The chitobiose transporter, chbC, is required for chitin utilization in Borrelia burgdorferi
© Rhodes et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 17 July 2009
Accepted: 26 January 2010
Published: 26 January 2010
The bacterium Borrelia burgdorferi, the causative agent of Lyme disease, is a limited-genome organism that must obtain many of its biochemical building blocks, including N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc), from its tick or vertebrate host. GlcNAc can be imported into the cell as a monomer or dimer (chitobiose), and the annotation for several B. burgdorferi genes suggests that this organism may be able to degrade and utilize chitin, a polymer of GlcNAc. We investigated the ability of B. burgdorferi to utilize chitin in the absence of free GlcNAc, and we attempted to identify genes involved in the process. We also examined the role of RpoS, one of two alternative sigma factors present in B. burgdorferi, in the regulation of chitin utilization.
Using fluorescent chitinase substrates, we demonstrated an inherent chitinase activity in rabbit serum, a component of the B. burgdorferi growth medium (BSK-II). After inactivating this activity by boiling, we showed that wild-type cells can utilize chitotriose, chitohexose or coarse chitin flakes in the presence of boiled serum and in the absence of free GlcNAc. Further, we replaced the serum component of BSK-II with a lipid extract and still observed growth on chitin substrates without free GlcNAc. In an attempt to knockout B. burgdorferi chitinase activity, we generated mutations in two genes (bb0002 and bb0620) predicted to encode enzymes that could potentially cleave the β-(1,4)-glycosidic linkages found in chitin. While these mutations had no effect on the ability to utilize chitin, a mutation in the gene encoding the chitobiose transporter (bbb04, chbC) did block utilization of chitin substrates by B. burgdorferi. Finally, we provide evidence that chitin utilization in an rpoS mutant is delayed compared to wild-type cells, indicating that RpoS may be involved in the regulation of chitin degradation by this organism.
The data collected in this study demonstrate that B. burgdorferi can utilize chitin as a source of GlcNAc in the absence of free GlcNAc, and suggest that chitin is cleaved into dimers before being imported across the cytoplasmic membrane via the chitobiose transporter. In addition, our data suggest that the enzyme(s) involved in chitin degradation are at least partially regulated by the alternative sigma factor RpoS.
Lyme disease is the most common vector-borne disease in the United States, with almost 250,000 cases reported between 1992 and 2006, and approximately 20,000 new cases reported each year . The disease is contracted from a tick (Ixodes species) infected with the spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi. Ixodes ticks typically feed on small vertebrates such as the white-footed mouse, but humans are sometimes an accidental host. If an infected-feeding tick is not removed before transmission occurs, B. burgdorferi disseminates from the site of inoculation and approximately 70% of the time causes a characteristic bulls-eye rash around the site of the tick bite known as erythema migrans. An untreated infection may become systemic and involve connective, neurologic and, to a lesser extent, cardiovascular tissues resulting in clinical complications such as arthritis, encephalitis or atrioventricular block . While antibiotic treatment and tick avoidance are effective in Lyme disease management and prevention, efforts to understand the molecular mechanisms underlying the pathogen's life cycle and host colonization strategies remain important for the development of new prophylactic measures.
B. burgdorferi exists exclusively in an enzootic cycle, moving between its tick vector and vertebrate host. In order for the tick to transmit B. burgdorferi, it must first obtain the organism from an infected host as spirochetes are not passed transovarially. Once infected, the tick remains so throughout its life-cycle and can pass the bacterium to naïve hosts during subsequent blood meals. Spirochetes exist in low numbers within the unfed-infected tick and are associated with the midgut epithelium, an interaction mediated by outer surface proteins such as OspA and OspB [3–5]. However, as the infected tick takes in a blood meal the number of spirochetes begins to increase. By 24 hours after initiation of the blood meal, bacteria begin to migrate from the tick midgut to the salivary glands where they can be transmitted to a new host .
B. burgdorferi is a limited-genome organism and relies heavily on its host (tick or vertebrate) for many essential nutrients [7, 8]. For example, N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) is required to generate peptidoglycan for cell wall synthesis and may be shuttled into the glycolytic pathway to generate ATP . Spirochetes must obtain GlcNAc from their surrounding environment, and an abundant source of bound GlcNAc is encountered within the tick in the form of chitin. This polymer of alternating GlcNAc residues linked by β-(1,4)-glycosidic bonds functions as a scaffold material for the tick. It is the major component of the exoskeleton and an integral part of the peritrophic membrane . The peritrophic membrane forms as the tick feeds and is composed of chitin, proteins, glycoproteins and proteoglycans. It encases the blood meal and serves as a permeability barrier between the food bolus and the midgut epithelium, enhancing digestion and protecting the midgut epithelium from attack by toxins and pathogens [11–13].
Previous work has demonstrated that B. burgdorferi can utilize chitobiose in the absence of free GlcNAc [14–17], and it has been suggested, but not shown, that this bacterium can also utilize longer GlcNAc oligomers (i.e. chitin) . The ability to degrade chitin could potentially serve two purposes for the spirochete within the tick midgut. First, remodeling of the peritrophic membrane during the molt may serve as an important source of GlcNAc in the form of free GlcNAc, chitobiose or longer GlcNAc oligomers . The ability to degrade longer GlcNAc oligomers into chitobiose or free GlcNAc would allow B. burgdorferi access to an essential nutrient in the nutrient-poor environment of the unfed tick midgut. Second, studies in I. ricinus, the European vector for B. burgdorferi sensu lato strains, suggest that the peritrophic membrane in nymphal ticks remains intact for at least 30 days after repletion . Thus, spirochetes apparently must cross the peritrophic membrane in order to successfully colonize the tick midgut epithelium. Studies in B. burgdorferi demonstrate that OspA and OspB mediate spirochete association with the tick midgut epithelium shortly after ingestion [3–5], a process that would presumably be facilitated by a chitinase activity. A similar mechanism for vector colonization has been investigated in other organisms that cause vector-borne disease. It has been demonstrated in Leishmania  and Plasmodium [21, 22] that chitinases and N-acetylglucosaminidases play a role in weakening the peritrophic membrane, thereby allowing invasion of the midgut epithelium of the sandfly and mosquito, respectively.
Inspection of the B. burgdorferi genome reveals both enzymes and transporters that may be involved in chitin degradation. There are two genes predicted to be involved in the cleavage of β-(1,4) glycosidic bonds, a putative β-N-acetylhexosaminidase (bb0002) and a putative β-glucosidase (bb0620). In addition, previous reports have characterized the chitobiose transport system in B. burgdorferi, which is encoded on circular plasmid 26 (bbb04, bbb05 and bbb06) [14, 15, 17]. It is possible that this transport system plays a role in the utilization of chitin breakdown products (i.e. chitobiose), a mechanism that has been investigated in other chitin-degrading microorganisms [23, 24].
As described above, B. burgdorferi cannot generate GlcNAc de novo and must import this essential sugar from the surrounding environment. Therefore, during in vitro propagation the addition of free GlcNAc is necessary for cells to reach optimal cell densities in a single exponential phase. In the absence of free GlcNAc, B. burgdorferi exhibits a unique biphasic growth pattern. In the first exponential phase cells utilize the residual GlcNAc and chitobiose present in complex medium components and grow to approximately 2.0 × 106 cells ml-1 [14, 17]. Cells then become starved for GlcNAc and exhibit a death phase in which cell numbers decrease to 1.0 × 105 cells ml-1. By 120 hours cells begin to grow in a second exponential phase and reach cell densities greater than 1.0 × 107 cells ml-1. While the source of GlcNAc in the second exponential phase remains unknown, it is possible that sequestered forms of this sugar such as chitin or glycoproteins present in complex medium components play a role. The goals of this study were to determine if B. burgdorferi could utilize chitin as a source of GlcNAc and to identify genes important in the process.
Chitinase activity in rabbit serum
Chitinase activitya in rabbit serum.
Average (± SE)
5.6 (± 3.0)
9,279.7 (± 1,321.6)
17,718.9 (± 6,559.2)
5.3 (± 2.2)
12.8 (± 3.6)
16.3 (± 5.2)
BSK + 7% Serum
9.3 (± 4.7)
2,610.6 (± 895.5)
2,931.1 (± 170.0)
11.0 (± 4.9)
14.3 (± 8.2)
28.2 (± 14.5)
Growth of wild-type B. burgdorferi on chitin
In another set of growth experiments, rabbit serum was replaced with a lipid supplement previously described by Cluss et al  to rule out the possibility of residual chitinase activity in boiled serum that was not detected by the artificial fluorescent substrates. Cells were subcultured at least twice in a medium containing the lipid supplement prior to initiating growth experiments without GlcNAc. Growth of wild-type cells in serum-free BSK-II lacking GlcNAc and supplemented with 1.5 mM GlcNAc, 75 μM chitobiose or 25 μM chitohexose resulted in a single exponential phase and a maximum cell density of approximately 1.0 × 107 cells ml-1 (Fig. 3). While the maximum cell density was approximately one order of magnitude lower than in BSK-II containing 7% boiled rabbit serum, the growth pattern was the same as that observed previously with chitin substrates (compare Fig. 3 with Fig. 1). Of note, cells cultured without GlcNAc in this serum-free medium only reached a maximum cell density of 8.0 × 105 cells ml-1 in the second exponential phase, which is more than one order of magnitude lower than that observed in medium containing 7% serum.
Growth of a β-N-acetylhexosaminidase and β-glucosidase double mutant on chitin
Growth of a chbC mutant on chitin
To confirm that chbC is necessary for growth on chitin and second exponential phase growth in the absence of free GlcNAc, we created a complementation plasmid to restore wild-type function. The complemented chbC mutant (JR14) was cultured in BSK-II containing 7% boiled rabbit serum, lacking free GlcNAc and supplemented with 75 μM chitobiose, 50 μM chitotriose or 25 μM chitohexose (Fig. 5B). Comparison of the wild type (Fig. 1), the chbC mutant (Fig. 5A), and the chbC-complemented mutant (Fig. 5B) under these growth conditions demonstrate that the presence of the functional chbC gene in the complemented mutant restored wild-type growth on all three substrates in the absence of free GlcNAc.
Growth of an rpoS mutant on chitin
Chitin is one of the most abundant polymers in the environment  and is a major structural component of arthropods, including Ixodid ticks, the vector hosts for B. burgdorferi. B. burgdorferi must obtain GlcNAc from its tick and vertebrate hosts and does so by transporting either free GlcNAc or chitobiose into the cell [14–17]. Recently, Tilly et al [14, 15] reported that B. burgdorferi cells exhibit biphasic growth in the absence of free GlcNAc in vitro. It was proposed that the second growth phase observed during GlcNAc starvation was due to the up regulation of chbC and the utilization of chito-oligomers present in the yeastolate component of BSK-II . While we were able to confirm that the induction of chbC expression during GlcNAc starvation is responsible for chitobiose utilization, our observations suggested that yeastolate is not the source of sequestered GlcNAc for second exponential phase growth . Thus, we set out to determine if B. burgdorferi could utilize chitin given that it is a major component of the tick peritrophic membrane [11–13]. Chitin utilization could prove beneficial to spirochetes in the nutrient-limited environment of the unfed-infected tick midgut and aid in the colonization of the midgut epithelium.
Prior to conducting growth studies in the presence of chitin, we determined if there was an inherent chitinase activity present in the medium. Previous reports characterized chitinase activity in goat serum , guinea pig blood , human macrophages  and a variety of mouse tissues . While chitinase activity has not been previously described in rabbit serum, the evolutionary conservation of this enzymatic activity in rodents and primates  suggested that it may also be present in rabbit serum. We demonstrated heat-sensitive chitinase activity in rabbit serum (Table 1). In addition, rabbit serum showed no activity against 4-MUF GlcNAc, suggesting that it possesses chitinase activity but not a β-N-acetylglucosaminidase activity in which free GlcNAc is released from the non-reducing end of chitin. These results support our observation that the source of sequestered GlcNAc in the second exponential phase is not due to chito-oligomers present in the yeastolate component of BSK-II . Any chito-oligomers present in yeastolate would be degraded to chitobiose by the chitinase activity present in rabbit serum, and imported into the cells by the chbC transporter.
To determine whether B. burgdorferi could utilize chitin and GlcNAc oligomers longer than chitobiose, we either inactivated the chitinase activity in rabbit serum by boiling before adding it to BSK-II or we replaced the rabbit serum with a lipid extract. In both cases, B. burgdorferi cells provided with chitin or various chitin oligomers as the sole source of GlcNAc grew in one exponential phase to optimal cell densities (Figs. 1 and 3). In the absence of these added sources of GlcNAc, the cells failed to grow to high cell densities. These data strongly suggest that B. burgdorferi has the genes necessary to degrade and utilize chitin or GlcNAc oligomers in the absence of free GlcNAc.
Additionally, GlcNAc starvation in the absence of rabbit serum resulted in biphasic growth, but with a lower maximum cell density in the second exponential phase (Fig. 3). This suggests that rabbit serum and one or more other components in BSK-II contribute the sequestered GlcNAc necessary for growth in the second exponential phase, possibly in the form of glycoproteins or glycosaminoglycans. It is interesting to note that boiling the serum or the entire medium had an impact on the ability of cells to grow in a second exponential phase in some experiments (Fig. 2B and Fig. 4). For example, in boiled medium without BSA, cells did not exhibit a second exponential phase in the absence of free GlcNAc (Fig. 2B). In another case, a reduced growth rate and a reduced cell density in the second exponential phase was observed for RR60 (the bb0002 and bb0620 double mutant) in the absence of free GlcNAc (Fig. 4). However, results with RR60 do not lead us to conclude that either of these genes play a significant role in obtaining sequestered GlcNAc in the second exponential phase, because the wild-type strain grew to the same final cell density as RR60 in this experiment (data not shown). Additionally, RR60 was cultured in BSK-II lacking GlcNAc and supplemented with serum that was not boiled, and cells grew to > 1.0 × 107 cells ml-1 in the second exponential phase (data not shown). The lack of a second exponential phase observed in boiled BSK-II (Fig. 2B) and the slower second exponential phase accompanied by reduced cell density observed with RR60 (Fig. 4) was occasionally observed and seemed to correlate with different batches of boiled medium or serum. This suggests that prolonged boiling alters components within the serum that B. burgdorferi normally utilizes for second exponential phase growth.
In addition to growth experiments, we attempted to detect B. burgdorferi chitinase activity using the artificial fluorescent substrates described above (data not shown). We used both culture supernatants and cell lysates from cultures starved for GlcNAc and supplemented with 7% boiled rabbit serum and various GlcNAc oligomers or chitin. While cells grew to maximum cell densities as expected, we were unable to detect cleavage of any of the artificial fluorescent substrates. These results were surprising in light of the growth experiments (Figs. 1, 2 and 3) and the known ability of B. burgdorferi to utilize chitobiose [14–17]. It is possible that the enzyme activity expressed was below the detection limit of our assay or that the artificial substrates were not recognized by these enzymes.
While attempts to knockout chitinase activity in this study were not successful, we did identify other candidates by genome analysis. We examined genes annotated by The Institute for Genomic Research (TIGR; http://cmr.jcvi.org) as hypothetical or conserved hypothetical using the NCBI Conserved Domain Database (CDD; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?db=cdd) to target those genes with domains that could be involved in chitin degradation or chitin binding. We generated a list of potential targets that included five genes with a potential hydrolase domain (bb0068, bb0168, bb0421, bb0504 and bb0511), three with a potential Lysin Motif (LysM; bb0262, bb0323 and bb0761), one with a potential Goose Egg White Lysozyme domain (GEWL; bb0259) and one with a cyclodextrin transglycosylase domain (CGTase; bb0600). As noted above, the bb0761 mutant showed no defect in utilization of GlcNAc oligomers and attempts to generate a bb0262 mutant were unsuccessful suggesting this is an essential gene with a role in cell wall synthesis or remodeling.
A recent report on Ralstonia A-471 described a novel goose egg white-type lysozyme gene with chitinolytic activity . BLAST analysis of the catalytic domain against the B. burgdorferi genome shows 36% identity at the amino acid level (E-value is 7.9e-08) to bb0259, which has a GEWL domain. We did not attempt to knockout this gene, but it may be a target to consider in future studies.
Since chitobiose transport is important for chitin utilization in other organisms [24, 31], we evaluated the role of chbC during chitin utilization in B. burgdorferi. As expected from previous studies [14, 17], RR34 (chbC mutant) was unable to grow on chitobiose in the absence of free GlcNAc (Fig. 5A). Similarly, no growth was observed when RR34 cells were cultured in the absence of GlcNAc and supplemented with chitotriose or chitohexose, demonstrating that chbC is also required for the utilization of GlcNAc oligomers longer than chitobiose. Complementation of the chbC mutant by introduction of the wild-type chbC gene on a shuttle vector (Fig. 5B) restores the wild-type phenotype. Together, these results demonstrate that chitobiose transport is necessary for the utilization of chitobiose and longer GlcNAc oligomers, and suggest that an unidentified enzyme(s) involved in the degradation of chitin is secreted, either extracellularly or into the periplasm. In addition, these results show that chitobiose transport is necessary for utilization of sequestered GlcNAc in the second exponential phase, and support our hypothesis that GlcNAc oligomers are not the source of sequestered GlcNAc in the second exponential phase.
Previous work conducted in our laboratory suggested that RpoS, one of two alternative sigma factors present in B. burgdorferi, regulates chitobiose utilization in the B31-A background by partially regulating expression of chbC during GlcNAc starvation . Here we cultured an rpoS mutant in BSK-II lacking GlcNAc and supplemented with chitobiose or chitohexose and 7% unboiled (Fig. 6A) or boiled (Fig. 6B) rabbit serum. Biphasic growth of the rpoS mutant in the presence of chitobiose was nearly identical in unboiled and boiled rabbit serum. This is important because it further demonstrates that unboiled serum does not possess a β-N-acetylglucosaminidase activity that cleaves chitobiose to monomeric GlcNAc. In contrast, growth of the rpoS mutant supplemented with chitohexose was delayed in boiled serum compared to that in unboiled rabbit serum. This delay supports the data presented in Table 1 showing an inherent chitinase activity in unboiled rabbit serum as rpoS mutant growth on chitohexose in unboiled serum (Fig. 6A) mirrors that on chitobiose, suggesting the chitinase activity in the rabbit serum degraded the chitohexose to chitobiose. In addition, the delay in chitohexose utilization in boiled serum strongly suggests that RpoS regulates chitin utilization not only through the regulation of chbC , but also through the regulation of other gene(s) important for degradation of chitin. Recently, Caimano et al  characterized the RpoS regulon in the 297 c162 background after temperature-shift in vitro and after maintenance in dialysis membrane chambers in rats or rabbits. We were unable to find any of our candidate chitin utilization genes upon examination of differentially regulated genes identified in their study. It is possible that starvation for GlcNAc is necessary for the induction of these genes, a condition that was not tested by Caimano et al.
In this study we provide evidence that B. burgdorferi can utilize GlcNAc oligomers and chitin in the absence of free GlcNAc, and we show that chitobiose transport via chbC is required for utilization of these substrates. A previous report suggested chbC is not required for maintenance or transmission of the organism between ticks and mice . However, these studies were conducted in a controlled laboratory environment using pathogen-free ticks and mice. It is possible chbC plays a role in infection in a natural setting by providing a competitive advantage to spirochetes in colonizing ticks that are often colonized with more than one microorganism. In addition, chbC is required for obtaining sequestered GlcNAc during second exponential phase growth in vitro which most likely comes from glycoproteins or glycosaminoglycans, so there may also be a role for this transporter in the mammal. However, it is also possible that chitinase activity, rather than chitin utilization, is required for transmission, as chitinase activity may be important for penetration of the peritrophic membrane and colonization of the tick midgut. In this instance, the chbC gene may be retained, but chitobiose uptake and utilization may be of secondary importance.
In this study we provide evidence of an inherent chitinase activity in rabbit serum, a component of the B. burgdorferi growth medium, BSK-II. We inactivated this activity by boiling, and showed that cells can utilize GlcNAc oligomers and chitin as a source of GlcNAc in the presence of boiled serum or a lipid supplement. In addition, we demonstrated that transport of chitobiose via the chitobiose transporter, chbC, is required for chitin utilization by this organism. Finally, delayed growth of an rpoS mutant on chitohexose suggests that this alternative sigma factor is involved in the regulation of chitin utilization.
Bacterial strains and culture conditions
Strains and plasmids used in this study.
Strain or Plasmid
Genotype and Description
High passage non-infectious wild type
StrR; B31-A putative β-N-acetylhexosaminidase (bb0002) mutant
KanR; B31-A putative β-glucosidase (bb0620) mutant
StrR KanR; B31-A double mutant for bb0002 and bb0620
StrR; B31-A chbC mutant
StrR KanR; RR34 complemented with BBB04/pCE320
CoumR; B31-A rpoS mutant
supE 44 F- Δlac U169 (ϕ80lac Z ΔM15) hsdR 17 relA 1 endA 1gyrA 96 thi-1relA 1
StrR; B. burgdorferi shuttle vector, cp9 based
KanR; B. burgdorferi shuttle vector, cp9 based
KanR ZeoR; B. burgdorferi shuttle vector, cp32 based
KanR; bbb04 complementation construct
Generation of a β-N-acetylglucosaminidase (bb0002) and β-glucosidase (bb0620) double mutant in B. burgdorferi
Oligonucleotide primers used in this study
3' BB0002mutF (XmaI)
BBB04 complement F1
BBB04 complement R1
BB0620 mut confirm F1
BB0620 mut confirm R1
BBB04 mut confirm F1
BBB04 mut confirm R1
The construct used to generate the bb0620 mutant with kanamycin resistance was created as follows: (i) a 2.7 kb fragment of the 3' end of bb0620 and flanking sequence was amplified using primers 5'BB0620mutF3 (KpnI) and 5'BB0620mutR2 (SalI); (ii) the amplicon was TA cloned into pCR2.1 to generate pBB0620.1; (iii) pBB0620.1 and pBSV2  (a B. burgdorferi shuttle vector conferring kanamycin resistance; Table 2) were digested with KpnI and SalI and separated by gel electrophoresis; (iv) the 2.7 kb fragment from pBB0620.1 was gel extracted and cloned into the gel extracted fragment from pBSV2 to create pBB0620.2; (v) the 2.7 kb fragment and flanking kanamycin resistance cassette was PCR amplified using primers 5'BB0620mutF3 and pBSV2 R1; (vi) the resulting 4.3 kb amplicon was TA cloned into pGEM T-Easy to create pBB0620.3A or B (based on orientation of the PCR product insertion); (vii) a pBB0620.3B clone was identified by restriction digest in which the 3' end of the kanamycin resistance cassette was adjacent to the SacII restriction site in the pGEM T-Easy vector; (viii) the 5' end of bb0620 and flanking DNA was amplified using primers 3'BB0620mutF2 (SacII) and 3'BB0620mutR2 (AatII) and TA cloned into pCR2.1 to create pBB0620.4; (ix) pBB0620.3B and pBB0620.4 were digested with SacII and AatII and separated by gel electrophoresis; (x) the 1.7 kb fragment from pBB0620.4 was gel extracted and cloned into the gel extracted fragment from pBB0620.3B to create the final construct, pBB0620.5. In summary, 81 bp near the 5' end of bb0620 were deleted and the kanamycin cassette under control of the B. burgdorferi P flgB promoter (from pBSV2) was inserted in the opposite orientation.
All plasmid constructs described above were confirmed by restriction digestion and/or sequence analysis. Plasmids pBB0002.7 and pBB0620.5 were used to generate deletion/insertion mutations in B31-A. Specifically, plasmids were concentrated to greater than 1 μg μl-1 and 10 μg of each plasmid was introduced into separate competent B31-A preparations by electroporation. Cells from each transformation reaction were resuspended in 10 ml of BSK-II containing 20 μg ml-1 phosphomycin, 50 μg ml-1 rifampicin and 2.5 μg ml-1 amphotericin B (Antibiotic Mixture for Borrelia 100×; Sigma-Aldrich; St. Louis, MO), and allowed to recover overnight (18-24 h) prior to plating. Cells were plated on BSK-II containing either 100 μg ml-1 streptomycin (pBB0002.7) or 340 μg ml-1 kanamycin (pBB0620.5) according to the protocol of Samuels et al . Antibiotic resistant colonies appearing 10-14 d after plating were transferred to liquid BSK-II and cell lysates were screened by PCR using primers flanking the antibiotic insertion site. One clone for each mutation was chosen for growth experiments. The bb0002 mutant was designated RR04, and the bb0620 mutant was designated RR53. Mutations in RR04 and RR53 were confirmed by PCR amplification of genomic DNA using primers flanking the antibiotic insertion site [Additional file 1 and Additional file 2], and DNA sequencing confirmed insertion of the antibiotic resistance gene.
To generate the bb0002/bb0620 double mutant, competent RR04 cells were transformed with 10 μg of pBB0620.5. Cells were resuspended in BSK-II and allowed to recover overnight prior to plating on BSK-II containing 100 μg ml-1 streptomycin and 340 μg ml-1 kanamycin. PCR was used to screen the transformants and a clone containing mutations in both genes was designated RR60. In addition, PCR was conducted on genomic DNA obtained from this clone using primers flanking the antibiotic insertion site [Additional file 1 and Additional file 2], DNA sequencing of the PCR products confirmed insertion of the antibiotic resistance genes in bb0002 and bb0620.
Construction of a chbC mutant in B. burgdorferi
The construct used to generate a chbC (bbb04) deletion/insertion in B31-A was created as follows: (i) a 2.6 kb fragment of the 3' end of chbC and flanking DNA was amplified using primers 5'BBB04mutF2 (BamHI) and 5'BBB04mutR2 (PstI); (ii) the amplicon was TA cloned into pCR2.1 to generate pBBB04.1; (iii) pBBB04.1 and pKFSS1 were digested with BamHI and PstI and separated by gel electrophoresis; (iv) the 2.6 kb fragment from pBBB04.1 was gel extracted and cloned into the gel extracted fragment from pKFSS1 to generate pBBB04.2; (v) the 2.6 kb fragment and flanking streptomycin resistance cassette in pBBB04.2 were PCR amplified using primers 5'BBB04mutF2 (BamHI) and pKFSS1 R1; (vi) the resulting 4.0 kb amplicon was TA cloned into pGEM T-Easy to generate pBBB04.3A or B (based on orientation of the PCR product insertion); (vii) a pBBB04.3B was identified by restriction digest in which the 3' end of the streptomycin resistance cassette was adjacent to the XmaI site in the pGEM T-Easy vector; (viii) the 5' end of bbb04 and flanking DNA was amplified using primers 3'BBB04mutF1 (XmaI) and 3'BBB04mutR1 (SacII) and TA cloned into pCR2.1 to create pBBB04.4; (ix) pBBB04.3B and pBBB04.4 were digested with XmaI and SacII and separated by gel electrophoresis; (x) the 1.8 kb fragment from pBBB04.4 was gel extracted and cloned into the gel extracted fragment from pBBB04.3B to create the final construct, pBBB04.5. In summary, 141 bp near the 5' end of chbC were deleted and the streptomycin resistance gene under the control of the B. burgdorferi PflgBpromoter (from pKFSS1) was inserted in the opposite orientation. All plasmid constructs were confirmed by restriction digestion and DNA sequencing.
The chbC deletion/insertion mutation was generated by transforming B31-A with 10 μg of pBBB04.5 and plating on BSK-II containing 100 μg ml-1 streptomycin as described above. Transformants were selected with streptomycin and screened by PCR using primers flanking the antibiotic insertion site. A single clone, RR34, was chosen for subsequent growth experiments and the mutation was confirmed by PCR with primers flanking the antibiotic insertion site [Additional file 3]. DNA sequencing was performed on the PCR product confirming the insertion of the streptomycin resistance gene.
Complementation of the chbC mutant
To complement the chbC mutant (RR34) the wild-type chbC gene (bbb04) and flanking DNA was amplified from B31-A genomic DNA using primers BBB04 complement F1 and BBB04 complement R1. The resulting 3.0 kb fragment was TA cloned into pCR2.1 to generate pchbCcomp.1. Next, pchbCcomp.1 and pBSV2  were digested with SacI and XbaI and separated by gel electrophoresis. The 3.0 kb fragment from pchbCcomp.1 was gel extracted and cloned into the gel extracted fragment from pBSV2 to create the complementation construct pchbCcomp.2. Several attempts were made to complement RR34 with pchbCcomp.2; however, no clones were obtained. Therefore, we transferred the bbb04 fragment from pchbCcomp.2 to pCE320 , a B. burgdorferi shuttle vector with a circular plasmid 32 (cp32) origin of replication, by digesting with NotI. The new construct, designated BBB04/pCE320, was transformed into RR34 and plated on BSK-II containing 100 μg ml-1 streptomycin and 340 μg ml-1 kanamycin as described above. One clone, designated JR14, was selected for further experiments, and PCR confirmation showed this clone carried both mutant and wild-type copies of chbC [Additional file 3].
Nucleotide sequencing and computer analysis
Nucleic acid sequencing was performed by the University of Rhode Island Genomics and Sequencing Center using a 3130xl Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems; Forest City, CA). Sequencing reactions were prepared using the BigDye® Terminator v3.0 Cycle Sequencing Kit. Sequences were analyzed using the DNASTAR Lasergene software (DNASTAR, Inc.; Madison, WI).
Chitinase activity assay
Chitinase activity assays were performed as previously described  using the following substrates: 4-MUF GlcNAc, 4-MUF GlcNAc2 and 4-MUF GlcNAc3 (Sigma-Aldrich). Briefly, 200 μl reactions were prepared by combining 150 μl Tris buffered saline (TBS; 25 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl), 30 μl of sample and 20 μl of the appropriate substrate (1 mM stock solution in DMSO) in a black 96 well microtiter plate with a clear bottom (Fisher Scientific). Plates were incubated at 33°C for up to 48 h, and fluorescence was monitored using the SpectraMax2 fluorimeter (Molecular Devices Corp.; Sunnyvale, CA) with excitation at 390 nm and emission at 485 nm.
For growth experiments, late-log phase cells (5.0 × 107 to 1.0 × 108 cells ml-1) cultured in complete BSK-II were diluted to 1.0 × 105 cells ml-1 in 6 ml of BSK-II lacking GlcNAc. Typically, 6-12 μl of culture was transferred to 6 ml of fresh medium; therefore, negligible amounts of nutrients were transferred with the inoculum. Cultures were supplemented with 1.5 mM GlcNAc, 75 μM chitobiose, 50 μM chitotriose, 25 μM chitohexose (V-Labs; Covington, LA) or 0.04% (w/v) chitin flakes from crab shells (Sigma-Aldrich). Chitin oligomers were > 95% pure as determined by the manufacturer. For experiments in which BSK-II was supplemented with boiled serum or lipid extract, cells were subcultured (i.e. diluted 1:1000) in fresh medium containing the appropriate supplement at least two times prior to the initiation of growth experiments. Therefore, the initial inoculum from BSK-II containing serum that was not boiled was diluted 109- fold in BSK-II supplemented with boiled serum or lipid extract before the initiation of growth experiments. All growth experiments were carried out at 33°C and 3% CO2. To enumerate cells, 2.5 μl of culture was transferred to a Petroff-Hauser counting chamber (Hauser Scientific; Horsham, PA) and cells were counted in all 25 squares by darkfield microscopy. For cultures with a cell density greater than 1.0 × 107 cells ml-1 a 10-fold dilution in BSK-II was made prior to loading in the counting chamber. Each growth curve is representative of multiple independent trials, as data could not be pooled due to the length of experiments and the different times at which bacteria were enumerated.
- 4-MUF GlcNAc:
- 4-MUF GlcNAc2:
- 4-MUF GlcNAc3:
bovine serum albumin
coumermycin A1 resistant
We thank P. Rosa and J. Radolf for providing strains and plasmids. This research is based in part upon work conducted using the Rhode Island Genomics and Sequencing Center, which is supported in part by the National Science Foundation under EPSCoR Grant No. 0554548. This work was supported by NIH grant 5 R01AI03723010 awarded to Thomas Mather and DRN. We thank Patrick Trewitt for careful reading of the manuscript.
- Bacon RM, Kugeler KJ, Mead PS: Surveillance for Lyme Disease - United States, 1992-2006. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2008, 57 (10): 1-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fikrig E, Narasimhan S: Borrelia burgdorferi-Traveling incognito?. Microbes Infect. 2006, 8 (5): 1390-1399. 10.1016/j.micinf.2005.12.022.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pal U, de Silva AM, Montgomery RR, Fish D, Anguita J, Anderson JF, Lobet Y, Fikrig E: Attachment of Borrelia burgdorferi within Ixodes scapularis mediated by outer surface protein A. J Clin Invest. 2000, 106 (4): 561-569. 10.1172/JCI9427.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pal U, Li X, Wang T, Montgomery RR, Ramamoorthi N, Desilva AM, Bao F, Yang X, Pypaert M, Pradhan D: TROSPA, an Ixodes scapularis receptor for Borrelia burgdorferi. Cell. 2004, 119 (4): 457-468. 10.1016/j.cell.2004.10.027.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Neelakanta G, Li X, Pal U, Liu X, Beck DS, DePonte K, Fish D, Kantor FS, Fikrig E: Outer surface protein B is critical for Borrelia burgdorferi adherence and survival within Ixodes ticks. PLoS Pathog. 2007, 3 (3): e33-10.1371/journal.ppat.0030033.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Piesman J, Mather TN, Sinsky RJ, Spielman A: Duration of tick attachment and Borrelia burgdorferi transmission. J Clin Microbiol. 1987, 25 (3): 557-558.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Saier MH J, Paulsen IT: Whole genome analyses of transporters in spirochetes: Borrelia burgdorferi and Treponema pallidum. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 2000, 2 (4): 393-399.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Das R, Hegyi H, Gerstein M: Genome analyses of spirochetes: a study of the protein structures, functions and metabolic pathways in Treponema pallidum and Borrelia burgdorferi. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 2000, 2 (4): 387-392.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fraser CM, Casjens S, Huang WM, Sutton GG, Clayton R, Lathigra R, White O, Ketchum KA, Dodson R, Hickey EK: Genomic sequence of a Lyme disease spirochaete, Borrelia burgdorferi . Nature. 1997, 390 (6660): 580-586. 10.1038/37551.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hackman RH: Structure and Function in Tick Cuticle. Annu Rev Entomol. 1982, 27 (1): 75-95. 10.1146/annurev.en.27.010182.000451.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Terra WR: The origin and functions of the insect peritrophic membrane and peritrophic gel. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol. 2001, 47 (2): 47-61. 10.1002/arch.1036.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hegedus D, Erlandson M, Gillott C, Toprak U: New Insights into Peritrophic Matrix Synthesis, Architecture, and Function. Annu Rev Entomol. 2009, 54 (1): 285-302. 10.1146/annurev.ento.54.110807.090559.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shao L, Devenport M, Jacobs-Lorena M: The peritrophic matrix of hematophagous insects. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol. 2001, 47 (2): 119-125. 10.1002/arch.1042.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tilly K, Elias AF, Errett J, Fischer E, Iyer R, Schwartz I, Bono JL, Rosa P: Genetics and regulation of chitobiose utilization in Borrelia burgdorferi . J Bacteriol. 2001, 183 (19): 5544-5553. 10.1128/JB.183.19.5544-5553.2001.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tilly K, Grimm D, Bueschel DM, Krum JG, Rosa P: Infectious cycle analysis of a Borrelia burgdorferi mutant defective in transport of chitobiose, a tick cuticle component. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2004, 4 (2): 159-168. 10.1089/1530366041210738.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- von Lackum K, Stevenson B: Carbohydrate utilization by the Lyme borreliosis spirochete, Borrelia burgdorferi . FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2005, 243 (1): 173-179. 10.1016/j.femsle.2004.12.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rhodes R, Coy W, Nelson D: Chitobiose utilization in Borrelia burgdorferi is dually regulated by RpoD and RpoS. BMC Microbiology. 2009, 9 (1): 108-10.1186/1471-2180-9-108.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Merzendorfer H, Zimoch L: Chitin metabolism in insects: structure, function and regulation of chitin synthases and chitinases. J Exp Biol. 2003, 206 (24): 4393-4412. 10.1242/jeb.00709.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhu Z, Gern L, Aeschlimann A: The peritrophic membrane of Ixodes ricinus . Parasitol Res. 1991, 77 (7): 635-641. 10.1007/BF00931028.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schlein Y, Jacobson RL, Shlomai J: Chitinase secreted by Leishmania functions in the sandfly vector. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1991, 245 (1313): 121-126. 10.1098/rspb.1991.0097.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Huber M, Cabib E, Miller L: Malaria parasite chitinase and penetration of the mosquito peritrophic membrane. PNAS. 1991, 88 (7): 2807-2810. 10.1073/pnas.88.7.2807.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tsai Y-L, Hayward RE, Langer RC, Fidock DA, Vinetz JM: Disruption of Plasmodium falciparum chitinase markedly impairs parasite invasion of mosquito midgut. Infect Immun. 2001, 69 (6): 4048-4054. 10.1128/IAI.69.6.4048-4054.2001.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Keyhani NO, Roseman S: The chitin catabolic cascade in the marine bacterium Vibrio furnissii. Molecular cloning, isolation, and characterization of a periplasmic chitodextrinase. J Biol Chem. 1996, 271 (52): 33414-33424. 10.1074/jbc.271.52.33414.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Uchiyama T, Kaneko R, Yamaguchi J, Inoue A, Yanagida T, Nikaidou N, Regue M, Watanabe T: Uptake of N,N'-diacetylchitobiose [(GlcNAc)2] via the phosphotransferase system is essential for chitinase production by Serratia marcescens 2170. J Bacteriol. 2003, 185 (6): 1776-1782. 10.1128/JB.185.6.1776-1782.2003.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lundblad G, Lind J, Steby M, Hederstedt B: Chitinase in goat serum. Eur J Biochem. 1974, 46 (2): 367-376. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1974.tb03629.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Overdijk B, Van Steijn GJ, Odds FC: Chitinase levels in guinea pig blood are increased after systemic infection with Aspergillus fumigatus . Glycobiology. 1996, 6 (6): 627-634. 10.1093/glycob/6.6.627.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boot RG, Renkema GH, Strijland A, van Zonneveld AJ, Aerts JMFG: Cloning of a cDNA encoding chitotriosidase, a human chitinase produced by macrophages. J Biol Chem. 1995, 270 (44): 26252-26256. 10.1074/jbc.270.44.26252.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zheng T, Rabach M, Chen NY, Rabach L, Hu X, Elias JA, Zhu Z: Molecular cloning and functional characterization of mouse chitotriosidase. Gene. 2005, 357 (1): 37-46. 10.1016/j.gene.2005.05.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cluss RG, Silverman DA, Stafford TR: Extracellular secretion of the Borrelia burgdorferi Oms28 porin and Bgp, a glycosaminoglycan binding protein. Infect Immun. 2004, 72 (11): 6279-6286. 10.1128/IAI.72.11.6279-6286.2004.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Buist G, Steen A, Kok J, Kuipers OP: LysM, a widely distributed protein motif for binding to (peptido)glycans. Mol Microbiol. 2008, 68 (4): 838-847. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06211.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Keyhani NO, Wang L-X, Lee YC, Roseman S: The chitin catabolic cascade in the marine bacterium Vibrio furnissii. Characterization of an N,N prime-diacetyl-chitobiose transport system. J Biol Chem. 1996, 271 (52): 33409-33413. 10.1074/jbc.271.52.33409.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kurita K: Controlled functionalization of the polysaccharide chitin. Prog Polym Sci. 2001, 26 (9): 1921-1971. 10.1016/S0079-6700(01)00007-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gianfrancesco F, Musumeci S: The evolutionary conservation of the human chitotriosidase gene in rodents and primates. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2004, 105 (1): 54-56. 10.1159/000078009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ueda M, Ohata K, Konishi T, Sutrisno A, Okada H, Nakazawa M, Miyatake K: A novel goose-type lysozyme gene with chitinolytic activity from the moderately thermophilic bacterium Ralstonia sp. A-471: cloning, sequencing, and expression. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009, 81 (6): 1077-1085. 10.1007/s00253-008-1676-y.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Caimano MJ, Iyer R, Eggers CH, Gonzalez C, Morton EA, Gilbert MA, Schwartz I, Radolf JD: Analysis of the RpoS regulon in Borrelia burgdorferi in response to mammalian host signals provides insight into RpoS function during the enzootic cycle. Mol Microbiol. 2007, 65 (5): 1193-1217. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05860.x.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barbour AG: Isolation and cultivation of Lyme disease spirochetes. Yale J Biol Med. 1984, 57 (4): 521-525.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Frank KL, Bundle SF, Kresge ME, Eggers CH, Samuels DS: aadA confers streptomycin resistance in Borrelia burgdorferi. J Bacteriol. 2003, 185 (22): 6723-6727. 10.1128/JB.185.22.6723-6727.2003.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stewart PE, Thalken R, Bono JL, Rosa P: Isolation of a circular plasmid region sufficient for autonomous replication and transformation of infectious Borrelia burgdorferi . Mol Microbiol. 2001, 39 (3): 714-721. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02256.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Samuels DS, Mach KE, Garon CF: Genetic transformation of the Lyme disease agent Borrelia burgdorferi with coumarin-resistant gyrB. J Bacteriol. 1994, 176 (19): 6045-6049.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Eggers CH, Caimano MJ, Clawson ML, Miller WG, Samuels DS, Radolf JD: Identification of loci critical for replication and compatibility of a Borrelia burgdorferi cp32 plasmid and use of a cp32-based shuttle vector for the expression of fluorescent reporters in the Lyme disease spirochaete. Mol Microbiol. 2002, 43 (2): 281-295. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02758.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thompson SE, Smith M, Wilkinson MC, Peek K: Identification and characterization of a chitinase antigen from Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain 385. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001, 67 (9): 4001-4008. 10.1128/AEM.67.9.4001-4008.2001.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Elias AF, Bono JL, Carroll JA, Stewart P, Tilly K, Rosa P: Altered stationary-phase response in a Borrelia burgdorferi rpoS mutant. J Bacteriol. 2000, 182 (10): 2909-2918. 10.1128/JB.182.10.2909-2918.2000.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hanahan D: Studies on transformation of Escherichia coli with plasmids. J Mol Biol. 1983, 166: 557-580. 10.1016/S0022-2836(83)80284-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.