Open Access

The analysis of oral microbial communities of wild-type and toll-like receptor 2-deficient mice using a 454 GS FLX Titanium pyrosequencer

BMC Microbiology201010:101

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2180-10-101

Received: 24 September 2009

Accepted: 6 April 2010

Published: 6 April 2010

Abstract

Background

Although mice have long served as an animal model for periodontitis, information on the composition of their indigenous oral microbiota is limited. The aim of the current study was to characterize mouse oral bacterial flora by applying extensive parallel pyrosequencing using the latest model pyrosequencer, a Roche/454 Genome Sequencer FLX Titanium. In addition, the effect of Toll-like receptor (TLR) 2 deficiency on oral microbiota was evaluated.

Results

Eight oral bacterial communities of wild-type (n = 4) and TLR2 knock-out (n = 4) C57BL/6 mice were characterized by analyzing 80,046 reads of 16S rRNA genes obtained by pyrosequencing. Excluding the PCR primers, the average length of each sequencing product was 443 bp. The average species richness of the murine oral bacterial communities was estimated to be about 200, but the communities were dominated by only two main phyla and several species. Therefore, the bacterial communities were relatively simple. The bacterial composition of the murine oral microbiota was significantly different from that of humans, and the lack of TLR2 had a negligible effect on the murine oral microbiota.

Conclusion

Pyrosequencing using the Roche/454 FLX Titanium successfully characterized mouse oral bacterial communities. The relatively simple oral bacterial communities of mice were not affected by TLR2 deficiency. These findings will provide a basis for future studies on the role of periodontal pathogens in the murine model of periodontitis.

Background

Mice do not develop periodontitis naturally, but experimental periodontitis can be induced by inoculating mice with a periodontal pathogen such as Porphyromonas gingivalis [1]. Experimentally induced periodontitis in mice has served as an animal model for human periodontitis. Since periodontitis is caused by a dental biofilm consisting of a complex microbial community rather than a single pathogen, information on the composition of indigenous oral microbiota is important. Although the oral microbiota of several mouse strains have been characterized [24], these studies were based on cultivation. In addition, the isolates were identified by phenotypic characterization, including Gram staining, the catalase reaction, and commercial biochemical tests such as API strips.

It is now generally accepted that microbial community analysis should be culture-independent and utilize molecular identification methods such as sequencing of 16S rRNA genes. The typical procedure for culture-independent dissection of a bacterial community's structure involves the isolation of whole bacterial community DNA, amplification of 16S rRNA genes, cloning into an Escherichia coli host, and sequencing of each cloned amplicon. Recently, pyrosequencing, a new high-throughput DNA sequencing technique, has been introduced and employed in various microbiological disciplines. Pyrosequencing allows over 100-fold higher throughput than the conventional Sanger sequencing method. The higher throughput makes it possible to process large numbers of samples simultaneously and also makes it possible to detect rare species [5]. The utility of pyrosequencing in the characterization of microbial communities has been well documented for the Roche/454 Genome Sequencer (GS) 20 machine [5, 6] and the GS FLX system [79], which produce sequence reads of approximately 100 bp and 250 bp in length, respectively. At the end of 2008, a new pyrosequencer called GS FLX Titanium was developed; it generates fivefold more sequencing reads and an extended read length (~450 bp) compared to the GS FLX system. This latest model pyrosequencer has been used for genome sequencing but has not been tested for culture-independent microbial community analysis based on 16S rRNA.

The composition of indigenous microbiota seems to be the result of strong host selection and co-evolution [10]. The role of the immune system in the selection of indigenous microbiota has been demonstrated in several studies. The total cultivable oral microbiota of athymic nu/nu mice was dominated by Enterococcus faecalis, while that of nu/+ mice was dominated by Lactobacillus murinus [11]. In contrast, B-cell-deficiency had no apparent influence on the indigenous oral microbiota of mice [12]. Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are innate immune receptors that recognize microbial molecular patterns and mediate innate immune responses to microbes. TLR2 recognizes the bacterial lipoproteins, lipoteichoic acids, and lipopolysaccharides of some bacterial species, including P. gingivalis [13]. TLR2-deficient mice clear P. gingivalis infection far more rapidly than control mice and resist alveolar bone loss induced by P. gingivalis [14]. However, it is not known if TLR2 deficiency affects the composition of indigenous oral microbiota and the colonization of P. gingivalis. To evaluate the effect of TLR2 deficiency on oral microbiota, oral bacterial communities of wild-type (n = 4) and TLR2 knock-out (n = 4) C57BL/6 mice were characterized using a Roche/454 GS FLX Titanium pyrosequencer. To our knowledge, this study presents the first report of a 16S rRNA-based survey of a microbial community using the Roche/454 GS FLX Titanium system with > 400 bp sequence reads.

Results and discussion

Collected data

We obtained a total of 102,976 reads (> 100 bp) with an average length of 449 bp from the pyrosequencing of PCR amplicons. Apparently, the Roche/454 GS FLX Titanium system produced data sets with a longer average length than those generated by earlier models (i.e., the GS20 and GS FLX systems). Barcodes embedded in both forward and reverse primers allowed sequencing of multiple DNA samples in a single run. In this study, we sequenced eight samples; however, this method could be extended to the multiplexing of hundreds of different samples using 8-bp long barcodes.

After the low quality reads and primer sequences were discarded, the final dataset contained 80,046 reads with an average length of 443 bp (excluding the PCR primer sequences). These results corresponded to 8,590 to 12,746 reads per mouse (Table 1). Non-specific short PCR products accounted for a substantial portion of the low quality reads, and gel purification of the PCR amplicons would have increased the number of passed reads. Since we only included reads that were longer than 300 bp in the final dataset, all analyzed sequences contained at least two of the V1, V2, and V3 regions [15].
Table 1

Data summary and diversity estimates

 

WT1

WT2

WT3

WT4

KO1

KO2

KO3

KO4

Mouse age (wk)

15

11

14

15

9

9

16

16

Housing period (wk)a

9

3

8

9

9

9

16

16

Total readsb

13054

10264

13187

11625

15745

15348

11573

12180

Number of reads analyzedc

9840

9029

9669

8590

12746

11687

8928

9557

Average length (bp)

436

466

437

432

463

432

436

437

Maximum length (bp)

525

530

512

526

527

524

518

518

Number of phylotypes

        

   observed

82

162

85

87

326

106

140

108

   Chao1 estimation

136

194

118

114

470

146

250

144

a Period that mice were housed at the Laboratory Animal Facility of the School of Dentistry, Seoul National University

b ≥ 100

c ≥ 300 and N = 0 or 1

Microbial diversity in murine oral microbiota

Each refined pyrosequencing read was first taxonomically assigned by aligning it to the sequences in the EzTaxon-extended database, which is a new 16S rRNA sequence database that has a complete taxonomic hierarchy for the correct assignment of each sequence read. Using this new system, 97.7% of all analyzed sequences were successfully assigned from the species up to the phylum level. About 0.03% of all sequences could not be defined at the phylum level, while the rest belonged to 12 phyla. Among these 12 phyla, Firmicutes and Proteobacteria (most were from the class Gammaproteobacteria) encompassed the majority of sequences (> 99%). The other phyla comprised a minor portion in each mouse (Figure 1A). For the phyla Cyanobacteria, Verrucomicrobia, Tenericutes, Acidobacteria and Planctomycetes, less than five sequences were found in the total analyzed reads. Surprisingly, the oral microbiota from captive mice were dominated by only a few thriving species/phylotypes. Most of the phylotypes (defined by 97% sequence similarity) identified in this study were present at very low levels. The ten most frequently found species/phylotypes represented more than 88% of the oral microbiota in each animal (Figure 1B). In particular, Streptococcus EU453973_s, which is a tentative species (phylotype) represented by the GenBank accession no. EU453973, was the most dominant phylotype in six out of eight mice examined, and represented 59% to 94% of all sequence reads analyzed in each animal. In mouse WT2, Streptococcus EU453973_s accounted for only 0.02% of the total bacteria, and instead of Streptococcus EU453973_s, lactobacilli and staphylococci were the dominant bacteria. This finding agrees with the findings of a previous report on the indigenous cultivable oral bacteria of C57BL/6 mice [4]. An unidentified Streptococcus species has been previously reported to eventually dominate the murine oral microbiota by displacing the other bacterial species. This bacterium was present in mice originating from the Jackson Laboratory, but not in mice from Charles River [16]. The C57BL/6 wild-type mice used in this study were purchased from the Orient Co., which originated from Charles River. It is not possible to confirm whether the streptococci observed in the study conducted by Marcotte et al. [16] corresponds to Streptococcus EU453973_s identified in the present study, due to a lack of sequence data from the previous study. Mouse WT2 was housed at the Laboratory Animal Facility of our school for only three weeks, whereas the three other wild-type mice were housed for eight or nine weeks in the same room with the TLR2-deficient mice. Thus, the microbial community of WT2 may represent that of the mice from Charles River without the dominant Streptococcus species. The effect of the housing environment and the suppliers on the composition of mouse oral microbiota has been previously reported [16, 17].
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2180-10-101/MediaObjects/12866_2009_Article_1057_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

The major phyla and species/phylotypes identified in murine oral bacterial communities. (A) Only phyla with a mean relative abundance greater than 0.01% are shown. (B) The top ten dominant species/phylotypes are shown. The right panel presents the mean values of the WT and KO groups. *, p < 0.05.

To determine whether all phylotypes present in the bacterial community were detected in this study, rarefaction analyses were performed. When a phylotype was defined using a threshold of 97% nucleotide sequence similarity, 82 to 326 (average 137) phylotypes were found in each mouse (Table 1). Although the gradients of collector's curves decreased quickly at approximately 1000 sampled sequences, the number of phylotypes was on the increase even at the highest numbers of sequences sampled (Figure 2). The Chao1 estimator of species richness in eight mice ranged from 114 to 470 (average 197), representing about 40% higher numbers than those observed in the present study (Table 1). Due to the known sequencing error of the Roche/454 technology and the possibility of chimeras, it is fair to say that the numbers of phylotypes calculated in this study are overestimates [18]. Trudel et al. [3] identified only 18 species among 671 cultivated bacterial isolates from the oral cavity of BALB/c mice. By applying the averaged rarefaction curves of our data sets, 671 sampled sequence reads would correspond to 44 phylotypes. Although the genetic backgrounds of the mice used in these two studies are different, the species diversity of murine oral microbiota determined by the culture-dependent method is only 41% of that determined by the culture-independent method. Similarly, over 60% of the 141 predominant species detected in the human oral cavity have not been cultivated [19].
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2180-10-101/MediaObjects/12866_2009_Article_1057_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Rarefaction analysis performed by the RDP pipeline. Repeated samples of phylotype subsets were used to evaluate whether further sampling would likely identify additional taxa.

Interestingly, the estimated species richness of murine oral bacterial flora is far lower than that of humans reported by Keijser et al. [6]. A direct comparison between the Keijser et al. findings and our results is inappropriate because the human data represented pooled samples from 71 individuals and was based on very short sequence reads (~100 bp). Nevertheless, the relatively low species richness of murine oral microbiota is expected due to the dominance of a small number of bacterial species.

A comparison of oral microbiota from wild-type and TLR2-deficient mice

To evaluate the effect of TLR2 deficiency on oral microbiota, the relative abundance of each taxon at the different taxonomic ranks ranging from phylum to species was compared between wild-type and TLR2-deficient animals. The present study has limitation in that the wild-type and TLR2-deficient animals were not subjected to the same environmental conditions during the entire period. Nevertheless, a significant difference in the relative abundance was found at the species level for three species of bacteria: Staphylococcus sciuri, Staphylococcus xylosus, and Enterococcus faecalis (p < 0.05 for all three species, Figure 1B). The diversity of oral microbiota showed a tendency to increase in TLR2-deficient mice, but this finding was not statistically significant (Table 1). Collectively, the lack of the TLR2 protein had a negligible effect on the murine oral bacterial flora. Thus, the innate immune response through TLR2 seems to be dispensable for maintaining normal oral bacterial flora in mice. Wen et al. [20] reported that MyD88 deficiency in NOD mice changed the composition of intestinal microbiota and protected the animals from the development of type 1 diabetes, but neither TLR2 nor TLR4 deficiency protected the animals from the disease. The MyD88 protein is an adaptor protein used by multiple TLRs including TLR2 and TLR4. Although the intestinal microbiota of TLR2- or TLR4-deficient mice was not analyzed in the previous study, it is likely that a single TLR gene deficiency may not be sufficient to affect the intestinal microbiota, as TLR2 deficiency hardly affected oral microbiota.

We observed remarkably similar oral microbial communities in six out of eight animals regardless of their TLR2 genotype (Figure 1B). This is quite different from human oral microbiota, where significant inter-individual variability has been recognized [19, 21]. The low inter-animal variability in murine oral microbiota may be attributed to their inbred genetic background, controlled diet, and specific pathogen-free housing conditions.

A comparison of mouse and human oral microbiota

We successfully analyzed previously published human saliva and plaque samples [6] using our new bioinformatic system for taxonomic assignment. Clearly, the human oral microbial communities were more complex than those of the mouse, and the top ten bacterial species/phylotypes represented less than 50% of the oral microbiota in the human samples (Additional file 1). Only 27 species of identified oral bacteria were found to be shared between mice and humans (Table 2). In particular, mouse WT2 contained as many as 19 out of the 27 bacterial species, although the frequencies of these species were substantially different from those observed in humans. In the other animals, only three to five common bacterial species were identified. These results indicate that the composition of the murine oral microbiota is significantly different from that of humans, which may partly explain why mice do not develop periodontitis. Although P. gingivalis-induced periodontitis has served as an animal model for periodontitis [1], P. gingivalis (or other species in the genera Porphyromonas) was not part of the normal murine oral flora. Interestingly, the 19 bacterial species shared between mouse WT2 and the humans included Fusobacterium nucleatum and Treponema denticola, which are known to be associated with periodontitis [22]. Whether or not the presence of these human-associated bacteria in the mouse oral cavity affects the colonization of P. gingivalis and susceptibility to P. gingivalis-induced periodontitis warrants further investigation.
Table 2

Bacterial species shared between mouse and human oral microbiota

 

Mousea

Humanb

Species

WT1

WT2

WT3

WT4

KO1

KO2

KO3

KO4

Saliva

Plaque

Actinomyces massiliensis

 

0.02

      

0.014

0.905

Actinomyces naeslundii c

 

0.02

      

-

-

Brevundimonas diminuta c

 

0.01

      

-

-

Corynebacterium accolens

    

0.01

   

0.003

0.002

Corynebacterium durum

 

0.01

      

0.152

0.775

Corynebacterium matruchotii

 

0.07

      

0.192

8.934

Corynebacterium tuberculostearicum

    

0.01

   

0

0.009

Enterobacter cancerogenus c

       

0.01

-

-

Enterococcus faecalis c

0.04

9.04

0.02

0.01

    

-

-

Fusobacterium nucleatum

 

0.02

 

0.07

    

0.824

3.219

Gemella haemolysans c

 

0.01

      

-

-

Haemophilus parainfluenzae

 

0.03

      

3.761

3.110

Kingella denitrificans

     

0.01

  

0.103

0.304

Lactobacillus johnsonii

      

0.01

 

0.001

 

Neisseria subflava

 

0.01

      

4.420

0.051

Propionibacterium acnes

0.21

0.03

0.01

0.02

 

0.03

0.95

1.21

0.017

0.150

Rothia aeria

 

0.02

      

0.208

1.048

Staphylococcus hominis

     

0.02

   

0.002

Staphylococcus saprophyticus

       

0.01

  

Staphylococcus sciuri

1.36

20.32

0.56

1.66

0.03

0.01

  

0.001

0.003

Streptococcus mitis c

 

0.01

    

0.01

 

-

-

Streptococcus pseudopneumoniae

0.03

       

4.890

2.344

Streptococcus salivarius

 

0.02

 

0.02

    

3.747

0.029

Streptococcus sanguinis

 

0.12

      

11.145

9.028

Treponema denticola c

0.03

0.72

   

0.03

 

0.01

-

-

Triticum aestivum

       

0.02

0.001

 

Veillonella parvula

 

0.01

      

0.003

 

SUMd

1.88

30.74

0.67

2.44

0.04

0.12

1.20

1.50

32.942

29.935

aThe relative abundance (%) of bacterial species observed in this study. Bacterial samples from the tongue, palate, and incisors were pooled.

bThe relative abundance (%) of bacterial species obtained from an analysis of data generated by Keijer et al. [6]. Saliva from 71 individuals and supragingival plaque from 98 individuals was pooled.

cNot present in the study by Keijer et al. but found in the study by Paster et al. [24]

dTotal contribution of bacterial species shared between mouse and humans

Conclusion

To our knowledge, this study presents the first successful application of the Roche/454 FLX Titanium to 16S rRNA-based microbial community analysis. Using this new method, the oral bacterial community of captive mice was found to be relatively simple, consisting mainly of a few species in the genera Streptococcus, Staphylococcus, Lactobacillus, Halomonas and Enterococcus. In addition, the mouse oral bacterial community was not affected by TLR2 deficiency. This survey provides a basis for future studies of the role of periodontal pathogens in the murine model of periodontitis.

Methods

Mice

TLR2-deficient mice of the C57BL/6 background were kindly provided by Shizuo Akira (Osaka University, Japan) and have been bred and maintained at the Laboratory Animal Facility of our school in pathogen-free conditions for five years. Pathogen-free wild-type (WT) C57BL/6NCrljBgi mice were 6 or 8 weeks old upon purchase from the Orient Co. (Kyung-gi, Korea) and were housed on the same rack with the TLR2-deficient mice for 3 to 9 weeks to exclude the effect of environmental factors on oral microbiota. The diet used at the Laboratory Animal Facility of our school and at the Orient Corporation was the same: irradiated Rodent Diet 20 (Orient) and filtered sterile water. All of the mice were male. The handling of the animals and experimental protocols were approved by the Seoul National University Animal Care and Use Committee.

Bacterial DNA extraction from oral tissues

Pieces of tongue, palate, and incisors (including the periodontium) were excised and subjected to bacterial genomic DNA (gDNA) extraction using a commercial kit (iNtRON, Kyung-gi, Korea). Briefly, the tissues were treated with lysozyme at 37°C for 15 min and lysed with a buffer containing proteinase K and RNase A at 65°C for 15 min. Subsequently, the lysates were mixed with binding buffer and the gDNA was purified using resin columns.

Amplification of 16S rRNA gene and sequencing

The extracted gDNA was amplified using primers targeting the V1 to V3 hypervariable regions of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene (V1-9F: 5'-X-AC-GAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG-3' and V3-541R: 5'-X-AC-WTTACCGCGGCTGCTGG-3' where X denotes an 8 nucleotide long barcode uniquely designed for each mouse followed by a common linker AC). In this study, fixed length barcodes were used. However, enhanced sequencing results were obtained using mixtures of barcodes with varied lengths (6 to 10 bp). PCR reactions were carried out in a thermocycler (MJ Research, Reno, USA) under the following conditions: initial denaturation at 94°C for 5 min; followed by 25 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 sec, annealing at 60°C for 30 sec, and elongation at 72°C for 1 min 20 sec. The amplified products were purified using resin columns, and 1 μg of PCR product for each mouse was mixed and subjected to pyrosequencing. The DNA sequencing was performed by Macrogen Incorporation (Seoul, Korea) using the standard shotgun sequencing reagents and a 454 GS FLX Titanium Sequencing System (Roche), according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Pre-processing of data sets

Sequencing reads from the different samples were separated by unique barcodes. Then, barcode, linker, and PCR primer sequences at both sides were removed from the original sequencing reads. The resultant sequences were subjected to a filtering process where only reads containing 0-1 ambiguous base calls (Ns) and 300 or more base pairs were selected for the final bioinformatic analyses. Non-specific PCR amplicons that showed no match with the 16S rRNA gene database upon BLASTN search (expectation value of > 10-5) were also removed from the subsequent analyses. The pyrosequencing data are available in the EMBL SRA database under the accession number ERA005744.

Taxonomic assignment of individual sequencing reads

For taxonomic assignment of each pyrosequencing read, we used an extension of the EzTaxon database http://​www.​eztaxon.​org[23], which stores 16S rRNA gene sequences of type strains of validly published names. In addition to the sequences of type strains, this newly developed database, designated as EzTaxon-extended database http://​www.​eztaxon-e.​org, contains representative phylotypes of either cultured or uncultured entries in the GenBank public database with complete hierarchical taxonomic classification from phylum to species. Representative phylotypes were designated as tentative species with artificially given specific epithets. For example, the specific epithet Streptococcus EU453973_s was given for the GenBank sequence entry EU453973, which plays a role as the type strain of a tentative species belonging to the genus Streptococcus. Similarly, tentative names for taxonomic ranks that were higher than species were also assigned where appropriate. Using this approach, the presence of species that have not yet been described can be compared across multiple bacterial community datasets. Details of the EzTaxon-extended database and software for related bioinformatic analyses will be published elsewhere.

Each pyrosequencing read was taxonomically assigned by comparing it with sequences in the database using a combination of initial BLASTN-based searches and pairwise similarity comparisons as described by Chun et al. [23]. We used the following criteria for taxonomic assignment of each read (x = similarity): species (x ≥ 97%), genus (97 > x ≥ 94%), family (94 > x ≥ 90%), order (90 > x ≥ 85%), class (85 > x ≥ 80%), and phylum (80 > x ≥ 75%). If the similarity was below the cutoff point, the read was assigned to an "unclassified" group. Previously published pyrosequencing data for human saliva and plaque bacterial communities [6] were obtained from the public domain and also processed using the same bioinformatic pipeline based on the JAVA programming language.

Calculation of species richness and diversity indices

The diversity, species richness indices, and rarefaction curves were calculated using the Ribosomal RNA database project's pyrosequencing pipeline http://​pyro.​cme.​msu.​edu/​. The cutoff value for assigning a sequence to the same group (phylotype) was equal to or greater than 97% similarity.

Statistics

The differences between WT and TLR2-deficient mice were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney U-test using SAS 9.1.3 software. The statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

List of abbreviations

TLR: 

Toll-like receptor

WT: 

wild-type

KO: 

knock-out.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Prof. Jonathan Adams for critically reviewing the manuscript. This study was supported by grants R13-2008-008-01003-0 from the Korea Science and Engineering Foundation.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Biological Sciences and Institute of Microbiology, Seoul National University
(2)
Interdisciplinary Program in Bioinformatics, Seoul National University
(3)
Programs in Oromaxillofacial Infection & Immunity and BK21 CLS, Seoul National University and Dental Research Institute

References

  1. Baker PJ, Evans RT, Roopenian DC: Oral infection with Porphyromonas gingivalis and induced alveolar bone loss in immunocompetent and severe combined immunodeficient mice. Arch Oral Biol. 1994, 39: 1035-1040. 10.1016/0003-9969(94)90055-8.View ArticlePubMed
  2. Beem JE, Clark WB, Bleiweis AS: Antigenic variation of indigenous streptococci. J Dent Res. 1985, 64: 1039-1045.View ArticlePubMed
  3. Trudel L, St-Amand L, Bareil M, Cardinal P, Lavoie MC: Bacteriology of the oral cavity of BALB/c mice. Can J Microbiol. 1986, 32: 673-678.View ArticlePubMed
  4. Gadbois T, Marcotte H, Rodrigue L, Coulombe C, Goyette N, Lavoie MC: Distribution of the residual oral bacterial populations in different strains of mice. Microb Ecol Health Dis. 1993, 6: 245-251. 10.3109/08910609309141333.View Article
  5. Sogin ML, Morrison HG, Huber JA, Mark Welch D, Huse SM, Neal PR, Arrieta JM, Herndl GJ: Microbial diversity in the deep sea and the underexplored "rare biosphere". Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006, 103: 12115-12120. 10.1073/pnas.0605127103.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  6. Keijser BJ, Zaura E, Huse SM, Vossen van der JM, Schuren FH, Montijn RC, ten Cate JM, Crielaard W: Pyrosequencing analysis of the oral microflora of healthy adults. J Dent Res. 2008, 87: 1016-1020. 10.1177/154405910808701104.View ArticlePubMed
  7. McKenna P, Hoffmann C, Minkah N, Aye PP, Lackner A, Liu Z, Lozupone CA, Hamady M, Knight R, Bushman FD: The macaque gut microbiome in health, lentiviral infection, and chronic enterocolitis. PLoS Pathog. 2008, 4: e20-10.1371/journal.ppat.0040020.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  8. Fierer N, Hamady M, Lauber CL, Knight R: The influence of sex, handedness, and washing on the diversity of hand surface bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008, 105: 17994-17999. 10.1073/pnas.0807920105.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  9. Dowd SE, Callaway TR, Wolcott RD, Sun Y, McKeehan T, Hagevoort RG, Edrington TS: Evaluation of the bacterial diversity in the feces of cattle using 16S rDNA bacterial tag-encoded FLX amplicon pyrosequencing (bTEFAP). BMC Microbiol. 2008, 8: 125-10.1186/1471-2180-8-125.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  10. Bäckhed F, Ley RE, Sonnenburg JL, Peterson DA, Gordon JI: Host-bacterial mutualism in the human intestine. Science. 2005, 307: 1915-1920. 10.1126/science.1104816.View ArticlePubMed
  11. Marcotte H, Lavoie MC: Comparison of the indigenous oral microbiota and immunoglobulin responses of athymic (nu/nu) and euthymic (nu/+) mice. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 1997, 12: 141-147. 10.1111/j.1399-302X.1997.tb00370.x.View ArticlePubMed
  12. Marcotte H, Lavoie MC: No apparent influence of immunoglobulins on indigenous oral and intestinal microbiota of mice. Infect Immun. 1996, 64: 4694-4699.PubMed CentralPubMed
  13. Kaisho T, Akira S: Toll-like receptors as adjuvant receptors. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2002, 1589: 1-13. 10.1016/S0167-4889(01)00182-3.View ArticlePubMed
  14. Burns E, Bachrach G, Shapira L, Nussbaum G: TLR2 is required for the innate response to Porphyromonas gingivalis : activation leads to bacterial persistence and TLR2 deficiency attenuates induced alveolar bone resorption. J Immunol. 2006, 177: 8296-8300.View ArticlePubMed
  15. Chakravorty S, Helb D, Burday M, Connell N, Alland D: A detailed analysis of 16S ribosomal RNA gene segments for the diagnosis of pathogenic bacteria. J Microbiol Methods. 2007, 69: 330-339. 10.1016/j.mimet.2007.02.005.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  16. Marcotte H, Rodrigue L, Coulombe C, Goyette N, Lavoie MC: Colonization of the oral cavity of mice by an unidentified streptococcus. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 1995, 10: 168-174. 10.1111/j.1399-302X.1995.tb00138.x.View ArticlePubMed
  17. Rodrigue L, Lavoie MC: Comparison of the proportions of oral bacterial species in BALB/c mice from different suppliers. Lab Anim. 1996, 30: 108-113. 10.1258/002367796780865853.View ArticlePubMed
  18. Kunin V, Engelbrektson A, Ochman H, Hugenholtz P: Wrinkles in the rare biosphere: pyrosequencing errors can lead to artificial inflation of diversity estimates. Environ Microbiol. 2010, 12: 118-123. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.02051.x.View ArticlePubMed
  19. Aas JA, Paster BJ, Stokes LN, Olsen I, Dewhirst FE: Defining the normal bacterial flora of the oral cavity. J Clin Microbiol. 2005, 43: 5721-5732. 10.1128/JCM.43.11.5721-5732.2005.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  20. Wen L, Ley RE, Volchkov PY, Stranges PB, Avanesyan L, Stonebraker AC, Hu C, Wong FS, Szot GL, Bluestone JA, Gordon JI, Chervonsky AV: Innate immunity and intestinal microbiota in the development of Type 1 diabetes. Nature. 2008, 455: 1109-1113. 10.1038/nature07336.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  21. Rasiah IA, Wong L, Anderson SA, Sissons CH: Variation in bacterial DGGE patterns from human saliva: over time, between individuals and in corresponding dental plaque microcosms. Arch Oral Biol. 2005, 50: 779-787. 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2005.02.001.View ArticlePubMed
  22. Ximénez-Fyvie LA, Haffajee AD, Socransky SS: Comparison of the microbiota of supra- and subgingival plaque in health and periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol. 2000, 27: 648-657. 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2000.027009648.x.View ArticlePubMed
  23. Chun J, Lee JH, Jung Y, Kim M, Kim S, Kim BK, Lim YW: EzTaxon: a web-based tool for the identification of prokaryotes based on 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007, 57: 2259-2261. 10.1099/ijs.0.64915-0.View ArticlePubMed
  24. Paster BJ, Boches SK, Galvin JL, Ericson RE, Lau CN, Levanos VA, Sahasrabudhe A, Dewhirst FE: Bacterial diversity in human subgingival plaque. J Bacteriol. 2001, 183: 3770-3783. 10.1128/JB.183.12.3770-3783.2001.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed

Copyright

© Chun et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement