Open Access

Surveillance of pyrazinamide susceptibility among multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from Siriraj Hospital, Thailand

  • Jirarut Jonmalung1,
  • Therdsak Prammananan2, 4,
  • Manoon Leechawengwongs3, 4 and
  • Angkana Chaiprasert1, 4Email author
BMC Microbiology201010:223

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2180-10-223

Received: 1 April 2010

Accepted: 20 August 2010

Published: 20 August 2010

The Erratum to this article has been published in BMC Microbiology 2010 10:278

Abstract

Background

Susceptibility testing of pyrazinamide (PZA) against Mycobacterium tuberculosis is difficult to perform because the acidity of culture medium that is required for drug activity also inhibits the growth of bacteria. In Thailand, very limited information has been generated on PZA resistance, particularly among multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) isolated from Thailand. Only two studies on PZA susceptibility among Thai M. tuberculosis strains have been reported; one used a pyrazinamidase assay, and the other used the BACTEC 460 TB for PZA susceptibility testing. In this study, we determined the percentage of strains possessing pyrazinamide resistance among pan-susceptible M. tuberculosis and MDR-TB isolates by using the pyrazinamidase assay, BACTEC MGIT 960 PZA method and pncA sequencing, and assessed the correlation in the data generated using these methods. The type and frequency of mutations in pncA were also determined.

Results

Overall, 150 M. tuberculosis isolates, consisting of 50 susceptible and 100 MDR-TB isolates, were tested for PZA susceptibility by BACTEC MGIT 960 PZA, the pyrazinamidase assay and pncA sequencing. The study indicated PZA resistance in 6% and 49% of susceptible and MDR-TB isolates, respectively. In comparison to the BACTEC MGIT 960 PZA, the PZase assay showed 65.4% sensitivity and 100% specificity, whereas pncA sequencing showed 75% sensitivity and 89.8% specificity. Twenty-four mutation types were found in this study, with the most frequent mutation (16%) being His71Asp. Of these mutations, eight have not been previously described. The Ile31Ser and Ile31Thr mutations were found both in PZA susceptible and resistant isolates, suggesting that mutation of this codon might not play a role on PZA resistance.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that phenotypic susceptibility testing is still essential for the detection of PZA resistance, especially for MDR-TB isolates. Some mutations were not associated with resistance and could lead to misinterpretation of the genotypic methods. This information could be helpful for clinicians in managing tuberculosis patients and frequencies, and the types of pncA mutations should offer baseline information on PZA resistance.

Background

Tuberculosis (TB) is a public health problem caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Thailand was ranked 18th among high-burden countries, with 91,000 cases per year and new cases of MDR-TB (resistance to at least isoniazid and rifampicin) of approximately 1.7% [1]. Tuberculosis infection is increasing in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) co-infected patients, affecting the TB control program as about one-third of Thai HIV/AIDS patients present with active TB [25]. The standard regimen for the treatment of TB consists of 2 months of intensive treatment with isoniazid, rifampicin, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide (H, R, E, and Z), followed by 4 months of maintenance treatment with isoniazid and rifampicin (H and R). Whereas other first-line drugs do not reveal any problem for susceptibility testing, this is not true for pyrazinamide, as it is active against tubercle bacilli only at an acidic pH (e.g., pH 5.5), resulting in that it cannot use conventional culture medium for susceptibility testing [6].

Pyrazinamide (PZA, Z) is a prodrug that requires conversion to the active form, pyrazinoic acid (POA), by mycobacterial pyrazinamidase (PZase) [7]. The exact target of POA is unknown. It has been suggested that the accumulation of POA in acidic conditions (from lactic acid produced by inflammation cells) leads to acidification of the cytoplasm and subsequent cell damage [7, 8]. Mycobacterial pyrazinamidase is encoded by pncA, and mutations in this gene have been demonstrated as the major mechanism of PZA resistance [9]. Several mutations, including missense, insertion, deletion and nonsense mutations, have been reported and located in both the putative promoter and coding regions of pncA [10]. PZA-resistant M. tuberculosis strains are usually correlated with defective PZase activity, but some PZA resistant strains have been reported to contain wild-type pncA and to maintain PZase activity [1114], suggesting that other unknown resistance mechanisms could be responsible for the resistance phenotype.

PZA susceptibility testing is difficult because the acidity of culture medium needed for drug activity also restricts the growth of M. tuberculosis. The use of large inoculum sizes results in the release of NH3, leading to increased pH and inactivated PZA [7]. The BACTEC 460 TB radiometric method has been validated and developed as the reference method for PZA susceptibility testing [15]. Recently, PZA susceptibility testing has been performed by the nonradiometric, fully automated, continuous-monitoring MGIT 960 system (Becton Dickinson), which produced a rapid and reliable result [16, 17]. Many studies revealed a good correlation between loss of PZase activity and resistance to PZA [1822]. Thus, the detection of PZase activity has been used for PZA susceptibility testing. Nevertheless, various levels of sensitivity (79-96%) of the PZase assay for PZA susceptibility testing have been reported [2022]. In Thailand, only two studies on PZA susceptibility among Thai M. tuberculosis strains have been reported, and the results revealed that the initial PZA resistance was 5.95% and 7.8% when detected by the PZase assay [18] and by BACTEC 460 TB [23], respectively. In this study, we determined the percentage of strains that exhibited pyrazinamide resistance among pan-susceptible M. tuberculosis and MDR-TB isolates by using the pyrazinamidase assay, BACTEC MGIT 960 PZA method and pncA sequencing, and we evaluated the correlation of the results obtained with these methods. pncA mutation type and frequency were also evaluated.

Methods

Mycobacterial isolates

During 2005-2007, there were 4,536 M. tuberculosis isolates from 7,807 sputum samples sending from all parts of Thailand (118 hospitals and 43 of 76 provinces) to the Molecular Mycology and Mycobacteriology Laboratory, Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis Research Fund, Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University. Of these, 220 and 4,316 isolates were identified as MDR-TB and non MDR-TB, including pan-susceptible isolates respectively. One hundred and fifty M. tuberculosis clinical isolates, consisting of 50 pan-susceptible isolates (susceptible to isoniazid, rifampicin, ethambutol, and streptomycin) and 100 isolates of MDR-TB, were selected based on their ability to re-cultivate from stock cultures and availability of demographic data. The MDR-TB isolates contain 17, 13, 26 and 44 isolates resisted to isoniazid and rifampicin, to isoniazid, rifampicin and streptomycin, to isoniazid, rifampicin and ethambutol and to all four drugs respectively. These isolates were identified to species using the in-house one-tube multiplex PCR [24], and antimicrobial susceptibility testing to isoniazid, rifampicin, ethambutol and streptomycim was performed by the standard proportion method on M7H10 agar as recommended by the CDC [25] and NCCLS [15]. Each isolate obtained from individual patient. The patients include new and previously treated patients with the age ranged from 5 to 81 years and comprised of 65% male and 35% female. Only 21% were known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) status. Among these, 52% were HIV-positive.

PZA susceptibility testing

Pyrazinamide susceptibility testing was performed using the BACTEC MGIT 960 PZA system (Becton Dickinson) as recommended by the manufacturer. The medium used was modified Middlebrook 7H9 broth (pH 5.9) containing 100 μg/ml PZA. Mycobacterium bovis BCG ATCC 34540 and Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv ATCC 27294 were used as pyrazinamide resistant and susceptible controls, respectively. The control strains were included in all test sets.

Pyrazinamidase assay

Pyrazinamidase activity was determined by Wayne's method [26]. This method is based on the detection of POA, which forms a compound with ferrous ammonium sulphate to produce a brownish or pink colour. Briefly, a heavy loopful of M. tuberculosis colonies was obtained from cultures that were actively growing in LJ medium and inoculated onto the surfaces of two agar butt tubes, each containing 5 ml of Wayne's medium supplemented with 100 μg/ml of PZA (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). The tubes were incubated at 37°C. Four days after incubation, 1 ml of freshly prepared 1% ferrous ammonium sulphate was added to the first tube. The tube was left at room temperature for 30 minutes and examined. The assay was positive if a pink or brownish band was present on the surface of the agar. If the test was negative, the test was repeated with a second tube and examined after 7 days of incubation. The results were blindly read by two independent observers. M. bovis BCG and M. tuberculosis H37Rv were used as negative and positive controls, respectively.

DNA extraction

Mycobacterial DNAs were extracted by the boiling method [27]. Briefly, one loopful of M. tuberculosis colonies obtained from LJ medium was suspended in 200 μl of TE buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0) and boiled for 20 minutes. The supernatant was collected by centrifugation at 12,000 rpm for 5 min and used as the DNA template for amplification.

Amplification and sequencing of the amplified pncA gene

The pncA forward primer, pncAF1, (5'-GCGGCGTCATGGACCCTATATC-3') was located 82 bp upstream of the start codon, and the reverse primer, pncAR1, (5'-CTTGCGGCGAGCG CTCCA -3') was located 54 bp downstream of the stop codon of M. tuberculosis pncA (Rv2043c). The expected size of the PCR products was 696 bp. PCR was performed in a total volume of 50 μl, and the PCR reaction mixture consisted of 0.25 mM dNTP (Fermentas, CA, USA), 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 50 mM KCl, 2.0 mM MgCl2, 20 pmol of each primer, 1 unit of Taq DNA polymerase (Fermentas, CA, USA) and 5 μl of crude DNA. The PCR reactions were performed under the following conditions: initial denaturation at 94°C for 5 min; 40 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 1 min, annealing at 62°C for 1 min and extension at 72°C for 1 min; and 1 final cycle of extension at 72°C for 10 min. PCR products were analysed by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis, and subsequently they were purified using the Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen, Germany). Finally, purified DNAs were directly sequenced with the ABI PRISM 3730XL Analyzer, (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, USA) using the pncAF1 and pncAR1 primers as sequencing primers. The obtained sequences were compared with the sequence of M. tuberculosis H37Rv pncA (Accession no. NC_000962) by using the blastn program http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi.

Results

Pyrazinamide susceptibility testing by the phenotypic method

MGIT 960 susceptibility testing demonstrated that 52 (34.6%) of 150 isolates were phenotypically resistant to PZA. More specifically, 3 (6%) of 50 pan-susceptible M. tuberculosis isolates were resistant to PZA, whereas 49 (49%) of 100 MDR-TB isolates were PZA-resistant, as summarised in Table 1.
Table 1

Comparison of pncA sequencing, the pyrazinamidase assay, and the MGIT 960 system for PZA susceptibility testing.

M. tb strains

(total no. of isolates)

MGIT (S)

PZase (pos)

pncA (wt)

MGIT (S)

PZase (pos)

pncA (mut)

MGIT (R)

PZase (neg)

pncA (mut)

MGIT (R)

PZase (pos)

pncA (wt)

MGIT (R)

PZase (pos)

pncA (mut)

Susceptible (50)

46

1

-

2

1

MDR-TB (100)

42

9

34

11

4

S; susceptible, R; resistant, PZase; pyrazinamidase assay, MGIT; BACTEC MGIT 960 method, pos; positive, neg; negative, wt; wild-type, mut; mutant

Correlation of PZA susceptibility testing and the pyrazinamidase assay

Pyrazinamidase activity was detected in all pan-susceptible isolates and in 3 PZA-resistant isolates. Among the 100 MDR-TB isolates, 85 provided concordant results between the two methods; 51 isolates with phenotypic susceptibility to PZA had PZase activity, whereas PZase activity could not be detected in 34 PZA-resistant isolates. However, 15 MDR-TB isolates with PZA-resistant phenotypes had PZase activity (Table 1). Compared to the BACTEC MGIT 960 PZA system, the PZase assay showed 65.4% sensitivity and 100% specificity.

Correlation of PZA susceptibility, pyrazinamidase assay and mutations in pncA

Susceptibility testing by BACTEC MGIT 960 PZA revealed 98 PZA-susceptible isolates with positive PZase activity. Of these, 88 isolates had no mutations in pncA, whereas 10 isolates harboured mutations at nucleotide 92 (T → G/C), causing an amino acid change from isoleucine to serine or threonine, respectively, at codon 31. Thirty-two of the PZA-resistant isolates without PZase activity contained mutations in pncA, with 18 types of nucleotide substitutions in the coding region, 2 mutational types in the putative promoter region, 2 nucleotide insertions, and one nonsense mutation, as summarised in Table 2. Interestingly, there were two PZA-resistant isolates with negative PZase activity that were mutated at codon 31 (Ile→Ser), a mutant that was also found in PZA-susceptible isolates. In contrast, five PZA-resistant isolates that had Ile31Ser or Ile31Thr mutations possessed PZase activity (Table 2). Moreover, there were 13 (26.5%) isolates with wild-type pncA and PZase activity but possessed resistant phenotypes. Thus, the sensitivity and specificity of pncA sequencing were 75% and 89.8% respectively, when compared with the BACTEC MGIT 960 PZA.
Table 2

Results of pncA gene sequencing of 150 M. tuberculosis clinical isolates.

M. tuberculosis strains (no. of isolates)

MGIT 960

PZase assay

pncA mutation

   

Nucleotide change

Amino acid change

Susceptible (46)

S

+

wild-type

no

Susceptible (1)

S

+

T92G

Ile31Ser

Susceptible (2)

R

+

wild-type

wild-type

Susceptible (1)

R

+

T92C

Ile31Thr

MDR-TB (42)

S

+

wild-type

wild-type

MDR-TB (9)

S

+

T92C

Ile31Thr

MDR-TB (34)

R

-

A(-11)G (1)

no

   

A(-11)C (1)

no

   

T56G (1)

Leu19Arg

   

T80C (1)

Leu27Pro

   

T92G (2)

Ile31Ser

   

T104C (1)

Leu35Pro

   

T134C (1)

Val45Ala

   

G136T (1)

Ala46Ser

   

T199C (1)

Ser67Pro

   

C211G (8)

His71Asp

   

G215A (1)

Cys72Tyr

   

G222C (1)

Gly74Arg

   

G289A (3)

Gly97Ser

   

C312G (2)

Ser104Arg

   

G364A (1)

Gly122Ser

   

G373T (1)

Val125Phe

   

G379T (1)

Glu 127 Stop

   

G insertion b/w 411-412 (1)

 
   

T416G (1)

Val 139 Gly

   

C425T (1)

Thr 142 Met

   

G436A (1)

Ala 146 Thr

   

C520T (1)

Thr 174 Ile

   

GG insertion b/w 520-521 (1)

 

MDR-TB (11)

R

+

wild-type

no

MDR-TB (4)

R

+

T92C (3)

Ile31Thr

   

T92G (1)

Ile31Ser

Discussion

Several studies have reported that the prevalence of PZA resistance ranges from 36% to 54% [14, 28, 29]. In Thailand, there is little information on PZA susceptibility. However, two previous studies have reported the initial PZA resistance to be 6% and 8%, respectively [18, 23]. In this study, PZA susceptibility testing by BACTEC MGIT 960 PZA revealed 34.6% (52/150) PZA resistance. More specifically, PZA resistance was found in 6% (3/50) of pan-susceptible isolates and 49% (49/100) of MDR-TB isolates. The results were correlated with those obtained from South Africa indicating 53.3% (68/127) PZA resistance among previously treated TB patients but a lower resistant rate of 2.1% (1/47) in drug susceptible isolates [14].

PZA resistance is usually associated with defects in PZase activity. Several studies attempted to detect enzyme activity and utilised susceptibility testing for PZA [18, 19, 21, 22]. The sensitivity of the PZase assay ranged from 79-96%, whereas the specificity was approximately 98% [2022]. In this study, PZase activity was detected in all 98 PZA-susceptible M. tuberculosis isolates but in only 18 of 52 PZA-resistant isolates. Eighteen isolates with positive PZase activity presented discordant results with the MGIT 960 PZA system, resulting in a sensitivity and specificity of 65.4% and 100% for that assay, respectively. The sensitivity of our PZase assay is low relative to earlier studies. This might be the result of geographic differences among M. tuberculosis isolates. Our isolates may have had alternative resistant mechanisms, such as insufficient drug uptake or the presence of an active efflux pump [10], which limits the utility of this test. However, the PZase assay was still useful for screening PZA-resistant M. tuberculosis isolates and could be used as an alternative method, particularly for low-income countries where the assay was highly sensitive.

The major mechanism of PZA resistance was associated with mutations of the gene coding for pyrazinamidase, pncA, in which mutations were scattered along the coding and promoter regions with high diversity [7]. In this study, mutations were found in 49 isolates, of which 39 were PZA-resistant and 10 were PZA-susceptible. However, 17 isolates (7 PZA-resistant and 10 PZA-susceptible isolates) showed either Ile31Ser or Ile31Thr mutations. Of these, 15 isolates (except 2 PZA-resistant isolates) had PZase activity. Previous studies have demonstrated the catalytic residues of M. tuberculosis PZase that comprise the active (Asp-8, Trp-68, Lys-96, Ser-104, Ala-134, Thr-135 and Cys-138) and metal-binding sites (Asp-49, His-51 and His-71) [3032]. Taken together with our results, the mutation at Ile-31 did not appear to be associated with PZA resistance. Notably, two PZA-resistant isolates harboured the Ile31Ser mutant but possessed no PZase activity. One possible scenario is that these 2 isolates might have PZase activity that is below the limit of detection for the PZase assay.

Twenty-two of 24 mutation types were detected in this study and showed a correlation with PZA resistance (Table 2). Of these, 14 nucleotide substitutions [13, 14, 29, 3336] and 2 putative promoter region [9, 33] mutations were previously reported. There were 6 novel mutation types, consisting of 3 nucleotide substitutions (Leu27Pro, Gly122Ser, and Thr174Ile), 2 nucleotide insertions (G insertion between nucleotide 411 and 412 and GG insertion between nucleotide 520 and 521), and 1 nonsense mutation at Glu127. In agreement with earlier studies, the mutations were diverse and scattered throughout the gene sequence, with the most frequently occurring mutation being His71Asp (8/49 = 16%). This is not surprising, as His71 is located in one of the three preferably mutated regions (positions 3 to 17, 61 to 76, and 132 to 142) [37] and in the metal-binding site. In addition, there were 13 PZA-resistant isolates (25%) with observed PZase activity and no mutations in pncA, implying that other unknown mechanisms are involved in PZA resistance.

Conclusions

This study showed the prevalence of PZA resistance in pan-susceptible and MDR-TB M. tuberculosis clinical isolates from Siriraj Hospital, Thailand. MDR-TB isolates had a much higher percentage of PZA resistance (49%) than susceptible isolates (6%). In this study, the sensitivities of the PZase assay and pncA sequencing were 65% and 75%, respectively. The results revealed that 25% of PZA-resistant isolates had wild-type pncA, indicating that phenotypic susceptibility testing was still necessary. Additionally, some pncA mutations are not likely to produce resistance, limiting the use of genotypic methods for PZA susceptibility testing. This information is useful for clinicians in choosing suitable drug regimens for treating TB patients. This study also indicated that the automatic addition of PZA in the treatment regimen of MDR-TB patients would have less benefit in Thailand and would increase the risk of XDR-TB development or render treatment ineffective. Therefore, PZA susceptibility testing in MDR-TB patients should be performed before starting or adjusting treatment regimens.

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Molecular Mycology and Mycobacteriology Laboratory, Drug Resistant Tuberculosis Research Fund, Siriraj Foundation, under the Patronage to Pass HRH Princess Galyani Vadhana Krom Luang Naradhiwas Rajanagarindra, Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital for supporting essential facilities in pyrazinamide susceptibility by the BACTEC MGIT 960 PZA system and all staff members for their help. JJ was financially supported by the Siriraj Graduate Scholarship. AC was supported by the Chalermphrakiat Grant, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University. The study was funded by the Siriraj Graduate Thesis Scholarship, Siriraj Grant for Research and Development, and Drug Resistant Tuberculosis Fund, Siriraj Foundation, Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital. The study was approved by the Siriraj Ethics Committee, Mahidol University. None of the authors has any conflicts of interest to declare.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University
(2)
National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, National Science and Technology, Development Agency, Ministry of Science and Technology
(3)
Vichaiyut Hospital
(4)
Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis Research Fund, Siriraj Foundation

References

  1. World Health Organization: WHO Report. Geneva. 2009Google Scholar
  2. Vermund SH, Yamamoto N: Co-infection with human immunodeficiency virus and tuberculosis in Asia. Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2007, 87 (Suppl 1): S18-25. 10.1016/j.tube.2007.05.008.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Verma JK, Nateniyom S, Akksilp S, Mankatittham W, Sirinak C, Sattayawuthipong W, Burapat C, Kittikraisak W, Monkongdee P, Cain KP, Wells CD, Tappero JW: HIV care and treatment factors associated with improved survival TB treatment in Thailand: an observational study. BMC Infect Dis. 2009, 9: 42-50. 10.1186/1471-2334-9-42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Cain KP, Anekthananon T, Burapat C, Akksilp S, Mankhatitham W, Sirinak C, Nateniyom S, Sattayawuthipong W, Tasaneeyapan T, Varma JK: Cause of death in HIV-infected persons who have tuberculosis, Thailand. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009, 15: 258-264. 10.3201/eid1502.080942.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Mankatittham W, Likanonsakul S, Thawornwan U, Kongsanan P, Kittikraisak W, Burapat C, Akksilp S, Sattayawuthipong W, Srinak C, Nateniyom S, Tasaneeyapan T, Verma JK: Characteristics of HIV-infected tuberculosis patients in Thailand. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2009, 40: 93-103.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Zhang Y, Permar S, Sun Z: Conditions that may affect the results of susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to pyrazinamide. J Med Microbiol. 2002, 51: 42-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Zhang Y, Mitchison D: The curious characteristics of pyrazinamide: a review. Int J Tuberc Lung. 2003, 7: 6-21.Google Scholar
  8. Zhang Y, Wade MW, Scorpio A, Zhang H, Sun Z: Mode of action of pyrazinamide: disruption of Mycobacterium tuberculosis membrane transport and energetics by pyrazinoic acid. J Antimicrob Chermother. 2003, 52: 790-795. 10.1093/jac/dkg446.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Scorpio A, Zhang Y: Mutation in pncA, a gene encoding pyrazinamidase/nicotinamidase, caused resistance to antituberculous drug, pyrazinamide in tubercle bacillus. Nature Med. 1996, 2: 662-667. 10.1038/nm0696-662.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Singh P, Mishra AK, Malonia SK, Chauhan DS, Sharma VD, Venkatesan K, Katoch VM: The paradox of pyrazinamide: an update on the molecular mechanisms of pyrazinamide resistance in mycobacteria. J Commun Dis. 2006, 38: 288-298.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Mestdagh M, Fonteyne PA, Realini L, Rossau R, Jannes G, Mijs W, de Smet KAL, Portaels F, Eeckhout VD: Relationship between pyrazinamide resistance, loss of pyrazinamidase activity, and mutations in the pncA locus in multidrug-resistant clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999, 43: 2317-2319.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Mphahlele M, Syre H, Valvatne H, Stavrum R, Mannsaker T, Mothivhi T, Weyer K, Fourie PB, Grewal HM: Pyrazinamide resistance among South African multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 2008, 46: 3459-3464. 10.1128/JCM.00973-08.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Cheng SJ, Thibert L, Sanchez T, Heifets L, Zhang Y: pncA mutations as a major mechanism of pyrazinamide resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: spread of a monoresistant strain in Quebec, Canada. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000, 44: 528-532. 10.1128/AAC.44.3.528-532.2000.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Louw GE, Warren RM, Donald PR, Murray MB, Bosman M, van Helden PD, Young DB, Victor TC: Frequency and implications of pyrazinamide resistance in managing previously treated tuberculosis patients. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2006, 10: 802-807.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Woods G, Desmond EP, Hall GS, Heifets L, Pfyffer GE: Susceptibility testing of mycobacteria, norcardiae, and other aerobic Actinomycetes: Approved standard NCCLS document M24-A. 2003, NCCLSGoogle Scholar
  16. Scarparo C, Ricardo P, Ruggiero G, Piccoli P: Evaluation of the fully automated BACTEC MGIT 960 system for testing susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to pyrazinamide, streptomycin, isoniazid, rifampicin and ethambutol and comparison with the radiometric BACTEC 460 TB method. J Clin Microbiol. 2004, 42: 1109-1114. 10.1128/JCM.42.3.1109-1114.2004.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Pfyffer GE, Palicova F, Rusch-Gerdes S: Testing of susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to pyrazinamide with the nonradiometric BACTEC MGIT 960 system. J Clin Microbiol. 2003, 40: 1670-1674. 10.1128/JCM.40.5.1670-1674.2002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Rienthong S, Rienthong D, Smithikarn S, Yamnimnual S: Study of initial drug resistance of pyrazinamide in new pulmonary tuberculosis patients before treatment in tuberculosis division by detection of enzyme pyrazinamidase. Thai J Tuberc Chest Dis. 1993, 14: 85-89.Google Scholar
  19. Miller MA, Thibert L, Desjardins F, Siddiqi SH, Dascal A: Testing of susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to pyrazinamide: comparison of Bactec method with pyrazinamidase assay. J Clin Microbiol. 1995, 33: 2468-2470.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Davies AP, Billington OJ, McHugh TD, Mitchison DA, Gillespie SH: Comparison of phenotypic and genotypic methods for pyrazinamide susceptibility testing with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2000, 38: 3686-3688.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Krishnamurthy A, Almeida D, Rodrigues C, Mehta A: Comparison of pyrazinamide drug susceptibility of M. tuberculosis by radiometric Bactec and enzymatic pyrazinamidase assay. Indian. J Med Microbiol. 2004, 22: 166-168.Google Scholar
  22. Singh P, Wesley C, Jadaun GPS, Malonia SK, Das R, Upadhyay P, Faujdar J, Sharma P, Gupta P, Mishra AK, Singh K, Chauhan DS, Sharma VD, Gupta UD, Venkatesan K, Katoch VM: Comparative evaluation of Lowenstein-Jensen proportion method, BacT/ALERT 3 D system, and enzymatic pyrazinamidase assay for pyrazinamide susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2007, 45: 76-80. 10.1128/JCM.00951-06.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Pransucharit V, Chuchottaworn C: Detection of initial drug resistance of pyrazinamide in Thai tuberculosis patients by radiometric method. Thai J Tuberc Chest Dis. 1995, 16: 59-65.Google Scholar
  24. Chaiprasert A, Prammananan T, Tingtoy N, Na-Ubol P, Srimuang S, Samerpitak K, Rangsipanuratn W: One-tube multiplex PCR method for rapid identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2006, 37: 494-502.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kent PT, Kubica GP: Plublic health mycobacteriology. A guide for the level III laboratory. 1985, Atlanta: US Department of health and human serviceGoogle Scholar
  26. Wayne LG: Simple pyrazinamidase and urease tests for routine identification of mycobacteria. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1974, 109: 147-151.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Cheunoy W, Prammananan T, Chaiprasert A, Foongladda S: Comparative evaluation of polymerase chain reaction and restriction enzyme analysis: two amplified targets, hsp65 and rpoB for identification of cultured mycobacteria. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2005, 51: 165-171. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2004.09.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Hou L, Osei-Hyiaman D, Zhang Z, Wang B, Yang A, Kano K: Molecular characterization of pncA gene mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates from China. Epidemiol Infect. 2000, 124: 227-232. 10.1017/S0950268899003635.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Chan RC, Hui M, Chan EW, Au TK, Chin ML, Yip CK, AuYeang CK, Yeung CY, Kam KM, Yip PC, Cheng AF: Genetic and phenotypic characterization of drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates in Hong Kong. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007, 59: 866-873. 10.1093/jac/dkm054.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Lemaitre N, Sougakoff W, Truffot-Pernot C, Jarlier V: Characterization of new mutations in Pyrazinamide-resistant strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and identification of conserved regions important for the catalytic activity of the pyrazinamidase PncA. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999, 43: 1761-1763.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Lemaitre N, Callebaut I, Frenois F, Jarlier V, Sougakoff W: Study of the structure-activity relationships for the pyrazinamidase (PncA) from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Biochem J. 2001, 353: 453-458. 10.1042/0264-6021:3530453.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Du X, Wang W, Kim R, Yakota H, Nguyen H, Kim SH: Crystal structure and mechanism of catalysis of a pyrazinamidase from Pyrococcus horikoshii. Biochemistry. 2001, 40: 14166-14172. 10.1021/bi0115479.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Sreevatsan S, Pan X, Zhang Y, Kreiswirth BN, Musser JM: Mutations associated with pyrazinamide resistance in pncA of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex organisms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997, 41: 636-640.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Hirano K, Takahashi M, Kazumi Y, Fukasawa Y, Abe C: Mutation in pncA is a major mechanism of pyrazinamide resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Tuber Lung Dis. 1997, 78: 117-122. 10.1016/S0962-8479(98)80004-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Morlock GP, Crawford JT, Butler ER, Brim SE, Sikes D, Mazurek GH, Woodley CL, Cooksey RC: Phenotypic characterization of pncA mutants of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000, 44: 2291-2295. 10.1128/AAC.44.9.2291-2295.2000.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Lee KW, Lee JM, Jung KS: Characterization of pncA mutations pyrazinamide- resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Korea. J Korean Med Sci. 2001, 16: 537-543.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Scorpio A, Lindholm-Levy P, Heifets L, Gilman R, Siddiqi S, Cynamon M, Zhang Y: Characterization of pncA mutations in pyrazinamide-resistance Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997, 41: 540-543.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Jonmalung et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement