Open Access

Listeria monocytogenes virulence factor Listeriolysin O favors bacterial growth in co-culture with the ciliate Tetrahymena pyriformis, causes protozoan encystment and promotes bacterial survival inside cysts

BMC Microbiology201010:26

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2180-10-26

Received: 5 August 2009

Accepted: 28 January 2010

Published: 28 January 2010

Abstract

Background

The gram-positive pathogenic bacterium Listeria monocytogenes is widely spread in the nature. L. monocytogenes was reported to be isolated from soil, water, sewage and sludge. Listeriolysin O (LLO) is a L. monocytogenes major virulence factor. In the course of infection in mammals, LLO is required for intracellular survival and apoptosis induction in lymphocytes. In this study, we explored the potential of LLO to promote interactions between L. monocytogenes and the ubiquitous inhabitant of natural ecosystems bacteriovorous free-living ciliate Tetrahymena pyriformis.

Results

Wild type L. monocytogenes reduced T. pyriformis trophozoite counts and stimulated encystment. The effects were observed starting from 48 h of co-incubation. On the day 14, trophozoites were eliminated from the co-culture while about 5 × 104 cells/ml remained in the axenic T. pyriformis culture. The deficient in the LLO-encoding hly gene L. monocytogenes strain failed to cause mortality among protozoa and to trigger protozoan encystment. Replenishment of the hly gene in the mutant strain restored toxicity towards protozoa and induction of protozoan encystment. The saprophytic non-haemolytic species L. innocua transformed with the LLO-expressing plasmid caused extensive mortality and encystment in ciliates. During the first week of co-incubation, LLO-producing L. monocytogenes demonstrated higher growth rates in association with T. pyriformis than the LLO-deficient isogenic strain. At latter stages of co-incubation bacterial counts were similar for both strains. T. pyriformis cysts infected with wild type L. monocytogenes caused listerial infection in guinea pigs upon ocular and oral inoculation. The infection was proved by bacterial plating from the internal organs.

Conclusions

The L. monocytogenes virulence factor LLO promotes bacterial survival and growth in the presence of bacteriovorous ciliate T. pyriformis. LLO is responsible for L. monocytogenes toxicity for protozoa and induction of protozoan encystment. L. monocytogenes entrapped in cysts remained viable and virulent. In whole, LLO activity seems to support bacterial survival in the natural habitat outside of a host.

Background

The gram-positive pathogenic bacterium Listeria monocytogenes is a causative agent of listeriosis, a food-borne disease associated with such severe manifestations as meningitis, meningoencephalitis and miscarriages in pregnant women. High mortality rates make listeriosis one of the most important issues among food-borne infections (for a review see [1, 2]).

L. monocytogenes is found widely both in rural and urban environment. The pathogen isolation from soil, water, wildlife feeding grounds and plants has been reported [35]. Frequent isolation of L. monocytogenes from sewage and sludge has been also demonstrated [6]. Being ubiquitously distributed in the environment, L. monocytogenes may be involved in the interactions with free-living protozoa, a common representative of natural ecosystems.

It has been shown that L. monocytogenes is resistant to digestion by free-living amoebae and ciliates [710]. However, the mode of L. monocytogenes interactions with unicellular eukaryotes is less clear compared to its interactions with mammalian cells [1, 11, 12]. The cholesterol-dependent pore-forming haemolysin listeriolysin O (LLO) plays a major role in L. monocytogenes virulence for mammals (for a review see [13, 14]. LLO is required for the mammalian host phagosome disruption and bacterial escape into the cytoplasm where L. monocytogenes multiplies [15]. In contrast L. monocytogenes lacking the LLO-encoding hly gene are not capable of proliferating in mammalian cells and hence are avirulent in murine model [16]. Besides its role in pathogen's intracellular replication, LLO can cause apoptosis in dendritic cells and lymphocytes during first days of infection in mice [17, 18].

LLO expression is driven by the transcriptional regulator PrfA [2]. PrfA activity is lowest in rich medium such as Brain Heart Infusion at room temperature and increases with temperature or upon a shift into minimal medium. Mutations that lock PrfA in constitutively active conformation (PrfA*) cause LLO hyperexpression [19].

LLO is thought to be involved in the interactions between L. monocytogenes and protozoa as LLO-dependent release from digestive vacuole was observed in the amoeba Acanthamoeba castellanii [8]. However, the function of LLO in the interactions of L. monocytogenes with bacteriovorous protozoa is not fully understood. In this study, we examined the involvement of LLO in the interactions of L. monocytogenes and the ciliate Tetrahymena pyriformis.

The ciliates are common in the environment where L. monocytogenes encounters including soil, natural and anthropogenic water sources, sewage and sludge [20, 21]. The majority of ciliates are bacteriovorous. Like other ciliates, T. pyriformis ingests food particles via the oral zone called a cytostome followed by formation of a food vacuole [22]. The vacuole circulates through the cytoplasm until the food is digested. T. pyriformis can undergo encystment, a protozoan response to adverse conditions and culture aging [21]. Encystment is accompanied by formation of resting non-feeding particles, cysts, which possess a protecting cell wall that preserves the cytoplasm [21]. T. pyriformis produces cysts at food deficiency, temperature changes, adverse pH and osmotic pressure [23]. The process of encystment is reversible as trophozoites can recover from cysts in favourable conditions.

We found that LLO production favours L. monocytogenes survival in association with T. pyriformis. Moreover, we have shown that T. pyriformis encystment is accelerated in co-culture with L. monocytogenes owing to LLO. In addition bacteria entrapped in cysts maintained viability and are capable of inducing infection in guinea pigs.

Results

A microscopic study of interactions between L. monocytogenes and T. pyriformis

The interactions between L. monocytogenes and T. pyriformis was studied by mixing T. pyriformis trophozoites with exponential culture of the wild type L. monocytogenes strain EGDe with MOI 1000:1 (bacteria/protozoa) in the LB broth and incubating at 28°C for up to 14 days. Active bacterial phagocytosis by protozoa was observed as soon as in 15 minutes after mixing (Figure 1A). In 1 h after bacterial addition, multiple vacuoles were observed inside the T. pyriformis cells (Figure 1B). Totally, 440 phagosomes were observed per 70 studied protozoan cells (Table 1). Each phagosome included from 5 to 15 bacteria as electron microscopy revealed (see Figure 1A and data not shown). Therefore, about 6,3 ± 3,1% of added bacteria were located intracellularly in 1 h after culture mixing. Undamaged bacterial cells were observed within phagosomes after 4 h, and some bacteria were dividing (Figure 1C). T. pyriformis cysts were observed together with trophozoites at later stages of incubation, and only cysts and cell remnants were revealed in the culture after 14 days (Figure 1D).
Table 1

Count of phagosomes formed by trophozoites in 1 h after addition of bacteria

Number of phagosomes per protozoan

0

5

6

7

8

9

10

Number of observed protozoa

5

14

18

16

7

6

4

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2180-10-26/MediaObjects/12866_2009_Article_982_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

A microscopic study of interactions between L. monocytogenes and T. pyriformis. A. Bacterial uptake by T. pyriformis in 15 minutes after the microorganisms were mixed. B. T. pyriformis cells in 1 h after the microorganisms were mixed. Multiple phagosomes within one cell are shown with arrows. T. pyriformis cell without phagosomes is shown with an arrowhead. C. Intraphagosomal bacteria. Dividing bacterium is shown with an arrow. D. Cysts (an arrow) and cell remnants (an arrowhead) after two weeks of incubation. The images were captured with transmission electron (A, C), or light (B, D) microscopy at magnification of 10 000 (A), 100 (B, D), and 25 000 (C).

L. monocytogenes impairs growth of T. pyriformis and accelerates protozoan encystment

The growth of T. pyriformis infected by the wild type L. monocytogenes strain EGDe was significantly impaired compared to the control culture of protozoa grown alone under the same conditions (Figure 2). Cyst and trophozoites counts performed over the time from the same culture revealed about six-fold and ten-fold L. monocytogenes-associated reduction in the number of trophozoites on day 2 and day 7. On day 14 the number of trophozoites in the co-culture decreased below the detection limit, 103 cells/ml, (see Materials and Methods) while about 5 × 104 cells/ml remained in the control axenic culture of protozoa. Both cell death and cyst formation were responsible for disappearance of infected trophozoites (Figure 1D and Figure 2).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2180-10-26/MediaObjects/12866_2009_Article_982_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Changes in the T. pyriformis population in the presence or absence of L. monocytogenes. Trophozoite concentrations are shown by polylines; cyst concentrations are shown by bars. Protozoa were grown alone (white) or in co-culture with the L. monocytogenes strain EGDe (solid). The mean values ± SD from three experiments made in triplicate are shown.

In the control culture, cysts were observed together with trophozoites starting from day 2; by the end of week 2, cyst concentration exceeded that of vegetative cells (Figure 2). Cyst formation might be due to depletion of nutrients exhausting by dividing protozoa. The presence of L. monocytogenes significantly accelerated protozoan encystment. Thus, on day 7 a four-fold increase in cyst concentration compared to the control culture was observed (p < 0.05). By the end of week 2 at least twice as more cysts compared to control and no vegetative cells were revealed in association with L. monocytogenes.

To examine whether the observed effects are characteristic for wild type L. monocytogenes and were not associated with specific toxicity of the EGDe strain, four additional L. monocytogenes strains were tested. The previously described wild type strains VIMVR081, VIMVW039, VIMHA034, and VIMVF870 isolated from a wild rodent, environment, human, and food, respectively, were used [5]. All L. monocytogenes strains tested reduced trophozoite concentrations on day 7 (Figure 3). In contrast, the number of cysts increased in the co-culture. Thus, wild type L. monocytogenes caused mortality and induced encystment in T. pyriformis.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2180-10-26/MediaObjects/12866_2009_Article_982_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

The effect of various L. monocytogenes strains on the T. pyriformis population. T. pyriformis trophozoite (while columns) and cyst (black columns) concentrations are shown on day 7 of co-cultivation with various L. monocytogenes strains designated on the figure, or without bacteria (w/o bacteria). The mean values ± SE from two experiments made in triplicate are shown.* p < 0,05; **p < 0,005.

LLO absence diminishes L. monocytogenes cytotoxic effect on T. pyriformis and prevents induction of protozoan encystment

Using LLO specific antibodies, we observed that LLO expression was low but detectable in the conditions used (the LB broth at 28°C) (Figure 4A). Therefore, these conditions permitted us to examine a LLO contribution into the interactions between L. monocytogenes and T. pyriformis.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2180-10-26/MediaObjects/12866_2009_Article_982_Fig4_HTML.jpg
Figure 4

Changes in the T. pyriformis population in the co-culture with L. monocytogenes in dependence on L. monocytogenes LLO production. A. Detection of LLO in the culture supernatant of L. monocytogenes grown in the LB broth at 28°C. Proteins from 0,5 ml were loaded in each lane. On the left, secreted proteins are separated onto 10 % SDS-PAGE gel and visualized by staining with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250; on the right, Western blot analysis of secreted proteins with LLO-specific antiserum; 1 - wild type EGDe strain; 2 - EGDeΔhly strain carrying the vector pTRKL2; 3 - EGDeΔhly strain carrying the plasmid pHly. Numbers show molecular weight standard positions. The arrow shows a LLO position (MWLLO 58 kDa). B. Trophozoite (left) and cyst (right) concentrations related to LLO production: designations for columns are shown on the figure. The mean values ± SE from two experiments made in triplicate are shown. * p < 0,05.

To investigate the importance of LLO for protozoan survival in co-culture with L. monocytogenes, the changes in T. pyriformis concentration were examined in the presence of the LLO deficient L. monocytogenes EGDeΔhly strain with the hly gene removed by deletion. In contrast to the parental EGDe strain, EGDeΔhly did not produce any decrease among alive trophozoites (Figure 4B) as well as no degraded cells (data not shown) were observed by day 7. Replenishment of the hly gene by introduction of a LLO-expressing pHly plasmid restored the cytotoxic phenotype of the EGDeΔhly strain. However, by day 14 the concentration of trophozoites in co-culture with both L. monocytogenes strains could not be detected regardless on LLO production while trophozoites were present in the control axenic culture.

L. monocytogenes LLO deficiency decreased protozoan encystment pace in the bacterial presence. In fact, there was no significant difference in cyst concentration between T. pyriformis grown alone or in association with the Δhly bacteria (Figure 4B). The functional hly gene located on the plasmid being introduced into the EGDeΔhly strain restored bacterial ability to accelerate encystment. Therefore, toxic effects of wild type L. monocytogenes seemed to be due to LLO. Still, disappearance of trophozoites from the co-culture with the EGDeΔhly bacteria suggested that other factors besides LLO might input into L. monocytogenes toxicity. L. monocytogenes phospholipases PlcA and PlcB, specific for phosphatidyl-inositol and phosphatidyl-choline [2], respectively, might be responsible for this effect.

LLO-expressing L. innocua induces T. pyriformis mortality and encystment

To confirm the role of LLO in L. monocytogenes toxicity, we checked an effect of LLO expression in non-haemolytic L. innocua on bacterial-protozoan interactions. L. innocua is a non-pathogenic species, which is closely related to L. monocytogenes [24]. Introduction of the pHly plasmid into the L. innocua strain NCTC 2188 did not result in detectable LLO production (data not shown). To improve LLO expression in L. innocua, we introduced the prfA* gene into the pHly plasmid. The prfA* gene encodes the PrfA* protein, which is a positive regulator of hly expression in L. monocytogenes [19]. L. innocua NCTC 2188 was transformed with the obtained plasmid designated as pHly/PrfA*. LLO production by the recombinant L. innocua strain carrying the pHly/PrfA* plasmid was evidenced by Western blotting (Figure 5A).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2180-10-26/MediaObjects/12866_2009_Article_982_Fig5_HTML.jpg
Figure 5

Changes in the T. pyriformis population in co-culture with recombinant LLO-prodicing L. innocua. A. Detection of LLO in the culture supernatant of L. innocua and L. monocytogenes. On the left, secreted proteins are separated in the 10 % SDS-PAGE gel; on the right, Western blot analysis of secreted proteins with LLO-specific antiserum; 1 - wild type L. innocua NCTC11288 strain; 2 - L. monocytogenes NCTC 5105 strain; 3 - LLO-expressing L. innocua NCTC11288 (pHly/PrfA*) strain. Numbers show molecular weight standard positions. B. Trophozoite (left) and cyst (right) concentrations related to LLO production: while columns - L. innocua NCTC11288 strain; black columns - LLO-expressing L. innocua NCTC11288 (pHly/PrfA*) strain. Data represent mean ± SE of two experiments made in triplicate. * p < 0,05; **p < 0,005.

Introduction of the LLO-expressing plasmid produced a dramatic effect on the outcome of interactions between L. innocua and T. pyriformis. In 48 h in co-culture, trophozoite concentration diminished by a factor of four in the presence of recombinant L. innocua in comparison with a control, which was T. pyriformis co-cultivated with the parental L. innocua NCTC 2188 strain. Moreover, trophozoites totally disappeared in co-culture with LLO-expressing L. innocua after 72 h (Figure 5B). LLO-expressing L. innocua accelerated T. pyriformis encystment as it was previously observed with L. monocytogenes. At 48 h cyst concentration was about 7 fold higher in the presence of LLO-expressing L. innocua compared to the wild type strain. Interestingly, the cyst concentration diminished by a factor 5.6 between 48 h and 72 h, the effect was not observed in the presence of wild type L. monocytogenes. Obtained results supported a suggestion about a leading role of LLO in L. monocytogenes toxicity for protozoa.

LLO supports L. monocytogenes survival in the presence of T. pyriformis

The next issue addressed was the L. monocytogenes survival in the presence of bacteriovorous T. pyriformis and its dependence on LLO production. Bacterial growth was measured in the sterile LB broth and in the presence of T. pyriformis.

Similar growth rates were observed for the wild type L. monocytogenes EGDe strain grown both alone or in association with T. pyriformis until end of week 1 (Figure 6). Later, bacterial population was stabilized in the association with T. pyriformis and higher bacterial concentrations were observed in the co-culture with T. pyriformis as compared with the control culture where L. monocytogenes grew alone. By the end of week 2 in the association with protozoa bacterial cell numbers exceeded the concentration of control bacteria by a factor of ten.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2180-10-26/MediaObjects/12866_2009_Article_982_Fig6_HTML.jpg
Figure 6

Bacterial growth in dependence on the presence of T. pyriformis and LLO production. White and solid symbols show L. monocytogenes grown alone and in the presence of T. pyriformis, respectively; triangles and squares are correspondent to the EGDe and EGDeΔhly strains, respectively. Bacterial concentrations were determined by plating of corresponding dilutions. A representative experiment from two replicates with similar results is shown.

Deletion of the hly gene did not affect bacterial growth rates in the sterile LB broth. In contrast, T. pyriformis impaired the EGDe Δhly growth especially during the first 5 days (Figure 6). By day 14, EGDeΔhly concentration was higher in co-culture with protozoa than in the sterile LB broth. In whole, LLO deficiency deteriorated L. monocytogenes growth in the presence of a predator although the LLO-deficient bacteria appeared to be resistant to protozoan digestion that allowed maintaining a population at a relatively steady level.

L. monocytogenes entrapped in cysts remains viable and virulent and causes infection in guinea pigs

The next question addressed was the fate of bacteria entrapped in the cysts. Bacterial presence in cysts, which were formed by day 7 in co-culture, was proposed on the base of positive PCR results (Figure 7A). However, no bacterial growth was observed when L. monocytogenes infected T. pyriformis cysts were directly plated on the LB agar. Bacteria in cysts might be dead or non-culturable.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2180-10-26/MediaObjects/12866_2009_Article_982_Fig7_HTML.jpg
Figure 7

Infection in guinea pigs caused by L. monocytogenes -infected T. pyriformis cysts. A. qPCR products resolved on 2,5 % agarose. 1 - negative control, 2 - L. monocytogenes culture lysates, 3 - lysates of T. pyriformis cysts infected with L. monocytogenes. B. L. monocytogenes associated conjunctivitis. On the left, conjunctivitis of the right eye caused by L. monocytogenes, the left eye was not infected; on the right, conjunctivitis caused by T. pyriformis cysts carrying L. monocytogenes. C. L. monocytogenes isolated from faeces of animals infected orally with L. monocytogenes (while columns) or with L. monocytogenes-infected cysts (black columns). D - bacterial loads in the liver and the spleen of animals infected orally with L. monocytogenes (while columns) or with L. monocytogenes-infected cysts (black columns) after 72 h post-infection. Data were expressed as the mean ± SE for groups of three animals. X, only one animal gave feces after 24 h. * p < 0,05

To examine the viability and virulence potential of bacteria entrapped in cysts, we performed the infection of guinea pigs with T. pyriformis cysts. Stationary phase bacteria served a control. Bacterial loads were equalized using quantitative PCR (qPCR, Figure 7A). The inoculation of L. monocytogenes-infected cysts into guinea pig eyes induced acute conjunctivitis on days from 2 to 5 (Figure 7B). The eye injury ranged from moderate (closing of the palpebral fissure, epiphora, and photophobia) to severe (acute keratoconjunctivitis with edema and eyelid hyperaemia). Intact T. pyriformis cysts obtained by incubation of axenic trophozoites at +4°C overnight did not produce conjunctivitis.

To further examine the virulence potential of the bacteria clogged in T. pyriformis cysts, guinea pigs were orally infected with of cultured or entrapped in cysts L. monocytogenes with concentration 106 CFU/guinea pig as determined with qPCR. Bacterial counts in feces did not change significantly by day 2 being higher in cyst-infected animals (Figure 7). When all the infected animals were sacrificed on day 3 similar concentrations of L. monocytogenes were observed in spleen of the animals either infected by bacteria entrapped in cysts or grown in culture. The bacteria concentrations in the liver were about 20 times lower in the animals infected by bacteria entrapped in cysts compared to those obtained from culture.

Discussion

Cytotoxicity of haemolytic Listeria spp. in ciliates and amoebae was originally demonstrated by Chau Ly and Müller [7]. They have shown that haemolytic L. monocytogenes and L. seeligeri induce lysis of T. pyriformis and Acanthamoeba castellani during 8-15 days while only few protozoa underwent lysis in the presence of non-haemolytic L. innocua.

Our results demonstrated that a L. monocytogenes mutant strain deficient in L. monocytogenes haemolysin, listeriolysin O (LLO) was incapable of impairing T. pyriformis growth compared to the isogenic wild type strain. A saprophytic species of L. innocua expressing LLO acquired toxicity in protozoa and caused their mortality and encystment. Thus, obtained results suggested that it is LLO that is responsible for L. monocytogenes cytotoxicity in protozoa.

Another observed LLO activity was stimulation of T. pyriformis encystment. Both cell death and encystment were responsible for decrease of trophozoite counts in the presence of L. monocytogenes. Here our results were in contradiction with previously published [7]. Although cited above authors found that L. monocytogenes accelerates encystment of A. castellani, they did not observe T. pyriformis encystment independently on bacterial presence [7]. This contradiction is related to the protozoan ability to encyst rather than LLO activity and might be due to different sources of a protozoan culture. Cyst formation by ciliates was described earlier [21] and cysts that we observed for the used T. pyriformis culture were similar to cysts depicted there (see Figure 1).

In contrast to wild type L. monocytogenes, LLO-expressing L. innocua caused a rapid decrease in counts not only trophozoites but as well cysts (see Figure 5). The constitutive LLO expression driven by PrfA* protein, which gene was inserted into the pHly/PrfA* plasmid, might be responsible for higher toxicity of L. innocua transformed with the plasmid. Wild type PrfA protein activity is regulated by co-factor binding, while the PrfA* protein is locked in the active conformation by a Gly145Ser substitution [19]. Obtained results suggested that PrfA activity and LLO expression by intracellular L. monocytogenes might be switch off after host cell encystment but this is not possible for PrfA* protein. Further studies with using L. monocytogenes prfA* [19] are needed to get evidences in support of this suggestion.

Another pathogenic bacterium, a common representative of natural ecosystems, L. pneumophila was demonstrated to be cytotoxic for amoeba and to kill A. polyphaga via induction of necrosis due to Legionella pneumophila pore-forming activity [25]. A similar mechanism might be responsible for the cytotoxic effect of LLO. LLO belongs to the family of cholesterol-dependent haemolysins, which includes streptolysin O and pneumolysin O [13, 14]. Proteins of this family can form oligomeric rings that plunge into membrane and generate pores [26]. Therefore, LLO pore-forming activity might be responsible for L. monocytogenes cytoxicity in protozoa.

Our observations on the reduced growth of the hly gene deficient mutant in the co-culture with T. pyriformis compared to isogenic wild type bacteria are in line with a previous report that a hly gene deletion prevented L. monocytogenes from A. castellanii phagosome escaping [8]. Phagosome escaping is prerequisite for L. monocytogenes replication in mammalian but not insect cells [27]. It is not clear at present how the failure to escape the phagosome impairs intracellular growth in protozoan cells. However, the improved intracellular survival in synergy with rapid reduction of trophozoite concentration might be responsible for the advantages that LLO exerts on bacterial survival in the presence of actively grazing protozoa.

Considering the natural environment, LLO production seems to increase L. monocytogenes survival compared to non-haemolytic bacteria. Obtained results demonstrated higher counts for wild type L. monocytogenes than for the isogenic LLO deficient mutant during first days of co-cultivation supposing that wild type bacteria better survived upon initial interactions with the predator than non-haemolytic counterparts. Furthermore, prolonged bacterial survival might be supported by bacterial maintenance in protozoan cysts forming due to LLO activity. It is generally accepted that entrapped bacteria may benefit from the protective coat conferred by protozoan [2830]. It has been demonstrated previously that encysted bacteria could survive sewage water treatment, which is fatal to free living bacteria [31]. Survival of human pathogens inside protozoan cysts was demonstrated previously for Vibrio cholerae, L. pneumophila, Mycobacterium spp and an avirulent strain of Yersinia pestis [3234]. However, to our knowledge active stimulation of protozoan encystment by bacteria was demonstrated only in case of L. monocytogenes ([7]; and this work). Maintenance of pathogenic bacteria within cysts not only protects them from unfavorable environmental conditions but as well can preserve at the first stages of interactions with the macroorganism. That might be an important mechanism for bacterial spreading in the natural ecosystems when cyst protection not only supports pathogen survival in the hostile environment but as well increases its chance to multiply upon host invasion.

Involvement of LLO in different aspects of interactions between L. monocytogenes and protozoa has a striking similarity with its multiples roles during infection in mammals. Phagosome membrane disruption is the major role for LLO in intracellular parasitism in mammalian cells [2, 14]. However, LLO input in L. monocytogenes virulence is not limited to phagosome escaping: LLO generates a calcium flux into cells, promotes bacterial invasion in certain epithelial cells, and causes apoptosis in dendritic cells and T lymphocytes [13, 17, 18]. In protozoa, LLO is required for phagosome escaping likewise it takes place in mammalian cells [8]; it exerts a cytotoxic effect on protozoa ([7]; and this work); at last, our results suggested that LLO causes protozoan encystment. Possible parallels between LLO-mediated mechanisms causing apoptosis in immune cells and encystment in protozoa require a special investigation.

Despite the growing number of evidences that a prey-predator model describing interactions between protists and saprophytic bacteria, is not appropriate to explain the interactions of bacteriovorous protozoa and pathogenic bacteria, the mechanisms that permit pathogenic bacteria to avoid protozoan grazing are not clear. It was suggested that these mechanisms may involve at least in part the means that pathogens utilize to survive in higher eukaryotes [2830, 35]. Moreover, it was suggested that the resistance to digestion by bacteriovorous protozoa might be an evolutionary precursor of bacterial adaptation to intracellular survival in mammalian professional phagocytes such as macrophages. Our results support this hypothesis by demonstration of the role that the major virulence factor listeriolysin O (LLO) plays in interpopulation relationships of the pathogenic bacterium L. monocytogenes and the bacteriovorous ciliate T. pyriformis.

Discussing the input of LLO in interactions of L. monocytogenes with mammals and protozoa, it is necessary to take notice of LLO expression under different conditions. Expression of the PrfA protein, which is a master-regulator of virulence genes in L. monocytogenes [2], changes in a temperature-sensitive manner that results in very low expression of PrfA-controlled genes under environmental temperatures while their expression increases at the temperatures of mammalian body [36]. In contrast to other virulence factors, the LLO-encoding hly gene expression is regulated by both PrfA-dependent and PrfA-independent promoters [37]. Low LLO expression at environmental conditions driven by the PrfA-independent promoter and the low-active PrfA-dependent promoter is sufficient to provide L. monocytogenes with benefits in its interactions with other members of the natural ecosystems. Increasing LLO expression, e.g. via introduction of the PrfA* protein, which stimulates higher expression from the PrfA-dependent promoter, distorts the balance causing mortality not only among trophozoites but as well among cysts as we observed for L. innocua carrying pHly/PrfA* plasmid. Therefore, mutations resulting in increased LLO production might be detrimental for survival in the nature. It is interesting, that another Listeria virulent species, L. ivanovii, which is highly haemolytic and is not able to repress virulence factor production via a described PrfA-dependent mechanism [38], is much more rear isolated from environment than L. monocytogenes [39, 40]. Thus, LLO expression might be beneficial under different conditions but it is required a tight regulation in dependence on external conditions.

Conclusions

LLO exerts a toxic effect on protozoa and causes protozoan encystment. LLO production favors the L. monocytogenes growth in the presence of T. pyriformis and promotes bacterial survival inside protozoan cysts. Infected cysts cause specific bacterial infection in susceptible animals.

Methods

Microorganisms and growth conditions

Bacterial strains used in the study are listed in Table 2. The Escherichia coli JM109 strain was used as an intermediate host in cloning procedures. Bacteria were routinely cultured on LB agar plates at 28°C. For plasmid-carrying strains, the medium was supplemented with erythromycin (10 μg/ml and 300 μg/ml for Listeria spp. and E. coli, respectively). Axenic T. pyriformis from the Collection of the Gamaleya Institute was maintained on LB supplied by gentamycin 100 μg/ml, diflucan 100 μg/ml, cyfran 100 μg/ml at 28 °C. Antibiotics were removed 3 days before the onset of the experiment.
Table 2

Bacterial strains used in the study

Bacterium

Description

Reference

L. monocytogenes

  

EGDe

Wild type, serovar 1/2a

[24]

EGDeΔhly

The hly gene deletion

[19]

NCTC5105

The prfA* gene encoding constitutively active PrfA*, serovar 1/2a

[19]

VIMVR081

Wild type, wild rodent isolate, serovar 4b

[5]

VIMVW039

Wild type, environmental isolate, serovar 4b

[5]

VIMHA034

Wild type, clinical isolate, serovar 1/2a

[5]

VIMVF870

Wild type, food isolate, serovar 1/2a

[5]

L. innocua

  

NCTC11288

Wild type, serovar 6a

[5]

E. coli

  

JM109

recA 1, endA 1, gyrA 96, thi, hsdR 17, supE 44, relA 1, Δ(lac-proAB)/F' [traD 36, proAB+, lacIq, lacZ ΔM15]

Fermentas (Lituania)

Three day old culture of T. pyriformis was diluted by fresh LB broth to a concentration of 103 cells/ml. Exponentially grown L. monocytogenes were introduced into protozoan culture with multiplicity 1000:1 (bacteria/protozoa). The co-culture was maintained at 28°C without agitation for 14 days. All experiments were performed in triplicate.

Protozoan and bacterial growth quantification

The culture was shaken to keep the concentration of protozoa steady throughout the volume. Bacteria were counted by plating of serial dilutions of the culture on LB plates. 500 μl of suspension was mixed with equal volume of the Lili buffer (30 % acetic acid - 70 % ethanol) to fix ciliates. After that protozoan cells were counted using light microscopy.

Plasmid construction

The DNA fragment carrying the hly gene including the promoters and the regulating element (PrfA box) was synthesized in PCR using hly1 and hly2 primers (hly1: 5' - AGAGCGCTGCAG GGTTTGTTGTGTC; hly2: 5' - TACGTTCTGCAG TAGAAACTATAGG; PstI recognition sites are highlighted in bold) and L. monocytogenes EGDe bacterial lysates obtained after bacterial cell treatment with lysozyme (2 mg/ml) at 37°C for 1 h and Proteinase K (100 μg/ml) at 56°C for 1 h followed by boiling for 10 min. The PCR product was inserted into the PstI restriction site of the shuttle vector pTRKL2 [41]. The insertion was sequenced to evidence the hly gene integrity. The obtained plasmid designated pHly was introduced into the EGDeΔhly strain by electroporation as was described previously [42]. LLO expression was verified by Western blotting as described below.

To obtain a plasmid for LLO expression in L. innocua, the DNA fragment carrying the prfA* gene encoding the transcriptional regulator PrfA* was obtained in PCR using the lysate of the L. monocytogenes NCTC5105 cells (prfA* phenotype, [19]) and prf1 and prf2 primers (prf1: 5' - CCCAGTTCTTTCAGGTCCGGC; prf2: 5' - ACT CACGCAAATTCGGCATGC). PrfA regulator is necessary for the hly gene expression, the substitution Gly145Ser in the PrfA* protein results in constitutive PrfA protein activity and constitutive the hly gene expression [19]. The ends of the obtained PCR product were blunted with T4-polymerase. After that it was inserted into the SmaI restriction site on the pHly plasmid. The plasmid designated pHly/PrfA* was introduced into the L. innocua strain NCTC11288 by electroporation [42].

SDS-PAGE and Western immunoblotting

L. monocytogenes and L. innocua strains were grown overnight on LB, supplemented with erythromycin 10 μg/ml when necessary, at 28°C. Secreted proteins present in 1.5 ml of cell free culture supernatant were precipitated on ice for 1 h with 10% trichloroacetic acid followed by centrifugation at 10 000 rpm for 30 min. The protein pellet was washed with 70% ethanol, resuspended in 1× Laemmli buffer and boiled for 5 min. Proteins were separated onto 10 % SDS-PAGE gels and visualized by staining with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250. For Western analysis proteins were transferred electrophoretically from SDS-PAGE gels onto the nitrocellulose membrane (Amersham) using a Mini-Protein Cuvette (Bio Rad). LLO was detected with polyclonal rabbit primary antibodies raised against the purified L. monocytogenes LLO [43], secondary horseradish peroxidase-conjgated goat anti-rabbit antibodies (Bio-Rad) and visualized with the TMB stabilized substrate (Promega).

Sample preparation and PCR

The quantitative PCR (qPCR) was performed using bacterial lysates obtained after bacterial cell treatment with lysozyme (2 mg/ml) at 37°C for 1 h and Proteinase K (100 μg/ml) at 56°C for 1 h followed by boiling for 10 min. Bacteria-containing T. pyriformis cysts were subjected to ultrasound treatment for 1 min (4 cycles of 15 seconds at a maximal amplitude) and then to the same treatment as described above. The act1 and act2 primers and the TaqMan probe were specific for the L. monocytogenes chromosomal actA gene (act1: 5'-AAAGATGCGGGGAAATGGG; act2: 5'-TGGTGTCTCTGGCAAAGCA; TaqMan: act 5'-FAM-ATG-CTT-CGG-ACT-TCC-CGC-CAC-CAC-CTA-BHQ1). qPCR was carried out in a 25 μl reaction volume containing 1 μl of bacterial lysate, 5 pM of each primers, 2.5 pM of the TaqMan probe and 1 U of Taq-polymerase (qPCR degree, Syntol, Russia) with the ANK-16 amplification and detection system (Syntol, Russia). The following cycle profile was used: one cycle at 96°C for 2 min followed by 40 cycles at 96°C for 15 s, and 62°C for 30 s. DNA amounts were quantified by using a standard curve obtained with results of tenfold serial dilutions of lysates of 1 to 106 bacteria. All measurements were done in duplicate.

Guinea pig infection

All experiments on animals were performed with the approval of the Animal Care and Use Committee of Gamaleya Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology.

T. pyriformis and L. monocytogene s EGDe strain were co-cultured for 7 days in 100 ml LB broth at 28°C. On day 7 cyst concentration exceeded that of trophozoites. After that in the remaining vegetative cells the encystment was promoted by their incubation at +4°C overnight. This was followed by the removal of extracellular bacteria with gentamycin treatment (100 μg/ml) for 2 h at room temperature. Control bacteria were grown overnight on LB plates, suspended in 1 ml of PBS, diluted with PBS to a concentration of 109 CFU/ml and kept frozen in 10% glycerin.

Groups of three female 350 g guinea pigs were infected intraconjunctivally by applying a cotton wool tampon saturated with the T. pyriformis cyst water suspension at concentration 8.9 x104 cyst/ml, which contained 1 × 106 L. monocytogenes CFU/ml or with L. monocytogenes suspension at concentration 1 × 106 CFU/ml. Bacterial loads were equalized using qPCR as described above. Three guinea pigs were infected with 1 × 105 axenic T. pyriformis cysts as a control.

For oral inoculation, 1 ml of water suspension containing L. monocytogenes in concentration 1 × 106 CFU/ml (clogged in cysts or from the culture) was introduced to the back of oral cavity of three animals. The animals were not fed for 12 h before infection. The concentration of L. monocytogenes in faeces was determined daily by plating serial dilutions on the selective medium (PALCAM agar, HiMedia, India). On day 3 (72 h after infection) animals were anaesthetized by chloroform and sacrificed. The liver and the spleen were homogenized in PBS and serial dilutions of homogenate material were plated on LB agar.

Microscopic studies

Transmission electron microscopic investigations were performed in general as described in [44]. In short, microorganisms were fixed with phosphate-buffered osmium tertraoxide according to [45], dehydrated in alcohols of increasing concentrations, and embedded in araldite M. Ultrathin sections were produced on an LKB-3 ultratome, and studied in a GEM 100B electron microscope. Up to six sections for one sample were studied. Light microscopic studies were performed with Olympus IX-71 microscope.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Authors are grateful to Prof. J.A. Vazquez-Boland, Univ. Bristol, UK, for a gift of the L. monocytogenes strains EGDe, EGDeΔhly, NCTC5105 and the L. innocua strain NCTC11288, and to Prof. T.R. Klaenhammer, North Carolina State University, for a gift of the vector pTRKL2. Authors highly appreciate Dr. L. Didenko and Dr. N. Konstantinova for the help with electron microscopy. The work was supported by Russian Foundation for Basic Research (Projects No. 06-04-49287 and 09-04-00403) and Federal Agency on Science and Innovations (Project No. 02.740.11.0310).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Gamaleya Research Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences

References

  1. Farber JM, Peterkin PI: Listeria monocytogenes, a food-borne pathogen. Microbiol Rev. 1991, 55: 476-511.PubMed CentralPubMed
  2. Vázquez-Boland JA, Kuhn M, Berche P, Chakraborty T, Domínguez-Bernal G, Goebel W, González-Zorn B, Wehland J, Kreft J: Listeria pathogenesis and molecular virulence determinants. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2001, 14: 584-640. 10.1128/CMR.14.3.584-640.2001.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  3. Weis J, Seeliger HP: Incidence of Listeria monocytogenes in nature. Appl Microbiol. 1975, 30: 29-32.PubMed CentralPubMed
  4. Welshimer HJ, Donker-Voet J: Listeria monocytogenes in nature. Appl Microbiol. 1971, 21: 516-519.PubMed CentralPubMed
  5. Zaytseva E, Ermolaeva S, Somov GP: Low genetic diversity and epidemiological significance of Listeria monocytogenes isolated from wild animals in the far east of Russia. Infect Genet Evol. 2007, 7: 736-742. 10.1016/j.meegid.2007.07.006.View ArticlePubMed
  6. Dijkstra RG: The occurrence of Listeria monocytogenes in surface water of canals and lakes, in ditches of one big polder and in the effluents and canals of a sewage treatment plant. Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg[B]. 1982, 176: 202-205.
  7. Ly TM, Müller HE: Ingested Listeria monocytogenes survive and multiply in protozoa. J Med Microbiol. 1990, 33: 51-54. 10.1099/00222615-33-1-51.View ArticlePubMed
  8. Zhou X, Elmose J, Call DR: Interactions between the environmental pathogen Listeria monocytogenes and a free-living protozoan (Acanthamoeba castellanii). Environ Microbiol. 2007, 9: 913-922. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01213.x.View ArticlePubMed
  9. Gourabathini P, Brandl MT, Redding KS, Gunderson JH, Berk SG: Interactions between food-borne pathogens and protozoa isolated from lettuce and spinach. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008, 74: 2518-2525. 10.1128/AEM.02709-07.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  10. Huws SA, Morley RJ, Jones MV, Brown MRW, Smith AW: Interactions of some common pathogenic bacteria with Acanthamoeba polyphaga. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2008, 282: 258-265. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01123.x.View ArticlePubMed
  11. Dussurget O, Pizarro-Cerda J, Cossart P: Molecular determinants of Listeria monocytogenes virulence. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2004, 58: 587-610. 10.1146/annurev.micro.57.030502.090934.View ArticlePubMed
  12. Portnoy DA, Auerbuch V, Glomski IJ: The cell biology of Listeria monocytogenes infection: the intersection of bacterial pathogenesis and cell-mediated immunity. J Cell Biol. 2002, 158: 409-414. 10.1083/jcb.200205009.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  13. Kayal S, Charbit A: Listeriolysin O: a key protein of Listeria monocytogenes with multiple functions. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2006, 30: 514-529. 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2006.00021.x.View ArticlePubMed
  14. Schnupf P, Portnoy DA: Listeriolysin O: a phagosome-specific lysin. Microbes Infect. 2007, 9: 1176-1187. 10.1016/j.micinf.2007.05.005.View ArticlePubMed
  15. Berche P, Gaillard JL, Richard S: Invasiveness and intracellular growth of Listeria monocytogenes. Infection. 1988, 16 (Suppl 2): S145-148. 10.1007/BF01639738.View ArticlePubMed
  16. Portnoy DA, Jacks PS, Hinrichs DJ: Role of hemolysin for the intracellular growth of Listeria monocytogenes. J Exp Med. 1988, 167: 1459-1471. 10.1084/jem.167.4.1459.View ArticlePubMed
  17. Carrero JA, Calderon B, Unanue ER: Listeriolysin O from Listeria monocytogenes is a lymphocyte apoptogenic molecule. J Immunol. 2004, 172: 4866-4874.View ArticlePubMed
  18. Guzmán CA, Domann E, Rohde M, Bruder D, Darji A, Weiss S, Wehland J, Chakraborty T, Timmis KN: Apoptosis of mouse dendritic cells is triggered by listeriolysin, the major virulence determinant of Listeria monocytogenes. Mol Microbiol. 1996, 20: 119-126. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1996.tb02494.x.View ArticlePubMed
  19. Vega Y, Rauch M, Banfield MJ, Ermolaeva S, Scortti M, Goebel W, Vázquez-Boland JA: New Listeria monocytogenes prfA* mutants, transcriptional properties of PrfA* proteins and structure-function of the virulence regulator PrfA. Mol Microbiol. 2004, 52: 1553-1565. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04052.x.View ArticlePubMed
  20. Curds CR: The ecology and role of protozoa in aerobic sewage treatment processes. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1982, 36: 27-46. 10.1146/annurev.mi.36.100182.000331.View ArticlePubMed
  21. Hausmann K, Hülsmann N, Radek R: Protistology. 2003, E. Schweizerbartsche Buchhandlung, Stuttgart, Germany, 3
  22. Sattler CA, Staehelin LA: Oral cavity of Tetrahymena pyriformis. a freeze-fracture and high-voltage electron microscopy study of the oral ribs, cytostome, and forming food vacuole. J Ultrastruct Res. 1979, 66: 132-150. 10.1016/S0022-5320(79)90130-8.View ArticlePubMed
  23. Gutiérrez JC, Callejas S, Borniquel S, Benítez L, Martín-González A: Ciliate cryptobiosis: a microbial strategy against environmental starvation. Int Microbiol. 2001, 4: 151-157.PubMed
  24. Glaser P, Frangeul L, Buchrieser C, Rusniok C, Amend A, Baquero F, Berche P, Bloecker H, Brandt P, Chakraborty T, Charbit A, Chetouani F, Couvé E, de Daruvar A, Dehoux P, Domann E, Domínguez-Bernal G, Duchaud E, Durant L, Dussurget O, Entian KD, Fsihi H, García-del Portillo F, Garrido P, Gautier L, Goebel W, Gómez-López N, Hain T, Hauf J, Jackson D, Jones LM, Kaerst U, Kreft J, Kuhn M, Kunst F, Kurapkat G, Madueno E, Maitournam A, Vicente JM, Ng E, Nedjari H, Nordsiek G, Novella S, de Pablos B, Pérez-Diaz JC, Purcell R, Remmel B, Rose M, Schlueter T, Simoes N, Tierrez A, Vázquez-Boland JA, Voss H, Wehland J, Cossart P: Comparative genomics of Listeria species. Science. 2001, 294: 849-852.PubMed
  25. Gao LY, Abu Kwaik YA: The mechanism of killing and exiting the protozoan host Acanthamoeba polyphaga by Legionella pneumophila. Environ Microbiol. 2000, 2: 79-90. 10.1046/j.1462-2920.2000.00076.x.View ArticlePubMed
  26. Tilley SJ, Orlova EV, Gilbert RJC, Andrew PW, Saibil HR: Structural basis of pore formation by the bacterial toxin pneumolysin. Cell. 2005, 121: 247-256. 10.1016/j.cell.2005.02.033.View ArticlePubMed
  27. Cheng LW, Portnoy DA: Drosophila S2 cells: an alternative infection model for Listeria monocytogenes. Cell Microbiol. 2003, 5: 875-885. 10.1046/j.1462-5822.2003.00327.x.View ArticlePubMed
  28. Greub G, Raoult D: Microorganisms resistant to free-living amoebae. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004, 17: 413-433. 10.1128/CMR.17.2.413-433.2004.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  29. Bichai F, Payment P, Barbeau B: Protection of waterborne pathogens by higher organisms in drinking water: a review. Can J Microbiol. 2008, 54: 509-524. 10.1139/W08-039.View ArticlePubMed
  30. Molmeret M, Horn M, Wagner M, Santic M, Abu Kwaik Y: Amoebae as training grounds for intracellular bacterial pathogens. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005, 71: 20-28. 10.1128/AEM.71.1.20-28.2005.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  31. Kilvington S, Price J: Survival of Legionella pneumophila within cysts of Acanthamoeba polyphaga following chlorine exposure. J Appl Bacteriol. 1990, 68: 519-525.View ArticlePubMed
  32. Abd H, Saeed A, Weintraub A, Nair GB, Sandström G: Vibrio cholerae O1 strains are facultative intracellular bacteria, able to survive and multiply symbiotically inside the aquatic free-living amoeba Acanthamoeba castellanii. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2007, 60: 33-39. 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2006.00254.x.View ArticlePubMed
  33. Pushkareva VI: Experimental evaluation of interaction between Yersinia pestis and soil infusorians and possibility of prolonged preservation of bacteria in the protozoan oocysts. Zh Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol. 2003, 4: 40-44.PubMed
  34. Steinert M, Birkness K, White E, Fields B, Quinn F: Mycobacterium avium bacilli grow saprozoically in coculture with Acanthamoeba polyphaga and survive within cyst walls. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998, 64: 2256-2261.PubMed CentralPubMed
  35. Matz C, Kjellenberg S: Off the hook bacteria survive protozoan grazing. Trends Microbiol. 2005, 7: 302-307. 10.1016/j.tim.2005.05.009.View Article
  36. Johansson J, Mandin P, Renzoni A, Chiaruttini C, Springer M, Cossart P: An RNA thermosensor controls expression of virulence genes in Listeria monocytogenes. Cell. 2002, 110: 551-561. 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00905-4.View ArticlePubMed
  37. Freitag NE, Rong L, Portnoy DA: Regulation of the prfA transcriptional activator of Listeria monocytogenes: multiple promoter elements contribute to intracellular growth and cell-to-cell spread. Infect Immunit. 1993, 61: 2537-2544.
  38. Mauder N, Ecke R, Mertins S, Loeffler DI, Seidel G, Sprehe M, Hillen W, Goebel W, Müller-Altrock S: Species-specific differences in the activity of PrfA, the key regulator of listerial virulence genes. J Bacteriol. 2006, 188: 7941-7956. 10.1128/JB.00473-06.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  39. Bou-m'handi N, Jacquet C, El Marrakchi A, Martin P: Phenotypic and molecular characterization of Listeria monocytogenes strains isolated from a marine environment in Morocco. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2007, 4: 409-417. 10.1089/fpd.2007.0019.View ArticlePubMed
  40. Zaytseva E, Ermolaeva S, Somov GP: Low genetic diversity and epidemiological significance of Listeria monocytogenes isolated from wild animals in the far east of Russia. Infect Genet Evol. 2007, 7: 736-742. 10.1016/j.meegid.2007.07.006.View ArticlePubMed
  41. O'Sullivan DJ, Klaenhammer TR: High- and low-copy-number Lactococcus shuttle cloning vectors with features for clone screening. Gene. 1993, 137: 227-231. 10.1016/0378-1119(93)90011-Q.View ArticlePubMed
  42. Park SF, Stewart GS: High-efficiency transformation of Listeria monocytogenes by electroporation of penicillin-treated cells. Gene. 1990, 94: 129-132. 10.1016/0378-1119(90)90479-B.View ArticlePubMed
  43. Ermolaeva S, Novella S, Vega Y, Ripio M, Scortti M, Vazquez-Boland JA: Negative control of Listeria monocytogenes virulence genes by a diffusible autorepressor. Mol Microbiol. 2004, 52: 601-611. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04003.x.View ArticlePubMed
  44. Didenko LV, Ermolaeva SA, Konstantinova ND, Varfolomeeva NA, Tartakovskii IS: Ultrastructural and immunocytochemical study of Listeria monocytogenes with varying levels of pathogenecity factor production. Mol Gen Microbiol Vir. 1998, 17-25. 6
  45. Ito S, Winchester RJ: The fine structure of the gastric mucosa in the bat. J Cell Biol. 1963, 16: 541-577. 10.1083/jcb.16.3.541.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed

Copyright

© Pushkareva and Ermolaeva; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.