Prevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in rodents from Gansu, northwestern China
© Zhang et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 12 July 2009
Accepted: 28 May 2010
Published: 28 May 2010
Lyme disease is a multi-organ infection disease caused by Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato. Lyme disease was first documented in north-east China in 1986. Since then more than 20 provinces in China were confirmed the existence of nature foci of Lyme disease. In the present study, a molecular epidemiological survey was conducted to investigate the presence of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in rodents from Gansu Province for the first time.
A total of 140 rodents of 7 species were examined for Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato. by nested-PCR and culture isolation. The overall infection rate was 22.86%. Two rodent species most frequently trapped were responsible for all positive. 3 strains were isolated from Apodemus agrarius, which belonged to B. garinii, 1 strain isolated from Rattus losea was identified as B. afzelii.
The study firstly showed the role of rodents in maintaining the pathogen of Lyme disease in the environment from Gansu Province and there existed at least two genotypes of Lyme disease spirochaetes in rodents.
Lyme disease is a multisystemic zoonotic disease caused by Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato (B. burgdorferi s. l.). B. burgdorferi s. l. circulates in an enzootic cycle between the primary vertebrate reservoir and the ticks[1, 2]. A wide range of mammals are severeded as reservoir hosts in the natural cycle of B. burgdorferi sensu lato[3, 4]. Different species of rodents, mainly mice and voles, are identified to be efficient natural reservoirs for B. burgdorferi sensu lato. They could naturally infect B. burgdorferi sensu lato and remain infective for a long time.
In China Lyme disease was first identified in 1986 from Heilongjiang Province , since then more than 20 provinces were confirmed the existence of nature foci of Lyme disease . In China at least 9 tick species have been identified as the vector of B. burgdorferi s.l. and it also confirmed the difference of vector species varied with the geographical origin . However, less is known about the prevalence and distribution of B. burgdorferi s.l. in rodents. Limited studies have been conducted to investigate the prevalence of B. burgdorferi s.l. among rodents from northwestern China , systemic surveys on rodents are still lacking. The objective of the study was to investigate the prevalence of B. burgdorferi s.l. in rodents from Gansu Province of northwestern China.
Prevalence of B. burgdorferi s.l. in rodents
Results of detection and isolation for B. burgdorferi s.l. in rodents by species in Gansu.
No. of rodent tested
NO. isolates for
The isolation and identification of isolates from rodents
RFLP analysis of 5S-23S rRNA intergenic spacer and reactivity with mAbs
5S-23S rRNA intergenic spacer
MseI Pattern (band positions [bp])
It has been reported that the primary reservoir hosts in hyperendemic foci of the spirochete in the northeastern and southwestern China are Apodemus agrarius and Clethrionomys rufocanus . However, information concerning the epidemic status of the disease in western part of China is inadequate. Gansu Province is located in northwestern China, in the midway along the old Silk Road, and has been identified as natural focus of Lyme disease as early as in 1994 [10, 11]. In our study we identified two rodent species, A. agrarius and R. losea harbored B. burgdorferii in nature. The high prevalence of B. burgdorferi s.l. infection in rodents indicates that an enzootic transmission cycle of B.burgdorferi s.l. still exist. Therefore it is important to identify the main local vector tick species responsible for transmission of the Lyme spirochete to humans in future work.
To identify the main reservoir host species in each particular geographic area is important, because the reservoir host species compositon may affect genospecies of B. burgdorferi s.l. There are several common characteristics for an efficient reservoir hosts of B. burgdorferi s.l. They are abundant in nature, they could naturally infected the B. burgdorferi s.l. and remain infective for long periods of time, often for life . In our study we found A. agrarius was one of most frequently trapped rodent species and field survey showed the number of A. agrarius was huge, they could easily be observed in field and in home. The strains were isolated not only from adult A. agrarius but from immature A. agrarius, the data suggested the role of A. agrarius as the primary reservoir of B. burgdorferi s.l. in Gansu Province. As we have mentioned above that A. agrarius are distributed over an extensive area in mainland China, and are known to be major reservoir host for B. burgdorferi s.l. in China . Combing these data make us believe that A. agrarius is a major reservoir host in Gansu Province.
One of the remarkable discoveries of this research was that we firstly isolated B. burgdorferi s.l. from R. losea, which showed the potential role of R. losea in Lyme disease epidemiology in Gansu Province. In fact, previous studies have showed the prevalence of B. burgdorferi in R. losea (8%) collected in south-east China . However, due to the limited number of R. losea in the present study, it is still too early to state that R. losea be a reservoir host of B. burgdorferi s.l.. It is also unclear whether this rodent could survive long enough for ticks feeding or the agent in rodent remain infectious for ticks. More samples should be collected and the role of this rodent as a source of B. burgdorferi s.l. infection for immature ticks should be documented in the future.
In our study three isolates from A. agrarius were identified as B. garinii and the isolate from R. losea was identified as B. afzelii based on Mse I RFLP analysis. It seemed that there was some specificity between the rodent species and B.burgdorferi s.l. genospecies. More samples should be included to illuminate whether there are differences in various genospecies among host ranges.
The study showed the role of two rodent species in maintaining the pathogen of Lyme disease in the environment from Gansu Province. The isolates which isolated from rodents were identified as two different genospecies.
DNA sample preparation
After species identification of the captured rodents, a small piece of spleen was triturated in 2 ml of TE buffer for culture and PCR. After centrifugation, the samples were subjected to DNA extraction using DNA extraction Kit (Sangon) according instruction. DNA of culture isolates were extracted by boiling method. Briefly, cultures were harvested by centrifugation (10,000 × g; 20 min). The bacterial pellet was washed in phosphate-buffered saline and resuspended. The DNA was extracted from the centrifugation pellet of cultivated isolates by boiling in water at 100°C for 10 min, and stored at -20°C until use.
Culture and identification
The samples from spleen were cultured in 4 ml BSKII medium (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) supplemented with 6% rabbit serum and 1% antibiotic mixture for Borrelia (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) at 32°C. Cultures were subsequently examined for spirochetes by dark-field microscopy for 6 weeks at ×400. Spirochetal isolates were analyzed by IFA with monoclonal antibody. The monoclonal antibody H5332, FITC-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG were friendly provided by Professor Chenxu Ai from Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology. The IFA was performed briefly as follow: cultures were harvested by centrifugation and washed three times by suspension in 500 ul of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (0.01 M, pH 7.38), recentrifugation at 12,000 × g for 25 s, and removal of the supernatant. After being washed, the pellet was resuspended in PBS to a final concentration of 5 × 107/ml. Ten microliters of this suspension was applied to wells on a glass slide. Slides were air dried, fixed in acetone for 10 min, and stored in airtight containers until use. The primary antibody H5332 were diluted from 1:32 to 1:1024 in PBS and then added to wells of slides, and incubated at 37°C for 40 min. After washing, FITC-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG was added at a dilution of 1:20 amd incubated at 37°C for 40 min. After washing, the sildes were examinated by fluorescence microscopy.
A nested PCR was performed with primers designed to amplify the variable spacer between two conserved structures, the 3' end of the 5S rRNA and the 5' end of the 23S rRNA as described [14, 15]. To minimize contamination, DNA extraction, the reagent setup, amplification and agarose gel electrophoresis were performed in separate rooms.
The culture isolates were further analysed by RFLP to identify their genotypes as described [15, 16]. For each one, 13 μl. amplified DNA was digested at 37°C overnight with endonuclease MseI (New England Biolabs) according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Electrophoresis was conducted in 16% polyacrylamide gel at 100 V for 3 h. The gels were silver stained, and bands were subsequently visualized under white light. A 50 bp DNA Ladder Marker (TaKaRa, Shuzo) was used as a molecular mass marker. Positive controls of B. garinii, B. afzelii and B. burgdorferi s.s. were prepared in the same way. Genospecies of culture isolates were identified according to RFLP profiles of each sample. RFLP profiles that differed from the known profiles of positive controls were further analysed by sequence analysis.
DNA sequencing of PCR products
PCR products were purified by using the Qiaquick Gel Extraction kit (Qiagen). The nucleotide sequences were determined by a dideoxynucleotide cycle sequencing method with an automated DNA sequencer (ABI Prism 377, Perkin-Elmer). The sequences obtained in the present study were deposited in GenBank. MseI RFLP analysis of the 5S-23S rRNA intergenic spacer was performed on the basis of the DNA sequences obtained using software Vector NTI 9.0 (Lu & Moriyama, 2004).
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers
The accession numbers of the 5S-23S rRNA intergenic spacer sequences of culture isolates in this study are GQ369934--37.
We thank Dr. Bin Kang and Dr. Jing He for reviewing the manuscript. This work supported by the Special Project of the "Eleventh Five-Year Plan"for Medical Science Development of PLA (08Z003)
- Steere AC, Grodzicki RL, Kornblatt AN, Craft JE, Barbour AG, Burgdorfer W, Schmid GP, Johnson E, Malawista SE: The spirochetal etiology of Lyme disease. N Engl J Med. 1983, 308: 733-740.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Magnarelli L, Anderson JF: Ticks and biting insects infected with the etiologic agent of Lyme disease, Borrelia burgdorferi. J Clin Microbiol. 1998, 26: 1482-6.Google Scholar
- Anderson JF, Johnson RL, Magnarelli AC: Seasonal prevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi in natural population of white-footed mice, Peromyscus leucopus. J Clin Microbiol. 1987, 25: 1564-6.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Donahue JG, Piesman AJ: Reservoir competence of white-footed mice for Lyme disease spirochetes. Am J Trop Hyg Med. 1987, 36: 92-6.Google Scholar
- Ai CM: A new tick-borne spirochete (Lyme borreliosis) was identified in Linhai region of Heilongjiang Province. Chin Pub Heal. 1987, 2: 6-7.Google Scholar
- Zhang ZF, Wan KL, Zhang JS: An etiological and epidemiological investigation on Lyme disease in China. Chin J Epidemiol. 1997, 18: 8-11.Google Scholar
- Wan KL, Zhang ZF, Dou GL: Investigation on main vectors of Lyme Lyme borreliosis spirochetes in China. Chin J Epidemiol. 1998, 19: 263-6.Google Scholar
- Takada N, Masuzawa T, Ishiguro F, Fujita H, Kudeken M, Mitani H, Fukunaga M, Tsuchiya K, Yano Y, Ma XM: Lyme disease Borrelia spp. in ticks and rodents from Northwestern China. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001, 67: 5161-5165. 10.1128/AEM.67.11.5161-5165.2001.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wan KL, Zhang ZF, Zhang JS: Preliminary Investigation on Lyme disease in Animals in 20 Provinces, Cities and Autonomous Regions of China. J Hyg Res. 1999, 28: 7-9.Google Scholar
- Liu ZJ, Shi SZ, Wang DH, Yang YS: Investigation on seroepidemiology of Lyme disease in Gansu. Journal of Lanzhou University. 1994, 30: 18-20.Google Scholar
- Liu ZJ: Studies on clinical epidemiology of 46 cases of Lyme disease in Gansu Province. Medicine and Society. 1994, 30: 31-32.Google Scholar
- Oliver JH, Lin T, Gao L, Clark KL, Banks CW, Durden LA, James AM, Chandler FW: An enzootic transmission cycle of Lyme borreliosis spirochetes in the southeastern United States. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003, 100: 11642-11645. 10.1073/pnas.1434553100.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chu CY, Jiang BG, Liu W, Zhao QM, Wu XM, Zhang PH, Zhan L, Yang H, Cao WC: Presence of pathogenic Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in ticks and rodents in Zhejiang, south-east China. J Med Microbiol. 2008, 57: 980-985. 10.1099/jmm.0.47663-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Huang HN, Ding Z, He J, Wu XM, Jiang BG, Gao Y, Chun CX, Zhang L, Zhao QM, Wang YF, Cao WC: Study on coinfection status of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato and spotted fever group Rickettsia in ticks from Hunchun, Jilin Province. Chin J Epidemiol. 2006, 27: 379-383.Google Scholar
- Dionysios L, Wormser GP, Nowakowski J: Molecular typing of Borrelia burgdorferii from Lyme patients by fragment length polyrmorphism analysis. J Clin Microbiol. 1996, 34: 1306-1309.Google Scholar
- Wang G, van Dam AP, Schwartz I, Dankert J: Molecular typing of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato: taxonomic, epidemiological, and clinical implications. Clin Microbiol Review. 1999, 12: 633-647.Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.