [21, 22]. Besides its general contribution to stress adaptation Hfq has been also shown to influence the nitrogen fixation process in free-living (Rhodobacter capsulatus) and symbiotic (Azorhizobium caulinodans and Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae) α-proteobacterial diazotrophs [23–26]. In these microorganisms Hfq acts as a positive post-transcriptional regulator of nifA, the gene encoding the major transcriptional activator of the genes coding for the nitrogenase complex. However, in contrast to the situation in A. caulinodans Hfq is not essential for the diazotrophic growth of the phototrophic purple bacterium R. capsulatus[24, 25].
Sinorhizobium meliloti belongs to the group of α-proteobacterial species (collectively called rhizobia) able to engage in symbioses with legume plants. The outcome of these interactions is the formation of new specialized organs within the host, the root nodules, where bacteria undergo a process of profound morphological differentiation to their endosymbiotic form, the bacteroid. The nodules provide the microoxic environment demanded by the rhizobial nitrogenases to catalyze the reduction of the chemically inert atmospheric dinitrogen to ammonia that can be metabolized by the plant. The S. meliloti-Medicago truncatula (sativa) symbiosis is a recognized tractable model system for deciphering molecular mechanisms employed by the infective rhizobia in their transition from a free-living state in soil to their final residence within the nodule cells [27, 28]. Despite the emerging role of Hfq in the establishment of successful prokaryote-eukaryote interactions, the functions of this RNA chaperone in α-proteobacteria, and in particular in the nitrogen-fixing endosymbionts, have remained largely unexplored. Nonetheless, a recent study has revealed the influence of Hfq on the stability of known S. meliloti sRNAs, thus anticipating the importance of this protein in sRNA-mediated regulatory pathways in this model symbiotic bacterium . Here, we have determined global Hfq-dependent changes in gene expression and protein accumulation coupled with the characterization of the symbiotic behavior of hfq knock-out mutants to pinpoint the function of this RNA chaperone in the alfalfa symbiont S. meliloti. We found that loss of hfq alters growth and energy-producing carbon metabolic pathways in free-living bacteria, and severely compromises the nodulation competitiveness and the efficiency of the symbiosis with alfalfa. Furthermore, we provide experimental evidence of Hfq binding to some of the recently identified S. meliloti sRNAs , which predicts that these molecules could be major players in the rhizobial Hfq regulatory network.
The S. meliloti hfq genomic region
The S. meliloti hfq gene seems to form a dicistronic operon with the downstream hflX-like gene coding for a putative GTP-binding protein. Upstream of hfq are SMc01047 and trkA coding for a D-alanine aminotransferase and a potassium transporter, respectively (Fig. 1a). Immediately upstream of trkA is the gene cluster specifying the nitrogen assimilation system ntr (ntrB-ntrC-ntrY-ntrX). This genomic arrangement is essentially conserved in all the nitrogen-fixing endosymbionts of the order Rhizobiales. The exception is the absence of either the trkA or SMc01047 homologs between the ntr operon and hfq in a few species (i.e. M. loti, R. leguminosarum bv. viciae). In contrast, the S. meliloti hfq upstream region totally diverges from that of its related intracellular animal pathogens (i.e. Brucella sp.). Enterobacterial and α-proteobacterial genomes only conserve the hflX gene downstream of hfq in this chromosomal region.
Construction and growth characteristics of the S. meliloti hfq mutants
As a first approach to address the S. meliloti Hfq functions in vivo two independent hfq knock-out mutants were constructed in strains 2011 and 1021. These S. meliloti strains are derived from the same progenitor (S. meliloti isolate SU47) although they exhibit some phenotypic differences in growth, induction of host gene expression or response to phosphate starvation [32, 33]. Nonetheless, partial sequence and restriction analyses revealed that the 1021 and 2011 hfq genomic regions are identical (data not shown).
A mutant (2011-3.4) and a control strain (2011-1.2) were first generated in 2011 by disruption of hfq with the mobilizable suicide vector pK18mobsacB mediated by single homologous recombination events. PCR amplification and sequence analyses of the resulting mutant alleles revealed that in 2011-3.4 pK18mobsacB disrupted the predicted Sm2 domain by inserting after nt 171 of the Hfq coding sequence (Fig. 1a). In 2011-1.2, plasmid integration was mapped to nt 231 of the Hfq ORF, thus affecting the translation of the non conserved last three amino acids of the protein (Fig. 1a). Both hfq strains formed colonies with wild-type morphology when grown in TY agar. However, the 2011-3.4 mutant exhibited a markedly slower growth than the strain 2011-1.2, which behaved as the wild-type 2011 strain on plates (not shown). When grown in TY broth with aeration no differences were observed between the wild-type 2011 strain and its derivative 2011-1.2 whereas the hfq insertion mutant 2011-3.4 showed a delayed lag phase and reached the stationary phase at lower optical density (Fig. 1b). This new observation further supports that the reduced growth of the 2011-3.4 strain was due to hfq inactivation rather than to polar effects caused by pK18mobsacB integration. Furthermore, the plasmid pJBHfq expressing the hfq gene from its own promoter fully complemented the growth phenotype of the hfq insertion mutant.
A second mutant was constructed in the reference strain 1021 by pK18mobsacB-mediated double crossing over resulting into a complete marker-free deletion of the Hfq ORF (Fig. 1a). The growth phenotype on TY agar plates previously observed in the 2011-3.4 hfq insertion mutant was used as a reference to discriminate between the colonies corresponding to the 1021Δhfq strain and those of the wild-type revertants after the second cross over event. A Southern hybridization further confirmed the expected genomic arrangement in the mutant (not shown). In liquid TY medium the 1021Δhfq strain also exhibited reduced growth rate which was complemented with plasmid pJBHfq as expected (Fig. 1b).
Therefore, 2011-3.4 and 1021Δhfq mutants displayed apparent indistinguishable free-living growth defects when compared to their respective parent strains and they have been combined in this study as independent genetic tools to identify general rather than strain-specific Hfq functions in S. meliloti.
Hfq-dependent alterations of the free-living S. meliloti transcriptome and proteome
According to the S. meliloti 1021 genome sequence annotations (http://iant.toulouse.inra.fr/bacteria/annotation/cgi/rhime.cgi)and the KEGG database (http://www.genome.jp/kegg/) 137 (82%) out of the 168 genes with altered expression in 1021Δhfq could be assigned to particular functional categories, whereas 31 (18%) exhibited global or partial homology to database entries corresponding to putative genes with unknown function (Fig. 2, upper circle graph). More than half of the genes with functional homology are predicted to encode proteins and enzymes for the transport (45 genes) and metabolism (39) of small molecules, mainly sugars and amino acids, whereas the remaining 53 are related to regulation of transcription (5 genes), electron transport or nitrogen fixation (17; including the regulatory genes fixK1/K2) and other cell processes (31) such as macromolecule or central intermediary metabolism. Within the latter group several genes with a major role in translation and cellular RNA/protein turnover were differentially regulated in the mutant; SMc01929 coding for RNAseJ, SMc03796 encoding a putative endoribonuclease L-PSP likely involved in mRNAs cleavage, SMa1126, degP4 and degP1 annotated as determinants of different types of proteases, and rplS/rpmA both encoding ribosomal proteins. All these genes except SMa1126 and degP4, were up-regulated in the mutant.
As an independent supporting approach to investigate the Hfq function in S. meliloti the proteomic profiling of the wild-type strain 2011 and its hfq mutant derivative 2011-3.4 was also determined. Analysis of 24 Coomassie-stained 2D-gels from bacteria grown on TY medium to lag phase (OD600 0.5-0.8) revealed on average 293 spots of which 33 corresponded to individual polypeptides with reliable differential accumulation in the wild-type and mutant strains (see additional file 2: differentially accumulated proteins in S. meliloti 2011 wild-type and 2011-3.4 insertion mutant derivative). Mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF) revealed that 28 of these proteins are encoded in chromosomally located genes, 4 in pSymB and only one in the pSymA megaplasmid, thus confirming the major role of Hfq in regulating S. meliloti chromosomal traits (Fig. 2, lower charts). Of these 33 proteins, 21 were over-represented and 12 under-represented in the 2011-3.4 mutant strain. Classification of the differentially expressed proteins according to the S. meliloti 1021 and KEGG databases identified three main functional categories; transport (12 proteins), small molecule metabolism (8) and chaperones and/or stress factors (4) whereas the remaining 9 were catalogued either as involved in translation (i.e. Tig trigger factor and Efp elongation factor P) or as hypothetical conserved proteins with unpredicted function (7) (Fig. 2, lower circle graph).
Comparison of the transcriptomic and proteomic profiles described in this study revealed an overlap of 9 genes identified as differentially expressed in hfq mutants and wild-type strains in both analyses. Their predicted encoded proteins are the periplasmic components of the ABC transporters of myo-inositol (IbpA), fructose (FrcB), α-glucosides (AglE), amino acids (SMc02259), leucine (LivK) and L-amino acids (AapJ and AapP) as well as two enzymes related to myo-inositol catabolism, IolE and IolD. Therefore, regardless the recognized phenotypic differences between the 1021 and 2011 strains both approaches support the general conclusion that Hfq has a major impact in the regulation of transport and metabolism in S. meliloti.
Hfq influences central metabolic pathways in S. meliloti
This transcriptomic profiling predicts a physiological state of bacteria demanding alternative nutrient sources to support growth and macromolecule biosynthesis in the hfq mutant. Indeed, our results also revealed that more than 50% of the transcripts with enhanced abundance in the mutant as compared to the wild-type strain encode proteins for the transport and catabolism of different N compounds. Up-regulated transport genes have been shown or predicted to be involved in the uptake of L-aminoacids or peptides (aapJ, aapQ, aapP, oppB, oppC, SMc00140, SMc01597, SMc02259, SMb21572, SMb20605), branched-chain aminoacids (livH, livM, livG, livF, livK), uracil/uridine (SMc01823, SMc01824, SMc01825, SMc01827), sugar amines (SMb21151) or other complex N substrates such as the polyamines spermidine and putrescine (SMc01966, SMc01965, SMc01963). Consequently, loss of hfq also resulted in the up-regulation of an important set of genes likely related to the utilization or modification of amino acids and other N compounds. The transcripts corresponding to the 3 genes specifying the glycine cleavage system, gcvP, gcvH and gcvT (M values 2.06, 2.02 and 3.32, respectively), and to SMc01930 (M value 3.26) encoding a putative methylmalonyl-CoA epimerase likely operating in the catabolism of branched-chain amino acids were particularly over-represented in the mutant.
The proteomic analysis of the other hfq mutant (2011-3.4) used in this study identified periplasmic solute binding proteins of ABC transporters and metabolic enzymes as the predominant sets of polypeptides which accumulation in the cell was altered by disruption of the hfq gene by the insertion of pK18mobsacB (Fig. 3, lower circle graphs). Down-regulated transport proteins are all involved in the uptake of different sugars; myo-inositol (IbpA), mannose/xylose/glucose (AraA), fructose (FrcB) and α-glucosides (AglE). Accordingly, several enzymes of the central carbon metabolism were also less abundant in the mutant: a putative myo-inositol catabolic protein (IolE), a predicted malonic semialdehyde oxidative decarboxylase (IolD) and a probable acetyl-CoA synthetase (AcsA1). Conversely, the transporters overproduced by the 2011-3.4 mutant are all related to the import of N substrates such as peptides (DppA1 and DppA2), leucine (LivK), L-amino acids (AapJ and AapP), other aminoacids (SMc02259), glycine betaine (SMc02378) or choline (ChoX). Other up-regulated proteins as a result of the hfq mutation include metabolic enzymes such as ornithine cyclodeaminase (Ocd), a probable arginase (ArgI1), a putative adenosylhomocysteinase (AhcY) and a phosphoenol pyruvate carboxykinase (PckA). Ocd and ArgI1 catalyze enzymatic reactions of the urea cycle whereas AhcY is involved in the metabolism of sulphur-containing aminoacids. PckA catalyzes the conversion of oxalacetate into phospho-enol pyruvate, thus initiating the gluconeogenic pathway.
In summary, transcriptomics and proteomics independently suggest that in both S. meliloti hfq knock-out mutants metabolism is biased towards the gluconeogenesis pathway so that growth of free-living bacteria is mainly supported by the utilization of amino acids rather than primary carbon substrates as energy sources.
Loss of Hfq affects S. meliloti nodulation kinetics, competitiveness and symbiotic nitrogen fixation
Competition assays were then performed on alfalfa plants grown in two different solid media; Leonard assemblies and agar plates (Fig. 4b). Taking advantage of the tagging of the 2011-3.4 mutant with the Km resistance marker of pK18mobsacB co-inoculation suspensions were prepared in this case by mixing S. meliloti 2011 and 2011-3.4 suspensions at 1:1 ratio. Thirty dpi nodules were able to fix nitrogen as revealed by their pink colour because of the presence of leghemoglobin. A total of 180 nodules (121 from plants in Leonard jars and 59 from plants on plates) were excised from roots, crushed and simultaneously plated on TY and TY-Km to identify nodule-occupying bacteria. Only 2.5% of the nodules analyzed (mean of the two experiments) were found to contain the mutant 2011-3.4 (Fig. 4b). Nonetheless, wild-type bacteria were also found within these nodules and therefore the former percentage represents double occupancy. The remaining nodules (97.5% on average) were exclusively occupied by the wild-type 2011 strain. These findings revealed that loss of Hfq has a major impact on nodulation competitiveness of S. meliloti on alfalfa roots.
Major differences in the symbiotic behaviour of the 1021 wild-type strain and the 1021Δhfq mutant were also observed when looking at the final number of nitrogen-fixing nodules (i.e. pink nodules expressing the plant leghemoglobin) induced by each strain when inoculated independently on alfalfa plants. This parameter was determined in plants grown either in test tubes or agar plates. At the end of the experiment (30 dpi) 95% nodules elicited by the wild-type strain were pink as indicative of active nitrogen-fixation, whatever the plant growth conditions, whereas 55% (test tubes)-64% (agar plates) nodules induced by the 1021Δhfq mutant remained white (Fig. 4c, left graph). Furthermore, the first wild-type pink nodule appeared on average 13 dpi. In contrast, this time was estimated to be 18 dpi in plants inoculated with the 1021Δhfq strain. Finally, growth of alfalfa plants inoculated with S. meliloti 1021 and 1021Δhfq strains were also compared in experiments performed on Leonard jars during 30 days (Fig. 4c, right panels). Plants inoculated with the hfq mutant exhibited leaves with pale green colour and reached roughly half of the height of the 1021-inoculated plants. Dry weight determinations of individual plants confirmed this perception; the average weight of plants inoculated with the 1021Δhfq strain was hardly 64% of that of wild-type-inoculated plants. These results indicate that Hfq also influenced late symbiotic stages and is required for the establishment of an efficient nitrogen-fixing symbiosis.
1021Δhfq-induced nodules are almost devoid of nitrogen-fixing bacteroids
A large proportion of 1021Δhfq-induced nodules were white and less elongated than those induced by the wild-type strain, thus revealing symbiotic deficiencies (Fig. 5e). The remaining nodules appeared pink and exhibited wild-type histology (not shown). Light microscopic observation of longitudinal sections of the Fix--looking nodules revealed that the bacteroid-infected tissues were restricted to the interzone II-III which even showed much less autofluorescence than in wild-type nodules when observed under 520 nm light (Fig. 5f and 5g). The underlaying zone, extending to the base of the nodule, did not look as a typical nitrogen-fixation zone III but instead it resembled the senescence tissues (zone IV) of wild-type nodules. A detail of this zone (Fig. 5h) further evidenced the histological reminiscences of zone IV where a major proportion of plant cells were devoid of differentiated bacteria and started to collapse as revealed by the appearance of some cell debris . The few plant cells housing bacteroids were not pink as in the wild-type nodules, but rather they appeared dark, probably because of leghemoglobin degradation concomitant to bacterial death. We interpret this histology as the 1021Δhfq mutant retained some capacity to infect the host and to differentiate into bacteroids but it was compromised in the survival as endosymbiotic bacteria within the nodule cells. This deficiency is the major determinant of the Fix- phenotype observed in these nodules.
Hfq contributes to the regulation of nifA and fixK1/K2
Some S. meliloti sRNAs bind Hfq
Hfq influences growth and central carbon metabolism in S. meliloti
Hfq loss-of-function affected the free-living growth of S. meliloti, thus confirming the predicted pleiotropy of this mutation in bacteria. To investigate the molecular basis of this growth deficiency we combined transcriptomic and proteomic profiling of two independent S. meliloti hfq mutants (1021Δhfq and 2011-3.4) exhibiting similar free-living growth defects. These experiments identified 168 transcripts and 33 polypeptides displaying reliable differential accumulation in the respective mutant and wild-type strains, with 9 genes common to both sets. The differences between the wild-type 2011 and 1021 strains could partially explain the limited overlap between proteins and transcripts regulated by Hfq in both genetic backgrounds. However, this has been also observed in Salmonella and more likely reflects the differential global effects of this protein on transcription, transcript stability and translation . Nonetheless, both analyses converged in the identification of genes coding for periplasmic solute binding proteins of ABC transporters and metabolic enzymes as the dominant functional categories influenced by an Hfq mutation. The extensive role of Hfq in the regulation of nutrient uptake and central metabolism has been also highlighted by global transcriptome/proteome analyses of other hfq mutants such as those of E. coli, Salmonella tiphymurium, Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Yersinia pestis[15, 43–45]. Furthermore, in Salmonella and E. coli the massive regulation of genes encoding periplasmic substrate-binding proteins of ABC uptake systems for amino acids and peptides involves the Hfq-dependent GcvB sRNA . GcvB homologs of distantly related bacteria conserve a G/U-rich stretch that binds to extended complementary C/A-rich regions, which may serve as translational enhancer elements, in the mRNA targets . The apparent widespread distribution of GcvB RNAs in bacteria suggests that a similar regulatory mechanism for ABC transporters could also exist in S. meliloti. Loss of Hfq also resulted in the general down-regulation of genes of the main central energy production pathways based on sugar uptake and catabolism as well as of some other genes predicted to participate in the biosynthesis of macromolecule building blocks such as amino acids or nucleosides. This seems to impose a metabolic shift favouring TCA and gluconeogenesis which are supported by the up-regulation of the amino acid supply and nitrogen metabolism (Fig. 8). Furthermore, some genes encoding components of the electron transfer chains were also down-regulated in the mutant, which predicts the reduction of the proton motive force across the cytoplasmic membrane. We conclude that this metabolic rearrangement could explain the growth phenotype of the S. meliloti hfq knock-out mutants.
Lack of Hfq affects different stages of the S. meliloti-alfalfa symbiosis
Early events of the symbiotic interaction of rhizobia with their legume hosts involve active colonization of the plant rhizosphere and the subsequent response to specific root-exuded compounds (i.e flavonoids) to trigger Nod factor signalling pathways leading to nodule organogenesis [27, 28, 47]. The rhizosphere is a complex environment providing bacteria with a wide range of carbon and nitrogen compounds. Therefore, the ecological success of the legume symbionts demands high metabolic plasticity, which in S. meliloti is guaranteed by the large sets of genes encoding ABC transporters and metabolic enzymes . It is well documented that metabolic traits related to carbon supply and catabolism are important for S. meliloti to successfully compete for nodulation in the rhizosphere . We have shown that the S. meliloti hfq mutants, when independently inoculated, are able to nodulate alfalfa roots at similar rates than the wild-type strains; although a slight delay in nodulation was observed. These results evidence that the hfq mutation did not compromise the perception and production of the specific symbiotic signals (i.e. flavonoids and Nod factors, respectively) that trigger nodule organogenesis but suggest that bacterial adaptation in the rhizosphere was affected. Indeed, in the presence of the wild-type strain an hfq knock-out mutant was unable to elicit nodules, further supporting that the metabolic alterations linked to the loss of Hfq represent a major disadvantage for the competitive colonization of the alfalfa rhizosphere.
Although the S. meliloti hfq mutants were able to induce nodules on alfalfa roots (Nod+ phenotype) we noticed that a large proportion of these nodules looked non-fixing. Furthermore, we also observed a significant delay in the onset of symbiotic nitrogen-fixation (i.e. expression of the leghemoglobin) in the remaining mutant-induced nodules (36%-45%) as compared to wild-type kinetics. As expected, these symbiotic deficiencies negatively affected the outcome of symbiosis (i.e. plant growth). Together, these findings indicate an influence of Hfq in intermediate and/or late symbiotic stages. A closer examination of the white 1021Δhfq-induced nodules revealed scarce presence of leghemoglobin and a small proportion of plant cells containing nitrogen-fixing endosymbiotic bacteria. Furthermore, signs of premature bacteroid senescence were observed in these nodules. These results suggest that loss of Hfq affects the ability of S. meliloti to survive within the intracellular environment of the host. This phenotype has been reported as a common feature of hfq mutants of phylogenetically distant pathogenic bacteria [10–12, 15, 21, 22].
Legumes provide invading bacteria with defined and dominant energy sources (i.e. dicarboxylic acids for bacteroids) other than the carbon substrates used for free-living growth in the rhizosphere . Therefore, although the alteration of central metabolic pathways could contribute to different extent to the colonization of developing nodules, they provide only a partial explanation for the hfq endosymbiotic phenotype. Besides nutrient compounds, invading bacteria has to perceive and respond to a variety of plant signals to successfully colonize legume nodules [27, 28], these include; reactive oxygen species released by the host upon infection , peptides likely transported into bacterial cells by the product of the bacA gene to launch bacteroid differentiation [50, 51], the low pH of intracellular compartments  or the microoxic environment demanded by the nitrogenase complex to fix atmospheric nitrogen . Our proteomic analysis identified GroEL2, GroEL3, GrpE and IbpA chaperons as deregulated in the 2011-3.4 hfq mutant. Four groESL operons and an additional groEL gene are present in the S. meliloti genome, being the groEL1 required for nodulation and nitrogen-fixation [53, 54]. Thus, it can be speculated that Hfq-dependent chaperones could help also infective rhizobia to cope with the prolonged stress within the plant host. On the other hand, the transcriptomic profiling revealed that the accumulation of FixK1/FixK2 transcripts is Hfq-dependent. RT-PCR experiments on RNA obtained from cells subjected to more stringent microaerophilic conditions revealed that Hfq-mediated regulation of fixK operates in our assumed aerobic conditions but not in microaerobiosis. In S. meliloti fixK expression is also subjected to indirect autoregulation through the inhibition of the FixL sensor kinase by the FixT protein [55, 56]. Therefore, our findings add another level of complexity to the FixK-dependent regulatory circuit whose biological significance remains to be elucidated. The same RT-PCR experiments showed that Hfq also contributes to the positive regulation of nifA, although transcripts of this gene were still detected in the mutant. Down-regulation of nifA would impact on nitrogenase synthesis, thus explaining the Hfq effects on the onset and probably the efficiency of nitrogen fixation itself in 36%-45% nodules that supported growth and development of the 1021Δhfq-inoculated plants in our assays. In addition, it has been recently reported that the effects of a mutation in the nifA gene extends beyond the regulation of the nitrogen fixation genes to influence other cellular processes such as motility or synthesis of extracellular proteins . Therefore, the down-regulation of this gene provides further explanation for the symbiotic phenotype of the hfq mutant. It has been recently reported that the Hfq-mediated post-transcriptional regulation of nifA in R. leguminosarum bv. viciae involves the cleavage of NifA mRNA in its 5' region by RNAseE, thereby making the Shine-Dalgarno sequence accessible for the ribosomes . Given the synteny of the nifA genomic region in S. meliloti and R. leguminosarum it is tempting to speculate on a similar mechanism controlling NifA translation in the alfalfa endosymbiont.
Detailed genome-wide identification of Hfq-dependent symbiotic genes in planta is a technical difficult task that can be approached by mimicking specific symbiotic conditions in bacterial cultures. Therefore, our study is definitely worth extending to all abiotic and biotic stresses impacting the S. meliloti symbiotic lifestyle. Nonetheless, the similarities among hfq-related phenotypes in phylogenetically distant bacterial species anticipate a conservation of major Hfq downstream target genes governing common adaptive responses of bacteria for the interaction with and the invasion of their eukaryotic hosts.
Some S. meliloti sRNAs are Hfq targets
Trans-acting antisense regulatory sRNAs are major components of Hfq-dependent regulatory networks helping bacteria to deal with external stimuli [5, 8, 58, 59]. Cellular processes controlled by Hfq-binding sRNAs include quorum sensing, transport and metabolism, synthesis of virulence factors, sensitivity to antimicrobial peptides or general adaptation to a variety of abiotic stresses including low pH or oxidative stress . Therefore, many of the recently identified S. meliloti sRNAs are predicted to fulfil similar functions in an Hfq-dependent manner [30, 60, 61]. We used a genetically modified S. meliloti 1021 strain expressing a chromosomally-encoded FLAG-epitope tagged Hfq protein to search for Hfq targets among the seven differentially expressed sRNAs identified and mapped in our previous work . This is a generic strategy that has been shown to retrieve high amounts of Hfq-binding RNAs with high specificity [40, 59, 62]. Our CoIP experiments identified 4 out of the 7 sRNA transcripts as specific targets of Hfq: SmrC9, SmrC15, SmrC16 and SmrC45. Accordingly, the conserved secondary structure of these sRNAs, as inferred from co-variance models, revealed several single stranded AU-rich stretches (del Val and Jiménez-Zurdo, unpublished) which are predicted to interact with Hfq . S. meliloti encodes an Hfq protein conserving the RNA binding core but lacking the C-terminal extension of γ- and β-proteobacterial Hfqs. In E. coli this C-terminal domain is dispensable for sRNA binding but required for auto- and riboregulation . Therefore, the mechanistic and biological implications of sRNAs binding to a naturally-occurring truncated variant of Hfq remain as open questions.
The S. meliloti RNA chaperone Hfq is a pleiotropic regulator influencing central metabolic pathways in free-living bacteria and several aspects of the symbiosis with its legume host alfalfa: nodulation competitiveness, survival of endosymbiotic bacteria within the nodule cells and expression of the key regulators of nitrogen-fixation. The identified Hfq-dependent phenotypes, mRNAs and sRNAs in a beneficial plant-interacting rhizobacteria such as S. meliloti constitute a new baseline to further investigate the Hfq-mediated pathways controlling common strategies of phylogenetically distant bacteria to colonize, infect and survive within their eukaryotic host cells.
Bacterial strains, plasmids, media and growth conditions
Bacterial strains and plasmids.
Wild-type SU47 derivative, Smr
Wild-type SU47 derivative, Smr
1021 hfq mutant strain, Smr
2011 hfq insertion derivative (control str.), Smr, Kmr
2011 hfq insertion mutant, Smr, Kmr
1021 derivative expressing a 3 × Flag-tagged Hfq, Smr
F- endA1, glnV44, thi-1, recA1, relA1, gyrA96, deoR, nupG, φ80d, lacZ ΔM15 Δ(lacZYA-argF)U169, hsdR17(rK- mK+), λ-
Bethesda Research Lab.
Helper plasmid, Col E1, Kmr
Cloning vector for PCR, Apr
Suicide vector in S. meliloti Kmr, sacB, ori V
Broad host-range IncP cloning vector, Apr, Tcr
Multicopy cloning vector, Apr
1,684-bp of hfq genomic region in pGEM-T
Internal fragment of hfq ORF in pK18mobsacB
Internal fragment of hfq ORF in pK18mobsacB
Genomic region with deletion of hfq in pGEM-T
Genomic region with deletion of hfq in pK18
pGEM-T containing hfq promoter and ORF
pJB3Tc20 containing hfq promoter and ORF
pKS3 × Flag
3 × FLAG encoding fragment in pBluescriptII KS+
pKS3 × Flag5
pKS3 × Flag with upstream region of hfq
pKSHfq3 × Flag
pBluescriptII KS+ with Flag-tagged hfq ORF
pGEMHfq3 × Flag
pGEM-T with Flag-tagged hfq ORF
pK18Hfq3 × Flag
pK18mobsacB with Flag-tagged hfq ORF
Growth rates of rhizobial strains were monitored in an automated BioScreen C MBR machine (Growth Curves USA, Piscataway, NJ). Tested strains were initially grown in TY to late log phase (109 cells/ml; O.D600 nm 0.9-1.0). Aliquots of 1 ml of the starting cultures were centrifuged; the pelleted cells were washed with fresh TY and finally resuspended in 1 ml of the medium. Ten μl of the bacterial suspensions (~107 cells) were inoculated into 340 μl of TY broth in Bioscreen Honey comb 100-well plates which were incubated at 30°C with continuous shaking. Absorbance readings at 600 nm were recorded every 2 h until the cultures reached the late stationary phase. OD values of uninoculated media were subtracted from cultures OD readings to normalize data for background prior to plotting. Determinations were done in triplicate for each strain.
Construction of the S. meliloti hfq mutant derivatives
A 1,684-bp DNA region containing the 243-bp hfq ORF and flanking sequences (714-bp upstream and 727-bp downstream of hfq) was PCR amplified with Pfu polymerase using the primers pair Hfq_Fw/Hfq_Rv (for all the oligonucleotides cited hereafter see the additional file 3: oligonucleotide sequences) and S. meliloti 1021 genomic DNA as template. This DNA fragment was inserted into pGEM®-T Easy vector generating plasmid pGEMhfq. For the construction of the S. meliloti 2011 hfq insertion mutant derivatives two internal regions of the gene were Taq amplified from pGEMhfq with primers combinations hfqforw1/hfqrev2 and hfqforw3/hfqrev4 and subcloned into the suicide vector pK18mobsacB generating plasmids pK18_1.2 and pK18_3.4, respectively. Both plasmids were independently conjugated into the 2011 wild-type strain by triparental matings, using pRK2013 as helper, yielding mutants 2011-1.2 and 2011-3.4 which were selected as KmrSmr colonies in MM agar as a result of pK18mobsacB integration into the hfq gene by single homologous recombination events. Mutations were verified by PCR and the precise location of plasmid insertion into the hfq gene was determined by sequencing of the PCR products. For the generation of the S. meliloti 1021 hfq deletion mutant, plasmid pGEMhfq was amplified with Pfu polymerase with divergent primers (hfqi_1/hfqi_2) flanking the hfq ORF and carrying an internal Hind III restriction site. The PCR product was Hind III-digested and autoligated generating plasmid pGEMΔhfq that contains a 1,447-bp S. meliloti 1021 genomic region in which the hfq ORF was deleted and replaced by a Hind III site. This region was retrieved from pGEMΔhfq and inserted into pK18mobsacB as an Eco RI fragment yielding pK18Δhfq which was mobilized into the wild-type 1021 by a triparental mating with pRK2013 as helper. Transconjugants arising from a single cross-over event were selected as KmrSmr colonies in MM and simultaneously verified to retain sacarose sensitivity in TY agar (10% sucrose). KmrSmrSacs bacteria from an isolated colony were further cultured in TY broth and 106 cells from this culture were finally plated on TY agar containing 10% sucrose to select double cross-over events (i.e. excision of pK18mobsacB). Deletion of the hfq gene in the mutant bacteria was checked by colony PCR with oligonucleotides 5HfqMut/3HfqMut followed by Hind III restriction of the PCR products.
To express Hfq under the control of its own promoter for complementation of the mutants an 842-bp DNA fragment containing the Hfq coding sequence along with 571 nt of the upstream region was PCR amplified with Pfu using primers 5Hfq_C/3Hfq_C and pGEMhfq as the template. The PCR product was inserted into pGEM®-T Easy yielding pGEMHfq and finally cloned into the low copy plasmid vector pJB3Tc19 as an Eco RI fragment generating pJBHfq which was conjugated into the S. meliloti hfq mutant derivatives by triparental matings.
Modification of the chromosomal hfq gene to express a C-terminal epitope-tagged Hfq protein was done as follows. A dsDNA fragment encoding 3 tandem FLAG epitopes (3 × FLAG; Sigma-Aldrich) was first generated by annealing of the 3 × Flag and 3 × Flag-i 69mer oligonucleotides which were designed to leave 5'-end overhangs complementary to Xba I and Hind III recognition sequences. The resulting DNA fragment was then inserted between these two restriction sites in pBluescript II KS+ giving pKS3 × Flag. The full-length Hfq coding sequence (without the TGA stop codon) along with 655 bp of its upstream genomic region was PCR amplified from pGEMhfq with the primers pair 5HfqTag/3HfqTag both carrying Xba I sites at the 5'-end. The resulting PCR product was cloned into pGEM®-T Easy and retrieved as an Xba I DNA fragment which was gel purified and inserted at the Xba I site of pKS3 × Flag yielding pKS3 × Flag5. A second 873-bp DNA fragment containing the stop codon for the translation of the epitope-tagged Hfq protein was generated by PCR amplification of the hfq downstream region from pGEMhfq using the primers pair 5FlxTag/3FlxTag which incorporates Hind III sites at both ends of the resulting fragment. The amplification product was inserted into pGEM®-T Easy, recovered as a Hind III fragment, gel purified and finally cloned into the Hind III site of pKS3 × Flag5 to obtain pKSHfq3 × Flag. This plasmid was used as template to amplify an 1,839-bp DNA fragment with a variant of primers 5HfqTag and 3FlxTag in which the Xba I and Hind III sites were replaced by Eco RI and Sph I sites, respectively. The resulting PCR product was cloned in pGEM®-T Easy to obtain pGEMHfq3 × Flag, then retrieved as an Eco RI/Hind III fragment and finally inserted between these two restriction sites in the polylinker of pK18mobsacB giving pK18Hfq3 × Flag. This plasmid was mobilized by a triparental mating to the wild-type strain 1021 for replacement of the hfq gene by the modified allele. Four out of the 18 colonies screened by colony PCR after the second cross-over event were found to incorporate the 3 × FLAG coding sequence and were kept for further Western analysis with commercial FLAG antibodies (Sigma-Aldrich).
All plasmid constructs requiring previous PCR amplification of the cloned inserts were checked by sequencing. The correct genomic arrangements in all the S. meliloti hfq derivative strains were assessed by Southern hybridization of genomic DNA with the appropriate radioactive labeled dsDNA probes using standard protocols.
Total rhizobial RNA was purified from log cultures in TY broth (10 ml) using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following manufacturers instructions. Cy3- and Cy5-labeled cDNAs were prepared from 20 μg total RNA according to an amino-allyl dye coupling protocol as previously described [66, 67].
Two slide (Sm14KOLI microarrays) hybridizations were performed with labeled cDNA from RNA preparations corresponding to 3 independent bacterial cultures following described protocols [67, 68]. This represents a total of 12 potential hybridization data per spot. Slides were scanned with the GenePixTM Personal 4100A Microarray Scanner (MDS Analytical Technologies Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Mean hybridization signal and mean local background intensities were determined for each spot of the microarray images with the GenePix 5.0 software for spot detection, image segmentation and signal quantification (MDS Analytical Technologies Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA). The log2 value of the ratio of intensities was determined for each spot according to M i = log2(R i /G i ), being R i = Ich1i- Bgch1iand G i = Ich2i- Bgch2i; where Ich1iand Ich2iare the signal intensities in channels 1 and 2, respectively, and Bgch1iand Bgch2iare the background intensities of each spot in channels 1 and 2, respectively. The mean intensity (A i ) was calculated for each spot using the formula: A i = log2(R i G i )0.5. Normalization and t-statistics were carried out with the EMMA 2.8.2 software developed at the Bioinformatics Resource Facility, Center for Biotechnology (CeBiTec), Bielefeld University (https://www.cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de/groups/brf/software/emma/cgi-bin/emma2.cgi) which implements a normalization method based on local regression accounting for intensity and spatial dependence in dye biases . Genes were scored as differentially expressed if the confidence indicator P was ≤ 0.05, the mean intensity A ≥ 8 and the expression ratio M ≥ 1 or ≤ -1, as calculated from at least eight of the 12 replicates per spot.
Preparation of protein extracts and 2D-gel electrophoresis were carried out essentially as described previously . The S. meliloti wild-type 2011 and derivative strains 2011-1.2 and 2011-3.4 were grown in 500 ml TY broth to log phase (OD600: 0.5-0.9). Bacteria were harvested by centrifugation at 4°C and 6,000 × g for 20 min and cells were washed twice with LS buffer (68 mM NaCl, 3 mM KCl, 1.5 mM KH2PO4, 9 mM NaH2PO4). The pellet was resuspended in 5 ml of lysis buffer (40 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.5, 40 μg/ml RNase, 20 μg/ml DNase, 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulphonyl fluoride). The cells were disrupted by either sonication or French press. Cell debris were removed by centrifugation at 4°C and 12,000 × g for 20 min. Proteins were precipitated during 4 h with 4 volumes of cold acetone and collected by centrifugation at 4°C and 15,000 × g for 10 min. Acetone was allowed to evaporate in a laminar flow cabinet and the proteins were solubilized in free-dithiothreitol (DTT) rehydration solution (8 M urea, 2% CHAPS and traces of bromophenol blue). Protein concentration in the supernatant was determined by the Bradford assay. For 2D electrophoresis, 600 μg of proteins were solubilized in 495 μl of rehydration solution and 5 μl of 28% DTT and 2.5 μl of IPG buffer were added. The mixture was subjected to isoelectric focusing using Immobiline DryStrip (18 cm-pH 4 to 7) (Amersham Biosciences) using the following program: 1 h at 0 V, 12 h at 30 V, 2 h at 60 V, 1 h at 500 V, 1 h at 1000 V and a final phase of 8,000 V until reaching 75,000 V/h. The strips were equilibrated for 15 min with shaking in a solution of 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.8 containing 6 M urea, 30% glycerol, 2% SDS and 2% DTT, subjected to a second equilibration for 15 min with the same solution containing 2.5% iodoacetamide and 0.01% of bromophenol blue instead of DTT and then loaded onto 12.5% polyacrylamide gels. Second-dimension electrophoreses were performed at 20 W per gel, with a previous 30 min step at 4 W per gel. Gels were stained with Coomassie blue R. Spots corresponding to differentially accumulated proteins were excised from the gels, digested with trypsin and subjected to MALDI-TOF MS (Unidad de Proteómica, Parque Científico de Madrid). Peptide fragmentation and sequencing was only performed if necessary. Protein identification was done with the help of PRIAM application (http://www.priam.prabi.fr) and MASCOT program .
Reverse transcriptase PCR
Total RNA of the wild-type 1021 and 1021Δhfq deletion mutant strains grown under both oxic and microoxic conditions was isolated with the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following manufacturers instructions. Each RNA sample (5 μg) was reverse transcribed with the AMV reverse transcriptase (Roche Diagnostics, Germany) using random hexamers as primers in 10 μl reaction mixtures. cDNA preparations were diluted to 100 μl and 1 μl of each sample was subjected to 25 cycles of PCR amplification for the detection of NifA and FixK1/K2 transcripts with primer pairs nifAFw/nifARv and fixKFw/fixKRv, respectively. As the reference, the abundance of the 16S RNA was assessed by amplification of each cDNA with primers 16SFw/16SRv. Possible contamination of the RNA preparations with DNA was assessed by PCR amplification of the samples with each combination of primers.
Plant assays and nodule microscopy
Medicago sativa L. 'Aragón' seeds were surface sterilized as previously described , germinated on 0.8% water agar plates in the dark at 28°C for 24 h, and finally transferred to either test tubes, Leonard assemblies or agar plates containing a nitrogen-free nutrient solution . Seedlings were inoculated with 1 ml of a bacterial suspension at OD600 nm 0.05. Nodulation kinetics of the assayed strains were determined in two independent sets of 24 plants grown hydroponically in test tubes by recording the number of nodulated plants and the number of nodules per plant at different days after inoculation. For competition assays, 7-days-old alfalfa plants grown in Leonard jars or agar plates were inoculated with 1:1 mixtures of the S. meliloti wild-type 2011 strain and its hfq insertion mutant derivative 2011-3.4 (Kmr). A representative number of mature nodules (50-130 depending on the experiment) were collected 30 days after plants inoculation, surface-sterilized for 5 min in 0.25% HgCl2, crushed and simultaneously plated on TY and TY-Km agar to record the number of nodules invaded by wild-type and 2011-3.4 strains. The efficiency of the reference S. meliloti 1021 and its hfq deletion mutant derivative (1021Δhfq) in symbiotic nitrogen fixation was assessed in Leonard assemblies by determination of the dry weigh of individual plants 30 days after inoculation with the rhizobial strains.
Microscopy was performed on mature (30-days-old) nodules from plants grown and inoculated in agar plates. Nodulated roots were embedded in 3% agarose and 100 μm-transversal sections were made using a Leica VT1200S vibratome. Nodule sections were observed under an optical Nikon AZ100 microscope.
Western blot and co-inmunoprecipitation assays
To verify the expression of the 3 × FLAG tagged Hfq protein, 0.05 OD whole cell protein fractions of the S. meliloti 1021 wild-type strain and the S. meliloti 1021hfqFLAG derivatives (two independent clones arising from the second crossing-over were tested) were resolved by SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes by electroblotting during 50 min at 100 mA (TE77PWR semidry apparatus, Amersham Biosciences). Membranes were blocked for 1 h in 1.5% dry milk in TBS (20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8, 0.18 M NaCl) and hybridized as follows: ANTI-FLAG® monoclonal antibody (Sigma #F7425; 1/1000 in TBS) for 1 h at room temperature, 3 × 10 min wash in TBS, α-mouse-HRP (1/5000 in TBS) for 1 h at room temperature, 3 × 10 min wash in TBS. Blots were developed by incubation for 2-3 min in 20 ml of luminol solution [50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.6, NaCl 150 mM, 8 mg luminol (Sigma Aldrich), 1 mg 4-iodophenol, 0.01% H2O2] and exposed to Konica Minolta medical films.
For co-inmunoprecipitation, the 1021 wild-type strain and its derivative 1021hfqFLAG were cultured in 200 ml of TY broth to OD600 nm 0.6. Total RNA was prepared from 25 ml of each culture as previously described . The remaining cells (175 ml) were collected by centrifugation (10 min, 4000 × g, 4°C). The pellets were washed with cold PBS, chilled on ice, resuspended in 8 ml of lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, and 1% TRITON X-100) and disrupted by sonication in three cycles of 10 s bursts at 32 W with a microprobe. Cell lysates were incubated 30 min at 4°C with shaking and centrifuged (20 min, 12000 × g, 4°C). Forty microliters of the ANTI-FLAG M2® resin (Sigma #A2220) were added to the cleared lysates followed by incubation overnight with shaking at 4°C. The suspensions were centrifuged; the beads were resuspended in 1 ml lysis buffer and transferred to spin columns, followed by five washes in 1 ml of the same buffer. Protein/RNA complexes were recovered from beads by incubation with 15 ng of 3 × FLAG Peptide® (Sigma #F4799) followed by elution in 100 μl of water. Phenol:chloroform extracted RNA was concentrated by ethanol precipitation and resuspended in 70 μl of water. Aliquots of 10 μg of total RNA and 10 μl of the co-inmunoprecipitated RNA were subjected to Northern analysis with the Smr sRNAs probes as described .
This work was funded by the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (Projects AGL2006-12466 and AGL2009-07925) and Junta de Andalucía (Project CV1-01522). Work at RR laboratory has been funded by the Comunidad de Madrid MICROAMBIENTE-CM Program. OTQ is recipient of a FPI Fellowship from the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación. We thank Vicenta Millán for technical assistance and M. Crespi and Philippe Laporte (Institut des Sciences du Végétal, CNRS, Gif-sur-Yvette, France) for their invaluable help in the performance and interpretation of nodule microscopy.
- Franze de Fernández MT, Hayward WS, August JT: Bacterial proteins required for replication of phage Q ribonucleic acid. Purification and properties of host factor I, a ribonucleic acid binding protein. J Biol Chem. 1972, 247 (3): 824-831.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brennan RG, Link TM: Hfq structure, function and ligand binding. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2007, 10 (2): 125-133. 10.1016/j.mib.2007.03.015.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Franze de Fernández MT, Eoyang L, August JT: Factor fraction required for the synthesis of the bacteriophage Qβ-RNA. Nature. 1968, 219 (5154): 588-590. 10.1038/219588a0.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moll I, Leitsch T, Steinhauser T, Blasi U: RNA chaperone activity of the Sm-like Hfq protein. EMBO Rep. 2003, 4 (3): 284-289. 10.1038/sj.embor.embor772.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Storz G, Opdyke JA, Zhang A: Controlling mRNA stability and translation with small, noncoding RNAs. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2004, 7 (2): 140-144. 10.1016/j.mib.2004.02.015.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Valentin-Hansen P, Eriksen M, Udesen C: The bacterial Sm-like protein Hfq: a key player in RNA transactions. Mol Microbiol. 2004, 51 (6): 1525-1533. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2003.03935.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hajnsdorf E, Régnier P: Host factor Hfq of Escherichia coli stimulates elongation of poly(A) tails by poly(A) polymerase I. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000, 97 (4): 1501-1505. 10.1073/pnas.040549897.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gottesman S: The small RNA regulators of Escherichia coli: roles and mechanisms. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2004, 58: 303-328. 10.1146/annurev.micro.58.030603.123841.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tsui HC, Leung HC, Winkler ME: Characterization of broadly pleiotropic phenotypes caused by an hfq insertion mutation in Escherichia coli K-12. Mol Microbiol. 1994, 13 (1): 35-49. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1994.tb00400.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sonnleitner E, Hagens S, Rosenau F, Wilhelm S, Habel A, Jager KE, Blasi U: Reduced virulence of a hfq mutant of Pseudomonas aeruginosa O1. Microb Pathog. 2003, 35 (5): 217-228. 10.1016/S0882-4010(03)00149-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Christiansen JK, Larsen MH, Ingmer H, Sogaard-Andersen L, Kallipolitis BH: The RNA-binding protein Hfq of Listeria monocytogenes: role in stress tolerance and virulence. J Bacteriol. 2004, 186 (11): 3355-3362. 10.1128/JB.186.11.3355-3362.2004.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ding Y, Davis BM, Waldor MK: Hfq is essential for Vibrio cholerae virulence and downregulates σE expression. Mol Microbiol. 2004, 53 (1): 345-354. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04142.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- McNealy TL, Forsbach-Birk V, Shi C, Marre R: The Hfq homolog in Legionella pneumophila demonstrates regulation by LetA and RpoS and interacts with the global regulator CsrA. J Bacteriol. 2005, 187 (4): 1527-1532. 10.1128/JB.187.4.1527-1532.2005.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sharma AK, Payne SM: Induction of expression of hfq by DksA is essential for Shigella flexneri virulence. Mol Microbiol. 2006, 62 (2): 469-479. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05376.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sittka A, Pfeiffer V, Tedin K, Vogel J: The RNA chaperone Hfq is essential for the virulence of Salmonella typhimurium. Mol Microbiol. 2007, 63 (1): 193-217. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05489.x.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kulesus RR, Díaz-Pérez K, Slechta ES, Eto DS, Mulvey MA: Impact of the RNA chaperone Hfq on the fitness and virulence potencial of uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Infect Inmun. 2008, 76 (7): 3019-3026. 10.1128/IAI.00022-08.Google Scholar
- Brown L, Elliott T: Efficient translation of the RpoS sigma factor in Salmonella typhimurium requires host factor I, an RNA-binding protein encoded by the hfq gene. J Bacteriol. 1996, 178 (13): 3763-3770.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Muffler A, Traulsen DD, Fischer D, Lange R, Hengge-Aronis R: The RNA-binding protein HF-I plays a global regulatory role which is largely, but not exclusively, due to its role in expression of the σs subunit of RNA polymerase in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1997, 179 (1): 297-300.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Papenfort K, Pfeiffer V, Mika F, Lucchini S, Hinton JC, Vogel J: σE-dependent small RNAs of Salmonella respond to membrane stress by accelerating global omp mRNA decay. Mol Microbiol. 2006, 62 (6): 1674-88. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05524.x.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Batut J, Anderson SGE, O'Callagham D: The evolution of chronic infection strategies in the α-proteobacteria. Nature Rev. 2004, 2 (12): 933-945. 10.1038/nrmicro1044.Google Scholar
- Robertson GT, Roop RM: The Brucella abortus host factor I (HF-I) protein contributes to stress resistance during stationary phase and is a major determinant of virulence in mice. Mol Microbiol. 1999, 34 (4): 690-700. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01629.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Roop MR, Robertson GT, Ferguson GP, Milford LE, Winkler ME, Walker GC: Seeking a niche: putative contributions of the hfq and bacA gene products to the successful adaptation of the brucellae to their intracellular home. Vet Microbiol. 2002, 90 (1-4): 349-363. 10.1016/S0378-1135(02)00220-1.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kaminski PA, Desnoues N, Elmerich C: The expression of nifA in Azorhizobium caulinodans requires a gene product homologous to Escherichia coli HF-I, an RNA-binding protein involved in the replication of phage Qβ RNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994, 91 (11): 4663-4667. 10.1073/pnas.91.11.4663.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kaminski PA, Elmerich C: The control of Azorhizobium caulinodans nifA expression by oxygen, ammonia and by the HF-I-like protein, NrfA. Mol Microbiol. 1998, 28 (3): 603-613. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.00823.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Drepper T, Raabe K, Giaourakis D, Gendrullis M, Masepohl B, Klipp W: The Hfq-like protein NrfA of the phototrophic purple bacterium Rhodobacter capsulatus controls nitrogen fixation via regulation of nifA and anfA expression. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2002, 215 (2): 221-227. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2002.tb11394.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang Y, Hong G: Post-transcriptional regulation of NifA expression by Hfq and RNase E complex in Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin. 2009, 41 (9): 719-730. 10.1093/abbs/gmp060.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jones KM, Kobayashi H, Davies BW, Taga ME, Walker GC: How rhizobial symbionts invade plants: the Sinorhizobium-Medicago model. Nature Rev. 2007, 5 (8): 619-633. 10.1038/nrmicro1705.Google Scholar
- Gibson KE, Kobayashi H, Walker GC: Molecular determinants of a symbiotic chronic infection. Annu Rev Genet. 2008, 42: 413-441. 10.1146/annurev.genet.42.110807.091427.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Voss B, Hölscher M, Baumgarth B, Kalbfleisch A, Kaya C, Hess WR, Becker A, Evguenieva-Hackenberg E: Expression of small RNAs in Rhizobiales and protection of a small RNA and its degradation products by Hfq in Sinorhizobium meliloti. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2009, 390 (2): 331-336. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.09.125.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- del Val C, Rivas E, Torres-Quesada O, Toro N, Jiménez-Zurdo JI: Identification of differentially expressed small non-coding RNAs in the legume endosymbiont Sinorhizobium meliloti by comparative genomics. Mol Microbiol. 2007, 66 (5): 1080-1091. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05978.x.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Galibert F, Finan TM, Long SR, Puhler A, Abola P, Ampe F, Barloy-Hubler F, Barnett MJ, Becker A, Boistard P, Bothe G, Boutry M, Bowser L, Buhrmester J, Cadieu E, Capela D, Chain P, Cowie A, Davis RW, Dreano S, Federspiel NA, Fisher RF, Gloux S, Godrie T, Goffeau A, Golding B, Gouzy J, Gurjal M, Hernandez-Lucas I, Hong A, Huizar L, Hyman RW, Jones T, Kahn D, Kahn ML, Kalman S, Keating DH, Kiss E, Komp C, Lelaure V, Masuy D, Palm C, Peck MC, Pohl TM, Portetelle D, Purnelle B, Ramsperger U, Surzycki R, Thebault P, Vandenbol M, Vorholter FJ, Weidner S, Wells DH, Wong K, Yeh KC, Batut J: The composite genome of the legume symbiont Sinorhizobium meliloti. Science. 2000, 293 (5530): 668-672. 10.1126/science.1060966.Google Scholar
- Wais RJ, Wells DH, Long SR: Analysis of differences between Sinorhizobium meliloti 1021 and 2011 strains using the host calcium spiking response. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 2002, 15 (12): 1245-1252. 10.1094/MPMI.2002.15.12.1245.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Krol E, Becker A: Global transcriptional analysis of the phosphate starvation response in Sinorhizobium meliloti strains 1021 and 2011. Mol Genet Genomics. 2004, 272 (1): 1-17. 10.1007/s00438-004-1030-8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mauchline TH, Fowler JE, East AK, Sartor AL, Zaheer R, Hosie AH, Poole PS, Finan TM: Mapping the Sinorhizobium meliloti 1021 solute-binding protein-dependent transportome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006, 103 (47): 17933-17938. 10.1073/pnas.0606673103.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Görke B, Stülke J: Carbon catabolite repression in bacteria: many ways to make the most out of nutrients. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2008, 6 (8): 613-624. 10.1038/nrmicro1932.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vasse J, de Billy F, Camut S, Truchet G: Correlation between ultrastructural differentiation of bacteroids and nitrogen fixation in alfalfa nodules. J Bacteriol. 1990, 172 (8): 4295-4306.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Timmers ACJ, Souppéne E, Auriac MC, de Billy F, Vasse J, Boistard P, Truchet G: Saprophytic intracellular rhizobia in alfalfa nodules. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 2000, 13 (11): 1204-1213. 10.1094/MPMI.2000.13.11.1204.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dixon R, Kahn D: Genetic regulation of biological nitrogen fixation. Nature Rev. 2004, 2 (8): 621-631. 10.1038/nrmicro954.Google Scholar
- Gong W, Hao B, Mansy SS, González G, Gilles-González MA, Chan MK: Structure of a biological oxygen sensor: a new mechanism for heme-driven signal transduction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998, 95 (26): 15177-15182. 10.1073/pnas.95.26.15177.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pfeiffer V, Sittka A, Tomer R, Tedin K, Brinkmann V, Vogel J: A small non-coding RNA of the invasion gene island (SPI-1) represses outer membrane protein synthesis from the Salmonella core genome. Mol Microbiol. 2007, 66 (5): 1174-1191. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05991.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Toledo-Arana A, Repoila F, Cossart P: Small noncoding RNAs controlling pathogenesis. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2007, 10 (2): 182-188. 10.1016/j.mib.2007.03.004.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ansong C, Yoon H, Porwollik S, Mottaz-Brewer H, Petritis BO, Jaitly N, Adkins JN, McClelland M, Heffron F, Smith RD: Global systems-level analysis of Hfq and SmpB deletion mutants in Salmonella: implications for virulence and global protein translation. PLoS One. 2009, 4 (3): e4809-10.1371/journal.pone.0004809.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sonnleitner E, Schuster M, Sorger-Domenigg T, Greenberg EP, Bläsi U: Hfq-dependent alterations of the transcriptome profile and effects on quorum sensing in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mol Microbiol. 2006, 59 (5): 1542-1558. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05032.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Guisbert E, Rhodius VA, Ahuja N, Witkin E, Gross CA: Hfq modulates the σE-mediated envelope stress response and the σ32-mediated cytoplasmic stress response in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 2007, 189 (5): 1963-1973. 10.1128/JB.01243-06.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Geng J, Song Y, Yang L, Feng Y, Qiu Y, Li G, Guo J, Bi Y, Qu Y, Wang W, Wang X, Guo Z, Yang R, Han Y: Involvement of the post-transcriptional regulator Hfq in Yersinia pestis virulence. PLoS One. 2009, 4 (7): e6213-10.1371/journal.pone.0006213.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sharma CM, Darfeuille F, Plantinga TH, Vogel J: A small RNA regulates multiple ABC transporter mRNAs by targeting C/A-rich elements inside and upstream of ribosome-binding sites. Genes Dev. 2007, 21 (21): 2804-2817. 10.1101/gad.447207.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Prell J, Poole PS: Metabolic changes of rhizobia in legume nodules. Trends Microbiol. 2006, 14 (4): 161-168. 10.1016/j.tim.2006.02.005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fry J, Wood M, Poole PS: Investigation of myo-inositol catabolism in Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae and its effect on nodulation competitiveness. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 2001, 14 (8): 1016-1025. 10.1094/MPMI.2001.14.8.1016.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Soto MJ, Domínguez-Ferreras A, Pérez-Mendoza D, Sanjuán J, Olivares J: Mutualism versus pathogenesis: the give-and-take in plant-bacteria interactions. Cell Microbiol. 2009, 11 (3): 381-388. 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2009.01282.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mergaert P, Uchiumi T, Alunni B, Evanno G, Cheron A, Catrice O, Mausset AE, Barloy-Hubler F, Galibert F, Kondorosi A, Kondorosi E: Eukaryotic control on bacterial cell cycle and differentiation in the Rhizobium-legume symbiosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006, 103 (13): 5230-5235. 10.1073/pnas.0600912103.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marlow VL, Haag AF, Kobayashi H, Fletcher V, Scocchi M, Walker GC, Ferguson GP: Essential role for the BacA protein in the uptake of a truncated eukaryotic peptide in Sinorhizobium meliloti. J Bacteriol. 2009, 191 (5): 1519-1527. 10.1128/JB.01661-08.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Glazebrook J, Ichige A, Walker GC: A Rhizobium meliloti homolog of the Escherichia coli peptide-antibiotic transport protein SbmA is essential for bacteroid development. Genes Dev. 1993, 7 (8): 1485-1497. 10.1101/gad.7.8.1485.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ogawa J, Long SR: The Rhizobium meliloti groELc locus is required for regulation of early nod genes by the transcription activator NodD. Genes Dev. 1995, 9 (6): 714-729. 10.1101/gad.9.6.714.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bittner AN, Foltz A, Oke V: Only one of five groEL genes is required for viability and successful symbiosis in Sinorhizobium meliloti. J Bacteriol. 2007, 189 (5): 1884-1889. 10.1128/JB.01542-06.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Foussard M, Garnerone AM, Ni F, Soupène E, Boistard P, Batut J: Negative autoregulation of the Rhizobium meliloti fixK gene is indirect and requires a newly identified regulator, FixT. Mol Microbiol. 1997, 25 (1): 27-37. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.4501814.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Garnerone AM, Cabanes D, Foussard M, Boistard P, Batut J: Inhibition of the FixL sensor kinase by the FixT protein in Sinorhizobium meliloti. J Biol Chem. 1999, 274 (45): 32500-32506. 10.1074/jbc.274.45.32500.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gong Z, Zhu J, Yu G, Zou H: Disruption of nifA gene influences multiple cellular processes in Sinorhizobium meliloti. J Genet Genomics. 2007, 34 (9): 783-789. 10.1016/S1673-8527(07)60089-7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang A, Wassarman KM, Rosenow C, Tjaden BC, Storz G, Gottesman S: Global analysis of small RNA and mRNA targets of Hfq. Mol Microbiol. 2003, 50 (4): 1111-1124. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03734.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sittka A, Lucchini S, Papenfort K, Sharma CM, Rolle K, Binnewies TT, Hinton JC, Vogel J: Deep sequencing analysis of small noncoding RNA and mRNA targets of the global post-transcriptional regulator, Hfq. PLoS Genetics. 2008, 4 (8): e1000163-10.1371/journal.pgen.1000163.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ulvé VM, Sevin EW, Chéron A, Barloy-Hubler F: Identification of chromosomal α-proteobacterial small RNAs by comparative genome analysis and detection in Sinorhizobium meliloti strain 1021. BMC Genomics. 2007, 8: 467-10.1186/1471-2164-8-467.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Valverde C, Livny J, Schlüter JP, Reinkensmeier J, Becker A, Parisi G: Prediction of Sinorhizobium meliloti sRNA genes and experimental detection in strain 2011. BMC Genomics. 2008, 9: 416-10.1186/1471-2164-9-416.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sittka A, Sharma CM, Rolle K, Vogel J: Deep sequencing of Salmonella RNA associated with heterologous Hfq proteins in vivo reveals small RNAs as a major target class and identifies RNA processing phenotypes. RNA Biol. 2009, 6 (3): 266-275. 10.4161/rna.6.3.8332.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vecerek B, Rajkowitsch L, Sonnleitner E, Schroeder R, Bläsi U: The C-terminal domain of Escherichia coli Hfq is required for regulation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36 (1): 133-143. 10.1093/nar/gkm985.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Beringer JE: R factor transfer in Rhizobium leguminosarum. J Gen Microbiol. 1974, 84 (1): 188-198.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Robertsen BK, Aiman P, Darvill AG, McNeil M, Alberstein P: The structure of acidic extracellular polysaccharides secreted by Rhizobium leguminosarum and Rhizobium trifolii. Plant Physiol. 1981, 67 (3): 389-400. 10.1104/pp.67.3.389.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- de Risi JL, Iyer VR, Brown PO: Exploring the metabolic and genetic control of gene expression on a genomic scale. Science. 1997, 278 (5338): 680-686. 10.1126/science.278.5338.680.Google Scholar
- Rüberg S, Tian Z-X, Krol E, Linke B, Meyer F, Wang Y, Pühler A, Weidner S, Becker A: Construction and validation of a Sinorhizobium meliloti whole genome DNA microarray: genome-wide profiling of osmoadaptive gene expression. J Biotechnol. 2003, 106 (2-3): 255-268. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2003.08.005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Becker A, Bergès H, Krol E, Bruand C, Rüberg S, Capela D, Lauber E, Meilhoc E, Ampe F, de Bruijn FJ, Fourment J, Francez-Charlot A, Kahn D, Küster H, Liebe C, Pühler A, Weidner S, Batut J: Global changes in gene expression in Sinorhizobium meliloti 1021 under microoxic and symbiotic conditions. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 2004, 17 (3): 292-303. 10.1094/MPMI.2004.17.3.292.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dondrup M, Goesmann A, Bartels D, Kalinowski J, Krause L, Linke B, Rupp O, Sczyrba A, Pühler A, Meyer F: EMMA: a platform for consistent storage and efficient analysis of microarray data. J Biotechnol. 2003, 106 (2-3): 135-146. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2003.08.010.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yang YH, Dudoit S, Luu P, Lin DM, Peng V, Ngai J, Speed TP: Normalization for cDNA microarray data: a robust composite method addressing single and multiple slide systematic variation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30 (4): e15-10.1093/nar/30.4.e15.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shamseldin A, Nyalwidhe J, Werner D: A proteomic approach towards the analysis of salt tolerance in Rhizobium etli and Sinorhizobium meliloti strains. Curr Microbiol. 2006, 52 (5): 333-339. 10.1007/s00284-005-6472-7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Perkins DN, Pappin DJ, Creasy DM, Cottrell JS: Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis. 1999, 20 (18): 3551-3567. 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2683(19991201)20:18<3551::AID-ELPS3551>3.0.CO;2-2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Olivares J, Casadesús J, Bedmar EJ: Method for testing degree of infectivity of Rhizobium meliloti strains. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1980, 39 (5): 967-970.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fähraeus G: The infection of clover root hairs by nodule bacteria studied by a simple glass slide technique. J Gen Microbiol. 1957, 16 (2): 374-381.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Meade HM, Signer ER: Genetic mapping of Rhizobium meliloti. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1977, 74 (5): 2076-2078. 10.1073/pnas.74.5.2076.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Casse F, Boucher C, Julliot JS, Michell M, Dénarié J: Identification and characterization of large plasmids in Rhizobium meliloti using agarose gel electrophoresis. J Bacteriol. 1979, 113: 229-242.Google Scholar
- Figurski DH, Helinski DR: Replication of an origin-containing derivative of plasmid RK2 dependent on a plasmid function provided in trans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1979, 76 (4): 1648-1652. 10.1073/pnas.76.4.1648.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schäfer A, Tauch A, Jäger W, Kalinowski J, Thierbach G, Pühler A: Small mobilizable multi-purpose cloning vectors derived from the Escherichia coli plasmids pK18 and pK19: selection of defined deletions in the chromosome of Corynebacterium glutamicum. Gene. 1994, 145 (1): 69-73. 10.1016/0378-1119(94)90324-7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Blatny JM, Brautaset T, Winther-Larsen HC, Haugan K, Valla S: Construction and use of a versatile set of broad-host-range cloning and expression vectors based on the RK2 replicon. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997, 63 (2): 370-379.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.